Print Page | Close Window

Perhaps THIS Will Bling a Bell?!?!?!?

Printed From: Official RAZZIE® Forum
Category: 31st Annual RAZZIE® Award Nominees & "WINNERS"
Forum Name: SEX & THE CITY, TOO
Forum Discription: "WINNER" of 3 RAZZIES® including WORST SEQUEL (Nominated for 7)
URL: http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4308
Printed Date: August 28 2014 at 8:26pm


Topic: Perhaps THIS Will Bling a Bell?!?!?!?
Posted By: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: Perhaps THIS Will Bling a Bell?!?!?!?
Date Posted: May 22 2010 at 6:11pm
IN a TIME WHEN FAMILIES ARE STILL BEING EVICTED from FORECLOSED HOMES, JOBS ARE STILL TOO SCARCE and GENUINE LAUGHS ARE SCARCER STILL, IT's ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE to DEFEND a PAEAN to MATERIALISM and BLING LIKE http://www.razzies.com/forum/sex-the-city-too_forum437.html -
AND, JUST LIKE the FIRST FILM (and FRANKLY, the ENTIRE HBO SERIES) THIS ONE IS #2 in MANY WAYS... 

LET'S TAKE a MOMENT, and COUNT THOSE WAYS:  

1) THERE'S NOT ONE of ITS CORE GROUP of CHARACTERS WHO ISN'T BLING-OBSESSED, SHOE-OBSESSED, FASHION-OBSESSED or OTHERWISE FOCUSED ON the TRULY UNIMPORTANT THINGS in LIFE...  

2) AREN'T THESE LADIES GETTING a TAD LONG-in-the-TOOTH to STILL BE LIVING THIS LIFESTYLE??  

3) WAS IT TOO MUCH to HOPE THAT, SINCE IT's LARGELY SET in DUBAI, the FOUR MAIN LADIES WOULD BE FORCED to WEAR BURKAS -- and the AUDIENCE WOULD BE SPARED HAVING to LOOK at THEIR SURGICALLY ENHANCED FACES??

3) THIS SHOULD QUALIFY for WORST SEQUEL, WORST ACTRESS (PERHAPS a GROUP NOMINATION for the FOUR PRINCIPALS) WORST SCREENPLAY, WORST EXCUSE for a ROM/COM and, THANKS to a MERCIFULLY BRIEF CAMEO by http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094678/awards - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094678/awards - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094678/awards - , WORST SUPPORTING ACTRESS... 

SADLY, WOMEN ALL ACROSS AMERICA ATE THIS UP with a SPOON...WHILE MOST MEN WE KNOW FOUND IT ABOUT as APPETIZING AS a SPOONFUL of BOOGERS. 

OKAY, WE'VE RUN OUT of VITRIOL -- NOW IT's YOUR TURN!  

UPDATE/SPECIAL LINK: HERE's a http://www.observer.com/2010/culture/sex-pity - to READ REX REED's  http://www.observer.com/2010/culture/sex-pity - http://www.observer.com/2010/culture/sex-pity - WE PROMISE YOU'LL ENJOY READING IT! 



LIZA: "I SURRENDER!! Just give me that Worst 
Supporting Actress nomination now..."  

SCARY LINK: LIZA IS SEEN ABOVE SINGING BEYONCE's 
"IF YOU LIKE IT, THEN YOU SHOULDA PUT a RING ON IT!" 
-- and DOING SO HORRIBLY! 

HERE's http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dq3s_rTViK0&feature=related - to SEE and HEAR IT, IN AWL ITZ GOD-AWFUL 
GLORY, on http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dq3s_rTViK0&feature=related -



-------------
Ye Olde Head RAZZberry



Replies:
Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: May 22 2010 at 6:24pm
*Looks at the cast of this movie* Busu! Busu! BUSU!
 
Several elderly women who worked at my high school liked Sex & The City 1. I heard it was average, not good, not bad. With George "Dubya" Bush out of office, it's easy to forget the economy's irredeemably stuck in the tank. I will give it a pinch of credit: This doesn't look nearly as bad as Bratz: The Movie (the 4th worst film of 2007). However, nearly all the women in this movie are so ugly!
 
UPDATE: Upon a closer look, Minelli's legs look like they're made out of wood in that photo!


