Print Page | Close Window

BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS"

Printed From: Official RAZZIE® Forum
Category: FORUMS on 30th RAZZIES Choices
Forum Name: WHATCHA THINK of OUR 30th Annual NOMz & "Winners"???
Forum Discription: Here's Where to Leave FEEDBACK About What We Nominated & Eventually RAZZed as 2009's Berry WORST -- Appreciative, Apoplectic & Otherwise!
URL: http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4103
Printed Date: April 25 2014 at 1:11am


Topic: BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS"
Posted By: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: BACK-TALK on OUR 30th ANNUAL NOMz & "WINNERS"
Date Posted: January 31 2010 at 8:59am
EVERY YEAR WE GET LOTSA RESPONSE to OUR CHOICES AS the YEAR's BERRY WORST ACHIEVEMENTS in FILM. 

SOME FOLKS THINK WE PICKED the WRONG "ACHIEVEMENTS"... 

SOME FOLKS THINK WE GOT 'EM JUST RIGHT... 

AND SOME FOLKS REALLY DON'T GIVE a RAT's THIRD NIPPLE WHAT WE PICK...

WHICHEVER CAMP YOU'RE IN, HERE's YOUR CHANCE to EXPRESS YOURSELF, SO FEEL FREE to... 

FIRE AWAY! 

Worst Actress & Worst Screen Couple Choice MEGAN FOX: 
"Hey, all you FanBoys -- That tatoo in my left armpit sez Future Oscar® Winner. 
Now that I've lost as Worst Actress, do yhink I'll ever get one of Those Other Awards...or am I destined to be a perennial at 
The RAZZIES® instead??"


-------------
Ye Olde Head RAZZberry



Replies:
Posted By: TaRaN-RoD
Date Posted: January 31 2010 at 11:47am
Not really agree on Megan Fox just because I hoped Kristen Stewart would have ''Worst Actress'' and Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattisson would have ''Worst Screen Couple''!
 
But the official list of nominees will be available tomorow!  

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: At the time we posted this, we weren't saying Megan Fox had "won" as Worst Actress or for Worst Screen Couple -- merely that she was officially one of the choices...   


-------------


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: January 31 2010 at 12:42pm
Megan Fox and Kristen Stewart have equal amounts of acting talent: none! Fox needs to go into porn, because she has the look, body (and acting ability) for it. Stewart must have gone to the Keanu Reeves School of Emotionless Acting. I predict it's going to be a dead heat between these two for Worst Actress, but let's wait and see who else is in the running... 

-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: TaRaN-RoD
Date Posted: January 31 2010 at 2:41pm
TOTALLY agree!!!! Dude, half time we agree, half disagree! LOL On this, you are SO right!!! But Kristen is beautiful...think she might do something porno? It would actually be better than seeing her try to act! LOL  

Originally posted by Michaels

Megan Fox and Kristen Stewart have equal amounts of acting talent: none. Fox needs to go into porn, because she has the look, body, and acting ability for it. Stewart must have gone to the Keanu Reeves School of Emotionless Acting. It's going to be a dead heat between these two, but let's wait and see who else is up for the running.
  

-------------


Posted By: Anuss
Date Posted: January 31 2010 at 3:49pm
I don't think Megan deserved her nomination...  

-------------


Posted By: Julianstark
Date Posted: January 31 2010 at 9:12pm
So... she was officially nominated for both Worst Actress and Worst Screen Couple?  

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Short answer...YES. To get a complete list of our 30th Annual Nominations, come back to our site at 5:30am/PST tomorrow/February 1...  


-------------
For Your 2010 Razzie Consideration: The Bounty Hunter and Leap Year --
Check out my blog! http://julianstark-moviesandotherthings.blogspot.com - Movies and Other Things


Posted By: HeadRAZZBerry
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 7:32am
Just in cast you missed the banner on our Main Page, here's a  http://www.razzies.com/history/30thNoms.asp -  to see the complete list of this year's 30th Annual RAZZIE http:// -  Nominations.


-------------
Ye Olde Head RAZZberry


Posted By: theatrechick7
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 7:39am
I cannot believe that Halloween II was not nominated for every award.  it was the worst movie that i've seen.  that disappoints me.  

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Apparently there were just too many choices for our awards in 2009. We actually did have a Forum discussion of HALLOWEEN II as one of our Worst of the Weak choices -- Here is a http://www.razzies.com/forum/halloween-too_forum381.html - to participate in it if you'd like...


-------------
Lindsay


Posted By: Youal
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 8:26am
Why isn't Street Fighter: Legend of Chun Li, Dragonball and The Spirit on the nom list?  

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: you may be pleased to know that CHUN-LI was among our Worst of the Weak choices last year, and was the subject of a Forum discussion -- Here is a http://www.razzies.com/forum/street-fighter-the-legend-of-chunli_forum341.html -


Posted By: Clayface9
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 8:39am
Very dissapointed that C Me Dance didn't receive any nominations.  It was easily the worst movie of the year, but I guess not enough people saw it.  

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Once again, C ME DANCE was one of our Worst of the Weak choices last year, was listed in multiple places on our 2009 Nominating Ballot, and was the subject of its own Forum discussion ( http://www.razzies.com/forum/c-me-dance_forum351.html - ). But, as you guessed, not enough people saw it for it to get the number of votes necessary to make the top five in any category.


-------------


Posted By: MiguelAntilsu
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 9:00am

When I post the nominees on Mister Poll, my additional Dishonorable Mention category will have nine candidates:

C Me Dance
Couples Retreat
Dragonball Evolution
I Love You, Beth Cooper
Street Fighter: The Legend of Chun-Li
Transylmania
The Ugly Truth
Whiteout
Year One


Posted By: TaRaN-RoD
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 10:01am
Disapointed that Twilight is not nominated for ''Worst Picture'' but glad it's nominated for some other Razzie Awards!!! Also VERY glad that Ben Affleck is nominated for ''Worst Actor of the Decade''!
So tomorow... Oscars nominations!


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 11:52am
My thoughts: 
 
Worst Picture: I knew "All About Steve", "Land of the Lost", "Trannies 2" and "GI Joe" would be shoe-ins. I figured "Miss March" would be the 5th movie, but I guess we'll make do with "Old Dogs."  
 
Worst Actor: What do you know, three comedians who USED to be funny, but are now in it only for the paycheck. Plus, Disney meal ticket, er, I mean music act, the Jonas Brothers -- and the Return of Mr. Battlefield Earth. 
 
Worst Actress: Sarah Jessica Parker is a surprising choice, I guess we hate her for her fame, even though she has a horse-face. That and she will be forcing our wives or girlfriends to make us sit through "Sex in the City 2". Sandra Bullock might join the elite "winning a Razzie and a Oscar in one year" club. Megan Fox is the heavy front-runner, in my opinon. Me, I'm hoping for Beyonce, because as good as she might be as a singer, she just plain sucks as an actress. 
 
Worst Supporting Actor: I'm only surprised the annoying roommate from "Trannies 2" didn't make it to this list, but I guess people found the little monkey guy from "Land of the Lost' more annoying. I say Robert Patterson for the win, and maybe we can get him a much needed bottle of shampoo while we're at it.
 
Worst Supporting Actress: Candice Bergen made the final five, but Kate Hudson and Anne Hathaway didn't? Interesting. My pick goes to the Annoying Mother from "Trannies 2", there was just no reason for that character to exist!
 
Worst Onscreen Couple: Hopefully, this catagory will be changed to Worst Ensemble Cast this time next year. That aside, everyone who deserves to be in this catagory, is in the catagory. It's a dead heat between "Trannies 2" and "New Moon" for the win, in my opinion.
 
Worst Sequel/Remake: Again, everyone who should be here is here. I can't choose from this list, it's like trying to find the Hope Diamond inside of a cow pie!
 
Worst Director: Michael Bay is all that matters. He's been making the same damn movie for 15 years now. If there was ever a fitting and ripe time  to razz him, it's now!
 
Worst Screenplay: Same as Worst Sequel/Remake. I can't choose from all this crap!
 
Now let's see what the Oscars will counter with.... 


Posted By: Jglucks
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 1:26pm
Very disappointed in the lack of Miss March, Obsessed, Halloween 2 -- and that the nominations were essentially the same 5 films over and over.  Also, if the academy is awarding 5 additional films with Best Pic nominations, there are certainly 5 additional films that should be razzed for Worst Pic.  And how Trevor Moore escaped unscathed with no nominations from Miss March is criminal!  


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 2:07pm
I think http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_topics.asp?FID=399 - OL'DOGS isn't exactly well done,but it's berry funny!It shouldn't be nominated at all.
 
You shouldn't have nominated The Jonas Brothers.They weren't acting.This is just an excuse to trash teen sensations(which the Razzie people like to do).Come on!You're in charged of naming the worst movies,somethin'almost as important as what the Oscars do.Can you please take it more serious?
 
You should've nominated WHATEVER WORKS and  http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_topics.asp?FID=374 - THE UGLY TRUTH for "Worst Picture",or at least the latter for "Worst Actor"(when is Gerard Butler goin'to learn how to keep the accent?).
 
