Official RAZZIE® Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > FORUMS on NON-NOMINATED 2008 RELEASES w/LYNX! > RAMBO the 4th
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: No Blood ’n’ Guts...No Vainglory!
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

No Blood ’n’ Guts...No Vainglory!

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 9>
Author
Message
saturnwatcher View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: July 14 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2577
Post Options Post Options   Quote saturnwatcher Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: No Blood ’n’ Guts...No Vainglory!
    Posted: June 19 2007 at 9:08am

Back from vacation...

Obviously, a few points are worth reiterating: 

1. I don't personally "hate"  Stallone, although I don't have a great deal of respect for his career body of work, nor do I feel there is reason to respect his off-screen conduct over the past few years.  That does not constitute hate for the man. Just a profound lack of respect. There is a signficant difference. I hate Osama Bin Laden because he masterminded the slaughter of 3000 innocent people. I hate Adolph Hitler because he ordered the deaths of 6 million innocent souls, and touched off a war that caused 25 million people to die needlessly. My feelings for the current occupant of the White House are approaching hatred, because he initiated a pointless, unwinnable conflict in the Middle East which has needlessly ended the lives of more Americans than bin Laden's actions. I just view Stallone as a sort of self-consumed jerk without a great deal of talent. I hope you can fathom the very significant difference.

2. Any reference to Stallone as an international drug smuggler is, sadly, perfectly legitimate. He was convicted by Australian courts.

3. With all due respect, ItBeast, no one has accused him of being a dealer although he certainly owes the public, from which he profited handsomely over the course of his very public life, some more suitable explanation for his actions than we have heard.

4. At the point in which any individual accepts the benefits of celebrity, they pretty much surrender any authority to object when the public questions their misbehavior. Whether or not that is fair or just is immaterial. If the individual involved objects, they have three options:

(a) Exercise extreme discretion when behaving in a socially unacceptable or illegal manner

(b) Don't behave in a socially unacceptable or illegal manner

(c) Bow out of the spotlight and sacrifice the rewards and perks of celebrity.

5. Yes, I personally not only confess to the label of "wiseass." I will wear it with some pride.

6. I was personally incorrect about Rocky Balboa. It wasn't a great film, probably not even a good one, but certainly not a Razzable one.

 

Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken
Back to Top
ITbeast View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: May 01 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 526
Post Options Post Options   Quote ITbeast Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2007 at 3:06am

Saturnwatcher, Welcome back from your vacation, hope the time off gave you an opportunity to clear your mind and feed the soul (or so it goes)...As you can see I was holding down the fort while you were re-charging your batteries in the land of sun and fun (At least I hope it was sun and some fun).

Have not heard a peep from Stallone's #1 wayward son since my last post back to him (Probably off somewhere thinking of new things that Stallone has never achieved or never done for humanity). Hope we did not hurt his feelings too bad.

Again, Welcome back!

The "Networking IT" Movie Buff!

Words to live by:
"Money doesn't make you happy. I now have $50 million but I was just as happy when I had $48 million." - Arnold Schwarzenegger
Back to Top
saturnwatcher View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: July 14 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2577
Post Options Post Options   Quote saturnwatcher Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2007 at 10:39am

Thank you, it's good to be home. My wife and I spent a couple days on Nantucket Island, then the rest of the week exploring Boston. There wasn't a whole lot of sunshine during the course of the week, but the Rockies pounded the Red Sox twice, which made the trip more than worthwhile.

Actually, Boston is always a very interesting place to visit because of the incredible amount of history in the area. On the downside, the people there drive like crap, and there isn't an accurate map of the city in existance. Still, it was a very enjoyable week.

Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken
Back to Top
cvcjr13 View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: September 01 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1161
Post Options Post Options   Quote cvcjr13 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 21 2007 at 1:59am

Originally posted by HeadRAZZBerry

Interesting concept, the idea of "re-negotiating our contract" with current celebs. But after 26 years of doing the RAZZIES, and seeing no indication that we've had much of an impact on the industry's attitudes and output, I wouldn't start holding my breath just yet...

