Print Page | Close Window

Oh, Go CHUCK Yourself!

Printed From: Official RAZZIE« Forum
Forum Discription: Nominated for 2 RAZZIES« including Worst Actress (Jessica Alba)
Printed Date: October 08 2015 at 11:59pm

Topic: Oh, Go CHUCK Yourself!
Posted By: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: Oh, Go CHUCK Yourself!
Date Posted: September 22 2007 at 3:42am






Fogler: "Hey, pretty lady...Is that chocolate under 

your fingernails, or did you just scratch your butt??"

Ye Olde Head RAZZberry

Posted By: cvcjr13
Date Posted: September 22 2007 at 3:51am

Yeah!  It's in for consideration! 

Now to go see how the filmmakers ruined this good premise.

Posted By: Nasty Man
Date Posted: September 22 2007 at 4:49am

Jessica Alba in a GOOD movie?  Are you kidding??  If it weren't for Mizz Simpson, Alba would "win" the title as the dopiest Jessica in the movies right now!


Everything SUX!

Posted By: Sanndman228715
Date Posted: September 22 2007 at 7:00am
Sin City was a good movie. I wonder if the person (Can't remember who) who was debating me on that ever responded. Hell, I can't even remember which Forum that was in...


Posted By: saturnwatcher
Date Posted: September 24 2007 at 3:43am

I saw this one Saturday, and to call it a dismal mess would qualify as one of the kinder compliments it has received. Rated "R" (with "NC-17" pretentions) the nearly uninterrupted parade of bare female breasts was the closest feature of the film that could be deemed a quality. Alba and Cook looked like they were reading their lines off cue cards, and there was no onscreen chemistry. The flock of penguins featured in a couple of scenes was more interesting than any of the characters.

Daddy Day Camp may have a race on its hands!


Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken

Posted By: Sanndman228715
Date Posted: September 25 2007 at 7:49am
I've often said that stage actors are the most talented actors in the world, due to their skill, consistency, etc.  Indeed, if you look at some Tony winners like Al Pacino, Kevin Spacey, and Jeremy Irons (And some Tony nominees like Philip Seymour Hoffman, Christopher Walken, and Alec Baldwin) there's a lot of weight to that theory. After all some Oscar winners (such as Julia Roberts and Denzel Washington) have not fared as well on stage as on film for whatever reason. All that being said, I wonder why some actors who are lauded for there stage work make some truly ass-trocious choices when it comes to choosing their film roles. We've already discussed the almost masochistic choices of Tony winner Alan Cumming, the strange choices made by multiple time Tony nominee Tim Curry, and sometimes I cringe when looking at the filmography ( Even though he's usually watchable in most of the films he chooses) of multiple time Tony winner Frank Langella. Which brings us to recent Tony winner Dan Fogler, who follows up his Tony award winning performance in "The 25th annual Putnam County Spelling bee" with such gems as Balls of Fury, and Good Luck Chuck. And in the reviews I've read of the latter he seems to be singled out in a none-too complimentary manner. For the love of God, man, we know you can act, don't pull a Cumming on us! (Yeah, I realize how dirty that sounds, so sue me) Ok, I'm done you were, ladies and gentlemen.


Posted By: cvcjr13
Date Posted: September 28 2007 at 6:45pm

I don't understand what the movie critics are complaining about.  Good Luck Chuck was funny.  The first part was not kiddie porn, well, unless one is a worried parent, then I can understand why this scene would bother you.  It plays off one of many parents' nightmares, I'm sure.  The gross parts, including the Hollywood Squares-style parade of unsatisfying (for Chuck), funny (for us) and sometimes weird (for everyone) one night stands (ah-ah-ah, I saw at least one repeat in that sequence)--I stopped counting the times I laughed past two dozen, and the rest of the audience laughed even more.  It was a terrific, sophomoric, slapstick, gross-out movie with a sensitive protagonist.

For the first hour.

And this is where I feel the reviews I've read went wrong.  The reviews should have pointed out how funny and fun this movie was until Chuck decided to go overboard in an effort to keep Cam.  And then become a stalker.  And then withdraw.  I stopped laughing, and the audience around me didn't even laugh a quarter as much.  The last hour of the movie was not only not funny, it was uninspired.  Well, not completely.  The last two minutes of the movie was beautiful (I'm talking about the ending, not pretending-to-be-gross footage over the end credits, of course), and choosing Jodelle Ferland of Silent Hill to play the daughter of the now grown-up witch (it wasn't Goth, peoples) put a smile on my face.  But those moments were few and far between.  The last half of the movie sucked, which makes the first half of the movie wasted, which left me wondering, what happened?