You also should've put in "Worst Director" and/or "Worst Screenplay",but never "Worst Picture", http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_topics.asp?FID=360 - MY LIFE IN RUINS  and  http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum345.html - KNOWIN' .


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 3:05pm
Originally posted by Michaels

Megan Fox and Kristen Stewart have equal amounts of acting talent: none! Fox needs to go into porn, because she has the look, body (and acting ability) for it. Stewart must have gone to the Keanu Reeves School of Emotionless Acting. I predict it's going to be a dead heat between these two for Worst Actress, but let's wait and see who else is in the running... 

I seriously suggest you rethink what you said. Before she was even doing the Twilight movies, she starred in Panic Room and was really good in it. She also starred in Zathura and Into the Wild. And last year, she starred in Adventureland so I don't know why you're complaining about her. It angers me so much so that if good respected actors star in movies you don't like, you automatically change your opinion on them as if they're the worst actors ever. See her this year in The Runaways and tell me she can't act.


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 3:09pm
I wholeheartedly agree. That and Miley Cyrus. Those two (or three) nominations are terrible, and make the Razzies seem more like a fool of themselves...but that's just my two cents.  

Originally posted by Vits

You shouldn't have nominated The Jonas Brothers.They weren't acting.This is just an excuse to trash teen sensations(which the Razzie people like to do).Come on!You're in charged of naming the worst movies,somethin'almost as important as what the Oscars do.Can you please take it more serious?





-------------


Posted By: TaRaN-RoD
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 3:35pm
Originally posted by moviewizguy


I seriously suggest you rethink what you said. Before she was even doing the Twilight movies, she starred in Panic Room and was really good in it. She also starred in Zathura and Into the Wild. And last year, she starred in Adventureland so I don't know why you're complaining about her. It angers me so much so that if good respected actors star in movies you don't like, you automatically change your opinion on them as if they're the worst actors ever. See her this year in The Runaways and tell me she can't act.
 
Oh come on man what you've said is just stupid and laughable!!! Zathura is an awful movie and she's just like the movie itself in it. Panic Room is a good movie and she was pretty watchable in it, but not more. And Into the Wild, please, stop this acclaim for what she did in that movie, I'm tired see people to acclaim her job in this movie... Say that she was good in that movie id like say Stallone was great in Taxi 3 or Spy Kids 3D! But Into the Wild is a great movie, but she did almost nothing!


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 4:02pm
While I applaud the RAZZIES for not nominating any good movies for the awards, I'm puzzled as to why 5 movies took up 63% of all the nominations. I wanted more variety than this.

-------------
My deadlines for Member-Started Forums, given 35% approval rating or less: Apl. 29; The Other Woman. May 6; Walk of Shame. May 20; Godzilla '014. May 27; Blended. Jne. 3; A Million Ways...


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 4:06pm
Originally posted by moviewizguy

I wholeheartedly agree. That and Miley Cyrus. Those two (or three) nominations are terrible, and make the Razzies seem more like a fool of themselves...but that's just my two cents.  
Then maybe you should stop posting at our forums if you don't agree with or like anything we do or have to say. 


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 4:09pm
Originally posted by GTAHater767

While I applaud the RAZZIES for not nominating any good movies for the awards, I'm puzzled as to why 5 movies took up 63% of all the nominations. I wanted more variety than this.
Well, according to the 600+ members who vote for these awards, those were the 5 hands down worst movies of 2009.


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 4:11pm
Originally posted by moviewizguy


I seriously suggest you rethink what you said. Before she was even doing the Twilight movies, she starred in Panic Room and was really good in it. She also starred in Zathura and Into the Wild. And last year, she starred in Adventureland so I don't know why you're complaining about her. It angers me so much so that if good respected actors star in movies you don't like, you automatically change your opinion on them as if they're the worst actors ever. See her this year in The Runaways and tell me she can't act.
I'm talking about her performance in the "Twilight" movies, not "Zathura", "Panic Room', "Into The Wild" or "Adventureland". Those might have been better examples of how she might be able to act, but the "Twilight" movies don't showcase any talent she might have. Besides, she's not up for Worst Actress, so be happy.


Posted By: Anuss
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 4:12pm
I would like to talk about acting categories (;
 
Worst Actor: JONAS'S
 
http://www.filmweb.pl/o825166/Joe+Jonas - Jonas - " http://www.filmweb.pl/f494295/Jonas+Brothers+-+Koncert,2009 - Jonas Brothers: The 3D Concert Experience "  (I'm very glad for them nomination. I hate them and I think it's good choice.)
http://will.ferrell.filmweb.pl/ - Will Ferrell - " http://www.filmweb.pl/f219643/Zaginiony+l%C4%85d,2009 - Land of the Lost "  (He used to be funny, but his not anymore. God choice.)
http://www.filmweb.pl/o265/Steve+Martin - Steve Martin - "Pink Panter http://www.filmweb.pl/f453802/R%C3%B3%C5%BCowa+Pantera+2,2009 - 2 "  (Terrible, absolutely not funny perfomance. Very good choice)
http://www.filmweb.pl/o72/Eddie+Murphy - Eddie Murphy - " http://www.filmweb.pl/f318868/Wyobra%C5%BA+sobie,2009 - Imagine That "  (Why he is here every year since 2007 (; He is really so bad? o.o)
http://john.travolta.filmweb.pl/ - John Travolta - " http://www.filmweb.pl/f429713/Stare+wygi,2009 - Old Dogs " (You can tell whatever you like but i have respect for him, for few roles.)
Worst Actress: BEYONCE
 
http://www.filmweb.pl/o56114/Beyonc%C3%A9+Knowles - Beyonce - " http://www.filmweb.pl/f475377/Obsesja,2009 - Obssed "  (I'm so glad that she's finally here. She is ao annoying and bad actress. She's absoulutely my favourite in this category!)
http://sandra.bullock.filmweb.pl/ - Sandra Bullock - " http://www.filmweb.pl/f382383/Wszystko+o+Stevenie,2009 - All About Steven " (I didn't watch that but... I think she could win, because she don't deserve for nomination to Oscars "The Blind Side" ;/)
http://www.filmweb.pl/o388178/Miley+Cyrus - Miley Cyrus - " http://www.filmweb.pl/f474465/Hannah+Montana+Film,2009 - Hannah Montana " (Funny and good choice xd)
http://www.filmweb.pl/o138899/Megan+Fox - Megan Fox - " http://www.filmweb.pl/f472475/Zab%C3%B3jcze+cia%C5%82o,2009 - Jennifer's Body " i "Transformers 2" (You know what i'm thinking (; She shouldn't be here for JB. But... I Don't care, but she can't win this year. The winner should be only Beyonce.) 
http://www.filmweb.pl/o3453/Sarah+Jessica+Parker - Sarah Jessica Parker - "Did You Hear About the Morgans??" (OMG! That's all I can say. She really is worse than pretty annoying Jennifer Anistion? I don't think so.)
 
Worst Supporting Actor: PATTINSON
 
http://www.filmweb.pl/o78926/Billy+Ray+Cyrus - Billy Ray Cyrus - " http://www.filmweb.pl/f474465/Hannah+Montana+Film,2009 - Hannah Montana " (Haha xD Good choice)
http://www.filmweb.pl/o304968/Hugh+M+Hefner - Hugh Hefner - "Miss March" (OMG he's really here? So where the hell is Jack Black or Michael Cera? o.O) 
http://www.filmweb.pl/o164450/Robert+Pattinson - Robert Pattinson - " http://www.filmweb.pl/f491960/Saga+Zmierzch+Ksi%C4%99%C5%BCyc+w+nowiu,2009 - New Moon " (Yeah! The best choice in this category. He is one of worst young actors. He must win!) 
http://www.filmweb.pl/o518966/Jorma+Taccone - Jorma Taccone - " http://www.filmweb.pl/f219643/Zaginiony+l%C4%85d,2009 - Land of the Lost " (I don;t know this guy, so I don't really care about him.) 
http://www.filmweb.pl/o478/Marlon+Wayans - Marlon Wayans - " http://www.filmweb.pl/f451059/G+I+Joe+Czas+Kobry,2009 - G.I. Joe " (Yeah could be good choice but... Where the hell is a guy from Dragonball.)
 
Worst Supporting Actress: MILLER

http://www.filmweb.pl/o9319/Candice+Bergen - Candice Bergen - " http://www.filmweb.pl/f216448/%C5%9Alubne+wojny,2009 - Bride Wars " (I'm so glad that you didn't nominated Kate Hudson and especially Anne Hathaway (; But I don't think Candice deserve to be here.)
http://www.filmweb.pl/o5956/Ali+Larter - Ali Larter - " http://www.filmweb.pl/f475377/Obsesja,2009 - Obssed " (Come on... It was necesarry?)
http://www.filmweb.pl/o138470/Sienna+Miller - Sienna Miller - " http://www.filmweb.pl/f451059/G+I+Joe+Czas+Kobry,2009 - G.I. Joe " (She is so pretty and she so don't have any talent. She definietly should win.)
http://www.filmweb.pl/o4989/Kelly+Preston - Kelly Preston - "Old Dogs" (Who care's? xd I don't know this girl honestly.) 
http://www.filmweb.pl/o63912/Julie+White - Julie White - "Trannies 2" (Yeah... She was awfoul.)
 
