Print Page | Close Window

Nothing to Crow About...

Printed From: Official RAZZIE® Forum
Category: 2007 RAZZIE® MOVIE FORUMS w/LYNX!
Forum Name: PREMONITION
Forum Discription: Look...in the Future...I See...a Worst Actress RAZZIE Nominee?!?
URL: http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1785
Printed Date: July 31 2014 at 4:45pm


Topic: Nothing to Crow About...
Posted By: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: Nothing to Crow About...
Date Posted: March 12 2007 at 3:12am

ESCAPING a WORST ACTRESS NOMINATION for LAST YEAR's TIME-TRAVEL TRAVESTY http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_topics.asp?FID=123 - THE LAKE HOUSE , SANDRA BULLOCK IS BACK ONCE AGAIN to TEMPT OUR VOTERS in THIS SIMILAR (THOUGH EVEN DOOFIER-LOOKING) EXERCISE, WHICH HAS HER BOUNCING THROUGH TIME, TRYING to PREVENT the AUTO ACCIDENT THAT WILL TAKE HER HUSBAND's LIFE. AT ONE POINT, IN a CLIP WE MAY BE SHOWING at NEXT SPRING's 28th ANNUAL RAZZIE CEREMONIES, SHE WAKENS (ala DALLAS) to FIND HER DEAD HUBBY TAKING a SHOWER...

SOUNDS ALL WET to US, BUT FEEL FREE to WORK YOURSELF INTO a LATHER DISCUSSING IT BELOW...

SANDRA: "Okay, so my agent can't read the future...But is it too much to ask that he at least read the script before signing me up to make any more movies like this??" 

THIS JUST IN: http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_topics.asp?FID=185 - PREMONITION IS NOW RANKED http://www.rottentomatoes.com/features/special/2007/wotw/?r=82&mid=1171125 - #82 on ROTTEN TOMATOES' "WORST REVIEWED MOVIES of ALL TIME" LIST ( http://www.rottentomatoes.com/features/special/2007/wotw/ - LINK ) ...WHICH ONLY SERVES to MAKE the LIST ALL the MORE SUSPECT...



-------------
Ye Olde Head RAZZberry



Replies:
Posted By: jb razz
Date Posted: March 12 2007 at 3:28am

Please don't compare this to The Lake House. The trailer actualy makes this movie look interesting, and I don't think it could ever near the doofiness of The Lake House.

To me, this actually looks like a good thriller...but that's what I also said about The Number 23...

Response from Head RAZZberry: Here's a http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1784&PN=1 - LINK to check out REVIEWS on http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1784&PN=1 - PREMONITION  (including the RT page for it). At this time (1pm/PST on 3/11/07) it's only got 5 reviews posted at RT, but it's scoring a big fat ZERO % Approval Rating. And ZERO is not a rating that's easy to turn around...



-------------


Posted By: tomsmo
Date Posted: March 12 2007 at 4:16am
Some cricits are comparing this to The Sixth Sense. Not sure about The Crow, but yea, the premise has a guy coming back from the dead...

-------------


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: March 12 2007 at 11:25am
Please don't pick on this movie. This thriller actually looks clever and good (and also Sandra Bullock wasn't very bad in The Lake House, that movie was fantastic!).

-------------


Posted By: saturnwatcher
Date Posted: March 12 2007 at 3:59pm
It looks silly. There is one scene where Bullock actually marks her husbands death on a calender. Hey, she has evidently lived this experience a dozen times (we are ripping off Lake House and Groundhog Day) and she still needs to mark it on her calender so she won't forget it this time?

-------------
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken


Posted By: cvcjr13
Date Posted: March 13 2007 at 2:43am

Well, I can understand why this is being considered since it still has a 0% rating on RT.  However, I'm actually looking forward to this movie.  I don't know why.  I just like Sandra Bullock.

