Print Page | Close Window

Reviews on DEATH @ a FUNERAL

Printed From: Official RAZZIEŽ Forum
Category: DISCUSSIONS & POLLS on 2010 RELEASES
Forum Name: DEATH AT a FUNERAL
Forum Discription: One Un-Dying Question: WHY REMAKE THIS SO SOON?!?!?!?!?
URL: http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4247
Printed Date: July 25 2014 at 1:48pm


Topic: Reviews on DEATH @ a FUNERAL
Posted By: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: Reviews on DEATH @ a FUNERAL
Date Posted: April 12 2010 at 10:54am
If you haven't seen http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0795368/ - of this material, you might think this one is fine. But we're betting most film crix will remember seeing the British original (all of 3 years ago!) and will likely find the 2010 remake of http://www.metacritic.com/film/titles/deathatafuneral2010?q=Death%20at%20a%20Funeral%20 - http://www.metacritic.com/film/titles/deathatafuneral2010?q=Death%20at%20a%20Funeral - , and http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/death_at_a_funeral_2010/ - , to see if we're right...  



-------------
Ye Olde Head RAZZberry



Replies:
Posted By: ziesha
Date Posted: November 11 2010 at 11:23pm
Death Proof is superbly made. There's a terrible tension watching these beautiful and spirited young women getting too close to the flame, followed by enormous relief when the mood changes in the second story.

-------------


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: November 12 2010 at 9:32am
Originally posted by ziesha

Death Proof is superbly made. There's a terrible tension watching these beautiful and spirited young women getting too close to the flame, followed by enormous relief when the mood changes in the second story.
And here I thought MWG mastered the art of sugarcoating reviews for movies that don't deserve to be sugarcoated.

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: November 12 2010 at 12:01pm

Why so many positive reviews at Metacritic?

Rotten Tomatoes gave it 38%, which isn't really dismal, but merely marginal.



-------------
Possible Unofficial Forums, given <35% approval: Ags 8; TMNT '014. Ags 13; Let's Be Cops. Ags 15; The Giver, The Expendables 3. Ags 29; Jessabelle


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: November 12 2010 at 12:43pm
Originally posted by GTAHater767

Why so many positive reviews at Metacritic?

Rotten Tomatoes gave it 38%, which isn't really dismal, but merely marginal.

I don't know, 38% seems pretty dismal to me. 40% or lower is just pitiful!

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: November 12 2010 at 1:37pm
Then why did it get more positive than negative reviews from pro critics?

-------------
Possible Unofficial Forums, given <35% approval: Ags 8; TMNT '014. Ags 13; Let's Be Cops. Ags 15; The Giver, The Expendables 3. Ags 29; Jessabelle


Posted By: ziesha
Date Posted: November 15 2010 at 4:14am
well every one has a choice and so do i .... I liked the movie , it was not sugarcoating of that 


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: November 15 2010 at 7:56am
Originally posted by ziesha

well every one has a choice and so do i .... I liked the movie , it was not sugarcoating of that 
It's a near copy and paste of everything that happened in a movie that came out 3 years eariler.

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.



Print Page | Close Window