Official RAZZIE® Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > 2005/26th RAZZIE® Awards Discussions & Forums > STAR WARS: EPISODE III: THE SITH HITZ the FANZ
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Hayden Christensen: Bad Enuff 2 Win??
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Hayden Christensen: Bad Enuff 2 Win??
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 43>
Poll Question: Is Hayden as "Annakin the Mannequin" worthy of a RAZZIE??
Poll Choice Poll Statistics
[75.48%]
[8.17%]
[12.98%]
[1.44%]
[1.92%]
You can not vote in this poll

Author
Message
  Share Topic Share Topic  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Lucifer View Drop Down
Berry Special GUESTS
Berry Special GUESTS
Post Options Post Options   Quote Lucifer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Hayden Christensen: Bad Enuff 2 Win??
    Posted: March 04 2006 at 10:11pm
I'm sorry, Haydn Christenson had some moments.  I have to agree, it was the dialog that sucked.

However, that remark requires qualification.  In the EMpire Strikes Back, when Han is about to be frozen for all eternity, Leia says "I love you."  What does Han say?  More importantly, who wrote that line, the one that Han says?

Yep, you guessed it.  It was ad-libbed.

Here's a short list of actors who could have taken that trash and turned it into a convincing show of Annakin being a nice guy and turning into a bad guy:

Val Kilmer
Gary Oldman
Bruce Willis
Leonardo DiCrappio (I hate to say it, but I think he could have done it)

Lest we forget Gary Oldman's most famous line ever:  You must have thought it was white boy day.  It ain't white boy day, is it?

(Followed up by a performance in the Fifth element that just plain rocked)
Back to Top
Movie Master View Drop Down
Berry Special GUESTS
Berry Special GUESTS
Post Options Post Options   Quote Movie Master Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 04 2006 at 10:54pm
The Razzies just have a thing for Star Wars films. They just don't appreciate them. All of the new trilogy has gotten nominations. Granted, the 1st and 2nd were not that great; but Revenge of the Sith was really good. Hayden Christensen doesn't deserve this award. Jamie Foxx for Stealth or Adam Sandler for The Longest Yard would be more credible choices. I must say that I'm disappointed with the Razzie choices this year. To the Razzies, I say, "go pound sand, you scumbags."
Back to Top
KeepThatRazzie View Drop Down
Berry Special GUESTS
Berry Special GUESTS
Post Options Post Options   Quote KeepThatRazzie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 04 2006 at 10:56pm
The people behind the Razzie award  "nominated" and "awarded" Hayden Christensen with the Worst Supporting Actor RAZZIE. Here's the problem: in their quest to put down the new Star Wars movies in general and Hayden Christensen in particular, they missed that he was the leading actor, and not a supporting actor.
It seems as if the people behind the Razzie awards are projecting their own failures and jealousy onto the Star Wars franchise.
Back to Top
Maike View Drop Down
Berry Best Friend
Berry Best Friend


Joined: March 03 2006
Location: Romania
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 32 		Post Options Post Options   Quote Maike Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 05 2006 at 12:51am
Could someone please tell me if there is any point in this current poll? It was said million times that Hayden does not deserve Razzie and Razzie people know it perfectly. Who it was made for? I am sorry maybe I just don't get... Are you guys going to take your Ruzzie back and sorry?
Back to Top
Guest View Drop Down
Berry Special GUESTS
Berry Special GUESTS
Post Options Post Options   Quote Guest Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 05 2006 at 5:01am
Hayden doesn't deserve this. His performance was fine most of the time. I'm not a fan of him or his movies but my boyfriend dragged me down to the theatre to watch this. I didn't want to because I hated episode 2 but he positively surprised me in episode 3. Episode 2, hands down it was not good performance and story-wise. But again hands down, episode 3 was amazing, the performances were pretty good and none of the performances even deserved a nomination, let alone a "win". This only shows your neediness for a big name movie to attract viewers to come to your site. It's a shame that when someone proves themselves to be better when given the second chance as Hayden Christiensen did from episode 2 to 3, you won't admit that he got better. Only shows the quality and how much this "award" is really worth: nothing.
Back to Top
Flipper View Drop Down
Berry Special GUESTS
Berry Special GUESTS
Post Options Post Options   Quote Flipper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 05 2006 at 5:51am

Yeah Stealth, and The Island. Where were the noms for those?

You guys should give yourselves a razzie for the ugliest website. What are all of you old over there?
Back to Top
Tomas View Drop Down
Berry Special GUESTS
Berry Special GUESTS
Post Options Post Options   Quote Tomas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 05 2006 at 6:50am
f**k everybody who hate Hayden... sh*t Awards!
Back to Top
sithilis View Drop Down
Berry Special GUESTS
Berry Special GUESTS
Post Options Post Options   Quote sithilis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 05 2006 at 9:55am
I can't believe the endless defence of Hayden Christensens woeful performance.  I completely agree with previous comments that a lot of the responsibility lies with Lucas, who can make the best actors in the world look like the cast of Neighbours, but our Hayden transcends even that.  The poor kid's more wooden than a Norway Spruce.  He's entirely unconvinicing in everything he did in both movies, and it's stretching the boundaries of belief to accept his transformation into the Vader of IV, V and VI.  A well deserved Razzie.
Back to Top
Hariman View Drop Down
Berry Special GUESTS
Berry Special GUESTS
Post Options Post Options   Quote Hariman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 05 2006 at 10:53am
Yeah, I agree with Sithilis.