In one sense, though, I'm surprised, since this weekend there will be two other possible klunkers coming out.  Dead Silence sounds like a good prediction of what the viewing audience will be like.  And I Think I Love My Wife starring Chris Rock may turn out to be as "good" as Troop Beverly HillsPremonition may be one of those movies that critics hate and audiences love.  While the critics RT meter is currently at 0%, the users RT meter is currently at 66%.  I predict the critics AND the audience will agree on the other two.



Posted By: tomsmo
Date Posted: March 13 2007 at 4:27am

I found out that on RT, I Think I Love My Wife is at 40%. Not sure about Dead Silence (none of The Critics have reviewed yet). I mostly see Silence as paying Homage to Magic & The Puppet Master. LINKS:

http://www.amazon.com/Magic-Anthony-Hopkins/dp/B000CR76U8/re f=pd_bbs_1/103-1643906-5715851?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=117 3807298&sr=1-1 - http://www.amazon.com/Magic-Anthony-Hopkins/dp/B000CR76U8/re f=pd_bbs_1/103-1643906-5715851?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=117 3807298&sr=1-1 http://www.amazon.com/Puppet-Master-Paul-Mat/dp/B0001XLWD0/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-1643906-5715851?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1173807241&sr=1-1 -

http://www.amazon.com/Puppet-Master-Paul-Mat/dp/B0001XLWD0/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-1643906-5715851?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1173807241&sr=1-1 - http://www.amazon.com/Puppet-Master-Paul-Mat/dp/B0001XLWD0/r ef=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-1643906-5715851?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid =1173807241&sr=1-1  



-------------


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: March 13 2007 at 11:33am
There has only been seven reviews so don't think it'll get a 0% the whole time. I highly doubt it. Wait until it reaches 110 reviews.


Posted By: tomsmo
Date Posted: March 13 2007 at 11:36am

More reviews should post Thursday, the day before the movie opens in theaters.

Response from Head RAZZberry: With 11 reviews posted at RT, http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/premonition/ - PREMONITION still has only ONE favorable one, giving it a current 9% Approval . http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/i_think_i_love_my_wife/ - I THINK I LOVE MY WIFE now stands at about 30% Approval, putting it just outside the usual RAZZIE Contender Range of 25% or lower.  And http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/dead_silence/ - DEAD SILENCE (which is not even being shown to critics before it opens) may well stink to high heaven, but picking bad horror movies week after week is way too easy, and gets old. Besides, of the three titles, PREMONITION is both the highest profile release and the most critically reviled at this point -- which, given all our criteria for RAZZIE consideration, makes it the logical choice as Worst of the Weak...



-------------


Posted By: tomsmo
Date Posted: March 14 2007 at 2:59pm

I was watching TV and saw an ad for PREMONITION, giving it all these great reviews. I couldn't make out where the reviews came from (Wired Magazine?). It made me want to pause each review, and stand close to the TV to read who was giving out such positive reviews.

I also went on RT, and they now have http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/i_think_i_love_my_wife/ - I THINK I LOVE MY WIFE  at 18%.

Response from Head RAZZberry: I checked your link, and I THINK I LOVE MY WIFE is now (10am/PST 3-15-07) officially in RAZZ-able territory, below 20% Approval on RT. But also note that http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/premonition/ - PREMONITION is still getting a lower rating -- it's currently at 10%...



-------------


Posted By: jb razz
Date Posted: March 15 2007 at 11:37pm

HeadRAZZ, do you have a general dislike of Sandra Bullock? You are implying that she was Razzie worthy in THE LAKE HOUSE (I didn't think she was, Keanau was much worse), and you seem to be implying that if this movie is bad, she is the one who should be punished with a Razzie. If this movie is terrible, she will probably be the best part of it. I am generally a fan of Sandra Bullock (though she was terrible in DEMOLITION MAN).

Response from Head RAZZberry: I have actually liked Bullock in a few films (WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING and the first MISS CONGENIALITY among them) but she seems to have lost her way of late. SPEED 2 was a major mis-step, MISS CONGENIALITY 2 was un-necessary and nowhere near as charming as the original, LAKE HOUSE seemed to genuinely please almost no one, and now PREMONITION looks poised to tank as well. Whether or not Bullock should get the bulk of the blame when one of her films blows, the bottom line is: She presumably read the script before signing on for the film, and should have known better...



