Print Page | Close Window

Reviews on PREDATORS

Printed From: Official RAZZIEŽ Forum
Category: DISCUSSIONS & POLLS on 2010 RELEASES
Forum Name: PREDATORS
Forum Discription: Striking Yet Another Blow for NON-Originality in 2010 Movie Fare...
URL: http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4404
Printed Date: September 15 2014 at 2:31am


Topic: Reviews on PREDATORS
Posted By: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: Reviews on PREDATORS
Date Posted: July 02 2010 at 12:18pm
Critics are even likelier than movie-goers to be scratching their heads and asking, "Why does this movie even exist??"  

Here's http://www.metacritic.com/film/titles/predators - , and http://beta.rottentomatoes.com/m/10012256-predators/ - to see if reviews of http://www.metacritic.com/film/titles/predators - come up with any answer besides the obvious one: "To make money..." 



-------------
Ye Olde Head RAZZberry



Replies:
Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: April 12 2011 at 12:49pm
R.T. gave it 64%:"After a string of subpar sequels,this bloody,action-packed reboot takes the franchise back to its testosterone-fueled roots".
 
Roger Ebert gave it **/****:"It lacks the quiet suspense of the first PREDATOR,and please don't even mention the ALIEN VS. PREDATOR pictures,which lacked the subtlety of MOTHRA VS. GODZILLA".


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile



Print Page | Close Window