Print Page | Close Window

DISASTER Indeed!!

Printed From: Official RAZZIE® Forum
Category: FORUMS on 29th ANNUAL RAZZIE® NOMINEES
Forum Name: DISASTER MOVIE
Forum Discription: Nominated for 6 RAZZIES® including WORST PICTURE
URL: http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2619
Printed Date: October 23 2014 at 1:55pm


Topic: DISASTER Indeed!!
Posted By: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: DISASTER Indeed!!
Date Posted: March 25 2008 at 7:15am

WHEN POSTING the FIRST ITEM for ANY RAZZIE® FORUM, WE LIKE to PICK a FONT COLOR APROPOS of the MOVIE BEING DISCUSSED...CAN YOU GUESS WHAT WE WERE THINKING of WHEN WE PICKED THIS COLOR?!?! 

LIKE a RASH on the ALREADY OVERLY-PIMPLED BUTT of HOLLYWOOD, EVERY 3 MONTHS OR SO COMES ANOTHER UN-FUNNY, IN-DEFENSIBLE EX-ECRABLE "MOVIE" from http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0783536/ - the TEAM http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0294997/ - WHO SPAWNED http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1592&PN=1 - DATE MOVIE , http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1648&PN=1 - EPIC MOVIE http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2397&PN=1 - MEET THE SPARTANS ...AD NAUSEUM.

IF the RAZZIES® ACHIEVE NOTHING ELSE in 2008, WE NEED to LET THE INDUSTRY KNOW -- WE'VE HAD ENOUGH of THIS CRAP!!

FEEL FREE to VENT YER SPLEENS BELOW ...NOTHING YOU COULD SAY or POST COULD POSSIBLY BE AS OBNOXIOUS AS WHAT THESE GIZE KEEP DUMPING ON OUR HEADS SEASON-AFTER SEASON, YEAR-AFTER-YEAR...

PRINCESS:  "JUNO, I don't think this one's any likelier to be ENCHANTED than that horrible EPIC MOVIE..."

BLACK GUY: "I'd like to know how these guys keep getting funding, in other words...WHO'S THEIR SUGAR DADDY?!?!?!"



-------------
Ye Olde Head RAZZberry



Replies:
Posted By: Budgieboy
Date Posted: April 02 2008 at 7:14pm
Yes, it's true, my fellow RAZZers: Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer are at it again. This time parodying one of last year's funniest films, Superbad (as well as such newer releases as The Love Guru and Hancock). Here's a LINK to the item "annoucning" http://www.worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=8117&count=0 - Disaster Movie ...



-------------
A friend in need is a bloody nuisence


Posted By: Movie Man
Date Posted: April 03 2008 at 2:50am

Look on the bright side: At least it doesn't have the word "Movie" in its title...oh, wait -- IT DOES! 

More info regarding the film here:

http://www.joblo.com/more-from-spartans-duo - http://www.joblo.com/more-from-spartans-duo

Maybe we should add them to the list for "Worst Career Achievment Award" nominees next year (with Sly and Uwe)??

 



-------------


Posted By: SchumacherH8ter
Date Posted: April 03 2008 at 6:40am
You know, Schumacher might not be so bad after all...

-------------
I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
https://twitter.com/Scott_DAgostino
Upcoming reviews: http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic7513.html


Posted By: Berrynoia
Date Posted: April 03 2008 at 1:57pm

How is it that Aaron & Jason movies still rake in the dough, while Superhero Movie did poorly at the box office?  Superhero Movie is not nearly as bad or as dumb as Date/Epic Movies or Meet the Spartans (though it's still crap). I guess the dumbest of the dumb get the $$$...



-------------


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: April 04 2008 at 7:40am

I actually liked Date and Epic Movie better than Superhero Movie. Maybe that's just me...I have my reasons. I tend to laugh more at random jokes than fart jokes, physical comedy, toilet humor, etc....but I'm not looking forward to seeing this.

 



-------------


Posted By: SchumacherH8ter
Date Posted: April 29 2008 at 1:27pm

With "Disaster Movie" getting a 2008 summer release, and "Meet the Spartan" having already come out, these guys'll be eligible for TWO films this year. Uwe may have  some competition!

Here's an excerpt from their Wikipedia page: "Jason Friedberg,STOP making movies. They're horrible, and you're a terrible writer."



-------------
I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
https://twitter.com/Scott_DAgostino
Upcoming reviews: http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic7513.html


Posted By: wetbandit82
Date Posted: May 01 2008 at 1:27pm
If they get 2 in this year, the Department of Homeland Security would have ample cause, as far as I can see, to have them booked for un-American activities.  By treating their audiences with such open contempt, that's just what they're really guilty of.  OK, maybe I'm overstating myself a tad, but lately the two of them have done more to kill American comedy since Tom Green ran around unregulated. And that, if nothing else, necessitates their being reined in somehow!   

-------------


Posted By: thomsonmg2000
Date Posted: May 17 2008 at 2:52pm
Apparently, there's going to be a character named McLover in the film, according the IMDB.

I'm just appalled


Posted By: cvcjr13
Date Posted: May 17 2008 at 11:50pm
Seltzer and Friedberg parodying Superbad?  Amazing!  Why would they beg the comparison?  Superbad is funny...Seltzer and Friedberg are not.

-------------


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: June 03 2008 at 9:31am
Ok, I'm a little interested right now, because its spoofing disaster movies and I love disaster movies but we all know they'll also be spoofing many other things not dealing with disasters...there's a poster here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disaster_Movie - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disaster_Movie


Posted By: Movie Man
Date Posted: June 15 2008 at 8:18am
Here are LINKS to view the first three posters for Disaster Movie:
Poster #1 - http://www.impawards.com/2008/disaster_movie.html - http://www.impawards.com/2008/disaster_movie.html
Poster #2 - http://www.impawards.com/2008/disaster_movie_ver2.html - http://www.impawards.com/2008/disaster_movie_ver2.html
Poster #3 - http://www.impawards.com/2008/disaster_movie_ver3.html - http://www.impawards.com/2008/disaster_movie_ver3.html


-------------


Posted By: wetbandit82
Date Posted: June 18 2008 at 1:53pm

Yep, the title "Disaster Movie" should sum up everything about it you'd need to know...  



-------------


Posted By: Movie Man
Date Posted: June 23 2008 at 9:05am
I think we have a potential Razzie winner right here!

http://www.joblo.com/disaster-movie-trailer


Posted By: thomsonmg2000
Date Posted: June 23 2008 at 12:32pm

Apparently, there's so much hate for this movie that there's a contest on a website, http://www.disastermovie.org - http://www.disastermovie.org , to see who can correctly predict all the dumb jokes that will appear in the movie.

I really hope disaster movie doesn't go to #1, but audiences keep on falling for these movies... 

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Based on these film-makers' track records, I'd say it's likelier DISASTER MOVIE will be ranked as #2...in every sense!  



-------------
Seltzerberg is back?

OH MY GOOOOOOOOOOD!!!!!!!

http://www.disastermovie.org
http://www.vampiressuck.org/


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: June 23 2008 at 2:25pm
I laughed at two things in the trailer: The Sex and the City and the Enchanted scenes...   

-------------


Posted By: cvcjr13
Date Posted: June 23 2008 at 5:40pm

The Sex and the City (and I do believe White Chicks) spoof only made me laugh when they threw in Juno and Zohan spoofs on top of 'em.  Otherwise, every joke was lame, lame, lame! 

If the trailer is any indication, it will definitely be worse than Epic Movie, as impossible as that may sound.



-------------


Posted By: Berrynoia
Date Posted: June 24 2008 at 10:31am

Originally posted by thomsonmg2000

Apparently, there's so much hate for this movie that there's a contest on the internet on who could predict the jokes that will be in Disaster Movie. The website: disastermovie.org. 

I really hope disaster movie doesn't go number 1, but audiences keep on falling for these movies.

They didn't fall for Superhero Movie.  From Wikipedia:

On its opening weekend, the film grossed $9,510,297 in 2,960 theaters averaging to about $3,212 per venue and ranked #3 at the box office. As of June 19th it has grossed $25,787,144 in North America, and $29,298,186 overseas for a total of $55,085,330 worldwide.

Date and Epic Movie and Meet the Spartans debuted higher and performed better (though they dropped off shortly afterwards).