-------------


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: March 16 2007 at 12:31am
I'm also a fan of Sandra Bullock, and think she was great in The Lake House. I read my newspaper today, and they gave Premonition 3/4 for  and 1.5/4 for I Think I Love My Wife. The review even said Bullock's performance was great in Premonition.

-------------


Posted By: Vidiot
Date Posted: March 16 2007 at 8:42am
Originally posted by jb razz

I am generally a fan of Sandra Bullock, though she was terrible in DEMOLITION MAN.


She is very lick-able... er... likeable, she also seems very genuine compared to 98% of the "talent" working these days, plus the camera loves her... but you're right, Demolition Man was brutal.

RT reads 89 bad reviews and 8 positive reviews for "Premonition." I think I'll pass on this one.




Posted By: Razzilla
Date Posted: March 16 2007 at 7:54pm
I predict a worst screenplay winner...but I have a feeling that Ms. Bullock will be out of the running for Worst Actress by month's end...

-------------
Comparing Uwe Boll's movies to a sack of horse manure will only get you sued by every fertilizer company in existence...


Posted By: Vidiot
Date Posted: March 17 2007 at 1:25am
Originally posted by Razzilla

I predict a worst screenplay winner...


The problem with "time loop" screenplays is if the lead does the same thing every time, (merely playing out their role in history), the time loop could simply replay itself endlessly. If the lead does anything different, (see: "free will" vs. determinism), the future outcome would be altered, and therefore time should not reset, or loop, a new timeline would have been created....

But alas then there would be no movie if time didn't loop regardless what the lead did.




Posted By: tomsmo
Date Posted: March 17 2007 at 5:42am
Have there been any of these "Premonition" Movies before.


Posted By: jb razz
Date Posted: March 17 2007 at 7:13am

I know that she has been in some terrible movies, but just because the movie is terrible doesn't mean she is terrible in it. I got the impression from the HeadRAZZ that for Bullock: bad movie=bad performance, but I could be totally wrong.

Here is a link to an article in my local newspaper about how Bullock is often very good even when he vehicle is not: http://www.accessatlanta.com/movies/content/movies/stories/2007/03/ 15/0316MMbullock.html - www.accessatlanta.com/movies/content/movies/stories/2007/03/ 15/0316MMbullock.html

Response from Head RAZZberry: My point in the previous posting, which may not have been clear, is that without Sandra Bullock agreeing to star in it, something like PREMONITION would never have been made. And if the script -- which almost every review has pointed to as one of the film's major flaws -- stinks, then Bullock signing on to star in it -- and thus, in a sense, "causing it to be made" -- deserves some a fair share of the blame...



-------------


Posted By: jb razz
Date Posted: March 17 2007 at 7:32am

I read one review on IMDb that said the Bullock was good, but Julian McMahon (a.k.a. Dr. Doom), who plays Bullock's husband, was terrible.

McMahon could be on the ballot this year for worst supporting actor for both this movie and The Fantastic Four 2, because acording to IMDb, his characters is coming back.



Posted By: tomsmo
Date Posted: March 17 2007 at 8:35am
She was also good in Crash...

-------------


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: March 17 2007 at 11:08am

She was very good in Crash, and some idiot says she picks bad movies like Crash. Hello, it won Best Picture! I don't think McMahon will win Worst Supporting Actor because he's not that bad in Fantastic Four, nor will he be in the sequel.

For the user who questioned about other "Premonition" films, they are actually a trilogy BASED on premonition. They are part of the Final Destination franchise. They are actually smart horror movies with GREAT, let me repeat, great and original kills. The beginning of each movie always starts with a premonition by the main character (having a foreseeing of a deadly accident) which makes him/her carry other people out. They finally see the premonition comes true and the survivors start dying one by one in grisly (mostly gory) ways. As you have read, I'm a HUGE Final Destination fan and they're really smart horror movies (3rd was the worst). It's kinda hard to understand because there are these rules and death things you have to understand.

