2006 RAZZIE Nominees

Printed From: Official RAZZIE® Forum
Category: RAZZIE® Basics
Forum Name: Entire RAZZIE® History, Year-by-Year: 1980-2012
Forum Discription: Every Golden Raspberry Nominee & Every "Winner" in Every Category...EVER!
URL: http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1642
Printed Date: May 22 2013 at 7:19am

Topic: 2006 RAZZIE Nominees

Posted By: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: 2006 RAZZIE Nominees
Date Posted: January 24 2007 at 6:27am

Nominees for The 27^th Annual Golden Raspberry (RAZZIE®) Awards

WORST PICTURE

BASIC INSTINCT 2 (Sony/Columbia) a.k.a. BASICALLY, IT STINKS, TOO

BLOODRAYNE (Romar Entertainment)

LADY IN THE WATER (Warner Bros.)

LITTLE MAN (Sony/Revolution)

THE WICKER MAN (Warner Bros.)

WORST ACTOR

Tim Allen / SANTA CLAUSE 3, THE SHAGGY DOG and ZOOM

Nicolas Cage $$ / THE WICKER MAN

Larry, the Cable Guy (Dan Whitney) / LARRY THE CABLE GUY: HEALTH INSPECTOR

Rob Schneider ## / THE BENCHWARMERS and LITTLE MAN

Marlon Wayans # & Shawn Wayans # / LITTLE MAN

WORST ACTRESS

Hilary Duff # & Haylie Duff / MATERIAL GIRLS

Lindsay Lohan / JUST MY LUCK

Kristanna Loken / BLOODRAYNE

Jessica Simpson # / EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH

Sharon Stone ## / BASICALLY IT STINKS, TOO

WORST SUPPORTING ACTRESS

Kate Bosworth / SUPERMAN RETURNS

Kristin Chenoweth / DECK THE HALLS, PINK PANTHER and RV

Carmen Electra # / DATE MOVIE and SCARY MOVIE 4

Jenny McCarthy ## / JOHN TUCKER MUST DIE

Michelle Rodriguez / BLOODRAYNE

WORST SUPPORTING ACTOR

Danny DeVito # / DECK THE HALLS

Ben Kingsley $$ / BLOODRAYNE

M. Night Shyamalan $ / LADY IN THE WATER

Martin Short / SANTA CLAUSE 3

David Thewlis / BASICALLY, IT STINKS, TOO! and THE OMEN

WORST SCREEN COUPLE

Tim Allen & Martin Short / SANTA CLAUSE 3

Nicolas Cage & His Bear Suit / THE WICKER MAN

Hilary & Haylie Duff / MATERIAL GIRLS

Sharon Stone’s Lop-Sided Breasts / BASICALLY, IT STINKS, TOO

Shawn Wayans & EITHER Kerry Washington OR Marlon Wayans / LITTLE MAN

WORST REMAKE or RIP-OFF

LITTLE MAN (Rip-off of the 1954 Bugs Bunny cartoon “Baby Buggy Bunny”)

PINK PANTHER (Sony/Columbia)

POSEIDON (Warner Bros.)

THE SHAGGY DOG (Disney)

THE WICKER MAN

WORST PREQUEL or SEQUEL

BASICALLY, IT STINKS, TOO!

BIG MOMMA’S HOUSE 2 (Fox)

GARFIELD 2: A TAIL of TWO KITTIES (Fox)

SANTA CLAUSE 3 (Disney)

TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE: THE BEGINNING (New Line)

WORST DIRECTOR

Uwe Boll # / BLOODRAYNE

Michael Caton-Jones / BASICALLY, IT STINKS, TOO!

Ron Howard $$ / THE DA VINCI CODE (Sony/Columbia)

M. Night Shyamalan $ / LADY IN THE WATER

Keenan Ivory Wayans # / LITTLE MAN

WORST SCREENPLAY

BASICALLY, IT STINKS, TOO Screenplay by Leora Barish & Henry Bean,

Based on Characters Created by Joe Ezsterhas##

BLOODRAYNE Screenplay by Guinevere Turner, Based on the Video Game

LADY IN THE WATER Original Screenplay by M. Night Shyamalan

LITTLE MAN Written by Keenan Ivory Wayans, Marlon Wayans and Shawn Wayans

THE WICKER MAN Screenplay Adapted by Neil LaBute from a Screenplay by Anthony Schaffer

WORST EXCUSE for FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT (New Category!)