Worst Actor of Decade: MYERS
 
http://ben.affleck.filmweb.pl/ - Ben Affleck (I would like to think he should be here. He's bad actor... But sometimes he can play like in "State of Play".)
http://www.filmweb.pl/o72/Eddie+Murphy - Eddie Murphy (God xD He is horrible.)
http://www.filmweb.pl/o324/Mike+Myers - Mike Myers  (He is worst! Basecally he should win!)
http://www.filmweb.pl/o5530/Rob+Schneider - Rob Schneider (He isn't so bad (;)
http://john.travolta.filmweb.pl/ - John Travolta (Damn! What he is doing up here? No way!)

NAJGORSZA Actress of Decade: HILTON

http://www.filmweb.pl/o7731/Mariah+Carey - Mariah Carey (She shouldn't be here. Her "Gliter" wasn't in this decade. In this decade she has a great role in "Precious". So... Why she is here if you didn't nominee Hilary Duff?)
http://www.filmweb.pl/o138461/Paris+Hilton - Paris Hilton (Yeah! She definitely have to win!)
http://www.filmweb.pl/o115477/Lindsay+Lohan - Lindsay Lohan (OMG xD She is bad!)
http://jennifer.lopez.filmweb.pl/ - Jennifer Lopez (Why? Why? I'm just kidding, she is bad but she can't win.)
http://madonna.filmweb.pl/ - Madonna   (She is almoust so bad like Paris, but Paris is even worse! xD)
 
BTW. I like that nominations. One year ago was worse.


Posted By: MiguelAntilsu
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 4:17pm
This might be our biggest show ever.


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 4:27pm
Originally posted by Vits

You shouldn't have nominated The Jonas Brothers.They weren't acting.This is just an excuse to trash teen sensations(which the Razzie people like to do).Come on!You're in charged of naming the worst movies,somethin'almost as important as what the Oscars do.Can you please take it more serious?
We trash teen sensations because we see them for what they are: talentless flavors of the month who are pre-packed and sold by a mega corporation for the sole purpose of getting little kids to make their parents shell out their hard earned money to see their latest crappy movie or crappy album.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 4:43pm
Originally posted by Michaels

Originally posted by moviewizguy

I wholeheartedly agree. That and Miley Cyrus. Those two (or three) nominations are terrible, and make the Razzies seem more like a fool of themselves...but that's just my two cents.  
Then maybe you should stop posting at our forums if you don't agree with or like anything we do or have to say. 

Why?He's here to discuss.

Originally posted by Michaels

Originally posted by Vits

You shouldn't have nominated The Jonas Brothers.They weren't acting.This is just an excuse to trash teen sensations(which the Razzie people like to do).Come on!You're in charged of naming the worst movies,somethin'almost as important as what the Oscars do.Can you please take it more serious?
We trash teen sensations because we see them for what they are: talentless flavors of the month who are pre-packed and sold by a mega corporation for the sole purpose of getting little kids to make their parents shell out their hard earned money to see their latest crappy movie or crappy album.

My point is that they shouldn't be trashed for that reason only.I'm a heterosexual adult,and like many others,I like their music(I personally don't like their voices).There are teen sensations I dislike,but not for being teen sensations.


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: thomsonmg2000
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 5:09pm
I'm surprised Miss March isn't on the nominations. Maybe it wasn't big enough.

At least you got down All About Steve and Old Dogs. Man, Robin Williams really needs to get a better agent.


-------------
Seltzerberg is back?

OH MY GOOOOOOOOOOD!!!!!!!

http://www.disastermovie.org
http://www.vampiressuck.org/


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 5:12pm
Originally posted by Vits

Why?He's here to discuss.
Because for the past 2+ years, all this moviewizguy does is go on and on about how every movie up for razzie consideration is "not that bad" (simply because he found those movies somewhat "entertaining"), he even claims some of them are instant classics and should be up for Oscars and gives them all high ratings of anywhere between 6 and 10 stars, and puts them on the same Top Ten Lists with actually good movies. And then he goes around saying how we don't know anything and how our opinions (at our own forum, no less) don't matter, yet he keeps coming back for more. If you ask me, that not someone here to discuss, that's a TROLL. Like I said before, I'm tired of these teenage, non Razzie voting member, armchair critics who can't tell a good movie from a bad telling us how we should be running our awards, and then tell us a minute later how we don't matter ... but they waste their time on our forum anyway.

Originally posted by Vits

My point is that they shouldn't be trashed for that reason only.I'm a heterosexual adult,and like many others,I like their music(I personally don't like their voices).There are teen sensations I dislike,but not for being teen sensations.
Well, just because some people like their music, that doesn't mean they have to be doing movies, as well, and bad ones at that. That's just being overexposed.


Posted By: Jglucks
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 5:14pm
Originally posted by Vits

I'm a heterosexual adult,and like many others,I like their music


Easily the most contradictory statement of the day.

And the Jonas Brother's nominations and Miley Cyrus nomination are the best since 1991 when Vanilla Ice and Andrew Dice Clay were nominated.  Pop culture disasters.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 5:34pm
Originally posted by Michaels

Originally posted by Vits

My point is that they shouldn't be trashed for that reason only.I'm a heterosexual adult,and like many others,I like their music(I personally don't like their voices).There are teen sensations I dislike,but not for being teen sensations.
 
Well, just because some people like their music, that doesn't mean they have to be doing movies, as well, and bad ones at that. That's just being overexposed.

But it's a concert movie,not a movie where you act.It's as dumb as when they awarded Britney and Bush for that Michael Moore documentary.It seems that the Razzie voters don't take it seriously.

Originally posted by Jglucks

Originally posted by Vits

I'm a heterosexual adult,and like many others,I like their music


Easily the most contradictory statement of the day.

And the Jonas Brother's nominations and Miley Cyrus nomination are the best since 1991 when Vanilla Ice and Andrew Dice Clay were nominated.  Pop culture disasters.

DICE RULES wans't even a movie!It was a comedy album!It shouldn't have been nominated!

I didn't say most heterosexual adults like'em.And I do personally hate movies written for especifical people,but that doesn't justifies trashin'them just because they're teen sensations.If you don't like their music,fine,but don't say it's bad in general(they've been nominated for Grammys).As for acting,some people say they're good,some people say they're bad.I've never seen HANNAH MONTANA,but I've seen some clips,and Miley is a lil'funny(not a lot).Joe Jonas did O.K. in CAMP ROCK(notice the dramatic moments),but I think he a lil'over the top in the show "J.O.N.A.S.",while I never like how Kevin & Nick act.

The bottom line?Maybe they shouldn't act(especially if they only do it'cuz their agents say it's profitable,when they should act'cuz it's a passion like music),but they don't deserve the nominations.


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: Berrynoia
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 6:55pm
I looked at Rotten Tomatoes's http://www.rottentomatoes.com/guides/rtawards/moldy/ - Moldy Tomatoes section and noticed that the two Moldiest only have a combined 1 nomination.

#1 Street Fighter: The Legend of Chun Li has no nominations whatsoever.
#2 Miss March only has the nod for Hefner.
#4 Whiteout has zero nods

Now #3 and #5 (Old Dogs and All About Steve) have a combined 9 nominations, but the other Top 10 worst reviews are lacking (#6-10 have no nods).  This includes Draggin Balls Evolution, a prime example of Hollywood butchering anime shows.

The three that should have received more attention were Miss March, SF Chun Li, and DBE.  Moreso than Trannies, think (Trannies 2 wasn't bashed as badly as the others, and many people say they like it...probably for the wrong reasons...)

With Street Fighter: Chun Li, you get a sequel that is arguably worse than the original van Damme movie.  And the older one may have been so bad it's good, while this one is just bad.

Dragonball Evolution has over--not using that joke again--problems that show that we urgently need to do whatever it takes to stop Hollywood from making any other films based on anime.  The lack of nods isn't helping the cause.  Well, I guess we wait for Keanu Bebop to stink up theaters...

My blood runs cold, my memory has just been sold...My angel's in the centerfold of Playboy magazine and yet the dreck that is Miss March only gets a single nod.  This should have been considered among Worst Ripoff nods (along with others) as a ripoff of the J. Geils Band song.  If Little Man could be considered a ripoff (of a Bugs Bunny Cartoon), then Miss March should have made the list.