Response from Head RAZZberry: While your defense of the Final Destination / Premonition trilogy is spirited, your comment that CRASH winning Best Picture somehow automatically anoints it as a great film is somewhat naive. Numerous times (especially in the last 30 years) the Academy has failed to name the year's actual BEST Picture as their winner. A perfect case in point: The nominees for Best Picture of 1976 included ALL THE PRESIDENT'S MEN, NETWORK and TAXI DRIVER -- any one of which film historians would rank as greater films than that year's Best Picture Oscar winner, ROCKY. While the original ROCKY is the best thing Stallone ever did, it was obviously a sentimental choice, and over the years has not retained the status of any of the three far superior competitors it won over...



-------------


Posted By: Movie Man
Date Posted: March 17 2007 at 3:42pm
HeadRazz, you mention "Speed 2: Cruise Control" was a major mis-step for her? And I agree. What about the original "Speed", one of the best action-thrillers of the last 15 years?

I like Sandra Bullock somewhat. She should've gotten an Oscar nom for "Crash", even if her role was 7-10 minutes in that film. (Bullock, Thandie Newton, and Michael Peña should've all been nominated for that excellent movie.). Her best mistake: not starring in "Million Dollar Baby"


Posted By: saturnwatcher
Date Posted: March 17 2007 at 4:22pm
28 Days, Two Week's Notice, Divine Secret's of the Ya Ya Sisterhood (the biggest secret was that all of their other secrets were incredibly boring), all of these were pretty bad recent career choices on the part of Bullock. I've noticed that she always seems to play the part of a professional woman of some sort who never actually has to go to work. Where do I  get a gig like that? On the whole, I think she is a capable actress...but she might want to give her agent a fierce beating, fire him and get some capable representation.

-------------
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: March 18 2007 at 3:29am
Well, I was happy that Crash won Best Picture. I completely agree with their choise. I'm also happy Happy Feet won best animated feature!


Posted By: tomsmobr
Date Posted: March 18 2007 at 4:39am

I Just found out that on Boxofficemojo.com that Premonition came in Third behind The Wild Hogs with $18,000,000 coming in first is 300

1 http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=300.htm - 300
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/studio/chart/?studio=warnerbros.htm - Warner Bros.

3,270
$10,000,000

+83.5% / $3,058
$106,288,000 / 8
$12,400,000

+24% / $3,792
$118,688,000 / 9
$8,800,000

-29% / $2,691
$127,473,000 / 10

N/A
2 http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=wildhogs.htm - WILD HOGS
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/studio/chart/?studio=buenavista.htm - Buena Vista

3,360
$5,511,000

+160.4% / $1,640
$90,679,000 / 15
$8,607,000

+56.2% / $2,562
$99,286,000 / 16
$4,707,000

-45.3% / $1,401
$103,993,000 / 17

N/A
3 http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=premonition.htm - PREMONITION
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/studio/chart/?studio=sony.htm - Sony / Columbia

2,831
$6,400,000

-- / $2,261
$6,400,000 / 1
$7,175,000

+12.1% / $2,534
$13,575,000 / 2
$4,425,000

-38.3% / $1,563
$18,000,000 / 3

N/A



Posted By: Brierfox
Date Posted: March 18 2007 at 6:13am
I don't like this kind of film, and watching the trailer confirms my bad opinion of this kind of flick.   Movies like this never seem to answer the basic questions of "who, where, what and why".  
The trailer seemed to indicate that only Susan Bullocks' character knows what is going on.  Her mother seems clueless in the scene I saw.  The music gets louder as Bullock's eyebrows go up and the viewer is supposed to "get it", but I seemed to have missed the point.
  What can I conclude but that this movie is about a woman going insane?   In which case it's a study of human delusion and our inability to accept the death of loved ones.
.
Other possible plot devices:
Her husband is an employee of a secret government agency and he is trying to save the world.
Her husband is under the federal witness protection program and his testimony could save the world.
Her husband, is in fact stuck in a town in Pennsylvania, covering a woodchuck race or something, and is desperately trying to contact her.
Her husband never really existed and everyone just goes along to humor her.
His real name is Jesus and he has died to save the world.
 