If Disaster Movie performs well, it means that we have a bunch of morons loyal to Aaron and Jason (Superhero Movie had Scary Movie people in it but not those dir eck! tors).  If it does poorly, then it likely means that the audiences have had enough of these stoopid spoofs and are ready to use them as human shields in Iraq.

I also noticed that many of the movies being spoofed are themselves crap!

Armageddon (I personally liked this movie, but it did get Razzie nods)
Poseidon (which received a Worst Remake nod, poor box office $)
Speed Racer ("Skittle barfling" colors, box office bomb, based off corny Japanese show)
You Don't Mess with the Zohan (with Adam Sandler, Rob Schneider)
The Love Guru (Mike Myers worse than Sandler's Zohan, but still not on forums)
The Happening (M. Night Shymalan's latest turd)
Never Back Down (a ripoff of fight movies like Karate Kid)



-------------


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: June 24 2008 at 11:36am
Well, it's sad their movies make money while Superhero Movie, made by the ZAZ team, who made Naked Gun and Airplane, bombed. Life isn't fair...


Posted By: SchumacherH8ter
Date Posted: June 25 2008 at 8:12am
Words fail me. This might actually be worse than "Batman & Robin"! If that, god forbid, happens then I'm changing my Razzie Forum name to "SeltzerbergSlasher."

-------------
I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
https://twitter.com/Scott_DAgostino
Upcoming reviews: http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic7513.html


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: June 25 2008 at 12:08pm

You should watch this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XgS834GUbI - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XgS834GUbI



Posted By: SchumacherH8ter
Date Posted: June 25 2008 at 2:22pm

Here's the Wikepedia page for Disaster Movie, with a list of all the movie "parodies" from this pile elephant  And, from the looks of this (and the fact that Tiffany "New York" Pollard is in it) SeltzerTurd may make Joel Schuer look like Stanley Kubrick!

 



-------------
I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
https://twitter.com/Scott_DAgostino
Upcoming reviews: http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic7513.html


Posted By: movieman
Date Posted: June 27 2008 at 3:55pm

Like Head RAZZberry said with Witless Protection the title to this one is a "self-fullfilling prophecy!" 

 



-------------


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: July 01 2008 at 1:10pm
I'm confused: Based on the title, is this movie a parody of movies that tank and bomb..or is the title just warning people in advance not to see it?

-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: SchumacherH8ter
Date Posted: July 05 2008 at 11:05am

Here's a poster for this from the Internet:

 disaster-movie-poster-final.jpg1.) Why is Amy Winehouse holding a baby? She's not a mother. It would make more sense if they made fun of that video of Amy playing with mice and showed her holding one of those chipmunks in the lower right hand corner. 2.) The guy who's playing Hancock is white. 3.) Is Carmen Electra supposed to "parody" "Wanted"? 4.) Why is Indiana Jones a midget? Is this supposed to be a "parody" of "Date Movie" where they had Hitch as a midget. And 5.) and most important; the only reference to an actual disaster movie is a cow spinning around a twister, a la "Twister".



-------------
I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
https://twitter.com/Scott_DAgostino
Upcoming reviews: http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic7513.html


Posted By: SchumacherH8ter
Date Posted: July 05 2008 at 12:51pm
I don't get why Sarah Jessica Parker is portrayed by a man in the trailer. Sure, she is butting-ugly, but I'd never mistake for a man. She has a nice body. Why not make her look like the Wicked Witch Of The West.

-------------
I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
https://twitter.com/Scott_DAgostino
Upcoming reviews: http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic7513.html


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: July 05 2008 at 5:47pm
Dear lord, I hope this movie bombs so badly it doesn't even make the top 20 Box Office. If these writers joined forces with Uwe Boll, it could be the end of the world!  

-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: movieman
Date Posted: July 09 2008 at 3:23am
I'm right there with MIchaels; I think it's time they stopped making these
spoof movies, they had a good run with the Scary Movie series, but I haven't
seen a movie after them that has actually been funny.


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: July 09 2008 at 12:39pm

Suggested new category for 2008: "Worst Movie Movie." If this one doesn't "win" it, maybe we could just give it to the whole series.

Seriously, these movies tell the same three jokes (usually pop culture related, ie Britney, MTV or E!, American Idol, etc.) over-and-over. Taking every major summer movie from a year and adding piss-poor jokes to them a funny movie does not make!

 



-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: thomsonmg2000
Date Posted: July 31 2008 at 10:45am
Scary Movie series still has some potential, as long as they limit their spoof target and don't go too overboard with pop culture. Also, it wouldn't hurt to throw in some gratuitous blood and gore, being how many scary movies are incredibly violent.

Seltzerberg's series, however, is in a vegetative state. No way the series can recover from such crappiness.

And another reason to get angry at Disaster Movie: The late Heath Ledger, according to IMDB, is supposedly gonna get spoofed!


-------------
Seltzerberg is back?

OH MY GOOOOOOOOOOD!!!!!!!

http://www.disastermovie.org
http://www.vampiressuck.org/


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: August 01 2008 at 1:47am
Well, they made fun of Anna Nicole Smith in Meet The Spartans, where I stated they had gone too far to make people "laugh." It was horrible...

-------------


Posted By: movieman
Date Posted: August 02 2008 at 8:29am

I know what you mean! These people should be legally banned from ever going near a camera again!!

Originally posted by thomsonmg2000

Scary Movie series still has some potential, as long as they limit their spoof target and don't go too overboard with pop culture. Also, it wouldn't hurt to throw in some gratuitous blood and gore, being how many scary movies are incredibly violent.Seltzerberg's series, however, is in a vegetative state. No way the series can recover from such crappiness.And another reason to get angry at Disaster Movie: The late Heath Ledger, according to IMDB, is supposedly gonna get spoofed!




-------------


Posted By: SchumacherH8ter
Date Posted: August 04 2008 at 5:39pm

Originally posted by thomsonmg2000

And another reason to get angry at Disaster Movie: The late Heath Ledger, according to IMDB, is supposedly gonna get spoofed!
 

If they do spoof him, I hope they like the heat, because they're gonna roast!



-------------
I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
https://twitter.com/Scott_DAgostino
Upcoming reviews: http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic7513.html


Posted By: SchumacherH8ter
Date Posted: August 05 2008 at 4:04am

The budget for this looks smaller than then their other movies. Look at this:  

It looks like a cardboard cut-out. Are these guys even trying anymore?



-------------
I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
https://twitter.com/Scott_DAgostino
Upcoming reviews: http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic7513.html


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: August 05 2008 at 3:05pm

This is already a movie that looks so stupid that it's beyond intelligence-insulting. But spoofing Ledger after his death (and after giving a performance none of the people in this movie will ever be able to equal) is just a whole other level of bad taste.

What's so funny about "Ironman" getting crushed by a cow anyway? They aren't even trying. I hope this bombs so badly it makes "Meet Dave" and "Love Guru" look like they made money...

 



-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: Berrynoia
Date Posted: August 06 2008 at 9:58am
Originally posted by Michaels

But spoofing Ledger after his death (and after giving a performance none of the people in this movie will ever be able to equal) is just a whole other level of bad taste.

So what if Amy Winehouse (whose body is said to be 100% pure crack) dies before the film comes out?

Also, that can't be a whole 'nother level of bad taste.  The movie itself did that!



-------------


Posted By: moat
Date Posted: August 06 2008 at 7:46pm
It's almost as if it's a test to see just how lazily made a film can be and still have audiences cough up enough cash to turn it into a "hit." Given how recent the subjects of the parodies are, this thing would have to have been written and filmed in weeks. The complete lack of effort on display is just......it leaves me stunned.

It's not that a film is this lazily made, but it's that a product like this would be marketed to this extent--as if it has any worth. And the truly scary prospect is the possibility of a big audience turn-out.


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: August 07 2008 at 1:30am

Originally posted by moat

It's almost as if it's a test to see just how lazily made a film can be and still have audiences cough up enough cash to turn it into a "hit." Given how recent the subjects of the parodies are, this thing would have to have been written and filmed in weeks. The complete lack of effort on display is just......it leaves me stunned.

It's not that a film is this lazily made, but it's that a product like this would be marketed to this extent--as if it has any worth. And the truly scary prospect is the possibility of a big audience turn-out.