-------------


Posted By: WakeUpStupid
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 7:09pm
This site can suck my assh*le after I take a sh*t and before wiping. Angry 


Posted By: WakeUpStupid
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 7:10pm
The people who run this site are turds. Angry


Posted By: ShariG
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 7:29pm
I completely disagree about Robert Pattinson.  First, I don't think of him as a supporting actor in New Moon.  He is the face of the franchise and the primary reason that New Moon is second only to Avatar this past year in box office dollars.  Hollywood, take note, the theaters were filled with women of all ages not just teens and preteens and we were not there to supervise our daughters.  We were there because Robert Pattinson is mesmerizing on the screen and his onscreen chemistry with Kristen Stewart something romantic dreams are made of.  I might agree about the screenwriter who took a beautiful love story from Twilight and turned it into the Jacob Black story in New Moon.  However, if any actor in the series deserved a Razzie it would be Taylor Lautner not Rob Pattinson.  Taylor may have beefed up his body for the role, but he apparently did not go to acting school.  His lines were stilted, his voice grating, and he had absolutely no chemistry with Kristen Stewart.  Robert Pattinson took a cartoonish character and made him believable.  Robert and Kristen have incredible screen chemistry, so again, that nomiination is way out in left field.  I think sometimes your organization picks a very popular film so that people actually pay money to join in order to vote for something or someone else so that their favorite does not win this nasty award.  I am personally insulted that you would take an actor that I believe has more potential to become a superstar than anyone else of his generation and suggest that he was one of the worst of the year.  You are out of your collective minds.

-------------
ShariG63


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 7:29pm
Yes, if I had my way, "Chung-Li" and "Dragonball" would have also been all over that nods list as well, but apparentally razzing Will Ferrell and Sandra Bullock is too tempting an offer for most Razzie voters.
 
But wow, we must have pissed off a ton of "Transformers", "GI Joe", "Jonas Bros.", and "Twilight" fans (which by the way, was NOT the second highest grossing movie of 2009 behind "Avatar", "Trannies 2" was), because we have new posters coming out of the wood work, each giving us a piece of their mind. Although, it seems some of them don't have much of a mind to give, like this one head case who took it apond himself to write over 30 of the most uncalled for, immature, and pointless spam posts he could "think" of. Seriously, who is the bigger loser, the people behind the Razzie Awards, or those who hate the Razzies, but take their time to repeatly insult them? Yeah, you sure showed us!


Posted By: conspiracy
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 8:32pm
Megan Fox...THE walking symbol of whats wrong in Hollywood...and probably society at large. This is what you get when someone is hired based on their ability to wash the directors Ferrari and look "hot" in a Thong;  instead of being hired based on the quality of their acting. Hey..I don't blame this bimbo...she just grabbed the brass ring hanging from Bays appendage as she lathered up that 360 Modena, I blame the uncritical public who just wants to see crap blow up. Sad...friggin sad.

Praise Bale


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 9:03pm

If it were up to me, All About Steve would win for Worst Picture, and the other four Worst Picture nominees would receive even distribution in the other 8 categories. I predict, however, that Revenge of the Fallen will sweep the penalties, taking home all 7 categories it was nominated for. It's only such a bad movie because it sets a new low for best-sellers.

I hope the admins will be here soon to sort things out on this forum.


-------------
My deadlines for Member-Started Forums, given 35% approval rating or less: Apl. 29; The Other Woman. May 6; Walk of Shame. May 20; Godzilla '014. May 27; Blended. Jne. 3; A Million Ways...


Posted By: ShariG
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 9:13pm
Speaking of the Ugly Truth, what about Katherine Heigl.  Now that is some ugly overacting.

-------------
ShariG63


Posted By: augusta87
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 10:11pm
Originally posted by ShariG

I completely disagree about Robert Pattinson.  First, I don't think of him as a supporting actor in New Moon.  He is the face of the franchise and the primary reason that New Moon is second only to Avatar this past year in box office dollars.  Hollywood, take note, the theaters were filled with women of all ages not just teens and preteens and we were not there to supervise our daughters.  We were there because Robert Pattinson is mesmerizing on the screen and his onscreen chemistry with Kristen Stewart something romantic dreams are made of.  I might agree about the screenwriter who took a beautiful love story from Twilight and turned it into the Jacob Black story in New Moon.  However, if any actor in the series deserved a Razzie it would be Taylor Lautner not Rob Pattinson.  Taylor may have beefed up his body for the role, but he apparently did not go to acting school.  His lines were stilted, his voice grating, and he had absolutely no chemistry with Kristen Stewart.  Robert Pattinson took a cartoonish character and made him believable.  Robert and Kristen have incredible screen chemistry, so again, that nomiination is way out in left field.  I think sometimes your organization picks a very popular film so that people actually pay money to join in order to vote for something or someone else so that their favorite does not win this nasty award.  I am personally insulted that you would take an actor that I believe has more potential to become a superstar than anyone else of his generation and suggest that he was one of the worst of the year.  You are out of your collective minds.
I'm not sure if I agree about everything you are saying about New Moon's nominations, but I DO agree on Taylor Lautner's absence in this year's Razzies. As I said before, Lautner's performance embodied everything wrong about that film, and his interactions with Kristen Stewart felt more like Blue Lagoon than the actual book.


Posted By: augusta87
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 10:16pm
Originally posted by Berrynoia

I looked at Rotten Tomatoes's http://www.rottentomatoes.com/guides/rtawards/moldy/ - Moldy Tomatoes section and noticed that the two Moldiest only have a combined 1 nomination.

#1 Street Fighter: The Legend of Chun Li has no nominations whatsoever.
#2 Miss March only has the nod for Hefner.
#4 Whiteout has zero nods

Now #3 and #5 (Old Dogs and All About Steve) have a combined 9 nominations, but the other Top 10 worst reviews are lacking (#6-10 have no nods).  This includes Draggin Balls Evolution, a prime example of Hollywood butchering anime shows.

The three that should have received more attention were Miss March, SF Chun Li, and DBE.  Moreso than Trannies, think (Trannies 2 wasn't bashed as badly as the others, and many people say they like it...probably for the wrong reasons...)
I agree with your opinions about Chun-Li (especially Chris Klein's absence in the Worst Supporting Actor category) and Miss March (NO!!!! WHY DIDN'T IT GET NOMINATED!!). Granted, I'm not going to call everyone "turds" for their lack of nominations (aka: WakeUpStupid), but it's too bad that the Razzie voters didn't get to fully appreciate how AWFUL these two movies were.


Posted By: MacViolinist
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 10:37pm
New poster here. I actually don't watch very many movies. And looking at the list of stuff put out in the last year reminds me of why. The only two movies I saw in the theater in 2009 were Transformers 2 and Avatar. And tranny too was only because my girlfriend is obsessed with transformers, and I basically had no choice, even suspecting that it was going to be f***tastically bad.

Anyway, in light of that, I was kind of hoping to see the following:

Worst Picture: Trannies 2

Worst Actor: Shia Le Bouf
 
Worst Actress: Meghan Fox

Worst Supporting Actor: Optimus Prime
 
Worst Supporting Actress: The mom from Trannies 2

Worst Onscreen Couple: StarScream and Megatron
 
Worst Sequel/Remake: Trannies 2
 
Worst Director: Michael Bay
 
Worst Screenplay: Michael Bay's Mother's Left Nut.


Posted By: augusta87
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 10:38pm

By the way, I know most people get on to moviewizguy for his hyper-positive reviews on....well....almost everything, but at least he (along with everyone else on this forum) doesn't waste their time by talking trash to everyone like WakeUpStupid. Which brings up a question: When you were looking for a forum to radomnly act like a moron, why pick the Razzies? Obviously, you have WAY too much free time!



Posted By: Julianstark
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 10:52pm
Did Channing Tatum get any write in votes for G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra? For me his lack of a nomination here was a HUGE snub. For what it's worth, those who are Razzie nominated for this film (Sienna Miller and Marlon Wayans) were MUCH better than Tatum

-------------
For Your 2010 Razzie Consideration: The Bounty Hunter and Leap Year --
Check out my blog! http://julianstark-moviesandotherthings.blogspot.com - Movies and Other Things


Posted By: Anuss
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 11:16pm
Originally posted by ShariG

Speaking of the Ugly Truth, what about Katherine Heigl.  Now that is some ugly overacting.
 
She has nomination for Glden Satelite. How can you imagine her nomination also for Razzie's?
 


Posted By: ShariG
Date Posted: February 01 2010 at 11:59pm
Primarily because I think Heigl was one of the year's worst.  She overacts in everything she does, in my opinion.  Gerard Butler was mentioned in an earlier post and I think he was actually a bit better than she was in this movie.

-------------
ShariG63


Posted By: dkla
Date Posted: February 02 2010 at 12:45am
I was kinda surprised that Gerard Butler was not on the list... didn't he have THREE stinkers last year?

Was also surprised that Year One didn't get any Razzie Buzz ("RazzBuzz?").  It was truly unwatchable.



Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: February 02 2010 at 5:04am
Originally posted by conspiracy

Megan Fox...THE walking symbol of whats wrong in Hollywood...and probably society at large. This is what you get when someone is hired based on their ability to wash the directors Ferrari and look "hot" in a Thong;  instead of being hired based on the quality of their acting. Hey..I don't blame this bimbo...she just grabbed the brass ring hanging from Bays appendage as she lathered up that 360 Modena, I blame the uncritical public who just wants to see crap blow up. Sad...friggin sad.
You speak the truth, my friend. And that is why Fox and "Trannies 2" is going to be razzed.