-------------
Possible Unofficial Forums, given <35% approval: Ags. 29; As Above, So Below


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: May 22 2010 at 9:53pm
I always thought "Sex And The City" was just "Bratz For Middle-Aged Women", mostly because, well, THEY ARE!  

Originally posted by GTAHater767

This doesn't look nearly as bad as Bratz: The Movie (the 4th worst film of 2007).However, nearly all the women in this movie are so ugly!


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: RoadDogXVIII
Date Posted: May 23 2010 at 5:44pm
Don't forget:

4.) Miley Cyrus has a cameo. If that's not an excuse to run for the hills, then I don't know what is.

-------------
You think you know, but you have no idea.


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: May 23 2010 at 7:31pm
My lord -- this movie just gets more Razzie-worthy by the minute!

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: May 24 2010 at 10:29am

The ending of the show was OK, but why do they continue? 

I'm just glad they didn't make the first movie right after the show ended like they planned,or it would've sucked. 


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: May 24 2010 at 12:14pm
"Why do they continue?" The same reason ANYTHING is done in Hollywood: Money, Money, Money, Money, Money!  

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: So is this post a Berry Subtle Reference to http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0591485/ - ® for http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0068327/awards - ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkRIbUT6u7Q - )...before "winning" her (first?) RAZZIE® for http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094678/awards - and http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0095977/awards -


Posted By: Berrynoia
Date Posted: May 24 2010 at 1:33pm
The RT score (for the first one) was 49%, so even the crix called it average.  But this second one is starting off on the wrong track. Also, I am sick of this Bling and Bratz stuff.  It promotes "Libby" girls and encourages these bratty girls from birth through adulthood...
 
Oh crap, I just thought of something even scarierSex and the City 3: Geriatric Girls.  They will wear skimpy clothing in this, parade about with their bling even then, brag about how they are better than everyone else, and also the traditional SatC stuff.  Eddie Murphy makes a cameo as Rasputia from Norbit!
 
Also, I do agree about the wooden legs.  Isn't their acting just as wooden?  Wooden also makes me think of Keanu Reeves, for some reason...  


-------------


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: May 24 2010 at 4:41pm
Eddie Murphy in drag for a "Sex and the City 3"!? No, do not speak of such a thing, or else it might actually happen!!!

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: May 24 2010 at 5:46pm
Don't worry, Murphy's busy getting up 10 drag costumes for NUTTY PROFESSOR 3.

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: May 24 2010 at 6:14pm
Would that mean Murphy could be eligible to win 10+ Razzies in one award season?!?!?

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: May 25 2010 at 7:22pm
Let's see...Murphy would be elegible for "Worst Actor"(as SHERMAN KLUMP and BUDDY LOVE)"Worst Supporting Actor"(as PAPA & ERNIE KLUMP)"Worst Supporting Actress"(as MAMA & GRANDMA KLUMP) and "Worst Screenplay." With the rest of the categories, it depends:  

1)"Worst Picture" and/or "Worst Remake or Sequel": He may be a producer, but probably won't be director. He said so after HARLEM NIGHTS.

2)"Worst Couple"We don't know the co-stars, but he could be nominated by himself again for 2 or more of his characters.


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: Julianstark
Date Posted: May 25 2010 at 8:06pm
Back onto the topic of Sex and the City 2, has anyone heard Liza Minnelli's cover of "Singles Ladies (Put a Ring on It)"? It's kind of a terrible cover, if you ask me.  

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Guess you missed it above (just below the scary image of Liza with no pants on) -- Here's http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kyi1SOsT6G4&feature=related - to hear http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kyi1SOsT6G4&feature=related - of the Beyonce' song. But, no, it's not "kind of a terrible cover," it's an out-and-out terrible cover. For one thing, the back-up track sounds like Karaoke Night in Kansas City!  


-------------
For Your 2010 Razzie Consideration: The Bounty Hunter and Leap Year --
Check out my blog! http://julianstark-moviesandotherthings.blogspot.com - Movies and Other Things


Posted By: kelemenmarc
Date Posted: May 26 2010 at 9:11am
Ok i don't care if SJP will be nominated but don't hurt Cynthia Nixon and Kim Cattrall. Cynthia has some very incredible performances and i think Kim was the only funny thing about SATC 2. 

