Print Page | Close Window

Reviews on LETTERS TO JULIET

Printed From: Official RAZZIEŽ Forum
Category: DISCUSSIONS & POLLS on 2010 RELEASES
Forum Name: LETTERS TO JULIET
Forum Discription: The Slo-Mo Death Throes of the Rom/Com Continue...
URL: http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4279
Printed Date: September 20 2014 at 9:11pm


Topic: Reviews on LETTERS TO JULIET
Posted By: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: Reviews on LETTERS TO JULIET
Date Posted: May 10 2010 at 10:00am
Many a critic would rather emulate Romeo -- and take poison -- than sit through something like this again! 

Here's http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/letters_to_juliet/%20 -  and http://www.metacritic.com/film/titles/letterstojuliet - ...  


-------------
Ye Olde Head RAZZberry



Replies:
Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: April 12 2011 at 12:41pm
R.T. gave it 40%:"It has a refreshingly earnest romantic charm,but it suffers from limp dialogue and an utter lack of surprises".
 
Roger Ebert gave it ***/****:"I know the ending is preordained from the setup.I know the characters are broad and comforting stereotypes.In this case,I simply don't care.Sometimes we have personal reasons for responding to a film".
 
Peter Travers gave it **/****:"Redgrave is incandescent, and casting Franco Nero as LORENZO was inspired".


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile



Print Page | Close Window