Official RAZZIE® Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > FORUMS on 29th ANNUAL RAZZIE® NOMINEES > M. Night Shyamalan's THE HAPPENING
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: M.  Night is Back...and BAD As Ever?!?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

M. Night is Back...and BAD As Ever?!?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 13>
Author
Message
HeadRAZZBerry View Drop Down
Berry Important MODERATOR
Berry Important MODERATOR


Joined: April 23 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5094
Post Options Post Options   Quote HeadRAZZBerry Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: M. Night is Back...and BAD As Ever?!?
    Posted: May 28 2008 at 5:52am

THE LAST TIME M. NIGHT SHYAMALAN WROTE and DIRECTED SOMETHING, IT WAS NOMINATED for FOUR RAZZIES® (INCLUDING WORST PICTURE) and "WON" TWO of THEM (SHYAMALAN as BOTH WORST DIRECTOR and WORST SUPPORTING ACTOR).

SO, DID OL' M. LEARN HIS LESSON from the DEBACLE THAT WAS LADY IN THE WATERTHE ANSWER IS DECIDEDLY...

NO.

WHILE THE HAPPENING MERCIFULLY DOESN'T FEATURE THE DIRECTOR CASTING HIMSELF in a CHRIST-LIKE SUPPORTING ROLE, IT IS YET ANOTHER "UNEXPLAINED PHENOMENON" CONCEPT -- THIS ONE with a "SURPRISE CULPRIT" THAT, with THEATRES AUDIENCES ACROSS AMERICA, DREW GALES of DERISIVE LAUGHTER.

LOOKS LIKE SHYAMALAN's STILL a DING-DONG...

WAHLBERG: "Oh, my God...It's the critics! They're 

coming for us!!  It could be LADY IN THE WATER 

all over again..."  



Ye Olde Head RAZZberry
Back to Top
Nasty Man View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: December 08 2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 194
Post Options Post Options   Quote Nasty Man Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 28 2008 at 5:58am

This one looks like a case of someone hiring an Emperor with No Clothes after everyone had alaready figured out the guy was "naked as a jaybird." Why anyone would risk a big budget on Shyamalan after the disaster of "Lady in the Water" is beyond me.

My guess is, if this one's as bad as it looks, he'll wind up directing Sci-Fi Channel direct-to-cable movies by 2010... 

Everything SUX!
Back to Top
moviewizguy View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: January 23 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2137
Post Options Post Options   Quote moviewizguy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 29 2008 at 9:26am

Well, if you want to know the mystery, which many people already knew way before anything was released from the film, here it is:

SPOILERS AHEAD!

 

It's the plants. The plants are causing people to kill themselvs by releasing toxin.

 

END SPOILERS...

 

ANYWAY, you can all say it sounds stupid but you didn't care how stupid a 2 feet tall doll serial killer, a girl coming out of a tv, a monster attacking NYC, etc. AND, there's no twist ending in this one, like Lady in the Water.

So yes, I'm a huge M. Night fan and he has yet to disappoint me. Lady in the Water is an underrated gem because people expected an action packed, effects filled, heavily budgeted fantasy film like Harry Potter but they instead got a family film (I still have no idea why this is PG-13). I'm so looking forward to this movie!!! M. Night is probably one of the few directors out there actually making up original movies.

Back to Top
SchumacherH8ter View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: September 06 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Online
Posts: 3015
Post Options Post Options   Quote SchumacherH8ter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 29 2008 at 2:02pm
Dear M. Night, get your head straight. Return to "The Sixth Sense".
I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
https://twitter.com/Scott_DAgostino
Upcoming reviews: http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic7513.html
Back to Top
moat View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: January 10 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 117
Post Options Post Options   Quote moat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 30 2008 at 11:41am
This guy really needs a new technique.
I'm curious as to what he would do outside of a supernatural "mystery," if he's capable of doing anything other than that.

Maybe he should try doing comedy. I mean deliberately.
Back to Top
moviewizguy View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: January 23 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2137
Post Options Post Options   Quote moviewizguy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 31 2008 at 10:48am

You guys have made an enemy. He's a brilliant director!

Back to Top
hastymanic View Drop Down
Berry Good Friend
Berry Good Friend


Joined: January 15 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 21
Post Options Post Options   Quote hastymanic Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 31 2008 at 2:08pm
The extended train sequence that I saw was as awkward and inept as anything he's ever done. I simply can not imagine any major studio giving him another chance if (when) this one tanks. Wait, I take that back. Major studios churn out loads of crap all the time. Oh well!
Back to Top
moviewizguy View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: January 23 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2137
Post Options Post Options   Quote moviewizguy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 31 2008 at 2:23pm

And you too. Really, you guys act if he's the worst director ever, which is completely false. Like I said, he's one of the few directors out there that are doing original movies. What, you would rather watch another remake, spoof, superhero movie, and sequel? You guys are sad.

And why would studios not want him? His films made tons and tons of money! That rarely happens! His movies have made over half a BILLION in the box office and Uwe Boll still continue making movies even though his movies make little to no money. In the Name of the King has a budget of $70 million! I'm sure M. Night will be miles from going away. You people need some sense in your brains.

Here is what I said in a post on IMDb:

People wanted horror elements and scary action in The Village but they got a romantic thriller instead. People wanted a CGI, action-packed violent fantasy in Lady in the Water but got a movie with little to no action that was great for the family. People wanted a heavily effects filled alien invasion movie in Signs but got no alien violence until the very end of the film. People didn't know about M. Night when he did Sixth Sense so that's why people liked that movie. Now people will want a lot of gruesome scenes and action violence in this film and I'm sure there will be plenty but please, people, don't get your hopes high.