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Unfortunately, the likely upshot for the leading ladies in this is that, in order to allow room for other "achievements" in their category, like The Spice Girls and decade ago and the Jonas Brothers for 2009, the four of them would be listed JOINTLY for Worst Actress. BTW: The "Girls" and the "Brothers" both ending up as RAZZIE® "winners"...  


-------------
FYC:
Worst Movie: The Bounty Hunter
Worst Actor: Johnny Depp (Alice in Wonderland / The Tourist)


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: May 26 2010 at 11:19am
I find it kinda odd that the women are taking a vacation in an Arab country, but are allowed to dress however they like. Only in the movies could women have "fun" being in an anti-female country!  

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: kelemenmarc
Date Posted: May 26 2010 at 3:03pm
Please, every voter who reads this - we have already got for Worst Actress this year: Megan Fox, Jennifer Aniston, Jennifer Lopez, Milla Jovovich, Kristen Bell, Kristen Stewart, etc. So please forget about the SATC girls, or just vote for SJP, cause the other 3 women don't deserve your votes.


-------------
FYC:
Worst Movie: The Bounty Hunter
Worst Actor: Johnny Depp (Alice in Wonderland / The Tourist)


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: May 26 2010 at 4:47pm
That all depends. With movies like "Valentine's Day", "Grown-Ups", "Expandables" and other movies starring "all-star" casts, I think it's safe to say there may very well be a Worst Ensemble Cast catagory in the Razzies' future. If so, this movie will be a prime target as well.

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: May 26 2010 at 5:03pm
None of the actresses in this should be nominated for a Razzie. They were good actresses on the show. I know it's not the same,but it's not fair to nominate them just because the movie isn't well done(the pre-release rating is 0%.It will change radically after the premiere,but it won't be over 59%).  

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: The RAZZIES® have never been about whether someone was "good" in some other project or context -- They are, like most showbiz-based awards, specifically about the nominee's work in the project(s) for which they are being considered. While the bulk of the vitriol in http://www.razzies.com/forum/reviews-on-sex-the-city-2_topic4307.html%20 - Guess we'll have to wait 'till the actual http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic876_post6176.html#6176 -


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: May 26 2010 at 5:41pm
Okay, what is all this "they are good actresses" debate everyone is pushing for? That means nothing. No actress gives only flawless performances in every movie she appears in -- They have to screw up sooner or later, and the fact they gave good performances in the past doesn't mean anything when they star in something Razzie-worthy. Just look at the past Razzie nods and "winners," many of whom had Oscar nods and/or wins before they got Razzed. So being "good actresses"as innoculation against being a Razzie target is nonsense ... anyone can be a Razzie target if they star in a sh*tty movie or give a sh*tty performance.


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: May 26 2010 at 6:40pm
I don't know about their other works,but they act the same way they did in the show,and the Emmy and Golden Globe noms. aren't handed out like free candy bars.  

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: To reiterate what has already been said repeatedly above (and elsewhere on this Forum): A film-maker's past credentials are not the be-all/end-all of their being considered for a RAZZIE® nomination. As for the specific "honors" you cite as evidence of these four actresses' merits, I find it amusing that you've chosen to focus on two of the most industry-maligned competitions -- The Emmys have so many categories it's surprising they don't honor Best Donuts at the Craft Services Table, and The Golden Globes, voted on by less than 90 individuals (who have in the past been accused of being swayed by "free candy bars") are secretly an industry joke, largely enjoyed by insiders as the one awards night where attendees get rip-roaring drunk during the proceedings, since one of their corporate sponsors is a champagne company...  



-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: kelemenmarc
Date Posted: May 27 2010 at 4:23am
Well, i think when somebody will be a Razzie nominee and before he/she won an Oscar or Emmy, Golden-Globe, that's shame. I dont wanna see Cynthia Nixon as Razzie nominee.


-------------
FYC:
Worst Movie: The Bounty Hunter
Worst Actor: Johnny Depp (Alice in Wonderland / The Tourist)


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: May 27 2010 at 5:10am
Even if these actresses did well on TV shows, movies are another animal. They can be playing different characters, and the pacing of a movie and its storytelling are different than that of a TV show. All this will affect the actresses' performance. 