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: February 02 2010 at 5:05am
Originally posted by MacViolinist

New poster here. I actually don't watch very many movies. And looking at the list of stuff put out in the last year reminds me of why. The only two movies I saw in the theater in 2009 were Transformers 2 and Avatar. And tranny too was only because my girlfriend is obsessed with transformers, and I basically had no choice, even suspecting that it was going to be f***tastically bad.

Anyway, in light of that, I was kind of hoping to see the following:

Worst Picture: Trannies 2

Worst Actor: Shia Le Bouf
 
Worst Actress: Meghan Fox

Worst Supporting Actor: Optimus Prime
 
Worst Supporting Actress: The mom from Trannies 2

Worst Onscreen Couple: StarScream and Megatron
 
Worst Sequel/Remake: Trannies 2
 
Worst Director: Michael Bay
 
Worst Screenplay: Michael Bay's Mother's Left Nut.
Well, that's pretty much seeing the best and worst of 2009. Yeah, "Trannies 2" has a great chance of sweeping.


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: February 02 2010 at 5:06am
Originally posted by GTAHater767

I predict, however, that Revenge of the Fallen will sweep the penalties, taking home all 7 categories it was nominated for. It's only such a bad movie because it sets a new low for best-sellers.
Yep, and that's why it's the front runner with 7 nods .. and maybe 7 "wins".


Posted By: hughjassuk
Date Posted: February 02 2010 at 5:20am
I don't get it. Do all your members think that all those godawful spoofs like Dance Flick are BETTER than all the films nominated?! Those excruicating spoofs (where even the trailers are unfunny) should be sweeping the awards year on year. They're the epitome of bad filmmaking.
 
Yes, Transformers 2 & GI Joe were pretty bad but just because they're big budget bloated studio efforts, shouldn't make them any more contenders than stupid, unfunny films which only copy scenes from better ones.
 
As you guys say, go figure!


Posted By: tangerine13
Date Posted: February 02 2010 at 8:34am
John Travolta and his wife (Kelly Preston), have already had a sh*tty enough year.. dont you think? Not sure if I personally would have given them the nod, just me though. 


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: February 02 2010 at 8:42am
Originally posted by tangerine13

John Travolta and his wife (Kelly Preston), have already had a sh*tty enough year.. dont you think? Not sure if I personally would have given them the nod, just me though.

Kelly didn't deserve it at all,'cuz she doesn't have enough screentime nor material to rate her performance.


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: fuldamobil
Date Posted: February 02 2010 at 11:12am
I actually thought Megan Fox was pretty good in Jennifer's Body. And, Freddy Got Fingered is a misunderstood masterpiece. 


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: February 02 2010 at 11:15am
Originally posted by hughjassuk

 Yes, Transformers 2 & GI Joe were pretty bad but just because they're big budget bloated studio efforts, shouldn't make them any more contenders than stupid, unfunny films which only copy scenes from better ones.
Bloated studio efforts are not the only reason why these movies are top contenders. It's also the fact both had bad acting, stupid dialongue, huge plot holes and many other problems.
 
PS: I can't help but notice that "District 9" is among the Oscars' bloated Best Picture catagory. I'm sure saturnwatcher is banging his head against a wall over that one. Hey, we all knew the 10 spots thing was so they cool include blockbusters in a sad attempt to get more viewers!


Posted By: MiguelAntilsu
Date Posted: February 02 2010 at 2:14pm

If all the feedback on the articles are any indication, we've really put ourselves in a big hole.  We may become notorious enough to get televised.  It's bad enough we failed to nominate "The Twilight Saga: New Moon" for Worst Picture because now I can't get revenge on the Moron's Choice Awards.  Sandra Bullock even said she'd show up if she wins Worst Actress.  I don't like her chances because she's competing against Miley Cyrus and Megan Fox.  Michael Bay should win Worst Director by a landslide, but even though Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen may be the big favorite for Worst Picture, the 'booty prize' may end up going to "All About Steve" or "Land of the Lost" instead (I hated those two more than the other three).  Old Dogs and G.I. Joe will probably leave empty-handed because Old Dogs has the fewest nominations of the Worst Picture nominees and G.I. Joe is not favored in any of the categories it's nominated for.

As for the Oscars, I am ashamed that they would deny Best Picture nods for Invictus and Star Trek.


Posted By: TaRaN-RoD
Date Posted: February 02 2010 at 3:20pm
Originally posted by fuldamobil

And, Freddy Got Fingered is a misunderstood masterpiece. 
W...........T........F.......????????
 
Are you crazy???? This is just one of the worst movie I've EVER seen!!!! It's AWFUL!!!! Deserves ''Worst Picture of the Decade'' and by far!!!
 
I'm scared just of thinking about this horrible movie!!!


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: February 02 2010 at 3:33pm
Originally posted by Michaels

Because for the past 2+ years, all this moviewizguy does is go on and on about how every movie up for razzie consideration is "not that bad" (simply because he found those movies somewhat "entertaining"), he even claims some of them are instant classics and should be up for Oscars and gives them all high ratings of anywhere between 6 and 10 stars, and puts them on the same Top Ten Lists with actually good movies. And then he goes around saying how we don't know anything and how our opinions (at our own forum, no less) don't matter, yet he keeps coming back for more. If you ask me, that not someone here to discuss, that's a TROLL. Like I said before, I'm tired of these teenage, non Razzie voting member, armchair critics who can't tell a good movie from a bad telling us how we should be running our awards, and then tell us a minute later how we don't matter ... but they waste their time on our forum anyway.

Wow. You're the troll and you're calling me a troll? Calling me a troll for having an opinion? Calling me a troll yet this whole post shows that you're the troll? Calling me a troll when you're blatantly lying about 99.9% of things to exploit a new user? Oh, ok. I'm the troll. You just made yourself look like a complete fool.

Originally posted by Vits

My point is that they shouldn't be trashed for that reason only.I'm a heterosexual adult,and like many others,I like their music(I personally don't like their voices).There are teen sensations I dislike,but not for being teen sensations.
Vits, I wouldn't bother arguing with Michael. You could argue with a blinking light bulb and it would be the same as arguing with him.


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: February 02 2010 at 3:36pm
Originally posted by augusta87

By the way, I know most people get on to moviewizguy for his hyper-positive reviews on....well....almost everything, but at least he (along with everyone else on this forum) doesn't waste their time by talking trash to everyone like WakeUpStupid. Which brings up a question: When you were looking for a forum to radomnly act like a moron, why pick the Razzies? Obviously, you have WAY too much free time!


The first post with common sense! Thank you! You know, if it weren't for you, I would totally ditch this site.


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: February 02 2010 at 3:36pm
Originally posted by TaRaN-RoD

Originally posted by fuldamobil

And, Freddy Got Fingered is a misunderstood masterpiece. 
W...........T........F.......????????
 
Are you crazy???? This is just one of the worst movie I've EVER seen!!!! It's AWFUL!!!! Deserves ''Worst Picture of the Decade'' and by far!!!
 
I'm scared just of thinking about this horrible movie!!!

The only way someone would even consider putting the words "Freddy Got Fingered" and "masterpiece" in the same sentance is if they were so drunk and/or high at the time that they had no clue what they were watching and lacked the common sense to judge its quality.


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: February 02 2010 at 3:44pm
Originally posted by moviewizguy

Wow. You're the troll and you're calling me a troll? Calling me a troll for having an opinion? Calling me a troll yet this whole post shows that you're the troll? Calling me a troll when you're blatantly lying about 99.9% of things to exploit a new user? Oh, ok. I'm the troll. You just made yourself look like a complete fool.
Vits, I wouldn't bother arguing with Michael. You could argue with a blinking light bulb and it would be the same as arguing with him.

Wow, those are such troll things to say. The only reason why there might be a blnking light bulb over my head is because it's from me trying to figure out why you keep posting here when you disagree with very single thing that's in these forums. What have I lied about, what have I said that made me look like a complete fool? Answer: not a damn thing.


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: February 02 2010 at 3:55pm
Originally posted by Michaels

Because for the past 2+ years, all this moviewizguy does is go on and on about how every movie up for razzie consideration is "not that bad" (simply because he found those movies somewhat "entertaining"), he even claims some of them are instant classics and should be up for Oscars and gives them all high ratings of anywhere between 6 and 10 stars, and puts them on the same Top Ten Lists with actually good movies.

Wow. Ok. I think every user can see what you just posted right there have been more trollish than anything I've ever posted on the Razzie forum in my entire two years on this site. Not only is this post immature, it's also filled with blatant lies and contradictory to the point you're making, something everyone will always see on your posts. You're condescending tone and desperation bores me to tears.

And then he goes around saying how we don't know anything and how our opinions (at our own forum, no less) don't matter, yet he keeps coming back for more.

Oh, it's your forum? Oh, I'm sorry, your Highness. Is your name on this site? No? Wait, wait, wait. Lemme figure it out....but anyway, I'm so so so sorry to act like a martyr on this site. Oh, wait, I mean, your site. And I'm so sorry when I said you guys didn't know anything. I mean, you could know soooo much about a movie without even seeing it, right? I'm sorry for having an opinion. I'm just terribly, terribly sorry and saddened that I don't conform to the masses.

