Predicting the WORST MOVIE OF THE WEEK!!!

Originally posted by Vits Second,and I'm sorry if this sounds a little harsh,but it's not my fault you feel that way,it's yours.

Since he backed me once, I'll back him in return. Yeah, that was harsh, dude. For all you know, Michaels could be 40 (sorry if I'm making you sound like an old man). You think it's okay for some 40 year old to be going around calling an 18 year old hot or sexy? We have a term for that, it's called a dirty old man or a cradle-robbing pervert. I hope you didn't think it was okay for that 51 year old actor from "The Green Mile" to marry that 16 year old girl. That was just sick.

Well, I'm three months older than Ms. Gomez, so I can ogle her without shame. I'll assume that Vits is in the same boat.

Well, it looks like Burn and I are alone among a den of posters who believe all is fair in love (or in this case, lust) and war. And that's just for Selena Gomez, I can't imagine what you all think of Victoria Justice, Miranda Cosgrove, and the rest of the female casts of "Victorious" and "iCarly". That's the whose who of celebrity jail bait!

Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn You think it's okay for some 40 year old to be going around calling an 18 year old hot or sexy? We have a term for that, it's called a dirty old man or a cradle-robbing pervert. I hope you didn't think it was okay for that 51 year old actor from "The Green Mile" to marry that 16 year old girl. That was just sick.

It may be a matter of semantics,but saying "Gorgeous"/"Beautiful"/"Handsome"/"Goodlooking" isn't the same as "Sexy"/"Hot".In fact,the latter impliy you are attracted to that person.Anyway,I could care less about that.Not because age doesn't matter,because it does...in relationships.Relationships between people with an age difference tend to not work.However,if you're pushing 40 and you're desperate to get married,it's OK to choose not to date someone older or younger,even if you're feelings are strong(of course as long as you know it won't work).But if I learned anything from every '90s sitcom is that the world of dating is about taking chances,specially when you're young.

Bottom line,it's not my fault Michaels feels like a pedophile.In fact,I don't care.He could be a 40 year old just who's afraid of what others think,which I can understand.Or he could be some tightass from the south that would arrest a guy for sleeping with is girlfriend the night he turns 18 while she's still 17(this has happened),which I doubt since I feel I sort of know him.

I'm about to be 21,and that won't prevent me from being attracted to Selena or Miranda Cosgrove.I found Victoria Justice to be very beautiful,but I just don't feel attracted to her.

Originally posted by SchumacherH8ter Well, I'm three months older than Ms. Gomez, so I can ogle her without shame. I'll assume that Vits is in the same boat.

Like it matters...

Originally posted by Vheid Do you think it deserves to be Bonus Worst Movie of the Week (or atleast a forum)?

Yes.It may turn out to be good,or maybe bad but not as much as LARRY CROWNE.Either way,that decision is about pre-opinion.

It seems that no one has an opinion on this question I asked... link

Vits, If I learned anything about dating through 90's sitcoms it's that they are completely wrong when it comes to the subject. Let's be honoust, sitcoms tend to be a very fabricated when it comes to depicting human interaction (especially conversations).

As for the Larry Crowne vs. Monte Carlo-debate.
Eventough it's supposed to be very dull and chliched. I kind of admire what Larry Crowne is doing by replacing the young goodlooking actors and actresses that you usually see in rom coms with actors in their 40's/50's.
I have however have no admiration for Monte Carlo. A film that seems to tell tweens that it's FUN being rich and buying/owning expensive clothes and jewelery. I mean Roger Ebert himself mentioned in his review that this movie resembles Sex & The City. So personally I think Monte Carlo is a little bit worse but i have yet to see either film...

Keep in mind, Vits, you're 21, so finding 18 years sexually attractive is no problem for you. Come back here when you're in your 30s and 40s and you'll realize what Michaels and I are talking about when it comes to feeling like a pedophile when you're lusting over girls who are decades younger than you. Thank you for replying to my and Michaels' comments in such an insensitive manner.

How were you not insensitive?

I mean you called Michaels a pedophile for saying that an 18 year old girl is cute (you were the first person here to imply that). Don't you think that's a bit harsh?

Pets can be cute, children can be cute, hot air balloons can be cute that doesn't mean that people are attracted by them.

Anyway....let's please end this discussion, It reminds me of my former next door neighbor who told me that he was attracted to 10 year old boys (Still not sure what I should have done with that information).

Returning back to the subject of this forum...

It's seems that both Monte Carlo and Larry Crowne both weren't bad enough to deserve a forum.

June 8th

We already know that Zoolander is going to be the worst movie of the upcoming week.

Early Prediction for June 15th:

I think this weekend will bring us NO worst movie of the week. Winnie the Pooh was already released in Europe and Brit critics loved it and there has yet to be a Harry Potter-movie with a bad RT-rating...

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: I personally loathe what Dizz-Knee did with A.A. Milne's characters (and especially Ernest Shepherd's wonderful character drawings - LINK) and am toying with listing POOH as the Worst of the Week choice for July 15th. Though I don't seriously expect it would get much attention come year's end/Nominating Ballot time, I do think it would stir up a lively discussion here. And the posting below about its mediocre reception in foreign release only encourages me to think maybe I should "go for it"...