It felt almost like the true genius of the screenplay up and left halfway through the rewrite, and left the second half plain, bare-boned and deflated.  If that or anything like it was what happened to this movie, a movie with a great premise that should have been wonderfully funny all the way through (gross or otherwise), that's a shame.

So, they took a great premise, produced half a funny movie, and then winged the rest.  I left broken-hearted.

I would have given it a 7 out of 10 if it had kept it up all the way through.  Because it pooped out halfway through, it doesn't even get half.  3 out of 10, and it's certainly in Razzie contention for the year.

Dane Cook and all the women he laid for Worst Screen Couple (or even better, Dane Cook and his penguin suit -- which Nicholas Cage would have looked good in!).  Dane Cook for Worst Actor.  Jessica Alba for Worst Actress (although honestly, she gave a far better performance in this movie than she did in either of the Fantastic Four movies).  Dan Fogler, Worst Supporting actor, and Lonnie Ross, too, as Cam's brother.  Mark Helfrich as Worst Director, and Josh Stolberg and Steve Glenn for Worst Screenplay.  I see Glenn wrote the short story on which this movie was based.  It would be interesting to see where the story stopped and the movie continued.  And, let's not forget, Good Luck Chuck for Worst Picture! 


Posted By: bruin_522
Date Posted: October 02 2007 at 12:40pm

Ok, Avoid Any Movie with CHUCK (as in "Barf") in Its Title...Well, Head RAZZ, that was difficult for audiences earlier in the year when I NOW PRONOUNCE YOU CHUCK AND LARRY came out. But the difference is that audiences would apparently rather go see a comedy with Adam Sandler in it.

Response from Head RAZZberry: The "CHUCK" referrence was meant for both this film and CHUCK & LARRY, two of the year's least funny "comedies"...


Posted By: Criss808
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 4:01am

FYC - "Good Luck Chuck"
Worst Picture

Worst Director

Worst Actor - Dan Cooke

Worst Actress - Jessica Alba

Worst Screen Couple - Cooke & Alba

Worst Screenplay

Posted By: SlammyFewFew
Date Posted: October 20 2007 at 12:16pm

Horrible film!

The best friend of Dane Cook was the most horrible performance that really comes to mind, but this is definitely a Worst Picture contender! 



Posted By: PlanB
Date Posted: January 15 2008 at 10:50am
I believe it IS possible for Jessice Alba to be in a good film.  Sin City was good, but it could hardly be described as "a Jessica Alba movie".  She was just one of MANY names in the movie, her part was relatively small, and it was never really her job to carry the film.

I also enjoyed the Fantastic Four films (more from being a Fantastic Four fan in general), and while they weren't all THAT great, I don't think that Jessica Alba could be singled out as THE thing that was wrong with them.  The real stars of the movies were special effects, and it really didn't matter WHO the actors were.

However, I don't like her outside of large ensemble casts, when she does have to be relied upon to carry a movie, particularly when she's paired up with other terrible actors, such as Dane Cook (who , from what I saw, just played Dane Cook) and Hayden Christiansen. 

Hmmmm, IMDB says she was in 5 movies last year.  I wonder if it's possible for her to be the ONLY nominee in the worst actress category....

Posted By: yotypeocom
Date Posted: January 17 2008 at 2:30am

I think Good Luck Chuck needs urgently to be nominated for Worst Picture in the 27th annual Razzies, along with I Know Who Killed Me.

To be honest I laughed at some parts of Chuck, but it was lame, cliched to the upmost, bad editing, bad timing, it looked reshot and I honestly have seen 50,000 different posters and logos, which always tells me there is some disaster and not even the ones doing it BELIEVE IN IT!

Posted By: SchumacherH8ter
Date Posted: January 19 2008 at 2:32pm
I agree with cvcjr13, it was funny for the first hour than became mega unfunny afterwards. The end credits pushed the film into "shovel in the face" bad, instead of the "needle in finger" bad i would have given it if the end credits weren't included.

I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
Upcoming reviews:

Posted By: cvcjr13
Date Posted: January 20 2008 at 8:03am

I agree with your description of the end credits.  After a terrible second half, the ending was (finally) okay, and then the movie sank into the depths of the celluloid septic tank with the scene showed over the end credits.  My brain hurts just thinking about it!