If you ask me, that not someone here to discuss, that's a TROLL. Like I said before, I'm tired of these teenage, non Razzie voting member, armchair critics who can't tell a good movie from a bad telling us how we should be running our awards, and then tell us a minute later how we don't matter ... but they waste their time on our forum anyway.

Wow. Did you just call me a troll? Ok. You wanna play that game? First of all, you're the troll here, no doubt. I mean, many users can see that by now but are afraid to say it for some God-awful reason. I've never acted immature and savage like you are now. I've actually been quite quiet around here the past few weeks and you're calling me a troll? Calling me a troll for having an opinion? Calling me a troll when you're blatantly lying about 99.9% of things to exploit a new user? Oh, ok. I'm the troll. You just made yourself look like a complete fool.

Originally posted by Vits

My point is that they shouldn't be trashed for that reason only.I'm a heterosexual adult,and like many others,I like their music(I personally don't like their voices).There are teen sensations I dislike,but not for being teen sensations.
Vits, I wouldn't bother arguing with Michael. You could argue with a blinking light bulb and it would be the same as arguing with him.


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: February 02 2010 at 4:07pm
Originally posted by Michaels

Wow, those are such troll things to say.

Yet the things you say is what trolls always say.

The only reason why there might be a blnking light bulb over my head is because it's from me trying to figure out why you keep posting here when you disagree with very single thing that's in these forums.

Oh, you finally agree you act like a blinking light bulb. I could have a better argument when staring at a wall.

What have I lied about, what have I said that made me look like a complete fool? Answer: not a damn thing.

Ok. Prepared to be torn apart:

1. You say I put movies with a 6/10 on my top 10 films of the year. This is not true since I've even posted my top 10 of 2009 and the lowest rating on that list is a 9/10.
2. You may be true that I like a lot of movies but it does make you a fool because all you're basically saying is that you hate me for having an opinion.
3. And then you say that I say that you guys don't know anything when I never posted such a thing like that in the past few months.
4. You say I can't tell the difference between a good movie and a bad movie yet there have been plenty of occurrences in the last few weeks that suggest otherwise.
5. And above all, I know you'll read this and reply something that has nothing to do with this and go on with your predictable post with zero substance on how I like every movie, trying to change the subject without letting everyone notice.


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: February 02 2010 at 4:42pm
Originally posted by moviewizguy

Ok. Prepared to be torn apart:

1. You say I put movies with a 6/10 on my top 10 films of the year. This is not true since I've even posted my top 10 of 2009 and the lowest rating on that list is a 9/10.
2. You may be true that I like a lot of movies but it does make you a fool because all you're basically saying is that you hate me for having an opinion.
3. And then you say that I say that you guys don't know anything when I never posted such a thing like that in the past few months.
4. You say I can't tell the difference between a good movie and a bad movie yet there have been plenty of occurrences in the last few weeks that suggest otherwise.
5. And above all, I know you'll read this and reply something that has nothing to do with this and go on with your predictable post with zero substance on how I like every movie, trying to change the subject without letting everyone notice.
1. There is no way in hell "2012" should be among a list of the "best" movies of the year. And "The Ruins" were on that same list last year. Both movies were listed here. That is what I don't care for. Every, single movie is posted in these forum, you automatically give 6 or higher to. Even "disappoints" are given a 5. This is why NO ONE takes your opinion seriously here.
2. I don't "hate" you because of your opinion, I just highly disagree with your opinion.
3. So what if you haven't posted it in a few month, it's been one of your main arguements that you have pulled out of your hat many times before, and has lost you all respect here.
4. Really, like the 6 or higher ratings that you give to everything posted here, mostly based on entertainment value only?
5. Change the subject, sure! Back in 2008, I was among many people personally asking HeadRazz to have you banned from the forum because of your lack of knowing what a good movie is and then telling people off who point this fact to you. He said he wouldn't ban you, but I was free to tell you off all I wanted. So that is what I'm doing. I'm trying to give you a clue and go away. Please, ditch this place. You'd be doing yourself and the rest of us a favor.


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: February 02 2010 at 4:52pm
Originally posted by Michaels

This is why NO ONE takes your opinion seriously here.

Ok. Who are they? Have you spoken to them via private message about it?

2. I don't "hate" you because of your opinion, I just highly disagree with your opinion.

Your posts towards me say otherwise.
3. So what if you haven't posted it in a few month, it's been one of your main arguements that you have pulled out of your hat many times before, and has lost you all respect here.

So what? It has been MONTHS. Nobody even talks about it anymore except yourself! That should be a sign and I'm sure a lot of members here have lost respect of you after what you did this day.

4. Really, like the 6 or higher ratings that you give to everything posted here, mostly based on entertainment value only?

Yeah. If you actually bothered reading my posts instead of looking at numbers only.

5. Change the subject, sure! Back in 2008, I was among many people personally asking HeadRazz to have you banned from the forum because of your lack of knowing what a good movie is and then telling people off who point this fact to you. He said he wouldn't ban you, but I was free to tell you off all I wanted. So that is what I'm doing. I'm trying to give you a clue and go away. Please, ditch this place. You'd be doing yourself and the rest of us a favor.

You and among many others? Yeah, I only remembered you were the only person that wanted me banned because I have a different opinion. And thank you for proving my point for point #2.


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: February 02 2010 at 5:28pm
Originally posted by moviewizguy


Ok. Who are they? Have you spoken to them via private message about it?
You mean other than HeadRazz, saturnwatcher, dEd, CriticalFrank and other major posters who have voiced their opinions against you more than once before?

Your posts towards me say otherwise.
Well, that might be what you think, but it's not. I don't know you as a person, all I know is what you write here.
So what? It has been MONTHS. Nobody even talks about it anymore except yourself! That should be a sign and I'm sure a lot of members here have lost respect of you after what you did this day.
Well no, 'cause at least I'm a paying and voting member of these awards and I agree with most of what's posted here.

You and among many others? Yeah, I only remembered you were the only person that wanted me banned because I have a different opinion. And thank you for proving my point for point #2.
Oh no, there were others who posted their requests of banning you in plain sight in the forum back in 2008.


Posted By: pandamon
Date Posted: February 02 2010 at 6:05pm
I was disappointed. I thought The Taking of Pelham 123 would be a shoe-in for a Worst Picture nomination--or a Worst Remake, Rip-off, or Sequel nomination, at least.

Also, how can you have a Worst Picture of the Decade category and not list The Spirit? I understand it's not as famously bad as Gigli, but it's far less watchable. Depending on my mood, I might even call it worse than Battlefield Earth.


Posted By: MiguelAntilsu
Date Posted: February 02 2010 at 8:50pm

I'm watching the Late Show with David Letterman and the category for tonight's Top 10 is the Top 10 Reasons Your Film Wasn't Nominated for an Academy Award.  You can catch it right now on CBS or tomorrow morning on the CBS website.



Posted By: hughjassuk
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 1:02am
[QUOTE
]Bloated studio efforts are not the only reason why these movies are top contenders. It's also the fact both had bad acting, stupid dialongue, huge plot holes and many other problems.
[/QUOTE]
 
Agree entirely - I just hate those unfunny spoofs even more! Comedies supposely have all the best gags in trailers - I've never laughed once during a trailer for any of those movies! You guys need to aim low and get rid of the chaff before going for the big guns!
 
pps - I like District 9!


Posted By: Mayhem5185
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 3:55am
And thus the great debate about razzie nods has been reduced to michaels and moviewizguy solving their differences the way our ancestors did long ago... and by that i mean like we did when we were in kindergarten "your a troll!" "no your a troll" " no your a troll times infinity!" Are you two freaking serious? At least when head razz and saturn went head to head with the stallone dip dunks it was funny. This is just sad and tragic, i mean i would expect this kind of pissing contest from Wiz since im pretty sure his balls are still waiting to drop, but aren't you thirty something (i think i remember reading about that in one of your, posts i could be wrong but you get the idea) come on michaels your usually one of the more even headed people on the forums, its time to be an adult and move on from this aint it cool crap. and Wiz, im not going to bash you for your opinion, but you got to understand that your kinda walking into the lions den most of the time when you make these post. im not saying people should bash you for your views just stop acting so suprised all the time that your not mr popular with the other guys. And do keep in mind that there have been times when you've brought this on yourself. Anyways im tired and my fingers hurt from typing this on my cell phone. I'll post my thoughts on the nominations later, and also sorry for the posts without paragraphs, for whatever reason my phone doesn't let me do them.


Posted By: Pahn
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 8:54am
This award is as stupid as it sounds! First of all the movies and actors nominated are mostly comedies and childrens' movies. The acting done by the actors in childrens' movies is just as good as it should be -- kids don't want to watch acting like Shawshank Redempion, Gilbert Grape, you name it. The "award" seems to be more focused on the written character roles than the person/actor in question. Like Eddie Murphy in "Imagine That." His acting was a bit over top, but that is what the target audience wants to see. Maybe you razzie people don't, but whatever. Same with Miley Cyrus in the Hannah Montana movie. Her acting is just fine for that movie, in fact, it was great. It seems as if the razzies only want to upset people that like these famous actors. Beacuse it's only rather famous movies that are nominated, and there is so many more horrible movies that came out this year and still apparently rank above these. Whatever...this award is pathetic!  

