Forum Members' DISCUSSION of SUMMER BUMMER Poll... - The Official RAZZIE® Forum

I wanna say Battleship. Even a bunch of the positive reviews for it admit that it is stupid.

Some things I wanna ask HeadRazz though.

So, Bruce Willis, if I'm not mistaken, has SEVEN movies coming out this year, including GI Joe 2 and Expendables 2. What do you think the chances are of all of them being bad?

Why is John Travolta the only one highlighted for Savages? The trailers make look like he's going to get killed and thrown away pretty early. So he can't be Worst Actor. That's for Taylor Kitsch, also in John Carter and Battleship. Oh, and you're not still considering John Carter Worst Picture, are you?

Last thing: That new Mark Whalburg/Mila Kunis movie Ted, from the creator of Family Guy. Do you think that's Razzie worthy?

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: On the matter of RAZZIE® Repeat Offender (and past "winner") Bruce Willis being in seven films this year, the odds of at least one of them achieving mediocrity (and thus not being bad enough to merit our attention) are statistically fairly high. Also, if you'll scroll down on the Summer Movie Bummer Poll page (LINK) you'll see that I did mention the lummox from JOHN CARTER (who, at this point, has my vote for Worst Actor based on that film alone). As for TED, I gotta say, I think the concept is quite original, and, if properly executed, could be wildly funny. So, no, at this point, I would not tag TED as being "RAZZIE® Worthy"...

Elizabeth Hartman and Judith Barsi are much more talented and beautiful than Scarlett Johansson and Chloe Grace Moretz. Fact.

I voted for Battleship.

Joel Schumacher is history's greatest monster!-Robot Chicken
https://twitter.com/SchumacherH8r
Next-up: The Adventures Of Ford Fairlane

Has HeadRazz left the building? I would really like him to comment on what I have just asked, especially about Ted.

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: I did respond -- See your original post, above. Oh, and on the subject of JOHN CARTER still being considered by me as a Worst Picture choice, I finally saw it this past weekend, and found it hilariously awful -- Especially the lead performance by Mr. Kitsch, the lummox playing the title role. So, short answer: YES!

Elizabeth Hartman and Judith Barsi are much more talented and beautiful than Scarlett Johansson and Chloe Grace Moretz. Fact.

I've got a feeling Adam Sandler is going to be doing another ROYAL FLUSH -- right down the box office drain!

2013's WORST PICTURE--InAPPropriate Comedy. WORST ACTOR-Rob Schneider & Adrian Brody WORST ACTRESS-Lindsay Lohan! WORST SUPPORTING ACTRESS--Kim Kardashian! WORST DIRECTOR--The Sham Wow Man!

We saw the trailer for "That's My Boy" yesterday. My son, 13, leaned over and whispered, "That looks AWFUL!" If Adam Sandler can't attract this demographic, his career is in bad, bad shape.

I'm expecting "That's My Boy" to be a Razzie 2fer for Mr. Sandler!

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Thanks for the feedback -- Having seen the trailer (and a handful of TV spots) for THAT'S MY BOY myself, I have to concur. The lone positives about the new film: Sandler will be playing only one character, and he will be wearing neither a padded girdle nor a wig!

John Carter was awesome! If it gets nominated for Worst Picture (which would be incredibly idiotic, but then, at times I find the Razzies to be hilariously awful as well), I will blow my mind.

May I also remind you that Reviews on Carter weren't awful, just mixed.

Originally posted by Head RAZZberry

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: I did respond -- See your original post, above. Oh, and on the subject of JOHN CARTER still being considered by me as a Worst Picture choice, I finally saw it this past weekend, and found it hilariously awful -- Especially the lead performance by Mr. Kitsch, the lummox playing the title role. So, short answer: YES!

Exactly! Ice Age 4 does need to go on the poll.

"If you can't make it good, make it 3D!" Peter Travers, Rolling Stone
F**k Yeah/WTF Were They Thinking Awards Results Live-Tweet @jesse685

I chose what I thought would be a good choice, Men in Black 3. However, there are some early reviews on RT already with 80% of them being positive. Well, here's my rationale:

*I hated Men in Black 2

*It's an unnecessary sequel

*Problems with production (unfinished script when they started shooting) and Will Smith having problems on set

*The lack of imagination with its marketing (the poster looks dull and boring)

But judging from the reviews, the film may not be as bad as I thought it would be.