-------------
"We aren't in Kansas anymore Toto... Toto??"


Posted By: bruin_522
Date Posted: March 22 2007 at 4:34am
Let's see, Sandra Bullock's been nominated for three RAZZIES, and she's never "won" any of them. She's been nominated for Worst Supporting Actress for http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0106697/ - Demolition Man (1993), and twice, Worst Actress and Worst Screen Couple with Jason Patric, for http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120179/ - Speed 2: Cruise Control (1997). I know http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120179/ - Speed 2: Cruise Control  was also nominated for Worst Picture, Director-Jan De Bont, Screenplay, and Supporting Actor-Willem Dafoe, and "won" the Worst Remake or Sequel RAZZIE. I'm sure she'll be on the list of potential nominees for Worst Actress, and this film will also be on list of potential nominees for perhaps Worst Picture, Worst Excuse for Horror/Thriller Entertainment, Worst Screenplay, etc.


Posted By: tomsmobr
Date Posted: March 22 2007 at 4:41am

Yea the Catagory we should have this year is "Worst Excuse for a Thriller and/ or a Horror Movie," considering every other movie coming out this year seems to be a really bad thriller, or a horror movie that rips offf some thing that's already been done, or sequel to one...



-------------


Posted By: jb razz
Date Posted: March 23 2007 at 2:23am
Originally posted by jb razz

I know that she has been in some terrible movies,
but just because the movie is terrible doesn't mean she is terrible in it. I
got the impression from the HeadRAZZ that for Bullock: bad movie=bad
performance, but I could be totally wrong.


Here is a link to an article in my local newspaper about how Bullock is
often very good even when he vehicle is not: http://
www.accessatlanta.com/movies/content/movies/stories/2007/03/
15/0316MMbullock.html
- www.accessatlanta.com/movies/content/
movies/stories/2007/03/ 15/0316MMbullock.html


Response from Head RAZZberry: My point in the previous posting,
which may not have been clear, is that without Sandra Bullock
agreeing to star in it, something like PREMONITION would never have
been made. And if the script -- which almost every review has pointed to
as one of the film's major flaws -- stinks, then Bullock signing on to star
in it -- and thus, in a sense, "causing it to be made" -- deserves some a
fair share of the blame...



I thought that worst actess means "worst performance by an actress
in a leading role", not "actress that caused the worst movie to get made".


Posted By: Razzilla
Date Posted: March 30 2007 at 9:58am
Come on...it can't be THAT bad...it only has 8% approval at RT at this time...

-------------
Comparing Uwe Boll's movies to a sack of horse manure will only get you sued by every fertilizer company in existence...


Posted By: cvcjr13
Date Posted: March 31 2007 at 5:29am

Originally posted by Razzilla

Come on...it can't be THAT bad...it only has 8% approval at RT at this time...

Critics are at 8%, but the users are at 59%.  At this point, it seems this is one of those movies that the critics hate but the rest of the audience likes.

Notice I said "like", not "love".  Although it seems good number of users have given it 4-1/2 to 5 stars, there have been enough low user votes to pull the overall total down to 59%.

http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0477071/ - The user rating at IMDb is 5.3 .  Even though 58% of the users gave it a higher rating, the 28 users among the top 1000 gave it an average of 4.8, pulling the overall total down. 

So, lump it in with Aeon Flux and Silent Hill.  The critics hate it, and the audience seems to be polarized about it.



Posted By: tomsmobr
Date Posted: March 31 2007 at 5:37am
I guess Ms. Bullock should had own PREMONITION before she signed on to make this film.