DECK THE HALLS (Fox)

GARFIELD: A TAIL OF 2 KITTIES

RV (Sony/Columbia)

SANTA CLAUSE 3: THE ESCAPE CLAUSE

THE SHAGGY DOG

NOMINATIONS PER PICTURE

BASICALLY, IT STINKS, TOO = 7 Nominations

Worst Picture, Actress, Supporting Actor, Director, Sequel, Screenplay and Screen Couple

LITTLE MAN = 7 Nominations

Worst Picture, Actor (2) Remake/Rip-Off, Director, Screenplay and Screen Couple

BLOODRAYNE = 6 Nominations

Worst Picture, Actress, Supporting Actor, Supporting Actress, Director and Screenplay

THE WICKER MAN = 5 Nominations

Worst Picture, Actor, Screenplay, Remake and Screen Couple

SANTA CLAUSE 3: THE ESCAPE CLAUSE = 5 Nominations

Worst Excuse for Family Entertainment, Worst Actor, Supporting Actor, Sequel and Screen Couple

LADY IN THE WATER = 4 Nominations

Worst Picture, Supporting Actor, Director and Screenplay

DECK THE HALLS = 3 Nominations

Worst Excuse for Family Entertainment, Supporting Actor and Supporting Actress

THE SHAGGY DOG = 3 Nominations

Worst Excuse for Family Entertainment, Worst Remake and Worst Actor

KEY TO SYMBOLS:

# = Previous RAZZIE Nominee

## = Previous RAZZIE “Winner”

$ = Previous Oscar Nominee

$$ = Previous Oscar Winner

-------------
Ye Olde Head RAZZberry

Replies:

Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: July 27 2010 at 3:36pm

THE HILLS HAVE EYES wasn't bad,but the directing was.It should've been up for "Worst Director".

-------------
http://vits-ingthemovies.blogspot.com - http://vits-ingthemovies.blogspot.com

Posted By: TaRaN-RoD
Date Posted: July 27 2010 at 4:48pm

Why don't you show the winners? I mean , I don't know how to say that little help here, there in the list but it's not clear who are the winners...

Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: July 27 2010 at 5:00pm

They separated the nominees and winners into 2 forums.

-------------
http://vits-ingthemovies.blogspot.com - http://vits-ingthemovies.blogspot.com

Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: July 27 2010 at 5:03pm

Why Superman Returns for that one nomination? Why not Eragon or Crossover?

-------------
RAZZIE Dirty Dozen: Battlefield Earth, F G Fingered, Pluto Nash, A Sound of Thunder, Alone in the Dark, Dirty Love, Rise Silver Srfr, Daddy Day Camp, IKWKM, The Love Guru, All About Steve, Airbender

Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: July 27 2010 at 5:44pm

Originally posted by GTAHater767

Why Superman Returns for that one nomination? Why not Eragon or Crossover?

Probably because more Razzie voters saw "Superman Returns". You have to remember that that's always a factor.

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.

Posted By: TaRaN-RoD
Date Posted: July 27 2010 at 9:14pm

I agree that Eragon was a total piece of s***!

Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: July 28 2010 at 11:28am

Originally posted by TaRaN-RoD

I agree that Eragon was a total piece of s***!

Not to mention the fact it copied and pasted plot points from "Star Wars" AND "Lord Of The Rings".

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.

Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: September 20 2010 at 7:33pm

I just realized, MWG is always saying "oh, there was no twist in "Lady In The Water", none". But, once again, he is wrong, as usual. Granted, it wasn't a twist ENDING, but there was a twist. The twist being that everyone in the apartment complex (or hotel, whichever it was) had some role in the "fairy tale", but they all guessed wrong who was suppose to be what role ... which were then revealed later on and we were suppose to be all surprised who was the real role players were. Yeah, again, why people hate MNS and his overuse of twists.

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.

Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: September 21 2010 at 12:51pm

No, Burn. People dislike his twist endings. It's not an obligation that horror movies must have twists at some point, but most of the good ones have at least one...

-------------
http://vits-ingthemovies.blogspot.com - http://vits-ingthemovies.blogspot.com

Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: September 21 2010 at 3:13pm

Originally posted by Vits

No, Burn. People dislike his twist endings. It's not an obligation that horror movies must have twists at some point, but most of the good ones have at least one...

Well, sorry, Vits, but MNS dug his own grave. He made twists and twist endings his trademark and used them in every movie to the point people were only going to see what the new twist was going to be. And after a while, the twists just began to suck, and you could predict them from miles away. And then, he starting letting his ego get the better of him, and then he started making overall bad movies. It's like he set out to ruin his own career by making one mistake after another like Michael Cimino before him. It's a true example of a director allowing a little success to go straight to his head.

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.

Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: September 21 2010 at 3:19pm

Wow!I know you usually repeat things like that,but that one seems to actually be copied and pasted word by word from another forum.How many times you have to bring up Michael Cimino?