-------------


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 12:28pm
You're right.The Razzies should take what they do more seriously. I mean,there are movies with worse reviews than the family movies they nominated. However, it's not like what they nominated they didn't deserve it. 

I've been defending http://www.razzies.com/forum/old-dogs_forum399.html - OL'DOGS for days,'cuz I think it's funny, However,I wouldn't encourage Hollywood to make any more movies like it... 


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: TaRaN-RoD
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 2:37pm
Originally posted by Michaels

Originally posted by TaRaN-RoD

Originally posted by fuldamobil

And, Freddy Got Fingered is a misunderstood masterpiece. 
W...........T........F.......????????
 
Are you crazy???? This is just one of the worst movie I've EVER seen!!!! It's AWFUL!!!! Deserves ''Worst Picture of the Decade'' and by far!!!
 
I'm scared just of thinking about this horrible movie!!!

The only way someone would even consider putting the words "Freddy Got Fingered" and "masterpiece" in the same sentance is if they were so drunk and/or high at the time that they had no clue what they were watching and lacked the common sense to judge its quality.
Lol SO true!


Posted By: mlgx
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 3:50pm
I'm Really desappointed with the nominees, There were a lot of UGLY PICTURES AND ACTORS!... 
Pictures like DISASTER MOVIE, PASSENGERS, THE FINAL DESTINATION, FUNNY PEOPLE, WHITE OUT... I really don't understand how you choose the Films... Really. DISASTER MOVIE, IS THE UGLYEST MOVIE EVER!... IS COMPLETLY NOT FUNNY my God!... Every actor is BAD!... And no any nomination!!!!! ... 
Please, be more WIDE.  

William from Argentina  

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Calm down, William...and maybe try using a SMALLER type font next time! 

If you would take a moment to check our choices before bashing them, you'd see that DISASTER MOVIE, the film you seem most offended by, was not only the subject of extensive discussion on our Forum ( http://www.razzies.com/forum/disaster-indeed_topic2619.html - ( http://www.razzies.com/history/08nomPICT.asp - ...




-------------
Willy!


Posted By: MiguelAntilsu
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 5:31pm
Ever since the Razzie nominees were announced, complaints have been pouring in all over the internet.  So until this thing blows over, I won't show my face at the movie theater again.  Here are my predictions:
 
Worst Supporting Actress
Favorite: Julie White
Winner: Kelly Preston
Upset: Ali Larter
 
Worst Supporting Actor
Favorite: Billy Ray Cyrus
Winner: Robert Pattinson
Upset: Hugh Hefner
 
Worst Remake, Ripoff or Sequel
Favorite: The Pink Panther 2
Winner: The Twilight Saga: New Moon
Upset: None
 
Worst Screenplay
Favorite: All About Steve
Winner: The Twilight Saga: New Moon
Upset: None
 
Worst Screen Couple
Favorite: Shia Labeouf and EITHER Megan Fox or any Transformer
Winner: Kristen Stewart and EITHER Robert Pattinson or Taylor Whatz-his-fang
Upset: Sandra Bullock and Bradley Cooper
 
Worst Actress
Favorite: Megan Fox
Winner: Sandra Bullock
Upset: Miley Cyrus
 
Worst Actor
Favorite: Steve Martin
Winner: Will Ferrell
Upset: Jonas Brothers
 
Worst Director
Favorite: Michael Bay
Winner: Michael Bay
Upset: Brad Silberling or Phil Traill
 
Worst Picture
Favorite: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
Winner: Land of the Lost
Upset: All About Steve
 
Worst Actress of the Decade
Favorite: Madonna
Winner: Paris Hilton
Upset: Lindsay Lohan
 
Worst Actor of the Decade
Favorite: Eddie Murphy
Winner: Eddie Murphy
Upset: John Travolta

Worst Picture of the Decade
Favorite: Battlefield Earth
Winner: Freddy Got Fingered
Upset: I Know Who Killed Me


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 6:09pm
Originally posted by Mayhem5185

At least when head razz and saturn went head to head with the stallone dip dunks it was funny.

Ok. Now is has to be funny? I'm sorry but I don't find this funny at all.

and Wiz, im not going to bash you for your opinion, but you got to understand that your kinda walking into the lions den most of the time when you make these post. im not saying people should bash you for your views just stop acting so suprised all the time that your not mr popular with the other guys.

I know I'm not popular. The reason I'm surprised is because Michael post lies all of the time. It's ridiculous and I'm so awe-struck that not one user bothers to mention this.


Posted By: saturnwatcher
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 8:00pm
Only one surprise for me on the final ballot...no AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLVIIINNNNN!

-------------
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken


Posted By: saturnwatcher
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 8:11pm
Originally posted by augusta87

By the way, I know most people get on to moviewizguy for his hyper-positive reviews on....well....almost everything, but at least he (along with everyone else on this forum) doesn't waste their time by talking trash to everyone like WakeUpStupid. Which brings up a question: When you were looking for a forum to radomnly act like a moron, why pick the Razzies? Obviously, you have WAY too much free time!

Typically, we have a long standing tradition on this forum of treating each other with respect. Outsiders who post stuff like that are ignored. Of course, I'll roast the Stallone apologists with profound delight, simply because they come with guns flaming and all the energy they can muster with their mono-syllabic vocabulary. but all I can say about people like WakeUpStupid is that he/she obviously did. Wink

-------------
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 8:56pm
Originally posted by moviewizguy

[QUOTE=Mayhem5185]At least when head razz and saturn went head to head with the stallone dip dunks it was funny.

Yeah, it's true, they are better at it than me. I've had my fun with MWG, blowing off some much needed steam I guess.


Posted By: saturnwatcher
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 9:07pm
Originally posted by Pahn

This award is as stupid as it sounds, first of all the movies and actors nominated are mostly comedys and children movies. The acting done by the actors in children movies is just as good as it should be, kids don't want to watch acting like Shawshank Redempion, Gilbert Grape, you name it.
 
By any definition I'd be willing to accept, among the 14 or so movies nominated in the various categories, there isn't a single "children's movie." Transformers and GI Joe were directed not primarly towards children, but rather at late stage baby boomers and Gen Xers who grew up with the toys. Hannah Montana is directed towards "tweener" girls. There are several comedies, probably because there isn't a more apt target than a comedy that seriously misfires.  
 
The "award" seems to be more focus on the written character roles than the person/actor in question. Like Eddie Murphy in "Imagine That", his acting was a bit over top, but that is want the target audience wants to see, mabye you don't but whatever. Same as with Miley Cyrus in the Hannah Montana movie, she is acting just fine for that movie, it was great.
 
Based on Murphy's last several movies, I really don't want to see him on the silver screen anymore. What he does can not be classified as "acting". In a way, it is terribly sad. He is an incredibly talented comic who developed classic characters and comedy sketches in his SNL days...Gumby and Buckwheat were hilarious. Alas, like most of SNL alums, a little goes a long way. It is a bit like Rowan Atkins' character Mr. Bean. In a 25 minute television show, he is terrific. Put the same character in a 90 minute film and it gets awfully tedious. As for Miley Cyrus and, for that matter, the rest of her family, their 15 minutes should have been long since exhausted.
 
It seems as if the razzle only wants to upset people that like these famous actors. Beacuse it's only rather famous movies nominated and there is so many horrible movies that came out this year and still apparently rank above these. Whatever this award is pathetic.
 
Of course we tend to fire on the higher profile films. As Jerome Lawrence once said Matthew Harrison Brady said, "If St. George had slain a dragon fly, who'd remember him?" (See his classic play twice adapted to film,  Inherit the Wind.) I don't think any of us here at the Razzies are out to upset anyone who looks up to famous actors. In fact, I suspect if our poor attentions are upsetting anyone, perhaps there is already a degree of insecurity about whether or not some of these people are really worthy of one's admiration. (A point we are not shy to make, even if sometimes subtley.) What we do is deflate some overstuffed shirts from time to time. I haven't been around anywhere near as long as Head Razz or some of the others in the upper echelon, but I have noticed that after every single one of the past Razzie presentations, the sun rose again the next day on every corner of the planet.


-------------
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken


Posted By: augusta87
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 9:09pm
I'm not sure why anyone would appreciate the "GREAT" works of Sylvester Stallone anyway. I can count all of the good films he has ever made on one hand: Rocky, First Blood, Rocky Balboa (to a certain extent), Cop Land (once again, only to a certain extent), and Antz (only because he played a minor voice role). Other than that, unless you're drunk enough to watch Demolition Man, Stallone's good films are pretty limited.


Posted By: MacViolinist
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 9:17pm
Originally posted by saturnwatcher

Typically, we have a long standing tradition on this forum of treating each other with respect. . . .

