Print Page | Close Window

A Star Iz Stillborn??

Printed From: Official RAZZIE® Forum
Category: 31st Annual RAZZIE® Award Nominees & "WINNERS"
Forum Name: BURLESQUE
Forum Discription: Nominated for WORST SUPPORTING ACTRESS / Cher
URL: http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4669
Printed Date: October 25 2014 at 11:33am


Topic: A Star Iz Stillborn??
Posted By: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: A Star Iz Stillborn??
Date Posted: November 17 2010 at 1:14pm
STARRING the OSSIFIED-LOOKING 64-YEAR-OLD http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000333/ - and PAST-HER-15-MINUTES POP TART http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0004694/ - , http://www.razzies.com/forum/current-releases-burlesque_forum469.html - HOPED EVERYONE WOULD THINK OF IT as http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0299658/awards - -- BUT ITS PLOT IS LIFTED DIRECTLY from BOTH the ANCIENT HOLLYWOOD WARHORSE http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0029606/movieconnections - and the ALL-TIME RAZZIE CLASSIC http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0114436/awards -  (with a TOUCH of POLE-DANCING from  http://c0181321.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/PHlaguqogR5von_1_m.jpg - THROWN IN for BAD MEASURE) -- IN OTHER WORDS, IT SURE LOOKED LIKELY to BE HOLLYWOOD's BIG HOLIDAY TURKEY for 2010 (WELL, AT LEAST UNTIL the CGI/3-D http://www.razzies.com/forum/gullibles-travels_forum476.html -  MOVIE CAME ALONG!). 

WE WERE HOPING IT WOULD NOT BE MERELY BAD, BUT BERRY...BERRY...BERRY BAD! 

TO BE HONEST, AS BAD AS IT WAS...IT WASN'T QUITE CLASSIC RAZZIE FODDER, THOUGH IT DID EARN CHER a http://razzies.com/history/2010-worst-supporting-actress.asp - ...

FEEL FREE to ATTACK/DEFEND BURLESQUE BELOW...



THIS IMAGE IZ SO RE-TOUCHED IT COULD BE a 
DIZZ-KNEE ANIMATION CEL... 




-------------
Ye Olde Head RAZZberry



Replies:
Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: November 17 2010 at 1:42pm
Am I the only one here who is slightly frightened by the fact that Cher hasn't aged in the past 30 years? Some might chalk it up to good plastic surgeons, but I wouldn't rule out vampirism just yet!

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: November 17 2010 at 4:52pm
A STAR IS BORN is being remade...again.It will be out in 2012(can't be a coincidence).

HeadRAZZBerry
,are you going to bring the http://www.razzies.com/forum/burlesque_forum453.html - here?

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: November 17 2010 at 5:10pm
I'd say the odds of this movie failing are barely over 50/50. There's still a chance that this movie could get average or even positive reviews, so I'm not ready to sling mud yet.

-------------


Posted By: shaurya
Date Posted: November 18 2010 at 3:57am
This cast is just "next to okay."   


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: November 18 2010 at 11:12am
I should warn you. You've probably heard early reviews praising Aguilera's performance. She could be good, but this is a musical, so it could be one of those "easy performances," like Beyonce's Golden Globe-nominated performance in DREAMGIRLS...and then came her Razzie-nominated performance in the non-musical  http://www.razzies.com/forum/obsessed_forum352.html - OBSESSED . 
Originally posted by Vits

HeadRAZZBerry,are you going to bring the http://www.razzies.com/forum/burlesque_forum453.html - - early discussion forum here?
You did!

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: MiguelAntilsu
Date Posted: November 19 2010 at 8:46am

Rotten Tomatoes's Anticipatron called it 'Moulin Scrooge' saying that it looked like rejected bits of Christina's performance of 'Lady Marmalade'.



-------------


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: November 19 2010 at 12:40pm
So what? I mean...this is the film adaptation of that music video...right?  

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: Anuss
Date Posted: November 19 2010 at 2:13pm
In RT first reviews are positive ;) Nice suprise for ya, right? It looks like it'll be really good.


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: November 19 2010 at 5:21pm
More like this film is the bastard/mutant love child of "Showgirls" and "Chicago"!  

Originally posted by Vits

 So what? I mean...this is the film adaptation of that music video...right?


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: cvcjr13
Date Posted: November 19 2010 at 10:47pm
Tell me, Vits, did you just made a joke about a movie?  That was funny! 

Originally posted by Vits

 So what? I mean...this is the film adaptation of that music video...right?  
 


-------------


Posted By: MiguelAntilsu
Date Posted: November 20 2010 at 6:15am

If this movie asked me, "Voulez-vous coucher avec moi?" I would answer, "HELL NO!"



-------------


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: November 20 2010 at 1:31pm
What was funny? The joke...or me making a joke about a movie? 

Originally posted by cvcjr13

Tell me, Vits, did you just made a joke about a movie?  That was funny!


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: cvcjr13
Date Posted: November 20 2010 at 8:50pm
The joke.  It was great.


-------------


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: November 21 2010 at 9:53am
Wink

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: November 21 2010 at 3:48pm
Meanwhile, the reviews I've come across were reasonably positive. If, on the night before Thanksgiving, the reviews are still positive, then we should probably drop this from the ballot, if only because there are many, much worse movies to tackle.

-------------


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: November 21 2010 at 3:49pm
Let's wait until the release,shall we?

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: November 21 2010 at 3:55pm
I agree. If, on November 24, the reviews turn out to me average or positive, I say we drop this from our radar. As far as I know, the only film from December or indeed the rest of 2010 that caught my bad attention was Yogi Bear.

-------------


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: November 21 2010 at 9:59pm
This movie might be too little, too late. We seem to have more than enough contenders from this year and the top two front runners (Grown-Up & Last Fart Bender) are already on DVD for our viewing ... displeasure.

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: November 22 2010 at 9:09am
I know you all don't care about the public voting awards, but I have to mention the American Music Awards. I saw them last night and Christina Aguilera sang the BURLESQUE theme song. Remeber her great song AIN'T NO OTHER MAN, and then CANDY MAN which was also good but sounded too similar to the former? Well, the BURLESQUE song is like a bad rip-off of both.  

A few months ago I told new users that it was pointless to have "Worst song." Now I'm doubting...specially since the music from THE NUTCRACKER 3D will be adapted to have lyrics.

By the way...I don't hate Justin Bieber, but awarding him as "Artist of the year" over Eminem, Katy Perry, Ke$ha and Lady Gaga has opened my eyes on why you all don't care about awards like this. They were so boring! Only the NKOTBBSB performance at the end was worth it! 



-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: November 22 2010 at 11:36am
It's good that you understand them as the joke that they are. I mean Bieber as Artist of the Year (although, with that list of artists to choose from, not that impressive at all)?! I mean, all these awards prove is that teenage girls have too much time on their hands with their Internet access.  

Originally posted by Vits


By the way...I don't hate Justin Bieber, but awarding him as "Artist of the year" over Eminem,Katy Perry,Ke$ha and Lady Gaga has opened my eyes on why you all don't care about awards like this. They were so boring
 




-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: November 22 2010 at 12:48pm
Didn't you like the other nominees?  




-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: November 22 2010 at 12:54pm
Tartarus no! I have a serious problem with the whole electro-pop trend that's been plaguing the music industry since 2007. My favorite decade in music has been the 1970's, or as I know them, the "Silver Seventies". I also liked AC/DC, Paul McCartney, and all those other classics, but then you look to the new millennium, and ask, "How will anyone remember this (expletives deleted)?"


-------------


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: November 22 2010 at 1:47pm
But Katy Perry variates her pop music and Eminem sings rap.