What this movie is all about is take a bunch of successful movies from the past or current year, have them all be mentioned (not in a funny way, just mentioned or an appearance be made) and see if audiences will flock to see all their favorite characters in a movie together. Let's see, "Meet Dave" made an opening of $5 million, "Swing Vote" had an opening of $6 million. I'm hoping this movie's opening day is in the $4 range. Not million, just $4.



Posted By: thomsonmg2000
Date Posted: August 09 2008 at 10:41am
Originally posted by moviewizguy

You should watch this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XgS834GUbI - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XgS834GUbI



Unfortunately, that video is now private

Enlightenment has been suppressed

-------------
Seltzerberg is back?

OH MY GOOOOOOOOOOD!!!!!!!

http://www.disastermovie.org
http://www.vampiressuck.org/


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: August 11 2008 at 2:47pm

The makers of this movie should watch "Tropic Thunder" to get an idea of what a real spoof movie is like. "TT" actually spoofs Hollywood sterotypes in a funny way, instead of just having random mentions of popular movies.

Case in point: the sterotypes. You have Ben Stiller's character, a knock-off of Sly or Ar-nold. He's an action movie star who had success for a while, but then hasn't had a hit movies for almost a decade. Then there's Jack Black who is like Eddie Murphy mixed with Chris Farley. A comedic actor with little acting talent who has become famous for movies in which he is loud, farts alot and plays every role in the movies by wearing tons of make-up, oh and he has a drug problem. Then there's Robert Downey Jr's method actor, who can't get out of character even when they aren't filming, period. As he says in the movie "I don't break character until after I've done the DVD commentary". There's also the rookie teen actor who is just excited to be in the movies and is aiming for a Teen Choice Award, and the spoof of Sean Combs with a rapper turn actor sterotype in a character named Alpa Chino (yes, Al Pacino). Then of course you have characters like the studio's yes-man producer, the stressed hack director, and the screenwriter whose book about his personal war story is what the movie is adapted from, but he's not happy how Hollywood is raping his story.

See, that's funny to me because for the most part, it's all true of what Hollywood has become. "Disaster Movies" is just a string of bad cameros. What's so funny about that?



Posted By: thomsonmg2000
Date Posted: August 12 2008 at 11:50am
I hope Tropic Thunder would still be strong at the box office when this crap comes out, so it can kick this movie's a$$ and help end Seltzerberg's blight on film by not being #1 .

-------------
Seltzerberg is back?

OH MY GOOOOOOOOOOD!!!!!!!

http://www.disastermovie.org
http://www.vampiressuck.org/


Posted By: Headbanger14
Date Posted: August 14 2008 at 5:05am

I'm actually shocked that Tropic Thunder did well. When I first saw the Trailer, I thought it would sufer the same fate that "Strange Wilderness" did -- but it actually turned out to be a pretty funny movie.

THIS movie on the other hand (and all the other movies made by Friedberg and Seltzer) is complete crap, and needs to rot in hell with all the other horrible movies of history...with the exception of Ed Wood's movies, because they were so bad they're actually funnier than this. 

Originally posted by thomsonmg2000

I hope Tropic Thunder would still be strong at the box office when this crap comes out, so it can kick this movie's a$$ and help end Seltzerberg's blight on film by not being #1 .



-------------


Posted By: cvcjr13
Date Posted: August 19 2008 at 2:41pm
Isn't it amazing that this movie already has this many posts on its Razzie thread...and it hasn't even come out yet?

-------------


Posted By: thomsonmg2000
Date Posted: August 20 2008 at 8:05am
You should check the amount of negative threads on the IMDB page for this movie

-------------
Seltzerberg is back?

OH MY GOOOOOOOOOOD!!!!!!!

http://www.disastermovie.org
http://www.vampiressuck.org/


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: August 24 2008 at 12:37pm

If this movie ends up any where near #1 on the Box Office charts, I will lose all faith in the human race. I have seen the trailers, and I found NOTHING funny about them.

Examples: The Hulk yells until his pants fly off -- Z-z-z-z-z-z.

A Sarah Jessica Parker look-a-like (played by a man no less, which is the only remotely funny thing the movie seems to offer) fights a Juno look-a-like who does a Zohan foot uppercut and Juno's unborn baby somehow kicks SJP in the face as well....Yawn!

The caveman from "10,000 BC" encounters Amy Winehouse (who apparently is part sabertooth tiger) and she growls in his face -- WTF?!

A midget Indiana Jones swings on his whip and flies right through a closed window. Yeah, that was funny ... 50 years ago.

People better be smoking that pineapple express pot if they're going to find humor in any of this -- Even the plot makes no sense. A bunch of twenty-somethings are running away from natural disasters and they somehow encounter all these pop culture icons along the way?  

Yeah, probably makes a lot more sense if you're high.



-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: HeadRAZZBerry
Date Posted: August 24 2008 at 1:11pm

Originally posted by Michaels

Probably makes a lot more sense if you're high.

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Or seriously Humor Impaired, like this film's makers... 



-------------
Ye Olde Head RAZZberry


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: August 27 2008 at 4:03am

There are a ton of new movies coming out this week: "Hamlet 2, "Babble-On ADD," "College." I don't care which of them gets #1 (or if "Tropic Thunder" stays at #1) -- so long as this festering turd doesn't get anywhere near the top of the list. It's a disgrace to filmmaking!

I'm only surprised Uwe Boll didn't direct it!!



-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: kursewerd
Date Posted: August 27 2008 at 5:06am

I hope I can post this in here, but...

Make sure you guys check out the third episode of "From 2 of the 6 Writers..." our comedy shorts mocking Seltzer, Friedberg, and their movies.  Just in time for "Disaster Movie".  Whether you're a fan or a hater (we're obviously hardcore haters) you can still get enjoyment out of the video, so make sure you check it out, subscribe, and spread the word.  Also, you can check out the first 2 videos we did, which mocked "Date Movie/Epic Movie" and "Meet The Spartans".

Helpus get these big enough that Seltzer/Friedberg can watch themselves get spoofed.  Hope you guys enjoy! (Just in case, I want to reiterate that this is NOT actually them, and these are mock interviews).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuPN6t3m8n8 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuPN6t3m8n8  

 



-------------


Posted By: thomsonmg2000
Date Posted: August 27 2008 at 8:06am
There's probably going to be another terrible "comedy" coming out the same weekend as this crap: College. Talk about a bad week for movies, with this, College, and Babylon A.D.

BTW Kursewerd, I did post one of your videos on these forums, the first episode mocking Seltzerturd. That didn't help much to increase the view counts though.


-------------
Seltzerberg is back?

OH MY GOOOOOOOOOOD!!!!!!!

http://www.disastermovie.org
http://www.vampiressuck.org/


Posted By: kursewerd
Date Posted: August 27 2008 at 10:28am

Oh, thanks for posting it up!  I recalled one was posted here, I didn't know it was you though so thank you.  

Originally posted by thomsonmg2000

BTW Kursewerd, I did post one of your videos on these forums, the first episode mocking Seltzerturd. That didn't help much to increase the view counts though.



-------------


Posted By: saturnwatcher
Date Posted: August 27 2008 at 11:35pm
My attentions this week have been fully consumed with the activities going on here in Denver, where we are working diligently to rebuild the hopes for the future of America. For one moment I turn my attention back to the outside world, and what is coming to a theater near me? Disaster (of a) Movie?  Make it go away!!!!!!!

-------------
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: August 28 2008 at 1:22pm

I have seen on YouTube there are people who are not only boycotting this movie, they are going to help people find links to sites where they can pirate it.

Whatever it takes to make sure this movie bombs, and it will be the last of its kind!! 



-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: thomsonmg2000
Date Posted: August 29 2008 at 8:43am

This movie better "win" some Razzies! Hell, let's give all of the "awards" this year to Seltzerberg, for their double blight on comedy; it would bring more attention to these rather unknown writers (no video interviews, no birthdate or bio?).

Uwe Boll should just get the Worst Career Achievement Award. 



-------------
Seltzerberg is back?

OH MY GOOOOOOOOOOD!!!!!!!

http://www.disastermovie.org
http://www.vampiressuck.org/


Posted By: dEd Grimley
Date Posted: August 30 2008 at 1:10am
I was hoping that people would be complaining about this movie AFTER it's release, but it looks like everyone's got their beef out already. Did it look to anyone else in the commercials that they were using some sort of inferior film stock in addition to this movie looking 100% horrible?


