|
LAST CHANCE 2-B UN-ORIGINAL... |
Post Reply
|
Page <1 456 |
| Author | |
saturnwatcher
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: July 14 2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2577 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: LAST CHANCE 2-B UN-ORIGINAL...Posted: March 11 2010 at 6:28pm |
|
Point taken...Raimi doesn't take his work all that seriously, and it's obvious.
|
|
|
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken
|
|
![]() |
|
BurnHollywoodBurn
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 03 2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3557 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March 11 2010 at 8:27pm |
The Spider-Man movies, need I say more? |
|
|
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
|
|
![]() |
|
saturnwatcher
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: July 14 2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2577 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March 12 2010 at 6:26am |
|
Ah c'mon now...how can anyone fail to be thrilled when Toby Maguire spits out, "I'm Thpiderman!"
|
|
|
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken
|
|
![]() |
|
BurnHollywoodBurn
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 03 2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3557 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March 12 2010 at 12:06pm |
|
|
|
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
|
|
![]() |
|
moviewizguy
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: January 23 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2136 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March 12 2010 at 5:36pm |
But DMTH isn't even a torture porn movie. It was critically successful, getting a 92% on RT. |
|
![]() |
|
moviewizguy
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: January 23 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2136 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March 12 2010 at 5:40pm |
The fact that this "piece of trash" has a 92% on RT, a site that even you, yourself, use to judge how bad movies are, just shows how unbelievably biased you are towards horror films. Along with the fact that you call Raimi a hack is beyond ridiculous because you can't name one bad movie from him that wasn't critically well received. Yes, even Spider-Man 3 got a Fresh rating on RT so don't give me that. Spider-Man 2 is said to be one of the best superhero movies ever made, and the Evil Dead trilogy is hailed as one of the best horror trilogies ever created. |
|
![]() |
|
BurnHollywoodBurn
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 03 2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3557 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March 12 2010 at 6:34pm |
I'm sure "DMTH" being trash is only saturn's opinon, and I'm sure he has his reasons for calling Raimi a hack. However, fans hate "Spider-Man 3". It's a joke of a movie and is the reason why the studios are going to reboot it. Dancing, emo Peter Parker, this is what a great superhero movie is made of?! And "Spider-Man 2" was good at best, but it doesn't hold a candle to "Dark Knight" or "IronMan", and "IronMan 2" is just going to blow it further away.
|
|
|
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
|
|
![]() |
|
moviewizguy
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: January 23 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2136 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March 12 2010 at 6:40pm |
Well, I actually loved Spider-Man 2. I think it's one of the best superhero movies ever made, up there with TDK. |
|
![]() |
|
BurnHollywoodBurn
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 03 2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3557 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March 12 2010 at 8:18pm |
I'm not going to run Spidey 2 into the ground. It's better than most superhero movies, but it's not without its flaws. It's high on the list, but again, it can't top the likes of TDK, IronMan or X-Men 2. |
|
|
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
|
|
![]() |
|
saturnwatcher
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: July 14 2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2577 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March 12 2010 at 9:11pm |
|
The thing is, MWG, sometimes you have to read between the lines a bit. For example, consider the follwing sentence:
"I'd much rather get the flu than cancer."
That statement does not, in any way, shape or form suggest that I believe that getting the flu is a good thing.
DMTH did get high marks with critics, but a close reading of a lot of the reviews clearly were positive in the sense that the critics were mostly saying, and I paraphrase, "compared to most of the other crap that has been released in the genre lately, this was a notch above." The movie pulled in a whopping $42 million at the box-office, putting it on par with some of Uwe Boll's more successful efforts.
As for the Spiderman license, the first two weren't terrible, but isn't really praise... so I hope MWG can resist the temptation to quote me as saying I "loved" them. Allow me to go on record and state clearly, right now, that I did not. The third one as a cinematic terd.
Incidentally, Raimi's 2001 film The Gift did not receive a fresh rating at RT, so yes, I can in fact "name one bad film film from him that did not receive a fresh rating." While my term of him as a hack may well be a personal opinion, I really don't have much respect for his work.
|
|
|
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken
|
|
![]() |
|
saturnwatcher
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: July 14 2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2577 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March 12 2010 at 10:25pm |
|
The thing is, MWG, sometimes you have to read between the lines a bit. For example, consider the follwing sentence:
"I'd much rather get the flu than cancer."
That statement does not, in any way, shape or form suggest that I believe that getting the flu is a good thing.
DMTH did get high marks with critics, but a close reading of a lot of the reviews clearly were positive in the sense that the critics were mostly saying, and I paraphrase, "compared to most of the other crap that has been released in the genre lately, this was a notch above." The movie pulled in a whopping $42 million at the box-office, putting it on par with some of Uwe Boll's more successful efforts.
As for the Spiderman license, the first two weren't terrible, but that isn't really praise... so I hope MWG can resist the temptation to quote me as saying I "loved" them. Allow me to go on record and state clearly, right now, that I did not. The third one as a cinematic terd.
Incidentally, Raimi's 2001 film The Gift did not receive a fresh rating at RT, so yes, I can in fact "name one bad film film from him that did not receive a fresh rating." While my term of him as a hack may well be a personal opinion, I really don't have much respect for his work. Considering that a significant amout of Raimi's work has been in the horror genre, there is a very significant difference between praising someone for high standards as established by the genre historically, and praising someone for high standards established by the genre lately.
|
|
|
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken
|
|
![]() |
|
moviewizguy
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: January 23 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2136 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March 13 2010 at 7:18am |
Fair enough. ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Vits
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 01 2010 Location: Chile Online Status: Offline Posts: 4807 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 12 2011 at 1:11pm |
|
I just saw this,and I was dissapointed to read in the credits that it was a remake because the best part was the originality of the script.But I checked the differences and it has a lot of good new things.
It was wrongly marketed.The premise everywhere said "Two parents get back at the people that hurt their daughter".That doesn't happen until the last 1/3 of the movie.It's because that must've been the premise of the original.I read Wes Craven was mad because the studio told him to cut a lot of the original one,so they must've put it in this one and it made this longer.The director should've known that when reading the script.Because of it,and the fact the movie
visually wasn't very scary,I feel he's the weak spot.
I give this 6/10. |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <1 456 |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |