Members' Discussion of TRANNIES 3...

I actually liked the first one, and while part two was confusing, I will go see part three of this (I do admit however the horrible casting choice of the new girl.)

The new girl is supposed to be Carly, who in the Transformers universe, is the new girlfriend and future wife of Sam Witwicky. Michael Bay auditioned a lot of women to replace Fox, and they picked THAT girl instead of some down to earth girls who look 10 times better by comparison.

I actually put "Transformers" on my top 10 list of 2007 (#10) and the visuals were dynamic and realistic looking. Why that movie lost the Best Visual Effects award to that PC "talking bears" movie is beyond me.

Even though part two was a little weak, what Micheal Bay does do good at is expanding and allowing the story to play out in its entirety. I was surprised to see 2 1/2 hour PG-13-rated films based on toys, and the third one clocks in at 157 minutes, so we'll see what happens.

Thank you Michael Bay for introducing me to the Transformers world in a way that the PC 1984 cartoon version couldn't have done.

Let this be a warning to anyone going to see "Trannies 3", thinking it will be an improvement since the last sequel (much like how "Star Wars" fanboys were desperately hoping that "Revenge of the Sith" would be the best of the prequels), go into the theaters with ROCK BOTTOM expectations. If you go in expecting this movie to be great in terms of characters and storylines, you are just setting yourself up for a huge disappointment. Just prepare to turn your brains off and stare at all the pretty colors, because that is all these movies have been good for. You have officially been warned.

Miguel, Please stop with your endless Twilight/Breaking Dawn-comments. If you'll read the title of this forum, you should know that this forum is to discuss Transformers 3, not Twilight.  

Your constant complaining about these movies alienates the members who couldn't care less about them (like me) and I think it makes the site overall an unpleasant place to be...

My last comment had nothing to do with Breaking Dawn.  It was a response to BurnHollywoodBurn's heartless perception of the upcoming Transformers movie.  As a result, I have scrapped my Methane Movie Award category for Worst Movie Critic because it's no longer a contest.

I just love the irony about a poster with a "heartless perception" towards one franchise going all crazy over another poster for having a "heartless perception" for different franchise, to the point the former dubs the latter as the "Worst Critic Ever". I think Armond White would abject to that statement, and I mean the REAL Armond, not MWG.

Originally posted by MiguelAntilsu That did it, Burn! I've had enough of your prejudiced and slurred judgment toward this franchise! I hereby dub you 'the worst film critic that ever existed' because your blind attitude toward this franchise has established your identity as nothing more than a heartless bastard. Take this title as a token of my disapproval.

B-O-O-H-O-O. Do I now get to give you a made-up award, too? I think "Only Person In the World That Takes Public Vote Awards As Seriously As Industry Awards" will due nicely. Or "The Dude Who Talks Out Of Both Sides Of His Face, As He Gets All Mad At Others Badmouthing Movies They Haven't Seen Yet, While He Himself Insults An Entire Franchise That He Saw One Installment Of". See, I can make up stupid and pointless awards, too.

Hell, and Shia LaBeouf is like the Lawrence Olivier of bad acting in Transformers movies, as well as Megan Fox. I mean, sure Bay learned his lesson from Revenge of the Fallen, but still, it's gonna be suckier, and is gonna dumb down for the audience, thus making Americans more stupid.