While reading this thread, something occurred to me.  As much as "re-negotiating our contract" with celebrities over their bad behavior, it occurred to me that many of our best artists, whether they be authors, poets, painters, sculptors, musicians, composers or actors, have been severely mentally ill, and it seemed they took their mental illness and turned it into art.  What do we do with these people?

Of course, when I talk about these artists, I'm not talking about Sly. . . .

Back to Top
saturnwatcher View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: July 14 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2577
Post Options Post Options   Quote saturnwatcher Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2007 at 2:18am

I think that you are absolutely correct in noting that great genious in any endeavor, whether it be music, art or even science and other areas has often been accompanied by at least a tinge of mental illness. Nonetheless, I think we can draw critical distinctions between the likes of Mozart, Paris Hilton and Mel Gibson. One of these things is not like the others.

In our society, we tend to give our celebrities so much free reign that they develop a sense of entitlement. The area where it bothers me most of late is professional sports, where those who eventually become professional athletes have often been singled out for their talents and granted all sorts of privilages from an early age. By the time they reach young adulthood, they are spoiled brats with a lot of money and no social conscious whatsoever.

Society has never been particularly good at recognizing sublime contributions temporally, but I daresay that we won't be listening to a lot of rap music 50 years from now (I'll go out on a limb and predict I won't be listening to any music that doesn't come from a harp by then, and even that propostion is doubtful, according to many), nor are crowds going to gather for any distant future Adam Sandler film festival. If we are going to grant these people some sort of heroic stature amongst us, I don't think its generally too much to ask that they at least make some effort to act the part. Then when that one truly great genious with natural eccentricities arrives amongst us, hopefully we will be more willing to tolerate them.

Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken
Back to Top
saturnwatcher View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: July 14 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2577
Post Options Post Options   Quote saturnwatcher Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2007 at 12:23am

Sometimes belaboring a point almost becomes a matter of public service, and, golly gee, every once in awhile even we of the "wiseass" persuasion actually have an inking of knowledge about what we blow off about. How sadly amusing.

If one has been living in a cave the past few days, said individual might well puzzle over how a discussion of the terrible tragedy that befell the Chris Benoit family could possibly tie in to our discussions of Sylvestor Stallone and his recent legal challenges overseas. For those living in the light of day, the matter should be relatively obvious.

Among the possesions found in the Benoit household was a quantity of steroids. Perhaps not HGH specifically (although the police mentioned "other prescription medications" as yet not identified), but HGH is an anabolic steroid alternative, works chemically on the body almost identically and has the same side effects.  These are extraordinarily dangerous substances even when administered  and used properly. Their misuse can create walking timebombs. It can not be established that Benoit's unfortunate meltdown was directly attributable to steroid use, however, that it was a contributing factor is a reasonable hypothesis. It has long been suspected that these drugs can lead to violence as a frequent side effect.

Naturally, the WWE immediately issued a statement that Benoit had recently tested negative for steroid use. The notion that the WWE actively attempts to discourage its performers from using steroids is the biggest load of B.S. we have heard since, well, the last time either Bush or Cheney opened their piehole (Vince McMahon did not develop his physique by workout alone). If anyone from the WWE wants to take offense at that statement, click on my name and you'll discover my email addy. I'll gladly supply you with further contact details. And when we meet in court, I hope you'll remember the part about having to put your hand on the Bible and issuing an oath prior to saying whatever you intend to say. Most of your previous and current performers are going to say something very different.

The bottom line here is that if Stallone is using HGH in quantities suggested by what he tried to smuggle into Australia, someone needs to sit the man down and have a serious discussion with him. If he didn't have them for personal use, just what WERE his intentions? I think it's time someone comes forward with some answers.

Out of courtesy and time constraints, I'll spare you a listing of the links, but a Google search on "steroids and violence" will yield 1,190,000 relevant links. Yes, a correlation has been established.

Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken
Back to Top
#1 Sly Fan View Drop Down
Berry Best Friend
Berry Best Friend


Joined: July 05 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 39
Post Options Post Options   Quote #1 Sly Fan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2007 at 1:33am

Okay, so a "correlation" between steroid abuse and violence has been established. How does this necessarily make Stallone some kind of villain? And why do you keep suggesting, with no real evidence to back it up, that Sly was trying to smuggle drugs to possibly deal them? Why would someone of his wealth and stature do something so boneheaded??