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: January 21 2008 at 11:17am
Ok, the movie was funny at some parts. Not only at the first hour but including the last 30 minutes. What I did not like was that the film was gross (I watched the unrated version), disgusting, and just plain ugh...HOWEVER, I do agree that one bad part in the film was when Charlie wanted to get Cam's attention. He acted like we wouldn't root for to get the girl. However, he can also turn good, which made me confused. Is he sweet or creepy? I liked the ending scene but it was either a hit or miss. 5/10

Posted By: icegirl
Date Posted: January 31 2008 at 8:51am
Ok, here we have it... another bad taste humor in a movie, that wants to be funny, but it makes you wanna jump from the empire state building!!And I really thought Jessica Alba could be a good actress! I mean I know her from the Dark Angel period and she was quite good! What the hell is wrong with her!

Posted By: sportsartist24
Date Posted: October 11 2008 at 1:38pm

I've seen this film and thought that it was pretty dumb as well. However, the scene I liked was where Cam's (Jessica Alba) skirt got caught in the car door and ripped off leaving her in her underwear.

Jessica Alba

Honestly, I thought that was the best scene overall.

The Mormons were'nt really popular in the beginning, they're now becoming more popular, even in Hollywood.

Posted By: SchumacherH8ter
Date Posted: October 12 2008 at 3:14am
We all liked that scene.

I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
Upcoming reviews:

Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: October 12 2008 at 1:58pm

It was the only "good" scene in the whole ... trailer. 

"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)

Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: May 08 2010 at 3:46pm
I only laughed at half of the slapstick jokes. The other half were just shockingly unfunny.  

This was a classic example of a movie that's great on paper, but not as the final product. Even Dane Cook does good 'cuz I believed him as a guy who enjoys a lot of sex, but doesn't know how to be with women he cares about. Despite that,and the fact he moves and talks the way his character should, he's just not funny. Maybe he should dedicate to bein' the funny sidekick...specially since Dan Fogler is like Jonah Hill,when Hill approaches the line between amusingly annoying and just annoying -- except Fogler crosses the line. 

Jessica Alba is just a little below average. However,considering how many "not good" performances of hers I see each year, she deserved her Razzie nomination. 

There was a lot of debate about whether the beginning scene was child porn -- It wasn't, but I can understand why someone might think that. They should've moved that scene to later in the film, 'cuz by having it at the beginning, it was more likely for audiences to give up on the movie early. 

Despite not being as predictable as one expects a rom-com to be (and it was still a little predictable), along with the other good things I mentioned, I'd give this movie 3/10.

You can follow me - @Vits_Chile

Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: May 08 2010 at 7:36pm
It stars Dane Cook and Jessica Alba ... how does that look good on paper?!

The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.

Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: May 09 2010 at 1:38pm
I meant that the script seemed appealing.

You can follow me - @Vits_Chile

Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: May 09 2010 at 2:46pm
Appealing idea, maybe, but not great when in the hands of the talentless hacks who made this movie.

The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.

Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: May 09 2010 at 8:37pm
On my Bottom 40 Films of 2007, I put this at #7.


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: May 10 2010 at 11:50am
Okay, so what was your 2007 list like?  

Originally posted by GTAHater767

On my Bottom 40 Films of 2007, I put this at #7.

The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.

Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: May 13 2010 at 6:38pm
#40: Firehouse Dog 
#39: Perfect Stranger 
#38: The Comebacks 
#37: I Think I Love My Wife 
#36: Mr. Woodcock 
#35: The Game Plan 
*#34: Love in the Time of Cholera 
#33: Georgia Rule 
#32: The Brothers Solomon 
#31: Blood & Chocolate 
#30: Wild Hogs 
#29: TMNT 
#28: Alvin & The Chipmunks 
#27: Happily N'Ever After 
#26: The Messengers 
#25: Premonition 
#24: License to Wed 
#23: Saw IV 
#22: Hannibal Rising 
#21: Are We Done Yet? 
#20: Alien vs. Predator: Requiem 
#19: Ghost Rider 
#18: Awake 
#17: Fantastic 4: Rise of the Silver Surfer 
#16: Next 
#15: The Number 23 
#14: Hostel Part II 
#13: Because I Said So 
#12: September Dawn 
#11: Captivity 
#10: Who's Your Caddy? 
#9: Evan Almighty 
#8: Epic Movie 
#7: Good Luck Chuck 
#6: Code Name: The Cleaner 
#5: I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry 
#4: Bratz: The Movie 
#3: Daddy Day Camp 
#2: Norbit 
#1: I Know Who Killed Me 

*Cholera used to have a forum here, but it was removed. Does anyone know why?


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: May 15 2010 at 3:36pm
I see. And Razzies winners in all the top spots, where they belong.

The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.

Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: November 03 2010 at 2:54pm
The first 5 are in fact the ones that were nominated.

You can follow me - @Vits_Chile

Print Page | Close Window