In the end, it really doesn't matter if they get Razzie nods or not -- it's not like some big black eye on their career. Halle Berry and Sandra Bullock (both Oscar winners) "won" Razzie Awards, and they didn't fall off the face of the Earth. 

Actually, if you notice, actors' careers usually go to s*** after they win Oscars, not Razzies -- Just ask Cuba Gooding Jr.


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: May 28 2010 at 1:03pm
I know is different to act in a movie than in a TV show,but since they act the same way they did in the show,it would be more logical to assume their performances won't be bad.
 
I know they're able to give bad performances in other movies playing different characters.After All,Sarah Jessica Parker was nominated for a Razzie for http://www.razzies.com/forum/did-you-hear-about-the-morgans_forum403.html - DID YOU HEAR ABOUT "THE MORGANS"? ,and Kim Cattrall for THE BONFIRE OF THE VANITIES.


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: May 28 2010 at 1:53pm
And then there's the other X factors: the director and the script! If they suck, it doesn't matter what the performances were like on the TV show ... and from what I've read, the director and the script do indeed suck!


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: saturnwatcher
Date Posted: May 28 2010 at 2:37pm
It is really difficult for me to weigh in on this discussion because: 

1. I never watched a single episode of the show, so I have no basis for comparison, and... 

2. I'm hoping beyond hope that this movie fades into obsurity without any attention from the Razzies. 

If it does earn nominations, I will have to see it at some point. That means I'll probably have to watch a few episodes of the series as well to get some context. Which all sounds like the 8th circle of hell.


-------------
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: May 28 2010 at 3:57pm
"I'm hoping beyond hope that this movie fades into obsurity without any attention from the Razzies." -- We can only hope, so even more attention is not given to this movie.

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: janmacy
Date Posted: May 29 2010 at 5:58pm
I'm very thankful I didn't read the reviews before seeing Sex and The City 2.  I thoroughly enjoyed it! Then I am a girl,  and it was the perfect fantasy movie for these times!  YOU GO GIRLS!


Posted By: saturnwatcher
Date Posted: May 29 2010 at 9:57pm
Welcome to the board Jan. However, I must sadly take strong issue with the very first post you have made here. I did not do a comprehensive tally of the female critics who's work is posted at RT. However, I suspect that the opinions of the first 20 I came across as pretty representative. Of those 20,  3 were positive and 17 were negative (most strongly so). That is a 15% positive rating, which precisely mirrors the overall RT rating for the movie.  

Originally posted by janmacy

I'm very thankful I didn't read the reviews before seeing Sex and The City 2.  I thoroughly enjoyed it! Then I am a girl,  and it was the perfect fantasy movie for these times!  YOU GO GIRLS!


-------------
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken


Posted By: saturnwatcher
Date Posted: May 29 2010 at 10:10pm
Curiosity got the best of me, so I went back and tallied all of the reviews for SITC 2 that were written by female critics. Overall, 7 were positive, 36 were negative, for a score of slightly over 16% -- just a sneeze higher than the overall score of 15%. 

Incidentally, female critcs accounted for approximately 1/3 of the total input. Bottomline: Women will almost certainly enjoy this movie more than men, particularly if they were fans of the series to start with. However, among people who review movies for a living, it isn't evident that women liked this movie any better than men...and not many of either sex liked it at all. 


-------------
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: May 30 2010 at 9:30am
Well, there's no doubt female movie goers will enjoy this movie more than men, seeing as how that is the movie's target audience. I guess female critics just happen to have more common sense! 

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: May 30 2010 at 10:44am
Fantasy movie? Are you sure?  

Originally posted by janmacy

It was the perfect fantasy movie for these times!


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: May 30 2010 at 11:30am
Women being able to easily afford anything they want, and have the perfect marriage with the man of their dreams ... sounds like the perfect chick fantasy movie to me!  

Originally posted by janmacy

It was the perfect fantasy movie for these times!
[/QUOTE]


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: May 30 2010 at 12:20pm

They TOLD us this movie was bad for the fight against "Dollar Worship".



-------------
Possible Unofficial Forums, given <35% approval: Ags. 29; As Above, So Below


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: May 30 2010 at 1:38pm
Ah yes, the Almighty Dollar, favorite deity among Hollywood studio heads.