By the way, your use of words like "correlation" supports my contention that you Razzie people are all "wiseasses." Using words that ordinary folks can understand suggestes you care to be understood, rather than revered. Using words that 90% of the population have never heard before (let alone ever use in daily conversation) makes you all seem effite and smart ass... 

Response from Head RAZZberry: Trying to convince us you're a Regular Joe and we're all Super Snobs, you wind up using a word like "effete" -- A word that, by your using it, belies your very point. I must say, I am both impressed and perplexed that someone with your command of language would spend his time defending someone like Sylvester Stallone, whose films' dialogue (most of which he himself "writes") rarely rises above the level of grunts, platitudes and vulgarisms... 

YO: Quit Pickin' on Stallone!!
Back to Top
#1 Sly Fan View Drop Down
Berry Best Friend
Berry Best Friend


Joined: July 05 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 39
Post Options Post Options   Quote #1 Sly Fan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2007 at 1:41am
SNOBS!!!
YO: Quit Pickin' on Stallone!!
Back to Top
ITbeast View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: May 01 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 526
Post Options Post Options   Quote ITbeast Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2007 at 3:12am

Well, so much for thinking that #1 Sly Fan was of higher Education and eloquence. My take take on this is that #1 Sly Fan was or is a big fat nerdy kid (some what like my boy Alfred E. Newman, posted below)

Alfred E. Neuman

 

 and the only person he could look up to while being picked on, bullied, and ridiculed was a person that was his exact opposite in intelligence and looks (Like #1 Sly Fan's Boy, also Posted below)

Sylvester Stallone - Rocky III Photo

to be like in his mind the person that #1 Sly Fan would think that everybody would respect or idolize.

In the end I think what #1 Sly Fan Needs is what I have stated before in this thread, just ONE BIG GROUP HUG!!!

 

The "Networking IT" Movie Buff!

Words to live by:
"Money doesn't make you happy. I now have $50 million but I was just as happy when I had $48 million." - Arnold Schwarzenegger
Back to Top
saturnwatcher View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: July 14 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2577
Post Options Post Options   Quote saturnwatcher Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2007 at 5:15am

First of all, let me state AGAIN Stallone WAS convicted of smuggling. As for the suggestion of selling, I point out for the umpteenth time that the quantity of the drug he possessed was excessive and dangerous. I just want to know what he was doing with it. If that quantity was maintained for personal use, the man could well be on a path to becoming a danger to himself and others. That surely is a red flag an acre wide. If he had other intents, I think he ought to come clean.

Okay, so a "correlation" between steroid abuse and violence has been established. How does this necessarily make Stallone some kind of villain? And why do you keep suggesting, with no real evidence to back it up, that Sly was trying to smuggle drugs to possibly deal them?

I wasn't personally aware that "correlation" is a particularly uncommon word. However, I am not in the practise of talking down to people, a charge I suspect you would be equally willing to level given the opportunity. Having followed the discourse here for some time, I am quite confident that most of the people who regularly post here can follow my contributions without difficulty...barring those times that typos or poor proof reading render them nearly unintelligible. I owe a debt of gratitude to our Head Razz for bailing me out once or twice in those instances.

Incidentally, I've already pleaded guilty to the charge of "smart ass" or at least "wise ass" but surely there is no signficant difference. It doesn't affect my point in this instance. 

By the way, your use of words like "correlation" supports my contention that you Razzie people are all "wiseasses." Using words that ordinary folks can understand suggests you care to be understood, rather than revered.

Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken
Back to Top
ITbeast View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: May 01 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 526
Post Options Post Options   Quote ITbeast Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2007 at 5:54am

I too have already pleaded "No Contest" (On all 30 or so counts) on the charge of being a "Smart Ass" and/or "Wise Ass" (either way it's all about my a$$!). I too also owe a great debt of thanks to the HeadRAZZ for bailing my a$$ (there's that a$$ again) out on a constant basis because fixing my horrible grammar skills.