Posted By: RoadDogXVIII
Date Posted: August 30 2008 at 2:44am
It's typical, because this is the time of month for sh*tty films to be released.

By the way, is it really true that they lampooned Heath Ledger in this film. And Anna Nicole Smith in Meet the Spartans? If I did that, I'd get the f**kin' electric chair in a snap.

By the way, here's an interesting tidbit about how Amy Winehouse is portrayed, according to a review: "...a bad Amy Winehouse impersonator who brags about being out of rehab while drinking gasoline (see, exploiting someone’s serious personal problems is funny)..."

I'd like to mention that the person who's impersonating Winehouse is none other than Nicole Parker, one of the more talented members on the now-execrable MADtv (I'm spending better time elsewhere at 11:00 P.M.). Shame how the show that spawned funny folk like Alex Borstein, Will Sasso, and the like have gone down the sh*tter.


-------------
You think you know, but you have no idea.


Posted By: thomsonmg2000
Date Posted: August 30 2008 at 3:46am
Here's a pretty detailed review of the movie:

http://contest.disastermovie.org/?page_id=182 - http://contest.disastermovie.org/?page_id=182

Sounds painful, even just reading it!


-------------
Seltzerberg is back?

OH MY GOOOOOOOOOOD!!!!!!!

http://www.disastermovie.org
http://www.vampiressuck.org/


Posted By: dEd Grimley
Date Posted: August 30 2008 at 7:33am
Originally posted by RoadDogXVIII


I'd like to mention that the person who's impersonating Winehouse is
none other than Nicole Parker, one of the more talented members on the
now-execrable <span style="font-style: italic;">MADtv</span> (I'm
spending better time elsewhere at 11:00 P.M.). Shame how the show that
spawned funny folk like Alex Borstein, Will Sasso, and the like have
gone down the sh*tter.



I believe Christa Flanagan or whatever her name is who is supposed to be Juno... (Guessing from the commercials now, mind you) is also from MadTV... Josh Meyer has been in some of their other movies as Napolean Dynamite and Owen Wilson... There seems to be a pretty strong tradition of grabbing MadTV cast members in their movies. The writing for "Movie" movies seem to have a bit less talent than the sketch comedy writers on TV, or maybe these movie's might work better as a 5 minute sketch on MadTV.


Posted By: SchumacherH8ter
Date Posted: August 30 2008 at 7:40am
According to BoxOfficeMojo this came in 6th place with just $2 million yesterday. There is a god.

-------------
I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
https://twitter.com/Scott_DAgostino
Upcoming reviews: http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic7513.html


Posted By: movieman
Date Posted: August 30 2008 at 11:15am
Originally posted by SchumacherH8ter

According to BoxOfficeMojo this came in 6th
place with just $2 million yesterday. There is a god.


Which means that it likely won't make more than $6 million this weekend.
Looks like audiences are finally getting smarter about where they throw their
money.

And another thing: why the hell doesn't College have a forum here??
Not that it's down in Disaster Movie league, but man the previews make
it seen like one of those brainless misfires that would be a chainsaw in the
ass just to watch.


Posted By: movieman
Date Posted: August 30 2008 at 11:25am
I just found out that it is already #1 at the bottom 100 on IMDB with a rating
of 1.3; according to their message boards, they are also making another
spoof called Teen Movie. I can only pray to God that that that's not
true.


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: August 30 2008 at 1:44pm
Haha, it's currently #7 on Box Office Mojo, behind "Dark Knight"! Even after a month in theaters, "Dark Knight" is keeping turd movies at bay!


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: August 31 2008 at 5:27am
Thank God! I'm so happy "Tropic Thunder" is still number 1 for the third week in a row! It deserves it!


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: August 31 2008 at 12:58pm

This is a great video I found. It 1. Shows us what Seltzer and Freidberg look like, 2. Explains what a spoof movie is suppose to be, 3. Talks about why bad movies exist in the first place.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65WNUiAe3tU - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65WNUiAe3tU

As I predicted, "DM" is sure to be our front-runner to sweep the awards next year.

 



Posted By: cvcjr13
Date Posted: August 31 2008 at 5:01pm
That was really good, Michaels. 


Posted By: movieman
Date Posted: September 01 2008 at 12:51am
That You Tube video was pretty good.

-------------


Posted By: SchumacherH8ter
Date Posted: September 01 2008 at 12:38pm

The Wikipedia page for "Spy Movie" has vanished. I remember the list of things that they were supposed to parody, they had "Quantom Of Solace", "Bourne Ultimatum" (actual spy movies!), "Live Free Or Die Hard", "Spongebob" (!), "Hannah Montana", "Eagle Eye", "Quarantine", "How To Lose Friends And Alienate People" (a perfect title for a biopic on the two), "W", and Heath Ledger.

Maybe the project got nixed??



-------------
I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
https://twitter.com/Scott_DAgostino
Upcoming reviews: http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic7513.html


Posted By: RoadDogXVIII
Date Posted: September 03 2008 at 3:32pm

Wait, wasn't there already a film like that called Not Another Teen Movie? Even this late in the game, if Teen Movie spoofs that film, it would be irrelevant, since Friedberg/Seltzer do the same schtick of spoofing things that have already been spoofed... 

Originally posted by movieman

I just found out that it is already #1 at the bottom 100 on IMDB with a rating
of 1.3; according to their message boards, they are also making another
spoof called Teen Movie. I can only pray to God that that that's not
true.




-------------
You think you know, but you have no idea.


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: September 04 2008 at 10:53am

It's Wikipedia, which means anyone could have made it, and there's no source to prove it. Maybe they took it down because it's completely false...although, as you can guess, there probably will be another "spoof movie"...

Originally posted by SchumacherH8ter

The Wikipedia page for "Spy Movie" has vanished. I remember the list of things that they were supposed to parody, they had "Quantom Of Solace", "Bourne Ultimatum" (actual spy movies!), "Live Free Or Die Hard", "Spongebob" (!), "Hannah Montana", "Eagle Eye", "Quarantine", "How To Lose Friends And Alienate People" (a perfect title for a biopic on the two), "W", and Heath Ledger.

Maybe the project got nixed??

 



-------------


Posted By: dEd Grimley
Date Posted: September 05 2008 at 8:34am

With FORTY EIGHT Rottens, and ZERO Freshes at Rotten Tomatos, Disaster Movie is worse than Witless Protection, with a meager 23 Rottens... Still 0 Fresh.

I REEEEEEEEEEALLY hope this is the end of an era!!



-------------
-Iron helps us play-


Posted By: thomsonmg2000
Date Posted: September 05 2008 at 8:54am

Not to mention it has a meager 1.3/10 grade on IMDB, making it worse than anything Uwe Boll has done.

I'm now kinda serious when I say this film should win all the Razzies this year. Seltzerberg has gotten off scot free for the past couple of years. Hell, this film better win at least 5 Razzies: Worst Picture, Worst Director, Worst "Screenplay", Worst Actor and Worst Supporting Actress and Worst New Star  / Kim Kardashian...

If not, and Ramblo 4 were to "win", then it gives that Miguel guy and Sly fans the incentive to keep blathering about how the Razzies are biased and stuff... 



-------------
Seltzerberg is back?

OH MY GOOOOOOOOOOD!!!!!!!

http://www.disastermovie.org
http://www.vampiressuck.org/


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 4:19am

There have been many rumors that a new Movie Movie is in the works. "Spy Movie" (already been done with "Spy Hard"), "Teen Movie" (already done in "Not Another Teen Movie"), and even "Sci-Fi Movie" (Mel Brooks did it best in "SpaceBalls"). But I think after this, "Seltzerberg" won't be making anything any time soon.

This movie should sweep the Razzies in everything. Worst Direction (I think all the directing they did was yell "action" and "cut", that's about it), Worst Script (if there even was one, I think everything was made up on the spot), Worst Actor for Matt "The Poor-Man's Hayden Christensen" Lanter, Worst Actress for Kim "The Poor-Man's Paris Hilton" Kardashian (I don't know what's worse, the fact she yawned onscreen, or the fact no one bothered to edit it out), Worst Supporting Actor for Gary "G Thang" Johnson (just having the stagename "G Thang" alone should get you a Razzie), Worst Supporting Actress for Vanessa Minnillo (she should stick to what she does best, being Nick Lachey's rebound girlfriend), Worst Couple for any two or more people who are onscreen together at the same time, and of course Worst Picture.

