Print Page | Close Window

Please, Pick Up After This DOG!!!

Printed From: Official RAZZIE® Forum
Category: 31st Annual RAZZIE® Award Nominees & "WINNERS"
Forum Name: CATS & DOGS #2: THE REVENGE of KITTY GALORE
Forum Discription: Nominated for WORST EYE-GOUGING MIS-USE of 3-D
URL: http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4506
Printed Date: July 31 2014 at 5:11pm


Topic: Please, Pick Up After This DOG!!!
Posted By: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: Please, Pick Up After This DOG!!!
Date Posted: July 26 2010 at 3:51pm
JUST WHEN YOU THINK HOLLYWOOD CAN'T BE ANY MORE BLATANT in THEIR PANDERING for FAMILY AUDIENCE BUX (and 3-D GLASSES FEES!) ALONG COMES http://www.razzies.com/forum/cats-dogs-the-revenge-of-kitty-galore_forum451.html - to http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0239395/awards - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0239395/awards - ...from NEARLY TEN YEARS AGO! 

WITH a TITLE DIMLY "RIFFING" on http://www.imdb.com/character/ch0000345/ - http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000560/awards - http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000560/awards - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0100691/awards - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0100691/awards -
BUT WE'LL LET YOU TELL US BELOW WHATCHA THINK -- IS THIS ONE a PUPPY DESERVING of BEING "PUT DOWN" (and WE DO MEAN THAT in ALL of IT's VARIOUS DEFINITIONS)...



POOPY PUPPY: "This microfilmed image of a page from 
the screenplay for CATS & DOGS #2 should be enough 
evidence to prove once-and-for-all that creativity in 
Hollywood has totally gone to the dogs..."


-------------
Ye Olde Head RAZZberry



Replies:
Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: July 26 2010 at 4:48pm
My head hurts just from looking at the picture!

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: July 26 2010 at 5:52pm
*My head hurts as well.
 
*When I found out about this movie, some of us said... [Nancy Kerrigan] WHYYYYYY!!!??? WHYYYYYYY!!!??? [/Nancy Kerrigan]
 
*Because this is THE most un-called-for sequel this year, how about one nomination?


-------------
Possible Unofficial Forums, given <35% approval: Ags 8; TMNT '014. Ags 13; Let's Be Cops. Ags 15; The Giver, The Expendables 3. Ags 29; Jessabelle


Posted By: sampsoninc916
Date Posted: July 26 2010 at 6:42pm
I knew that this would be added to the forum. No one truly and dearly wanted a sequel to this. The first was just pretty average, but by 2003, people forgot about it and moved on. Now they're unleashing this sequel upon us. People truly wanted a sequel to Tron, but no one seriously wanted a sequel to Cats and Dogs. Tron has a strong cult following. Cats and Dogs is behind in being a cult movie. Also, not to mention, I should say something interesting about Honor Blackman's character in Goldfinger. Her character was original going to be named Kitty Galore, all the way back when Goldfinger was in production in the 60s, but they changed it to Pussy Galore. Now, 46 years later, a movie took Albert R. Brocolli and Harry Saltzman's first idea on the character of Pussy Galore and put it in the title. I always seem to want to measure talking animal movies to the greatness of Babe, which I saw in theaters when it came out in '95, itself being the greatest talking animal movie ever.


-------------
Do you think I was young enough to grow up watching Smurfs, Thundercats, and reruns of shows like A-Team and Dukes of Hazzard, and Alvin and the Chipmunks?


Posted By: rburton
Date Posted: July 26 2010 at 7:20pm
People truly wanted a sequel to Tron??  No.


-------------
For Your Consideration

Dev Patel for WORST SUPPORTING ACTOR in The Last Fartbender


Posted By: MiguelAntilsu
Date Posted: July 26 2010 at 7:27pm

It seems that animal films are really hitting a new low this year.  First there was Furry Vengeance, then there was Marmaduke, and now there is this.  This film should get nominated for Worst Remake, Ripoff or Sequel, but it'll have a hard time competing against Vampires Suck, The Last Airbender and Sex and the City 2.



Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: July 27 2010 at 11:59am
We have "The Chipmunks" and "Garfield" movies to thank for that. Yet more examples of Hollywood raping my childhood!  

Originally posted by MiguelAntilsu

It seems that animal films are really hitting a new low this year.  First there was Furry Vengeance, then there was Marmaduke, and now there is this.


