Official RAZZIE® Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > INFO on POSSIBLE 2011 RAZZIE® CONTENDERS > DISCUSSION & Add'l INFO on SUCKER PUNCH
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Forum Members' Discussion of SUCKER PUNCH...
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Forum Members' Discussion of SUCKER PUNCH...

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 7>
Author
Message
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Forum Members' Discussion of SUCKER PUNCH...
    Posted: March 27 2011 at 7:31am
Originally posted by MiguelAntilsu

The movie was a disappointment, but I'm not that surprised.  I knew this was gonna be bad the moment I saw a critic call it, 'The Last Airbender with bustiers'.
It tries to cram 600 minutes worth of information into a 90 minute time frame?!
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
Vheid View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: December 10 2010
Location: Utrecht
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 994
Post Options Post Options   Quote Vheid Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 27 2011 at 7:55am
Just out of curiousity, Seeing that this is a failed big budget project directed by a director with name fame could this be one of the films that may find it's way onto the final ballot.
Back to Top
Vits View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Chile
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4887
Post Options Post Options   Quote Vits Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 27 2011 at 10:42am
Yes,but I think it'd be because it has negative reviews,and because it has a forum here.
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 27 2011 at 10:48am
Ouch, beaten at the box office by a "Diary of a Wimpy Kid" sequel! Even with hot girls, dragons, sword fights and a metric-f*** ton of CGI, the movie loses to a kids' flick about middle school. That's just sad! Hint, hint, Hollywood, maybe story-heavy movies should go over CGI-heavy movies, just a thought.
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
saturnwatcher View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: July 14 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2577
Post Options Post Options   Quote saturnwatcher Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 27 2011 at 1:19pm
All I can say is, when a movie with half naked women gets worked at the box-office by a kids flick, we have to keep it in our thoughts.
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 27 2011 at 3:13pm
Originally posted by saturnwatcher

All I can say is, when a movie with half naked women gets worked at the box-office by a kids flick, we have to keep it in our thoughts.
Yeah, I would love to know what the studio meeting will be tomorrow when they discuss that. "What is the world coming to when not even half naked women can promise you the #1 spot at the box office?!"
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
GTAHater767 View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: October 25 2009
Location: I shall not say
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1135
Post Options Post Options   Quote GTAHater767 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 28 2011 at 9:41am
If they learn their lesson from Sucker Punch, there will be less movies with half-naked "sorceresses"*... and most movies that involve half-naked sorceresses will not rely on them. I know this is highly unlikely knowing the Hollywood corporations, but I can dream that they'd cut their losses and rethink the beautiful characters. If everything in Hollywood that does not actively seek to get Oscars or other credible awards is done just for the money, then losing revenue should teach them a lesson. What else would it take? 
 
*The slim, beautiful curvaceous build of a woman is most often characteristic of sorceresses, or powerful spellcasters.
RAZZIE Dirty Dozen: Battlefield Earth, F G Fingered, Pluto Nash, A Sound of Thunder, Alone in the Dark, Dirty Love, Rise Silver Srfr, Daddy Day Camp, IKWKM, The Love Guru, All About Steve, Airbender
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 29 2011 at 5:03am
And the REAL irony of "Sucker Punch" .... no actual sucker punches are thrown during the movie!
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
Grounder the Critic View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: November 12 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 286
Post Options Post Options   Quote Grounder the Critic Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 29 2011 at 5:56am
If this movie actually had better sucker punchers, then I would go see not to crap on it.
Pictures move, do they?
Back to Top
Michaels View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: May 12 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2848
Post Options Post Options   Quote Michaels Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 02 2011 at 3:45pm
This movie reminds me of "Ultraviolet", except with triple the budget. In other words, it's hot chicks mowing down enemies left and right, and there's not much else going on.
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)
Back to Top
dEd Grimley View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: July 31 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2024
Post Options Post Options   Quote dEd Grimley Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 02 2011 at 4:45pm
I liked it. And if putting in "sexy" type people in action movies as the leads is so wrong, why is it that you always see big muscular dudes as the heroes when they're guys? Do you honestly think they're not trying to appeal to women?
-Iron helps us play-
Back to Top
GTAHater767 View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: October 25 2009
Location: I shall not say
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1135
Post Options Post Options   Quote GTAHater767 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 02 2011 at 7:37pm
I find it a bit unlikely they're trying to appeal to women. Don't ask me why, but people are more likely to take kindly to men with heavy muscles (the "Warrior's build") than even the most attractive women. I can keep on guessing as to the problem with displaying a woman's curves (the "Sorceress' build) in a film, but I wouldn't come up with a good answer. If it were up to me, either all of it would be okay, or none of it would. I didn't invent the double standard of warriors being more accepted and less talked-about than sorceresses.  

Originally posted by dEd Grimley

I liked it. And if putting in sexy type peopleses in action movies as the lead is so wrong, why is it that you always see big muscley dudes as the heroes when they're guys? Do you honestly think they're not trying to appeal to women?
RAZZIE Dirty Dozen: Battlefield Earth, F G Fingered, Pluto Nash, A Sound of Thunder, Alone in the Dark, Dirty Love, Rise Silver Srfr, Daddy Day Camp, IKWKM, The Love Guru, All About Steve, Airbender
Back to Top
Michaels View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: May 12 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2848
Post Options Post Options   Quote Michaels Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2011 at 12:18pm
My theory: Because in action movies, it's like the males in the audience are supposed to want to be that muscley hero dude. Or like in "Wanted", the males are suppose to want to be that lead character who rises from the dead-end job to become a bad-ass assassin and have sex with Angelina Jolie. Women, on the other hand. are supposed to relate to the women in rom-coms, you know, finding the perfect man and career and lifestyle, etc. Worst case movie: "Sex and the City 2", which was just plain superficial and stupid. But women don't go out of their way to relate to other women running around killing things while in school-girl outifits or leather cat-suits. That's just the way it is.  
 
PS: I find it funny that Mayhem mentioned all these old Forum posters not being around, then all of a sudden, we all came back!
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)
Back to Top
Mayhem5185 View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: October 10 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 259
Post Options Post Options   Quote Mayhem5185 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2011 at 8:08pm
I HAVE THE POWER!  

Originally posted by Michaels

PS: I find it funny that Mayhem mentioned all these old Forum posters not being around, then all of a sudden, we all came back!

I don't have pet peeves, I have major psychotic f**king hatreds! George Carlin
Back to Top
Michaels View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: May 12 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2848
Post Options Post Options   Quote Michaels Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2011 at 8:52pm
The power to turn into a 6 foot tall, muscular, oily, sword wielding Barbarian in a fur thong? 
(Sorry, but you walked right into that one!)...   

Originally posted by Mayhem5185

I HAVE THE POWER!
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)
Back to Top
Mayhem5185 View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: October 10 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 259
Post Options Post Options   Quote Mayhem5185 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2011 at 12:50am
Hey man, whatever floats yer boat!  Wink
I don't have pet peeves, I have major psychotic f**king hatreds! George Carlin
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 7>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down