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: moorlock2003
Date Posted: May 31 2010 at 12:52pm
Please, yes, let's have a Worst Actress nomination for the homely head of this troop of drooping boobs, the narrator from Hell, Sarah Jessica Parker. Gawd she's awful! But the rest of those bimbos are just as bad. The gawdy gals may only think about multiple orgasms, but I think multiple nominations are in order for this putrid excuse for a film.

-------------
Fred Cooper


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: May 31 2010 at 5:09pm
Let's say they will be nominated. In that case,remember S.J.P. is the lead. 

HeadRazz,has there ever been a "Worst Supporting Actress" nominee made out of a bunch of actresses,like The Spice Girls?This time, CARRIE's 3 friends could receive that.


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: May 31 2010 at 6:44pm
Yet another reason why a Worst Ensemble Cast Award is needed. Four or five people competing for one award, or giving an award to "Any Two People On-Screen At The Same Time" just doesn't work. And it fits these days with the on-going trend of "all-star" casts.

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: May 31 2010 at 6:50pm
At least this movie fell short at the box office. Who would have thought we would be thanking the 4th installment of a movie series for being successful?!

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: nyfilmfest
Date Posted: July 01 2010 at 8:35am
[TUBE]Z4udMQBtMzc[/TUBE]

Don't forget to vote for Liza! 

StarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStar

STAR POWER!!!

StarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStar


-------------


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: July 01 2010 at 6:16pm
Wow, is it just me, or does Liza look like Jack Nicholson's Joker in that video?

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: jewelrygirl
Date Posted: July 14 2010 at 12:35am

Do you remember the scene where all the girls are in the diner and Samantha asks them all to join her on her trip to Abu Dhabi?  Did anyone notice her earrings?  Her earrings were beautiful! Also the shop girls’ necklace was quite striking, huge brown beads and quite long. Does anyone know anything about them, or better yet, where I can get anything like that? I’ll settle for necklace, earrings, bracelet- I don’t care, it’s just beautiful!



-------------


Posted By: rburton
Date Posted: July 31 2010 at 9:23am
Originally posted by nyfilmfest

Don't forget to vote for Liza! 

StarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStar

STAR POWER!!!

StarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStarStar


I finally got around to seeing Sex and the City 2 today.  I wouldn't miss nominating Liza for the world!

The last time Liza was up for a Razzie was in 1988 and, of course, she won.  Liza doesn't do anything half-heartedly, which is why she deserves to be rewarded with a nomination for a performance that's every bit as much Twilight Zone as it is Sex and the City.


-------------
For Your Consideration

Dev Patel for WORST SUPPORTING ACTOR in The Last Fartbender


Posted By: JoeBoyden
Date Posted: July 31 2010 at 12:11pm
According to the IMDB, Miley Cyrus is in Sex and the City 2.
 
rburton, is Cyrus also worthy of a Worst Supporting Actress nomination or she just makes a small cameo appearance?


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: July 31 2010 at 3:06pm
Originally posted by JoeBoyden

According to the IMDB, Miley Cyrus is in Sex and the City 2.
 
rburton, is Cyrus also worthy of a Worst Supporting Actress nomination or she just makes a small cameo appearance?
Miley Cyrus has already starred in a lead role in the movie "The Last Song". If she doesn't get a nod Worst Actress for this cameo (and cameos really shouldn't count as supporting roles if they are under 10 minutes), she will surely get a Worst Actress nod for "Last Song".

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: rburton
Date Posted: August 30 2010 at 3:10pm
Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

Originally posted by JoeBoyden

According to the IMDB, Miley Cyrus is in Sex and the City 2.
 
rburton, is Cyrus also worthy of a Worst Supporting Actress nomination or she just makes a small cameo appearance?
Miley Cyrus has already starred in a lead role in the movie "The Last Song". If she doesn't get a nod Worst Actress for this cameo (and cameos really shouldn't count as supporting roles if they are under 10 minutes), she will surely get a Worst Actress nod for "Last Song".


I'm like a month late, but yeah.  She's barely in the movie at all.  A nomination would be insane overkill.  Save the space for Liza.


-------------
For Your Consideration

Dev Patel for WORST SUPPORTING ACTOR in The Last Fartbender


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: August 30 2010 at 4:41pm
Even if it happens,she'd have to be nominated for "Worst Supporting Actress".