Just like I said people dislike Shyamalan because of his twist endings,not the twists wee see throught the rest of the movies.

-------------
http://vits-ingthemovies.blogspot.com - http://vits-ingthemovies.blogspot.com

Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: October 02 2010 at 4:41pm

I don't think Tim Allen deserved the Worst Actor nomination. He was passable in http://www.razzies.com/forum/santa-clause-3_forum151.html - . And also in http://www.razzies.com/forum/zoom_forum135.html - , although that one maybe deserved at least "Worst Director".

-------------
http://vits-ingthemovies.blogspot.com - http://vits-ingthemovies.blogspot.com

Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: October 02 2010 at 6:39pm

Oh no, SANTA CLAUS 3 and ZOOM were both unwatchable. Tim Allen clearly just made them for the paychecks...

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.

Posted By: Jennifar
Date Posted: January 23 2011 at 1:57am

There was a "twist ending." The twist being that everyone in the apartment complex had some role in the "fairy tale," but they all guessed wrong as to who was supposed to play what role ... which was then revealed later on, and we were supposed to be all surprised who the real role players were. Yet again, an example of why people hate Shyamalan and his overuse of twists.

-------------
http://stopringinginearshelp.com - stop ringing in ears

Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: January 23 2011 at 6:51am

That didn't happen at the end.It didn't even happen after or during the climax.Therefor there's no twist ending.

-------------
http://vits-ingthemovies.blogspot.com - http://vits-ingthemovies.blogspot.com

Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: January 23 2011 at 9:02am

Sorry, Vits, but Jennifar is right. Although the twist didn't happen at the end, it's still a twist none the less. Same goes with "The Happening". Yes, the trees thing is not revealed at the end, but still, WHAT A TWIST. This is why people are sick of M. Night. Just make a straight forward movie for once.

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.

Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: January 23 2011 at 12:03pm

Then stop saying "twist ending"! You wanna hate him? Fine! But at least do it for the right reasons!

-------------
http://vits-ingthemovies.blogspot.com - http://vits-ingthemovies.blogspot.com

Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: January 23 2011 at 12:18pm

Okay, fine -- he "overuses twist endings and twists in general, when they are not needed."

Happy now?

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.

Posted By: mrbhavya
Date Posted: May 16 2011 at 10:32pm

If anyone knows the nominies for 2006, please post that info. I am making a database of it...

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: They're right here, fella. And, since we already have a complete "database" of our history (as do both NetFlix and The IMDb - http://www.imdb.com/event/ev0000558/ -

Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: October 07 2012 at 2:05am

2006. Perhaps Agent 006 was the second most famous of the 00-Agents behind James Bond (007). Alec Trevelyan had been on the side of MI6 until a mission to a Chemical Warfare Facility in the ByeLoMorYe Dam. Arkady Ouromov had seemingly executed him before the bombs attached to the chemical bottles could detonate in 3 minutes (Bond promised Trevelyan 6 minutes). He resurfaced in a junkyard and unmasked himself as Janus. I won't tell the rest. Here's my take on the Year of the Golden-Eyed Traitor:

Films that should've been RAZZed, but didn't: 7

The Lake House

Crossover

Eragon

Ultraviolet

Black Christmas [remake]

The Covenant

See No Evil

Films that got RAZZed, but shouldn't have: 1

Superman Returns

Films that got RAZZed to the wrong degree: 0

Worst Trends/Events of 2006:

V. EXTREMELY bad horror and fantasy films that luckily no-one saw (The Grudge 2, See No Evil, Stay Alive, Silent Hill, When a Stranger Calls [remake], Eragon.)
IV. Prequels, sequels, remakes, rip-offs, and other secondary installments hit a record high (Secondary installments in quantites like never before. We finally had to split 'em into 2 categories, but many of us wish it was that way to stay.)
III. Nicolas Cage's personal debt crisis begins in a bear costume (The Wicker Man [remake] is the first stand-out bad film starring Nic Cage since Gone in 60 Seconds [remake] in 2000, but this time it didn't slow down afterward.)
II. Between The Da Vinci Code, Shyamalan's savior role, and The Omen of 6-06-006, Jesus Christ and cinema didn't mix.
I. All the lousy family films, a dearth in quality G and PG rated entertainment (RV, The Shaggy Dog [remake], ZOOM, Garfield: A Tail of Two Kitties, The Pink Panther, The Benchwarmers)

-------------
RAZZIE Dirty Dozen: Battlefield Earth, F G Fingered, Pluto Nash, A Sound of Thunder, Alone in the Dark, Dirty Love, Rise Silver Srfr, Daddy Day Camp, IKWKM, The Love Guru, All About Steve, Airbender

Print Page | Close Window