The dialogue might have sucked but the actor sucked worse.

I watched ROTS (Ironic that the Acronym for the title is "Star wars rots") and I hated the fact that I spent 8 bucks on watching the movie.  At the end, I was thinking "If I were Vader, I'd kill the Emperor because he lied! The Emperor promised me that Paddleme would live.  But now she's dead and it's because I sided with the Emperor. DIE EMPEROR ********!!!!!!"   AND THE ACTING DID NOTHING TO MAKE ME BELIEVE THE CHARACTER WOULD ACTUALLY DO WHAT HE DID!!!!!!!!!!!

Let's face it, most of the support for Hayden Christensen came from girls who had the hots for him and idiots who don't know good acting from bad.  (The makeup showed more emotion that Hayden did.)
Back to Top
lauryb View Drop Down
Berry New Comer
Berry New Comer


Joined: December 24 2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8 		Post Options Post Options   Quote lauryb Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 05 2006 at 1:15pm

Hayden may not be the greatest actor out there, but he shouldn't be judged based on his good looks (yeah, I admit it : I think he's a real hottie). I think that when the dialogues suck as bad as they do in SW3 (especially in the scenes that involve Anakin and Padmé), there's only so much an actor can do. Perhaps he was miscast, perhaps he wasn't cut out for the role of Darth Vader. But that doesn't mean that he's hopeless and that he can't do a better job in another movie. I think the guy deserves to be given a second chance. And I'm not saying that just because I want to see more of his gorgeous face...
Back to Top
advent View Drop Down
Berry Special GUESTS
Berry Special GUESTS
Post Options Post Options   Quote advent Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 05 2006 at 1:16pm

The people at the "Razzies" spelt "Anakin" wrong. Just goes to show you exactly how PREFESSIONAL they are.

they probably didn't even watch the movie and based their Biased opinion on his performance in Episode II.

Back to Top
guest View Drop Down
Berry Special GUESTS
Berry Special GUESTS
Post Options Post Options   Quote guest Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 05 2006 at 2:22pm

I guess the people who voted for hayden can't accept the fact that Anakin Skywalker is not like DAMIEN but a bratty guy just like SITHILIS and HARIMAN. and it's common sense Hariman that Vader can't kill the emperor because he's not powerful anymore now that he's a cyborg and has to live with the consequence of his irresponsible actions.

oh i almost forgot to all the razzie voters STAR WARS III won 2 PEOPLE'S CHOICE AWARDS beat that!
Back to Top
rena View Drop Down
Berry Special GUESTS
Berry Special GUESTS
Post Options Post Options   Quote rena Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 05 2006 at 4:42pm

he's got razzie!?

It can't be!!

i thought hayden's act was good...i can't agree with this!mask2 was more 'worthy' to get razzie,wasn't it?this was really something...f**kin.

maybe who vote him can't agree whoever played anakin.they are too much dreamin trilogy's vader.but this movie is movie of george,by gorge, for george.george choose hayden,so hayden is a chosen one.
Back to Top
Ardent Spork View Drop Down
Berry Special GUESTS
Berry Special GUESTS
Post Options Post Options   Quote Ardent Spork Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 05 2006 at 4:47pm
Wow, Star Wars won a people's choice award? My god! This changes everything!

Oh, wait, no, no, it doesn't. It just proves that people are morons.

I say "Kudos!" to the Razzies, for their fearless defiance of the legions of semi-literate permanent children who now froth with rage on account of the fact that it's been pointed out that the emperor has no clothes. Sorry kids! Star Wars was a bad movie, lobsters feel pain when you boil them, true love rarely is, and nobody liked that "fanfic" you wrote.
Back to Top
Rolex View Drop Down
Berry Special GUESTS
Berry Special GUESTS
Post Options Post Options   Quote Rolex Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 05 2006 at 4:53pm
Originally posted by Hariman

Let's face it, most of the support for Hayden Christensen came from girls who had the hots for him and idiots who don't know good acting from bad. 


You are very wrong. Stop critizicing if you base your comments in preconceived subjectivities: if you happen to know who Roger Ebert is, you should also know that he gave SITH 3.5 out of 4 possible stars. If you didn't like the performances, at the worst it was Lucas' fault with the script (not production): " The dialogue throughout the movie is once again its weakest point" -Ebert said. And I agree.

The reason for this Star Wars flaming is pure misconception: just like people who hate Star Trek. I happen to be fan of none, but fair is fair. Let Hayden have a rest and let him try to perform a (perhaps) prebuilt wooden character.

But he was fine.

FYI: Check his comments here
Back to Top
Redinight View Drop Down
Berry Special GUESTS
Berry Special GUESTS
Post Options Post Options   Quote Redinight Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 05 2006 at 4:56pm

Hey, razzie people, it is spelled Anakin, not Annakin.  No, he doesn't deserve the award, or whatever you call it.  It is such a waste of everyone's time, the "winners" don't even accept it.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 43>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down