Last & Hardly Luxurious...

Funny, seeing how that's exactly the first Fast and the Furious and ironic, because I know that you enjoy films like those sometimes. Don't blame it on me. It happens to everyone. *cough*Wanted*cough* *cough*Hancock*cough* *cough*The Matrix*cough* Oh, and let's see, this film in the series turned out to be the worst. Fast and Furious 3 turned out to be the second best. That says a lot.

And, really, don't mock me. I never intended to see the film ever, like Nacho Libre, but I watched it and I liked it. If you like these types of films, you should watch it and there was hardly any CGI in the film so you can't go "OH, and the film filled with mindless, crappy CGI effects" again nor can you go, "Oh, it also has a twist ending that makes you think!" again.

Also, you can't blame the third film for anything, if it was intended to be mindless fun. Well, you can but that just makes you look dumb. You don't attack/bash a film of something it was trying to be in the first place. That's a law (well, not really). You can say, "The movie is dumb, and mindless, and have mindless car chases throughout! The plot is predictable and the characters one dimensional!" But then again...wasn't that the point? It's the same with dance movies.

Yeah, if I've seen 12 Angry Men on tv and doing something at the same time, I don't think I'd remember a single thing about that movie. I'm sure if you watch any movie while you're paying attention to something else, you wouldn't remember the movie. I don't see your point. It's called selective attention. Look it up.

See, I don't get how you want me to not go say "idiot," "retard," "dumb," and other condescending words when you, basically, want me to. It'slike you're asking for it. If you've read my previous comments, I wasn't trying to state your level of IQ, nor was I attacking you in any way so why you're attacking my tastes in movies, I don't know. It's apparant that what you're doing is (again) diverging from th topic and going on about someone's taste in movies. The purpose of people who do this is to 1) Ignore that the evidence I give out is, well...ignored and 2) you hoping people who read what I say is forgotten because you diverged from the topic, and it'll probably work, but that's not surprising.

I could care less about what happens to this movie. Give it every Razzie nominations. I won't be crying.

The fact that you have the audacity to support Mike is quite insane. First of all, he based his opinion on the Fast and the Furious films on how well he remembered the films, while, we shouldn't forget, doing something at the same time. Once more, I'll explain this again: If you watch ANY movie while doing something concurrently, I'm 99.9% sure you wouldn't remember a single thing about the film once you've finished it. Second, he can't read. We all know that by now. Third, he's ignorant. Fourth, he ignores my evidence for each subject we argue on. Example:

Me: On, RT, you can see Fast and Furious 3 has the second best rating, which shows that it's the second best in the series.

Mike: You're an idiot. You claim that Fast and Furious 3 is the second best in the series. I don't know why you question us about mocking your tastes in movies. I saw all of the Fast and Furious films while doing something at the same time...and I don't remember a thing from them.

Me: Oh, gee, you probably didn't remember a thing because YOU DID SOMETHING AT THE SAME TIME. I'm sure IF I have done the same to 12 Angry Men that I wouldn't have remembered a single thing in it too.

Mike: Oh, you idiot. You didn't like 12 Angry Men, one of the best films ever made.

Me: Can you read? I said "IF."

Mike: Oh, retard. Can you read?

Me: Why are you repeating me?

Mike: Why are you repeating me?

ETC.

Ah, good, there's some hope for you yet. And I said I only watched the "F&F" movies on cable while doing something else because that's all they are good for, something to keep you from sitting around in silence.

I made the comment based on how you phrased the sentance "It was the second best of the series, that says alot." You didn't mentioned anything about its RT rating being the reason why it's considered the second best, which was why I wrote it off as just your opinion.

Surprising? Of course it would be a Box Office hit, it's tailor made for teenage viewing. We never claimed it was going to bomb, just that it would suck. The only thing less surprising are the all the reports of teenagers being pulled over by cops for trying to street race and mimick the stunts that are in the movie, which happens every year when a "F&F" movie comes out. There's another reason to bash these movies besides their poor quality, they encourage the youth of the nation to do stupid things.

It doesn't matter. It doesn't change the fact of the billions of logical posts I've posted on this thread.

Anyway, this film opened with $72 MILLION. That's quite a lot, even bigger than Watchmen and the biggest opening on April and this year.