But "Disaster Movie" shouldn't hog all the awards. Uwe Boll should still get his Lifetime Career Award. That way we are sending a message to Hollywood or whomever is giving these three idiots money to make their "movies", and that message is "STOP IT NOW!"



Posted By: dEd Grimley
Date Posted: September 06 2008 at 5:15am
Ya know, as bad as Uwe Boll movies are, they don't get the hype, nor the money that the douchebag twins make. They deserve a lifetime award long before he does.


Posted By: SchumacherH8ter
Date Posted: September 07 2008 at 4:56am
Originally posted by Michaels

"Spy Movie" (already been done with "Spy Hard")

             It turns out that Seltzerberg worked on "Spy Hard"! So they'd be ripping themselves off.



-------------
I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
https://twitter.com/Scott_DAgostino
Upcoming reviews: http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic7513.html


Posted By: movieman
Date Posted: September 07 2008 at 7:50am
Originally posted by dEd Grimley

With FORTY EIGHT Rottens, and ZERO Freshes at
Rotten Tomatos, Disaster Movie is worse than Witless Protection, with a
meager 23 Rottens... Still 0 Fresh.


I REEEEEEEEEEALLY hope this is the end of an era!!


A substitute for "era" would be "error".


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: September 09 2008 at 9:24am

Read it if you want to because of my rating of the film...or ignore it because of my rating of the film.  

DISASTER MOVIE follows the comic misadventures of a group of
ridiculously attractive twenty-somethings during one fateful night as they try to make their way to safety while every known natural disaster and catastrophic event -- asteroids, twisters, earthquakes, the works -- hits the city and their path as they try to solve a series of mysteries to end the rampant destruction.

Yet another spoof from Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer...but in less than 6 months! This can only mean one thing: They are just trying to make the $$$. True, true, they might also not be trying anymore, seeing how the sets in these films are usually small, and the effects are horrible. But these factors do not deny one fact: The film was actually funny.

Now, like everyone in the world, don't judge me on that. Well, it's funny if you're going to judge me even if you haven't seen the film (more or less likely). But first, if you are one of those people who have CONVINCED yourself that this is the worst movie ever created, stop reading here. Everything else I am  going to say will not change your opinon about this movie, so just stop now. There's no point to my trying to convince you to go see a movie you'll think is the worst movie ever created.

Now, for the few of you who are left (people who are actually interested in seeing this film, or at least willing to give it a chance) let me continue: I hated "Meet the Spartans." I truly hated it. But I did like "Date Movie" and "Epic Movie." This film is considerably better than "Meet the Spartans" but not as good as those other two. But then again, you're thinking what's so different between all of these spoof films, right?

Well, if you haven't figured it out yet, this movie is different for
lots of reasons: Some of the jokes in here are laugh-out-loud
hilarious. If you think that's impossible, well, too bad. I actually
laughed out loud. Maybe you won't. Some of the jokes in here actually contain wit. An example is the very first joke in the film. I will not spoil it for you here, seeing how you're so excited about seeing the film (yes, I am being sarcastic).

Another difference is the jokes that do fall flat aren't that horrible, compared to "Meet the Spartans" and "Epic Movie." With those two films, they could only save themselves from a bad joke if they made a joke funny enough for me to forget the horrible one. Thankfully, there are far fewer rapper jokes (not that I am against those) or other stereotypical black jokes.

But what really made this movie for me are these two Mad TV
cast members: Crista Flanagan and Nicole Parker. As a devoted Mad TV fan, I'm so thankful (and you guys should be, too) that they are actually main characters in this film (or supporting roles, depending on how you look at it). These two light up the screen and make you laugh a lot more. Actually, this movie was like an extended Mad TV episode, seeing how Mad TV cast members also fill up the roles in these recent spoof movies nowadays, which makes the movie, for me, a lot better.

Maybe I'm one of the few who actually support this movie by giving it fair rating. It's not as horrible as people make it out to be, although they probably haven't seen the movie in the first place. It's not fantastic comedic gold either. I just found it a lot better than "Meet the Spartans," which makes me happy. If you're willing to give this movie a chance, give it a rent. If you're unconvinced, then just don't see it.

RATING: 6/10 

 



-------------


Posted By: thomsonmg2000
Date Posted: September 09 2008 at 11:54am
So what exact "jokes" from Disastrous movie contains wit? Let me guess, is it the Anton Chighur joke or midget Indiana Jones getting his whip caught in the fan joke? 

At least 6/10 would not be considered positive on RT, so that's one go thing about your review.


-------------
Seltzerberg is back?

OH MY GOOOOOOOOOOD!!!!!!!

http://www.disastermovie.org
http://www.vampiressuck.org/


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: September 09 2008 at 1:20pm
Funny jokes? I'm sorry, how are product plugs funny? Or the same repeated jokes like objects falling on top of people funny? Or bringing up the topic of Bradangelina for the fourth movie in a row? Or poorly done celebrity impressions? This guy says his review will not change our opinions of this being a crap movie made just for a quick buck. Well, he's right. All he did was waste 2 seconds of my life as I skimmed through his lackluster review (many other critics gave much more detailed reviews of this movie's crappiness). This movie will still sweep the Razzies.


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: September 09 2008 at 2:16pm

Originally posted by Michaels

Funny jokes? I'm sorry, how are product plugs funny? Or the same repeated jokes like objects falling on top of people funny? Or bringing up the topic of Bradangelina for the fourth movie in a row? Or poorly done celebrity impressions? This guy says his review will not change our opinions of this being a crap movie made just for a quick buck. Well, he's right. All he did was waste 2 seconds of my life as I skimmed through his lackluster review (many other critics gave much more detailed reviews of this movie's crappiness). This movie will still sweep the Razzies.

See, I hate people like you. First of all, HALF THE THINGS you have listed WERE NOT EVEN IN THE FREAKING MOVIE. Oh, gee, I guess you haven't seen the freaking movie yet! No wonder I acutally liked it! If the jokes you've listed were in the movie, I would probably NOT like it! Use freaking commen sense you ignorant person. You can't just judge me. I'm probably smarter than you seeing how I have over a 5.3 GPA in school.

And why make a list of jokes I found funny? You would probably not find it funny anyway! I TRIED to make a good review for close-minded people like you, yet I know you guys won't change. That's why I said to STOP READING MY REVIEW. This review was obviously NOT FOR YOU but for OTHER people to read! I'm so sick of this now. I hate people like you. You judge things before you see them. You judge me because I liked this movie.



Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: September 09 2008 at 2:20pm

Originally posted by thomsonmg2000

So what exact "jokes" from Disastrous movie contains wit? Let me guess, is it the Anton Chighur joke or midget Indiana Jones getting his whip caught in the fan joke? 

At least 6/10 would not be considered positive on RT, so that's one go thing about your review.

And you, you think you can't get away from my rage right now? Ok, well, your response was not as harsh as the other so I'll go easy on you. What jokes? Like ther other user, what's the point listing them when you probably would not find them funny. I mean, jokes on paper is usually not funny until you see them in context with the movie. But if you must:

 

SPOILERS BELOW!!!!

 

 

 

1. That scene I described (the first joke of the movie) had wit. You cannot deny that. From what you've previously seen, you would think if they spoofed 10,000 BC, they would do something stupid like dressing characters that look like the characters from the movie and practically cloning everything else. Well, they did do that but the fact that they showed "10,001 BC" is just so unexpected from them because they usually do horrible jokes.

2. Please, don't tell me that "Head On" joke was not funny. Say it. I dare you. In my opinion, that was the most hilarious joke in the whole movie!

3. Another fantastic joke was the Speed Racer scene. Watch it and I dare you to say it's not funny.

4. ...well, you may not agree. It's not the fact that there was poo that was funny. It was how that it was spreaded all over the face.