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: oiram
Date Posted: July 27 2010 at 3:43pm
What makes you say so?  

Originally posted by rburton

Originally posted by sampsoninc916

People truly wanted a sequel to Tron...


No.


-------------
Elizabeth Hartman and Judith Barsi are more talented and beautiful than Scarlett Johansson and Chloe Grace Moretz. Fact.

Worst Supporting Actor: Brendan Fraser/Gimme Shelter and The Nut Job




Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: July 27 2010 at 4:37pm
I'm sure there were fans fo the first movie who wanted a sequel, however, they wanted it back in the '80s or '90s when the movie was fresh in everyone's mind. Now it's decades after the first and now everyone knows it's just an excuse for Hollywood to bank on the "20 years later" sequels and 3-D fads.  

Originally posted by oiram

Originally posted by rburton

Originally posted by sampsoninc916

People truly wanted a sequel to Tron...

No.
What makes you say so?


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: July 27 2010 at 4:51pm
Tron was a good film back in 1982, but I can't remember how sequel-open it was. Personally, I think Tron: Legacy has a 50/50 chance of huge success or hard flop.
 
And the RAZZIES tagged Garfield: A Tail of Two Kitties and Alvin and the Chipmunks. Why is the rest of Hollywood trying to cash in on those two movies?


-------------
Possible Unofficial Forums, given <35% approval: Ags 8; TMNT '014. Ags 13; Let's Be Cops. Ags 15; The Giver, The Expendables 3. Ags 29; Jessabelle


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: July 27 2010 at 5:45pm
Because little children are easily entertained and their parents are willing to pay anything just for a moment's rest.  

Originally posted by GTAHater767

And the RAZZIES tagged Garfield: A Tail of Two Kitties and Alvin and the Chipmunks. Why is the rest of Hollywood trying to cash in on those two movies?


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: July 27 2010 at 6:17pm
If I had a child, I'd explain to them all the reasons they should hate this. Have you any idea why most of today's parents will give their kids anything they want? What's so different from decades past that kids won't be more selective anymore?

-------------
Possible Unofficial Forums, given <35% approval: Ags 8; TMNT '014. Ags 13; Let's Be Cops. Ags 15; The Giver, The Expendables 3. Ags 29; Jessabelle


Posted By: MiguelAntilsu
Date Posted: July 28 2010 at 4:44pm
We're lucky Hollywood hasn't given us a CTD (Cinematically Transmitted Disease) yet.  They haven't given me one either, but I'm just saying...  

Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

We have "The Chipmunks" and "Garfield" movies to thank for that. Yet more examples of Hollywood raping my childhood!


-------------


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: July 28 2010 at 5:28pm
Oh, it's only be a matter of time before they do...  

Originally posted by MiguelAntilsu

We're lucky Hollywood hasn't given us a CTD (Cinematically Transmitted Disease) yet.  They haven't given me one either, but I'm just saying...
  


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: DarkPhoenixSaga
Date Posted: August 01 2010 at 6:07pm
Oh God, I would never see a sequel to Tron, because the effects in the original movie were horrible, and the plot really sucked!  



-------------


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: August 01 2010 at 6:37pm
Keep in mind, the original Tron movie was made in 1982, so of course by today's standards, the effects look like s***, but back then, it was considered cutting edge. 28 years from, people will be watching "Avatar" and thinking, "Wow, these effects are dated! Why was this movie so popular?!".

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Film Reel Redemption
Date Posted: August 24 2010 at 11:27pm

I refer to this movie as:

Cats 'n' Dogs: The Revenge of sh*tty Ga-Bore (sort of sums up the movie really)


-------------
You see in this filmmaking world there's two types of people my friend. Those with the knowledge of film and those who think they do but really don't.


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: August 26 2010 at 10:01pm
Originally posted by Film Reel Redemption

I refer to this movie as:
Cats 'n' Dogs: The Revenge of sh*tty Ga-Bore (sort of sums up the movie really)
Or just call it what it is: "Cat 'n' Dogs 2: The Trying To Cash In On Talking Animals and 3-D Fads!".