Originally posted by saturnwatcher

I wasn't personally aware that "correlation" is a particularly uncommon word. However, I am not in the practise of talking down to people, a charge I suspect you would be equally willing to level given the opportunity. Having followed the discourse here for some time, I am quite confident that most of the people who regularly post here can follow my contributions without difficulty...barring those times that typos or poor proof reading render them nearly unintelligible. I owe a debt of gratitude to our Head Razz for bailing me out once or twice in those instances.

Incidentally, I've already pleaded guilty to the charge of "smart ass" or at least "wise ass" but surely there is no significant difference. It doesn't affect my point in this instance.

 

The "Networking IT" Movie Buff!

Words to live by:
"Money doesn't make you happy. I now have $50 million but I was just as happy when I had $48 million." - Arnold Schwarzenegger
Back to Top
saturnwatcher View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: July 14 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2577
Post Options Post Options   Quote saturnwatcher Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2007 at 9:32am

Hmmm..."effete"

I have been a human being on this planet for 50 years and some odd months. I have put pen to paper, pounded a typewriter, assembled and launched countless words into cyberspace and yet, this is the first time I have ever constructed that particular word. Funny how the best things in life can just pass you by.

#1 Sly Fan has painted the contributers to this board with a rather broad brush, calling all of us snobs based upon, as close as I can determine, our abilities to use and comprehend words containing more than one syllable. I confess that I have never treated myself to the experience of sampling a Stallone fan board, but the impression is suggested that one would read a lot of posts along the line of:

Yo! Sly rocks!

I guess I shall continue to exhaust a few idol moments now and then here with the rest of the snobs and wise-a$$es. However, a really sticky issue presents itself. I certainly don't want to discourage the Sly fans from coming here and defending their man and his work, should they feel so inclined. Perhaps in the future, I'll hire on the 3rd grader two condos down to edit my posts for their edification.

Without clear intent, I think #1 Sly Fan has done a much more effective job of slamming his commerades on the Sly board than us.

Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken
Back to Top
ITbeast View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: May 01 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 526
Post Options Post Options   Quote ITbeast Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2007 at 9:42am
HERE HERE! 
The "Networking IT" Movie Buff!

Words to live by:
"Money doesn't make you happy. I now have $50 million but I was just as happy when I had $48 million." - Arnold Schwarzenegger
Back to Top
#1 Sly Fan View Drop Down
Berry Best Friend
Berry Best Friend


Joined: July 05 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 39
Post Options Post Options   Quote #1 Sly Fan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 09 2007 at 7:09am

Yo, Dudes...I'm back from my vacation. 

I notice the string discussing Sly's latest may have gone stale...Did ya miss me??? 

 

YO: Quit Pickin' on Stallone!!
Back to Top
ITbeast View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: May 01 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 526
Post Options Post Options   Quote ITbeast Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 09 2007 at 8:57am

Always!!!...Sly Bashing is just not the same without you to throw in your misguided (If not just plain wrong) facts about how Stallone is the King of Your Universe!

On a serious note, hope you enjoyed your vacation.

While you have been gone we have been hit-ten up Robin Williams and Michael Bay for their latest efforts (Except Michael Bay may have actually produced something decent this time around).

Now Something that may totally blow your Stallone Bandanna off yer head: We've actually been promoting "Live Free or Die Hard" as the summer action flick of the year (HeadRAZZ approved!!!).  Also, if I remember right, Bruce Willis is a Pal of yours?!?

We'll be looking for yah!

The "Networking IT" Movie Buff!

Words to live by:
"Money doesn't make you happy. I now have $50 million but I was just as happy when I had $48 million." - Arnold Schwarzenegger
Back to Top
SchumacherH8ter View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: September 06 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2016
Post Options Post Options   Quote SchumacherH8ter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 06 2007 at 12:11pm
Originally posted by #1 Sly Fan

I almost forgot: On the matter of Sly being a humanitarian, I consider anyone who's given the world as much pleasure and inspiration as he has through his many films (the Rocky movies in particular) to be a "humanitarian"... 

Response from Head RAZZberry: I'm tempted to respond to that, but I'm afraid it's just too easy. Anyone else care to post a reply?? 

                                                                                           I Second that!
Joel Schumacher is history's greatest monster!-Robot Chicken
https://twitter.com/SchumacherH8r
Next-up: The Oogieloves
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 9>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down