5. Princess eating the glass.

5. Alvin and the Chipmunks attack (well, that may actually be disturbing).



Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: September 09 2008 at 4:03pm
Originally posted by moviewizguy

See, I hate people like you. First of all, HALF THE THINGS you have listed WERE NOT EVEN IN THE FREAKING MOVIE. Oh, gee, I guess you haven't seen the freaking movie yet! No wonder I acutally liked it! If the jokes you've listed were in the movie, I would probably NOT like it! Use freaking commen sense you ignorant person. You can't just judge me. I'm probably smarter than you seeing how I have over a 5.3 GPA in school.

I'm not personally judging YOU, just your taste in humor. And your sense of humor has nothing to do with your GPA (which by the way can't be higher than 4.0, if you're going by American standards). And frankly, I don't need to see the movie because if you check one page back, you will see this very detailed review of the movie:

http://contest.disastermovie.org/?page_id=182 - http://contest.disastermovie.org/?page_id=182

And what a surprise, stuff I mentioned IS in that review. Based on that, I didn't find anything funny. That and I'm not going to ever see the movie, because doing so would be putting more money in the moron twins' pockets. In fact, as I was reading that review, I was amazed, because I couldn't believe someone would greenlight this. Also, check this video out and you'll see what I'm talking about when it comes to the moron twins' favorite jokes.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIrU5DTF4V4 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIrU5DTF4V4

Or better yet, this video that was also posted a page back.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65WNUiAe3tU - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65WNUiAe3tU

Let's not degrade ourselves to insults and name calling. You like what you like and I like what I like. I'm just pointing out as much you might have enjoyed this movie, we all know for a fact that it's going to tie or break the record for Razzie "wins" that "I Know Who Killed Me" set.



Posted By: PopcornAvenger
Date Posted: September 10 2008 at 1:10am

 . . I'm not so sure this movie should get even one Razzie.

Not that it doesn't deserve any, it probably deserves them all. Problem is, even bad press is good press, and the notoriety of winning, or sweeping, the Razzies might boost it's bottom line, DVD sales, etc. The best approach might be to utterly ignore this lamentable flick.

I guess that won't work, though. This is the Razzie's, after all, and exists to barbecue lousy flicks. 

I wouldn't be surprised if these two actually came out and said, "Yes, it's utter crap, we know it, you know it - and people still pay money to see it. People are morons."

Or they are just drawn to the scent of manure, who knows.

As for losing faith in the Human Race, I did that ten years ago . . . . .



-------------


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: September 10 2008 at 8:45am

Well, that person was probably blind, because there never was a Brangelina joke. Maybe why I suffered less was because I saw Disaster Movie online. The two minute burp scene? I fast-forwarded through it. Maybe I should've said that in the first place.

And yes, I think Meet the Spartans, instead, should sweep the Razzies, because that's a much more horrible movie.

Originally posted by Michaels

Originally posted by moviewizguy

See, I hate people like you. First of all, HALF THE THINGS you have listed WERE NOT EVEN IN THE FREAKING MOVIE. Oh, gee, I guess you haven't seen the freaking movie yet! No wonder I acutally liked it! If the jokes you've listed were in the movie, I would probably NOT like it! Use freaking commen sense you ignorant person. You can't just judge me. I'm probably smarter than you seeing how I have over a 5.3 GPA in school.

I'm not personally judging YOU, just your taste in humor. And your sense of humor has nothing to do with your GPA (which by the way can't be higher than 4.0, if you're going by American standards). And frankly, I don't need to see the movie because if you check one page back, you will see this very detailed review of the movie:

http://contest.disastermovie.org/?page_id=182 - http://contest.disastermovie.org/?page_id=182

And what a surprise, stuff I mentioned IS in that review. Based on that, I didn't find anything funny. That and I'm not going to ever see the movie, because doing so would be putting more money in the moron twins' pockets. In fact, as I was reading that review, I was amazed, because I couldn't believe someone would greenlight this. Also, check this video out and you'll see what I'm talking about when it comes to the moron twins' favorite jokes.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIrU5DTF4V4 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIrU5DTF4V4

Or better yet, this video that was also posted a page back.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65WNUiAe3tU - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65WNUiAe3tU

Let's not degrade ourselves to insults and name calling. You like what you like and I like what I like. I'm just pointing out as much you might have enjoyed this movie, we all know for a fact that it's going to tie or break the record for Razzie "wins" that "I Know Who Killed Me" set.

 



-------------


Posted By: thomsonmg2000
Date Posted: September 10 2008 at 9:08am

Did DVD sales of I Know Who Killed Me  increase after it won 8 Razzies?

The reason I don't think Disaster Movie sweeping the Razzies would boost its DVD sales (or its bottom line) is that people would prefer to buy or see an unintentionally hilarious "drama" than an unfunny "comedy."

BTW, I wonder if Disaster Movie and Meet the Spartans can both sweep the Razzies together -- as in both movies "winning" Worst Picture? 

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: That would likely require some manipulation of the results on my part -- Something that, despite my occasionally disagreeing with our Voting Members' final choices over the years, I have never been willing to do...   


Originally posted by PopcornAvenger

 . . I'm not so sure this movie should get even one Razzie.

Not that it doesn't deserve any, it probably deserves them all. Problem is, even bad press is good press, and the notoriety of winning, or sweeping, the Razzies might boost it's bottom line, DVD sales, etc. The best approach might be to utterly ignore this lamentable flick.








-------------
Seltzerberg is back?

OH MY GOOOOOOOOOOD!!!!!!!

http://www.disastermovie.org
http://www.vampiressuck.org/


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: September 11 2008 at 4:00pm

Actually, the Juno lookalike in the movie is trying to sell her baby to Bradangelina through ebay. So there's your Bradangelina referance and a product plug, two birds with one stone.

Also, thomson has a point. It's not like sweeping the Razzies makes people want to run out and rent or buy the movie just to see how bad it really is. All it might do is make people download it on their computers (which I hear is how most people are seeing the movie anyway) which doesn't help put money in the moron twins' pockets.

PS: Here's yet another good video from someone who saw the entire movie and his opinion about it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCC2SjV4Nww - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCC2SjV4Nww



Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: September 11 2008 at 4:11pm
Originally posted by Michaels

Actually, the Juno lookalike in the movie is trying to sell her baby to Bradangelina through ebay. So there's your Bradangelina referance and a product plug, two birds with one stone.

Also, thomson has a point. It's not like sweeping the Razzies makes people want to run out and rent or buy the movie just to see how bad it really is. All it might do is make people download it on their computers (which I hear is how most people are seeing the movie anyway) which doesn't help put money in the moron twins' pockets.

PS: Here's yet another good video from someone who saw the entire movie and his opinion about it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCC2SjV4Nww - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCC2SjV4Nww

At least I don't go around following the majority of the people who "saw it."



Posted By: PopcornAvenger
Date Posted: September 11 2008 at 7:45pm

Originally posted by Michaels

Also, thomson has a point. It's not like sweeping the Razzies makes people want to run out and rent or buy the movie just to see how bad it really is. All it might do is make people download it on their computers (which I hear is how most people are seeing the movie anyway) which doesn't help put money in the moron twins' pockets.

uhh, I wasn't even serious. If the Razzie's didn't roast bad films, what else would we do? Films like this, though, you really wish they just were dropped in a deep, dark pit and never saw the light of day   :P    (along with their creators).



-------------


Posted By: HeadRAZZBerry
Date Posted: September 12 2008 at 5:27am

Actually, there is some evidence that "winning" RAZZIES® does have a "positive" effect on a film's DVD revenue. Otherwise, how do you explain that you can access the entire (and almost entirely correct) history of The RAZZIES® as a browsing tool on NetFlix?? 

For the curious, here's a http://www.netflix.com/AwardPage?awardId=79 - LINK to RAZZIE® Info at NetFlix... 



-------------
Ye Olde Head RAZZberry


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: September 12 2008 at 12:36pm

Well, no matter if it will help the DVD sales or if anyone thought the movie was worth seeing just for five somewhat funny scenes, this movie is the textbook example of the lazy, uninspired, just-making-a-quick-buck trash that Hollywood vomits onto screens across America and the world. As bad as "In The Name Of The King", "Strange Wilderness", "Meet Dave", and "Love Guru" were, I predict Selzterberg will be going home with lots of Razzies.

And yes, I'm even guessing they will have the guts to show up and accept them, too...

 



-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: thomsonmg2000
Date Posted: September 13 2008 at 3:26pm
Originally posted by Michaels


And yes, I'm even guessing they will have the guts to show up and accept them, too...