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Please explain to me how "he's a brilliant director" gibes with "don't get your hopes high"...

 

Back to Top
cvcjr13 View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: September 01 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1190
Post Options Post Options   Quote cvcjr13 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 31 2008 at 4:49pm
We're (or at least I'm) bagging on him because he did three great movies - Sixth Sense, Unbreakable and Signs - and he's been going downhill in a sadly comic way ever since.
Back to Top
moviewizguy View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: January 23 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2137
Post Options Post Options   Quote moviewizguy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 01 2008 at 1:44am
Well, in YOUR opinion. I loved The Village, Signs, 6th Sense, and Lady in the Water. Have yet to see Unbreakable.
Back to Top
moat View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: January 10 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 117
Post Options Post Options   Quote moat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 01 2008 at 11:33am
Okay moviewizguy, you seem to be off in your presumptions  of why a lot of us are put off by Shyamalan's recent work. I can't speak for everybody else, but I'll give you my personal take.

I liked The Sixth Sense and despite its flaws, I also enjoyed Signs. I found the films to be atmospheric and effectively suspenseful. Even The Village managed to pull this off to an extent, but that film also is when I (and many others) began to grow weary of Shyamalan's film-making methods. The main issue for me is how the film is completely built around its twist denouement, which felt contrived and anticlimactic. I'd almost be willing to overlook it if the entire film wasn't contingent upon its ending, but it doesn't offer anything else. Every personality in the film is at best a stock character, and the story is structured to where the unknown factors to be revealed later on are the only thing that holds the audience's interest. As a result, there is no emotional payoff, no provocation of any kind, and nothing satisfactory. It comes off seeming artificially (mis)calculated and unnatural in the context of the events. Everything rests on the revelation of the unknown, and that discovery is not something that has any impact. Anything effectively scary about the film is completely undermined, as a result.

So the man had a misstep in his direction--it happens. I didn't really like Unbreakable, and Shyamalan came back and entertained me with Signs. Let's see what he has in store next.

Only things got exponentially worse with Lady in the Water. Shyamalan no longer was able to hide the fact that he wasn't writing stories with any kind of aim or purpose outside of misleading the audience only to bring up an arbitrarily unexpected plot point in what devolves into a futile effort to compel an audience. He wasn't building to something of any kind of substance or emotional evocation, and he still failed to draw characters with any dimension outside of what is needed to keep the story twisting.  Only to further hamper the film, he delivered the story through large amounts of exposition and directly tells the audience how they should be feeling, instead letting his material do that work for him. He wasn't showing us something, he was telling it to us, which is purpose-defeating in a film. That's something that should be left to books-on-tape (a medium better suited for Lady in the Water), not a motion picture. He seemed to try to force the audience into buying into the film, when he should have let the story do that for him, but he couldn't go that route because he had no real story to tell. He instead opted for an aimless series of plot points that didn't culminate into anything other than a series of plot points. There was no emotional payoff, no deeper meaning, and no entertainment value. It was just jerking the audience around from one point to the next, loaded with contrivances and exposition along the way.

And I would contend that his movies aren't original. Maybe the main idea that they're built from is something new, but the way the films are executed (twist, twist, twist) is nothing worth writing home about. Contrivances have been in cinema for a long time.

That is my opinion.
Back to Top
SchumacherH8ter View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: September 06 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Online
Posts: 3015
Post Options Post Options   Quote SchumacherH8ter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 03 2008 at 9:07am
M. Night did make a superhero movie. It was "Unbreakable". As for this, it'll, problably, suck
I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
https://twitter.com/Scott_DAgostino
Upcoming reviews: http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic7513.html
Back to Top
moviewizguy View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: January 23 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2137
Post Options Post Options   Quote moviewizguy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 03 2008 at 9:29am
No, I'm just saying, don't expect this film to have a lot of action and death scenes or else you'll only disappoint youself.
Back to Top
SchumacherH8ter View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: September 06 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Online
Posts: 3015
Post Options Post Options   Quote SchumacherH8ter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 03 2008 at 11:03am
I'm not expecting action and death scenes, I'm expecting another "Lady In The Squater".
I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
https://twitter.com/Scott_DAgostino
Upcoming reviews: http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic7513.html
Back to Top
Michaels View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: May 12 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2848
Post Options Post Options   Quote Michaels Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 03 2008 at 4:28pm

Okay, M. Night needs to stop writing and direct ONLY. "Lady" was a bad script, but every actor tried his or her best with what they had to work with. And Uwe Boll was robbed of his Worst Director Razzie that year. Sure, "Lady" was dumb, but "Bloodrayne" was just plain unwatchable on ALL levels.

And what annoys me about this movie, the poster's taglines: "We SENSED it ... we saw the SIGNS ... now is the time for the Happening!" Yes, plugging the few good movies you had will make us want to go see a movie about ....

SPOILER AHEAD!

Plants that kill?

Back to Top
cvcjr13 View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: September 01 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1190
Post Options Post Options   Quote cvcjr13 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 03 2008 at 4:42pm

If you haven't read anything about this movie months ago when a script titled The Green Planet was being bounced around, let me tell you this:

Yes, there will be deaths.

 

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 13>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down