Posted By: Fresh in DC
Date Posted: April 07 2007 at 8:35pm

I think Premonition deserves a C for CRAP!!! This movie was god awful, i only saw it because i couldnt see 300. I had a nice nap though, and a few laughs. Like when The ladys daughter jogs toward a sliding glass door and breaks it with her face resulting in heavy cgi bleeding. Should have been a commercial for windex. I like how they spend 5 minutes on Sandra Bullock making a sad face to show that she is sad. I like how they spend 5 minutes on Sandra bullock making a confused face to show how she is confused. I like how the movie ended without solving anything really and not changing anything from the begginning. I like how nia long had four lines in this movie ,nd they didnt have anything to do with anything but some good reviewers said she gave a powerful performance. This movie was sooooooo Gay. OMG. It was pointless. People who said it was a good movie are so Homo. They try and make it seem more complicated than it really is.

Actual Review:

" This movie started to freak me out, and confuse me. I guess it's important to know the meaning of the word "Premonition" before you watch a movie with that title. "

No bull thats a real review.

Not That Confusing the trailer is the entire movie.



Posted By: cvcjr13
Date Posted: May 06 2007 at 7:56pm

WARNING: MAJOR SPOILERS

Originally posted by cvcjr13

So, lump it in with Aeon Flux and Silent Hill.  The critics hate it, and the audience seems to be polarized about it.

Well, it's time to eat crow, especially after watching the crow.  A dead crow.  That has a lot of blood despite being long past dead and electrocuted.  And is full of maggots and horseflies, as if we were watching the Amityville Horror.

I liked Aeon Flux, and I liked Silent Hill.  However, Premonition failed to foresee its own disaster.  Anyone who read the script beforehand should have had a premonition.

Take Linda Hanson's (Bullock) daughter Bridgette (Courtney Taylor Burgess).  On the day Linda finds out her husband, Jim (Julian McMahon) is dead, Linda puts stickers on the glass door and Bridgette's face doesn't have a single scar.  However, the film reveals that Bridgette plowed through the glass door BEFORE Jim's death, and all other scenes after this incident have her scarred up.  So why isn't she scarred in the scene the day after his death?

But that's not the worst part.  The movie plods, like hiking through the mud in combat boots while carrying 200 pounds on your back.  I looked at my watch no fewer than 10 times through this movie.  It failed to captivate me.

That's still not the worst part, though.  That would go to the ending.  SPOILER.  What's the point of bouncing a character back and forth through space and time, which includes a lecture about fighting for what you believe in, when your child still winds up scarred from running through the glass door, when you still wind up being held for psychiatric observation with a needle in your arm, when your repentant husband still winds up dead, and, even worse, when you find out that you had a hand in causing his death.  What is the point of that?  Has fatalism suddenly become entertaining?  Well, maybe in some movie I can't recall or have yet to view, but certainly NOT in this one.  And what was this thing that Linda believed in that she was to fight for?  Maybe her family?  Is that it?  Can't tell with this movie. 

This doesn't even address the fact that the driver of the tanker truck that killed Jim should have seen Linda on the scene.  The driver would be able to place her at the scene of her husband's death, making the sheriff's notification the next day unnecessary.  And, really, with Linda being the woman that she is, I doubt she would have left the scene before the police arrived.

To be fair, the acting was excellent except for McMahon's dull performance.  Because of the acting and a few inspired moments, I gave it a generous 4 at IMDb.  That said, the HeadRazzberry points out that a star of Bullock's calibre and (at least at one time) box office draw should have seen the flaws in the script and demanded that they be corrected.  If she didn't say yes, it would not have been made.  I don't mind time yet another time travel movie, as long as it holds my interest.  So if Bill Kelly is nominated for worst screenplay and Mennan Yapo for worst director, I'll be voting for them, and I'd recommend Sandra Bullock for worst actress and Julian McMahon for worst supporting actor unless there are even worse out there (Epic Movie and Blood and Chocolate being two of them).



Posted By: cvcjr13
Date Posted: May 12 2007 at 5:51pm

Major spoilers.