 



Hopefully that would happen, because we'll finally put a personality and face behind those unknown as hell --as in no biography, and only a handful of photos and interviews compared to Uwe Boll-- but much hated directors.


-------------
Seltzerberg is back?

OH MY GOOOOOOOOOOD!!!!!!!

http://www.disastermovie.org
http://www.vampiressuck.org/


Posted By: dEd Grimley
Date Posted: September 13 2008 at 4:38pm
Originally posted by Michaels

across America and the world. As bad as "In The Name Of The King", "Strange Wilderness", "Meet Dave", and "Love Guru" were, I predict Selzterberg will be going home with lots of Razzies.


And yes, I'm even guessing they will have the guts to show up and accept them, too...


 



I disagree. The movies you listed contained their own premise. The "Movie" movies don't even have that.


Posted By: BulletRiddled
Date Posted: September 16 2008 at 5:05pm
Originally posted by moviewizguy

I'm so sick of this now. I hate people like you. You judge things before you see them. You judge me because I liked this movie.


Whoa, calm down there, buddy!  I know you say you don't want to hear from people who haven't seen the movie, but since I'm the guy that wrote that http://contest.disastermovie.org/?page_id=182 - long-assed review people keep quoting on here, do you mind if I have a crack at a rebuttal?

Originally posted by moviewizguy

I'm probably smarter than you seeing how I have over a 5.3 GPA in school.

Well, I'm in Mensa, so I'm probably smarter than you.  Good thing intelligence is subjective and doesn't mean anything.

Originally posted by moviewizguy

1. That scene I described (the first joke of the movie) had wit. You cannot deny that. From what you've previously seen, you would think if they spoofed 10,000 BC, they would do something stupid like dressing characters that look like the characters from the movie and practically cloning everything else. Well, they did do that but the fact that they showed "10,001 BC" is just so unexpected from them because they usually do horrible jokes.


"10,001 BC" is a horrible joke.  And then a guy gets stomped into a pile of mammoth poop.

Originally posted by moviewizguy

2. Please, don't tell me that "Head On" joke was not funny. Say it. I dare you. In my opinion, that was the most hilarious joke in the whole movie!

It wasn't funny, and it wasn't funny when the joke was beaten to death two years ago by every lame late-night talk show host and stand-up comedian on the face of the earth.

Originally posted by moviewizguy

3. Another fantastic joke was the Speed Racer scene. Watch it and I dare you to say it's not funny.

It's not funny.

My turn: I dare you to tell me what the joke was even supposed to be.

Originally posted by moviewizguy

4. ...well, you may not agree. It's not the fact that there was poo that was funny. It was how that it was spreaded all over the face.

You're right, I don't agree.  It was gross and dumb, and it was the punchline to a freakin' Get Smart joke.  GET SMART!  Mel Brooks!  It was already funny!  Also, "spreaded" isn't a word, Mr. 5.3 GPA

Originally posted by moviewizguy

5. Princess eating the glass.

Gross != Funny

Originally posted by moviewizguy

5. Alvin and the Chipmunks attack (well, that may actually be disturbing).

It was disturbing, especially when they ate the pregnant woman.  Even if that part never happened, though, people getting kicked in the balls isn't funny in and of itself, and every single fight sequence in the entire "____ Movie" series consist entirely of people trading blows to the crotch.



-------------
http://www.disastermovie.org


Posted By: dEd Grimley
Date Posted: September 17 2008 at 12:53am
Hey, if we're inventing intellectual statistics here... I've got an IQ of 305.


Posted By: thomsonmg2000
Date Posted: September 17 2008 at 6:48am
Here's a statistic I hope need not be invented: Disaster Movie "winning" all of this year's Razzies!

-------------
Seltzerberg is back?

OH MY GOOOOOOOOOOD!!!!!!!

http://www.disastermovie.org
http://www.vampiressuck.org/


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: September 17 2008 at 11:36am

Hmm...I'm back after Hurricane Ike hit us. We've had neither power nor Internet for days. Now that it's back on, it's not really great to see the reply below...but anyway, I'll just say one thing: BulletRiddled has no sense of humor! 

Originally posted by BulletRiddled

Originally posted by moviewizguy

I'm so sick of this now. I hate people like you. You judge things before you see them. You judge me because I liked this movie.


Whoa, calm down there, buddy!  I know you say you don't want to hear from people who haven't seen the movie, but since I'm the guy that wrote that http://contest.disastermovie.org/?page_id=182 - long-assed review people keep quoting on here, do you mind if I have a crack at a rebuttal?

Originally posted by moviewizguy

I'm probably smarter than you seeing how I have over a 5.3 GPA in school.

Well, I'm in Mensa, so I'm probably smarter than you.  Good thing intelligence is subjective and doesn't mean anything.

Originally posted by moviewizguy

1. That scene I described (the first joke of the movie) had wit. You cannot deny that. From what you've previously seen, you would think if they spoofed 10,000 BC, they would do something stupid like dressing characters that look like the characters from the movie and practically cloning everything else. Well, they did do that but the fact that they showed "10,001 BC" is just so unexpected from them because they usually do horrible jokes.


"10,001 BC" is a horrible joke.  And then a guy gets stomped into a pile of mammoth poop.

Originally posted by moviewizguy

2. Please, don't tell me that "Head On" joke was not funny. Say it. I dare you. In my opinion, that was the most hilarious joke in the whole movie!

It wasn't funny, and it wasn't funny when the joke was beaten to death two years ago by every lame late-night talk show host and stand-up comedian on the face of the earth.

Originally posted by moviewizguy

3. Another fantastic joke was the Speed Racer scene. Watch it and I dare you to say it's not funny.

It's not funny.

My turn: I dare you to tell me what the joke was even supposed to be.

Originally posted by moviewizguy

4. ...well, you may not agree. It's not the fact that there was poo that was funny. It was how that it was spreaded all over the face.

You're right, I don't agree.  It was gross and dumb, and it was the punchline to a freakin' Get Smart joke.  GET SMART!  Mel Brooks!  It was already funny!  Also, "spreaded" isn't a word, Mr. 5.3 GPA

Originally posted by moviewizguy

5. Princess eating the glass.

Gross != Funny

Originally posted by moviewizguy

5. Alvin and the Chipmunks attack (well, that may actually be disturbing).

It was disturbing, especially when they ate the pregnant woman.  Even if that part never happened, though, people getting kicked in the balls isn't funny in and of itself, and every single fight sequence in the entire "____ Movie" series consist entirely of people trading blows to the crotch.

 



-------------


Posted By: dEd Grimley
Date Posted: September 17 2008 at 3:06pm
Originally posted by moviewizguy

Hmm...I'm back after Hurricane Ike hit us. We've had neither power nor Internet for days. Now that it's back on, it's not really great to see the reply below...but anyway, I'll just say one thing: BulletRiddled has no sense of humor! 


 



... I really think you're fairly alone on the whole "enjoying Disaster Movie" thing.


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: September 18 2008 at 5:08am
Originally posted by BulletRiddled

Originally posted by moviewizguy

I'm so sick of this now. I hate people like you. You judge things before you see them. You judge me because I liked this movie.


Whoa, calm down there, buddy!  I know you say you don't want to hear from people who haven't seen the movie, but since I'm the guy that wrote that http://contest.disastermovie.org/?page_id=182 - long-assed review people keep quoting on here, do you mind if I have a crack at a rebuttal?

Originally posted by moviewizguy

I'm probably smarter than you seeing how I have over a 5.3 GPA in school.

Well, I'm in Mensa, so I'm probably smarter than you.  Good thing intelligence is subjective and doesn't mean anything.

Originally posted by moviewizguy

1. That scene I described (the first joke of the movie) had wit. You cannot deny that. From what you've previously seen, you would think if they spoofed 10,000 BC, they would do something stupid like dressing characters that look like the characters from the movie and practically cloning everything else. Well, they did do that but the fact that they showed "10,001 BC" is just so unexpected from them because they usually do horrible jokes.


"10,001 BC" is a horrible joke.  And then a guy gets stomped into a pile of mammoth poop.

Originally posted by moviewizguy

2. Please, don't tell me that "Head On" joke was not funny. Say it. I dare you. In my opinion, that was the most hilarious joke in the whole movie!