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Film Reel Redemption
Date Posted: August 27 2010 at 6:59am
I could do that

-------------
You see in this filmmaking world there's two types of people my friend. Those with the knowledge of film and those who think they do but really don't.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: November 10 2010 at 2:48pm
Can someone explain this to me?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cats_%26_Dogs_2#Awards



-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: November 15 2010 at 3:21pm
It has been announced that only 3 movies will be up for the Oscar for "Best Animated Feature".This is among the contenders.
Originally posted by Vits

Can someone explain this to me?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cats_%26_Dogs_2#Awards
No?Oh,well.


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: November 15 2010 at 8:07pm
Originally posted by Vits

It has been announced that only 3 movies will be up for the Oscar for "Best Animated Feature".This is among the contenders.
Again, no way in hell it's getting nod. And considering it's half live action, it shouldn't even be considered for an animated movie. 


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Grounder the Critic
Date Posted: November 16 2010 at 5:54am
There will only be either 3 or 5 nominations for Best Animated Feature. I pick 5.

-------------
Pictures move, do they?


Posted By: TheMovieCritic
Date Posted: December 06 2010 at 12:18pm
A sequel that was not needed. The first was just fine. 

This movie was a quick buck for the studio to fill their pockets with the green stuff. This disaster of a film that was "nine years in the making" should be left in a desert and forgotten. .


-------------


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 06 2010 at 8:00pm
Originally posted by TheMovieCritic


This movie was a quick buck for the studio to fill their pockets with the green stuff.

Yep, but instead, they ended up covering theater screens everywhere with brown stuff.


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: SchumacherH8ter
Date Posted: September 14 2011 at 5:47pm
Time to review a bland nothing of a movie.
 
The good:
 
Mr. Tinkles' cameo: One of the few good things about the first one is back for a minute or two as a Hannibal Lector parody. Especially the scene were he threatened to eat that f*cking bird.
 
The bad:
 
Chris O'Donnell: Is it me, or is everyone in Batman & Robin not named George Clooney or Uma Thurman or Ah-nuld stuck in crappy children's films?
 
Bette Midler: Bette Midler please go away! No-one under the age of 50 likes you anymore! From A Distance is one of the worst songs ever and I'm a Christian! Also, she sucks in this.
 
The script: This is some lazy-ass, piss-poor writing! While the script level is above that of some of the other family films released last year, (i.e. Nutcracker, Furry Vengeance, Spy Next Door, Marmaduke, and, of course, FartBender) that doesn't excuse it.
 
The ugly:
 
The special effects: The only people who could think that these effects are good are stupid children or James Nguyen.
 
That f*cking bird: That f*cking bird (Seamus) is one of the most annoying characters to grace the silver-screen in a long time! He's voiced by Katt Williams star of Epic Movie and Norbit. That resume seems less like a resume and more like an arrest warrant!
 
The death of originality: I've bitched about this a couple times, but it's really noticable here. It was nine years before the last one and no-one seemed to remember (or care) about it. What was the reason for this? Other than money!
 
Well, that's an un-essential movie right there! Grade: D+
 
Next-up: The Spy Next Door!


-------------
I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
https://twitter.com/Scott_DAgostino
Upcoming reviews: http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic7513.html
Up-next: Winter's Tale


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: September 14 2011 at 6:06pm
Originally posted by SchumacherH8ter

Chris O'Donnell: Is it me, or is everyone in Batman & Robin not named George Clooney or Uma Thurman or Ah-nuld stuck in crappy children's films?
Are you being sarcastic about Ah-Nuld?Also,George was in SPY KIDS 3.Meanwhile,John Glover* was in GREMLINS 2.

*LEX LUTHOR's dad played DR. JASON WOODRUE.
Originally posted by SchumacherH8ter

Bette Midler please go away! No-one under the age of 50 likes you anymore! From A Distance is one of the worst songs ever and I'm a Christian!
I think it's more that no one under 50 knows her.Do you want to hear a good song performed by her?No,not the one from PEACHES.I'm talking about ROCHELLE,ROCHELLE.
Originally posted by SchumacherH8ter

That f*cking bird (Seamus) is one of the most annoying characters to grace the silver-screen in a long time! He's voiced by Katt Williams star of Epic Movie and Norbit. That resume seems less like a resume and more like an arrest warrant!
When I lived in the U.S.,my "brother" was always looking forward to seeing his stand-up specials.I don't remember if I liked him.I was to busy moaning because he got the remote instead of me. LOL


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile



Print Page | Close Window