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: September 02 2010 at 11:36am
There should really be a minimal screen-time rule about how long being on-screen counts as a "supporting" role, so we don't run the risk of being like the Emmys that one time they gave a Best Supporting Actress nod to an actress who was on-screen for all of 15 seconds!

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: November 09 2010 at 3:19pm
This has been nominated for the People's Choice Awards for "Comedy Movie".Shocker!But will it win?


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: November 09 2010 at 4:51pm
I hope they have a LOT of money then! Otherwise I can't understand how they could stand for a movie about old women obsessed with fancy shoes in this second Great Depression...

-------------
Possible Unofficial Forums, given <35% approval: Ags. 29; As Above, So Below


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: November 09 2010 at 8:25pm
Originally posted by GTAHater767

I hope they have a LOT of money then! Otherwise I can't understand how they could stand for a movie about old women obsessed with fancy shoes in this second Great Depression...
Actually, reports came in a month ago that this so-called "Great Depression" ended back in July of 2009. I mean, if Apple can sell something like 4 million iPads in 7 months, I think people have money to spare these days. But we just don't need entire movies based on that money spending.

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: November 17 2010 at 12:03pm
I'd like for Kim Cattrall to win "Worst Supporting Actress" for this and THE GHOST WRITER.

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: November 17 2010 at 12:54pm
Originally posted by Vits

I'd like for Kim Cattrall to win "Worst Supporting Actress" for this
Do not worry, I shall vote for her in that catagory, seeing as how her character was the most annoying of that movie ... after Sarah Jessica Parker, of course.


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Mayhem5185
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 5:33pm
The only thing i can say about this movie:



Who is that transvestite donkey witch and why is it wearing a dress! LOL



Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 6:29pm
Yep, that's Sarah Jessica Parker alright!


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: curl
Date Posted: February 14 2011 at 10:32pm
She is always good with her role in my opinion. 


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: August 28 2011 at 2:15pm
I just saw this.  

People often equate being materialistic with being shallow. These 4 women are materialistic, but we put up with them for 6 years because they were "deep" and spoke about the complexity of relationships. 

In the first movie, they were all in commited relationships, so they had to focus on the melodrama. It felt like watching a marathon of HBO episodes, especially because they changed the plot;s focus so often. And I felt like the cast and crew were beating a dead horse out of obligation. Guess what? They didn't need to make that movie. 

In this second one, it's easier to watch because it stays on one direction, feeling more like a single, really long episode. But of course, that doesn't mean it's better...or any good at all. I did laugh at times, but none of the puns were funny, and this time the friends said as many of them as CARRIE! And,back to the first point, the characters become shallow as hell*. Sarah Jessica's performance is weak at times, while Kristin's is weak the whole time(just like Chris Noth's). But I didn't find anything wrong with Cynthia, and Kim was over the top, but in the good way. And at least it didn't try and fail at another "happily ever" after ending --it was more of a "we may be back" ending.

I give these movies 6/10 and 5/10 respectively.

*Am I the only one who felt that when CHARLOTTE's daughter messed her skirt she cared more about the brand




-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: August 29 2011 at 7:51am
I forgot to mention...while I'm usually against nominating cameos (because I almost never see bad cameo performance)here, I have to agree with our nominating Liza. When she sang, it seemed she was having one of LUCILLE 2's panic attacks. And yeah, her musical number was laughable. 




-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: SuperTeenTopia
Date Posted: August 30 2011 at 8:29pm
The scene where they sing "I Am Woman, Hear Me Roar" is worse than nails on chalkboard. I guess that scene alone is why all four actresses won Worst Actress.

-------------
"People say 'It's all about the story’. When you're making tentpole films, bull$hit." -Andy Hendrickson (Disney Animation Studios' Chief Technical Officer)


Posted By: pasim
Date Posted: September 06 2011 at 6:39am
I still can't believe I actually saw this film -- I guess it was more because I didn't have anything else to watch, not so much any desire to see it. But I have to say, throughout all the Sex and the City episodes and the first film, I thought Kim was the only thing keeping the show from being overly annoying, and Cynthia was the one who kept it away from being too shallow. Sadly, in this second part, they were both transformed to be more like Carrie, and I couldn't stand them at all.

Total waste of time and money, period!  


-------------



Print Page | Close Window