It wasn't funny, and it wasn't funny when the joke was beaten to death two years ago by every lame late-night talk show host and stand-up comedian on the face of the earth.

Originally posted by moviewizguy

3. Another fantastic joke was the Speed Racer scene. Watch it and I dare you to say it's not funny.

It's not funny.

My turn: I dare you to tell me what the joke was even supposed to be.

Originally posted by moviewizguy

4. ...well, you may not agree. It's not the fact that there was poo that was funny. It was how that it was spreaded all over the face.

You're right, I don't agree.  It was gross and dumb, and it was the punchline to a freakin' Get Smart joke.  GET SMART!  Mel Brooks!  It was already funny!  Also, "spreaded" isn't a word, Mr. 5.3 GPA

Originally posted by moviewizguy

5. Princess eating the glass.

Gross != Funny

Originally posted by moviewizguy

5. Alvin and the Chipmunks attack (well, that may actually be disturbing).

It was disturbing, especially when they ate the pregnant woman.  Even if that part never happened, though, people getting kicked in the balls isn't funny in and of itself, and every single fight sequence in the entire "____ Movie" series consist entirely of people trading blows to the crotch.

And haven't you read my review? It explains a theory: If you've convinced your self you will not like this movie, you will not like this movie. If this movie had a different director, people would've liked it. Well, at least they would like it a lot mroe than they do now. This is a proven fact. House of Wax was an above average slasher film. If Paris Hilton wasn't in it, people would've liked it a lot more.

The fact that you've seen probably Date, Epic Movies and Meet the Spartans, you wouldn't give them a chance anymore. The jokes I've listed ARE FUNNY if you didn't convince yourself they're not. Take out their names and you would've laughed. I know it. I mean, I've always wanted to make a documentary about this one big social experiment about people would react differently if different names appear on the same films.



Posted By: dEd Grimley
Date Posted: September 18 2008 at 9:15am

Most people watched House of Wax to see Paris Hilton get killed, because for some reason, she's clearly a horrible person for being born into wealth. But back to Disaster movie... Honestly, nothing about that movie looks funny to me, from start to finish. Every joke sounds entirely predictable. Every single one. Making the Chipmunks rabid and psychotic is about the only way to parody them and TRY to make it funny. I can't, in good conscience, watch this movie for any reason -- that might provide more money for the writers. Even if you get a chuckle or two out of this movie, you can't say that it's a good movie, or that it deserves to make a profit...

Originally posted by moviewizguy

[QUOTE=BulletRiddled] And haven't you read my review? It explains a theory: If you've convinced your self you will not like this movie, you will not like this movie. If this movie had a different director, people would've liked it. Well, at least they would like it a lot mroe than they do now. This is a proven fact. House of Wax was an above average slasher film. If Paris Hilton wasn't in it, people would've liked it a lot more.
The fact that you've seen probably Date, Epic Movies and Meet the Spartans, you wouldn't give them a chance anymore. The jokes I've listed ARE FUNNY if you didn't convince yourself they're not. Take out their names and you would've laughed. I know it. I mean, I've always wanted to make a documentary about this one big social experiment about people would react differently if different names appear on the same films.




-------------
-Iron helps us play-


Posted By: BulletRiddled
Date Posted: September 18 2008 at 11:41am
Originally posted by moviewizguy

I've always wanted to make a documentary about this one big social experiment about people would react differently if different names appear on the same films.


Well, I ran a social experiment to see if people could guess the jokes in the movie before it even came out.  Turns out 61 out of 110 could, including myself (I got 2 right).

I'll admit that I went into the movie expecting it to be bad, but I didn't want it to be bad.  I would have been thrilled if it would have made me laugh, and in a couple of spots it actually did.  The problem, though is that 99.8% of the gags in the movie are just set-ups with no punch line.  The cast is driving in the Speed Racer car - so what?  Where's the gag?  There's no joke, we're just supposed to laugh because we recognize Speed Racer.  Speed Racer isn't funny, and neither are midgets, homosexuals, celebrities, black people, dancing, fighting, pop singers, or movie characters.  You have to actually do something with them, not just trot them out on screen one after the other like a parade.


-------------
http://www.disastermovie.org


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: September 18 2008 at 5:03pm

Originally posted by BulletRiddled


I'll admit that I went into the movie expecting it to be bad, but I didn't want it to be bad.  I would have been thrilled if it would have made me laugh, and in a couple of spots it actually did.  The problem, though is that 99.8% of the gags in the movie are just set-ups with no punch line.  The cast is driving in the Speed Racer car - so what?  Where's the gag?  There's no joke, we're just supposed to laugh because we recognize Speed Racer.  Speed Racer isn't funny, and neither are midgets, homosexuals, celebrities, black people, dancing, fighting, pop singers, or movie characters.  You have to actually do something with them, not just trot them out on screen one after the other like a parade.

Thanks again, Bullet, for making good points. The Speed Racer scene, I think what he is taking about is that Seltzerberg made a connection between the Speed Racer little boy and monkey duo and Michael Jackson. Yes, the old "Michael Jackson is a pedophile" joke. It would be funny, only it's not, because it's been beaten to death since 1993. That and Seltzerberg already used that joke in "Scary Movie 3" and "Date Movie", again, they are recycling their own jokes. As for the Head-On joke, sorry, but I fail to see humor in product plugs during movies when they aren't even trying to hide the fact the scene's only reason for being is to sell you something. And if the funniest scenes in the movie are made up of a guy spreading poop on his face and a princess eating a glass slipper, then by that logic, "Freddy Got Fingered" -- the most random, grossed-out, pointless movie of this decade -- must be the funniest movie ever made by those standards.

As for other people's reaction to the movie, I asked a few people I know if they saw the movie in theaters. Those who did said either one of two things: "DON'T GO SEE IT" or "I might as well wiped my butt with my $10, because either way, it would have been a total waste".

As for hating this movie just for the directors, I would have hated this movie no matter who directed it. Even if Spielberg himself directed it, I would be thinking "wow, he has lost all creativity and respect for filmmaking". What sparked most people's hatred for the movie were the trailer and poster, both of which are suppose to hook you in. I didn't laugh ONCE at ANY point of the trailer. A good trailer is suppose to be like a writer or director trying to pitch a movie idea to a studio head. When a trailer fails to hook the movie-goers, it's doomed to fail just as a failed movie pitch would. Then there's the poster, which displayed a number of characters from movies that either were still in theaters or weren't even released yet, which was a major hint that the movie would be made entirely of references to scenes from movie trailers. Granted, studio heads at Lionsgate noticed past "Movie Movies" have made money and thus thought this movie was a good investment, but movie-goers saw right through it.

Seltzerberg need to learn how to be funny in a SMART way, not just making overly gross sight gags, racist and sexist jokes, and random references. But we at the Razzie Awards will be showing OUR sense of humor, when we are making jokes and poking fun at this movie all night long as we hand out every award available to it.

PS: Someone mentioned the movie takes a jab at Heath Ledger. This is how it does: the lead character, Will, suffers from nightmares and takes sleeping pills ... the same sleeping pills Ledger died from. Yeah, that's comedy made in good taste.  



Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: September 20 2008 at 8:55am

Originally posted by BulletRiddled

Originally posted by moviewizguy

I've always wanted to make a documentary about this one big social experiment about people would react differently if different names appear on the same films.


Well, I ran a social experiment to see if people could guess the jokes in the movie before it even came out.  Turns out 61 out of 110 could, including myself (I got 2 right).

I'll admit that I went into the movie expecting it to be bad, but I didn't want it to be bad.  I would have been thrilled if it would have made me laugh, and in a couple of spots it actually did.  The problem, though is that 99.8% of the gags in the movie are just set-ups with no punch line.  The cast is driving in the Speed Racer car - so what?  Where's the gag?  There's no joke, we're just supposed to laugh because we recognize Speed Racer.  Speed Racer isn't funny, and neither are midgets, homosexuals, celebrities, black people, dancing, fighting, pop singers, or movie characters.  You have to actually do something with them, not just trot them out on screen one after the other like a parade.

I never said the reason why the Speed Racer scene was funny because he looked like Speed Racer. The joke about Speed Racer was that Enchanted kept shooting him. The comedic performance and timing by the Nicole Parker (sp) in that scene is perfect (or excellent).




Print Page | Close Window