Originally posted by cvcjr13

Has fatalism suddenly become entertaining?  Well, maybe in some movie I can't recall or have yet to view, but certainly NOT in this one. 

Earlier today, three movies about fatalism came to my mind - the Final Destination movies.  What does it say about Premonition when Final Destination makes the same point in, dare I say, a more satisfying way?



Posted By: bruin_522
Date Posted: July 09 2007 at 4:26pm
I walked over to Best Buy and I thought I saw that PREMONITION has been released on DVD in stores. All I have to say about that is, UGH!! I didn't really enjoy that movie at all.


Posted By: ITbeast
Date Posted: July 17 2007 at 7:23am
The Really sad part is that I just barely remember it being released earlier this year (It was this year right?) Anyways, I think the Lake House was just a tad better than this waste of time! (Get it, waste of TIME).

-------------
The "Networking IT" Movie Buff!

Words to live by:
"Money doesn't make you happy. I now have $50 million but I was just as happy when I had $48 million." - Arnold Schwarzenegger


Posted By: #1-Movie-Fan!
Date Posted: July 18 2007 at 6:23pm

WOW! Just saw this on DVD -- What an idiotic, irritating, pointless movie! It was often convoluted in ways that actually seemed hostile to the audience -- And when all was said and done, it wasn't even as satisfying as an old "Twilight Zone" episode...At least those were only 30 minutes long, not 90+ !!!

 



Posted By: jb razz
Date Posted: August 02 2007 at 2:25am
I just saw this movie. It wasn't awful, but there are many things I didn't like about it, which I don't feel like discussing right now. However, I will say, Sandra Bullock was not Razzie worthy! She was the best part of the film.


Posted By: dipitlow555
Date Posted: August 02 2007 at 6:14am
This movie was one big headache, with deja vu and "RAZZIE" written all over it... 

-------------


Posted By: Criss808
Date Posted: August 13 2007 at 4:50am

I think Sandra Bullock is a terrible actress. The only two movies I've ever liked her in was "Crash" and "Infamous". Other than that, I think she's very UNfunny, and remindes me alot of Fran Drescher from "The Nanny".



-------------


Posted By: SchumacherH8ter
Date Posted: September 06 2007 at 11:47am
Originally posted by Criss808

I think Sandra Bullock is a terrible actress. The only two movies I've ever liked her in was "Crash" and "Infamous". Other than that, I think she's very UNfunny, and remindes me alot of Fran Drescher from "The Nanny".

                                                                                             I agree, except for "Infamous". I saw this with my mom, a big Bullock fan, and she hated!

-------------
I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
https://twitter.com/Scott_DAgostino
Upcoming reviews: http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic7513.html
Up-next: Winter's Tale


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: November 03 2007 at 3:17pm

Ok, I finally saw this film and I actually liked it a lot more than I thought it would. I thought it would've been an average thriller but it was more than that! It made you think! Still, there are some minor holes (like the inconsistent scars) but overall, it was actually really good. And I heard people didn't like this movie because of the ending...

WELL SPOILERS!!!

well...why do people complain of the hollywood happy sappy ending? If they always complain each movie ends happily, and Premonition did not, then why are people complaining now, They all say "it was all for nothing". Well, how about Usual Suspects, Night of the Living Dead, and Saw and other movie ending with the bad guys winning over?

Can't you say all those movies were for nothing? I like it because, of course, it wasn't the usual happy ending but because it was happy in the end. She doesn't grieve over her husbands death because she is pregnant (from him). It all fits well.

END SPOILERS

THat's why I liked the movie. And yes, I think audiences like this film while critics did not.



Posted By: Mrs. Magnatech
Date Posted: December 10 2007 at 4:41pm

Dumb movie...but not quite bad enough for the Razzies. 

 



-------------


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: September 30 2012 at 4:17pm
Skip to 05:47.

[TUBE]OGJAd9PGv_A[/TUBE]

Any thoughts?


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile



Print Page | Close Window