I was pretty pumped about participating in this forum until I read that. Way to steal all the fun. Back to sitting through Pandorum to see how bad it really is.


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 9:22pm

I've been looking around this site and forums, and I see alot of people giving you guys hell over what you choices for Worst Picture. I don't know why everyone is moaning about, these are the best picks possible. There is not a watchable or enjoyable movie among them. "Transformers 2" and "GI Joe", did the directors have their eyes closed when they were filming these? "All About Steve", proof why rom-coms need a reboot more than the Spider-Man movies. "Land of the Lost" was doomed to fail the moment Will Ferrell signed on, and "Lost Dogs", Seth Green had to carry that whole movie, and he couldn't do that. You guys know what you're doing. 

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Thanks for those lone words of encouragement amongst a sea of complaints. I guess if we weren't pissing off fans of the movies we RAZZ, we wouldn't be doing our jobs.

Oh, and...welcome to our Forum, BurnHollywoodBurn!  



-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: saturnwatcher
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 9:29pm
Originally posted by augusta87

I'm not sure why anyone would appreciate the "GREAT" works of Sylvester Stallone anyway. I can count all of the good films he has ever made on one hand: Rocky, First Blood, Rocky Balboa (to a certain extent), Cop Land (once again, only to a certain extent), and Antz (only because he played a minor voice role). Other than that, unless you're drunk enough to watch Demolition Man, Stallone's good films are pretty limited.
 
I think it is primarily a cult of personality. My theory is that there'd be a whole lot less Christians in the world if most of them actually read the Bible. Wink Similarly, most of the Stallone fans probably aren't really watching the movie, they are just thrilling to the carnal images of flying body parts without actually stopping to create an intellectual context which would permit them to realize that, for the most part, there is no story to accompany the carnage. Nor is there a well developed character for them to idolize...just a paper cutout with slightly different paste on clothing depending on the film.


-------------
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken


Posted By: MiguelAntilsu
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 9:33pm
"There is not a watchable or enjoyable movie among them."
 
I beg to differ because I watched all five movies and I enjoyed the experience watching three of them.
 
"These are the best picks possible."
 
Wrong again.  If they were the best picks possible, they would've included Miss March and The Twilight Saga: New Moon.


Posted By: augusta87
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 9:39pm
I agree with you -- with the exception of Miss March's exclusion from the Worst Picture category, of course!   

Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

I've been looking around this site and forums, and I see alot of people giving you guys hell over what you choices for Worst Picture. I don't know why everyone is moaning about, these are the best picks possible. There is not a watchable or enjoyable movie among them. "Transformers 2" and "GI Joe", did the directors have their eyes closed when they were filming these? "All About Steve", proof why rom-coms need a reboot more than the Spider-Man movies. "Land of the Lost" was doomed to fail the moment Will Ferrell signed on, and "Lost Dogs", Seth Green had to carry that whole movie, and he couldn't do that. You guys know what you're doing. 



-------------


Posted By: augusta87
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 9:40pm

Oh, and with the exclusion of Street Fighter: The Legend of Chun-Li too.



Posted By: saturnwatcher
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 9:41pm
Originally posted by MiguelAntilsu

"There is not a watchable or enjoyable movie among them."
 
I beg to differ because I watched all five movies and I enjoyed the experience watching three of them.
 
"These are the best picks possible."
 
Wrong again.  If they were the best picks possible, they would've included Miss March and The Twilight Saga: New Moon.
That of course, is one man's opinion, but decidedly a minority view. Actually, New Moon managed to do somewhat better than I anticipated with 4 nominations on the final ballot, but I'd be surprised to see it win anything. It is getting a well deserved poke or two...it doesn't deserve a full blown clubbing. Sorry...it just doesn't.

-------------
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken


Posted By: augusta87
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 9:45pm
Originally posted by saturnwatcher

Originally posted by MiguelAntilsu

"There is not a watchable or enjoyable movie among them."
 
I beg to differ because I watched all five movies and I enjoyed the experience watching three of them.
 
"These are the best picks possible."
 
Wrong again.  If they were the best picks possible, they would've included Miss March and The Twilight Saga: New Moon.
That of course, is one man's opinion, but decidedly a minority view. Actually, New Moon managed to do somewhat better than I anticipated with 4 nominations on the final ballot, but I'd be surprised to see it win anything. It is getting a well deserved poke or two...it doesn't deserve a full blown clubbing. Sorry...it just doesn't.
I agree with you on Twilight Saga, but I'm actually surprised that its backlash didn't give it more nominations. Granted, I only voted to nominate Taylor Lautner, but I was sure that there was enough New Moon haters to get it nominated.


Posted By: augusta87
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 9:49pm
By the way, I also agree with saturnwatcher's comments against Vits and Pahn. In the end, many of these high-profile actors ultimately know better than to underperform in a particular film. Given the fact that Eddie Murphy received an Oscar nomination for his performance in Dreamgirls, he has no one to blame for his Razzie nominations other than himself.

-------------


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 9:52pm
You liked three of those movies? Are you really sure about that? There's nothing to enjoy about any of them. I've had more fun watching grass grow or paint dry than watch those movies. Hell, giving myself a papercut and rubbing salt and lemon juice on the wound was as enjoyable as watching any of those movies. As for "Miss March" and anything to do with "Twilight", I haven't seen those. And from what I heard, I'm not missing much.  

Originally posted by MiguelAntilsu

"There is not a watchable or enjoyable movie among them."
 
I beg to differ because I watched all five movies and I enjoyed the experience watching three of them.
 
"These are the best picks possible."
 
Wrong again.  If they were the best picks possible, they would've included Miss March and The Twilight Saga: New Moon.





-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 9:54pm
Originally posted by augusta87

Oh, and with the exclusion of Street Fighter: The Legend of Chun-Li too.
Hehehe, Chris Klein, funniest role of his career. And it wasn't even suppose to be a comedy! Or was it?


Posted By: augusta87
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 9:56pm

Regardless, now that my pick for Worst Picture (Miss March) is out of the running, I will most likely choose either Land of the Lost or All About Steve. I was between Christine DeMarco (C Me Dance) or Beyonce (Obsessed) for Worst Actress, so that narrows down my options a bit.



Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 9:59pm
Originally posted by augusta87

Regardless, now that my pick for Worst Picture (Miss March) is out of the running, I will most likely choose either Land of the Lost or All About Steve. I was between Christine DeMarco (C Me Dance) or Beyonce (Obsessed) for Worst Actress, so that narrows down my options a bit.
What a great year it would be for Beyonce. Six Grammy Awards and a Golden Raspberry! But which would go for the most money if sold on e-bay?


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 9:59pm
Originally posted by saturnwatcher

 
I think it is primarily a cult of personality. My theory is that there'd be a whole lot less Christians in the world if most of them actually read the Bible. Wink 
Amen to that, brother, amen to that!Clap


Posted By: saturnwatcher
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 10:02pm
I have to admit that right now, I am leaning toward giving my vote to Land of the Lost. In the long line of recent Hollywood adaptations of old television series, it is the only film that actually does justice to the series...which is most of the problem. Big smile

-------------
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken


Posted By: augusta87
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 10:02pm
YES! I'm still a little mad that Chris Klein ridiculous performance wasn't even on the nominating ballot. I would given up all rights of being a voting Razzie member just to see Chris Klein "win" for Worst Supporting Actor. Alas, it did not happen, but I will try (key word: try) not to complain too much about it.  

Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

Originally posted by augusta87

Oh, and with the exclusion of Street Fighter: The Legend of Chun-Li too.
Hehehe, Chris Klein, funniest role of his career. And it wasn't even suppose to be a comedy! Or was it?


-------------


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 10:03pm
Originally posted by augusta87

I'm not sure why anyone would appreciate the "GREAT" works of Sylvester Stallone anyway. I can count all of the good films he has ever made on one hand: Rocky, First Blood, Rocky Balboa (to a certain extent), Cop Land (once again, only to a certain extent), and Antz (only because he played a minor voice role). Other than that, unless you're drunk enough to watch Demolition Man, Stallone's good films are pretty limited.
Only 5 good movies in a four decade career? No wonder he's the Razzies' personal whipping boy!


Posted By: augusta87
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 10:07pm
Originally posted by saturnwatcher

I have to admit that right now, I am leaning toward giving my vote to Land of the Lost. In the long line of recent Hollywood adaptations of old television series, it is the only film that actually does justice to the series...which is most of the problem. Big smile
Ha! I completely agree with you. In fact, I almost feel sorry for Jorma Taccone ("Cha-Ka"). I'm not sure if anyone could do a good job with that character. Robin Williams on his best day EVER couldn't play Cha-Ka effectively. It's just a ridiculous character!


Posted By: saturnwatcher
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 10:11pm
I'm going to start a betting pool here...any one want to bet on the date that we will see the release of Saved by the Bell: The Motion Picture ?

-------------
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken


Posted By: augusta87
Date Posted: February 03 2010 at 10:12pm

Zac Ephron plays Zack, Taylor Lautner plays Slater,. . .




Print Page | Close Window