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: saturnwatcher
Date Posted: November 22 2010 at 3:26pm
Originally posted by GTAHater767

Tartarus no! I have a serious problem with the whole electro-pop trend that's been plaguing the music industry since 2007. My favorite decade in music has been the 1970's, or as I know them, the "Silver Seventies". I also liked AC/DC, Paul McCartney, and all those other classics, but then you look to the new millennium, and ask, "How will anyone remember this (expletives deleted)?"
The thing is, music becomes intimately tied to events in our lives that become cherished memories. I still love the music from the 70's because I grew up with it. Younger people today WILL have the same nostalgia for the music they are listening to now, even though you and I probably don't understand it or appreciate it. The young people now will hate the music their kids listen to, and the beat goes on.

-------------
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: November 22 2010 at 3:51pm

To Vits: So maybe there are a few exceptions. But that won't cut it for me. Also, I like Eminem's older work better.

To saturnwatcher: I'll admit there's one genre that I like because it's associated with my childhood, but it's not classic rock. From about 1996 to 2001, many popular songs and albums were alternative rock and post grunge. That's saying a lot, because a large fraction of people my age, plus or minus 8 years (!) rejected alternative rock.

-------------


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: November 22 2010 at 5:23pm
So what?Thanks to GLEE I can listen the greatest hits from any decade in one episode!

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: November 22 2010 at 5:24pm
Originally posted by Vits

Didn't you like the other nominees?
Little Justin appeals entirely to teenage girls, and I am not a teenager, nor a girl. I don't like rap, so Eminem is out. Katy Perry is cute and all, but her music is nothing to go crazy over, and Lady Gaga is just a crazy cocaine abuser in wacky dresses.


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: November 23 2010 at 4:10am
Originally posted by Vits

I know you all don't care about the public voting awards, but I have to mention the American Music Awards. I saw them last night and Christina Aguilera sang the BURLESQUE theme song. Remeber her great song AIN'T NO OTHER MAN, and then CANDY MAN which was also good but sounded too similar to the former? Well, the BURLESQUE song is like a bad rip-off of both.

They were shown again yesterday,and I change my mind.The song was like blending the two others plus FIGHTER.
Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

Little Justin appeals entirely to teenage girls, and I am not a teenager, nor a girl. I don't like rap, so Eminem is out. Katy Perry is cute and all, but her music is nothing to go crazy over, and Lady Gaga is just a crazy cocaine abuser in wacky dresses.

And Ke$ha?

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: rburton
Date Posted: November 23 2010 at 12:14pm
Hate to say http://hollywoodandfine.com/reviews/?p=3088 - I told you so ...

Marshall Fine says, "It’s been a while since I’ve seen a stinker as obvious as “Burlesque.” As a colleague and I noted afterward, it made us long for something as coherent and restrained as “Showgirls.” Or “Glitter.”

 

Not that there’s all that much difference. “Burlesque” is like “Showgirls” without the redemptively gratuitous sex and nudity. Or “42nd Street” without the originality.

The script is free of credible friction or jeopardy. The club shows look like post-Bob Fosse knock-offs. There’s nary a surprise to be had, except for Aguilera’s apparent misconception that she has acting talent. And that’s not really so surprising.

 

Thanks to “Burlesque,” we now have the answer to the question “Which film ended the film careers of both Christina Aguilera and Cher?” So all is not for naught.




-------------
For Your Consideration

Dev Patel for WORST SUPPORTING ACTOR in The Last Fartbender


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: November 23 2010 at 4:53pm
We should be careful.Before it's release http://www.razzies.com/forum/dragonball-evolution_forum350.html - had around 15% good reviews.When it premiered,it went up to 45%,and a few days later back to 15%.I'm just saying we really have to wait to the last second.

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: November 23 2010 at 5:59pm
Originally posted by Vits

We should be careful.Before it's release http://www.razzies.com/forum/dragonball-evolution_forum350.html - - - DRAGONBALL:EVOLUTION had around 15% good reviews.When it premiered,it went up to 45%,and a few days later back to 15%.I'm just saying we really have to wait to the last second.
Everyone and his brother knew "Dragonball" was going to be a piece of s***, and they were right. And 45% is still very Razzie worthy. Remember, RT rating is only ONE of many factors in choosing contenders.

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: November 23 2010 at 6:02pm
And "Showgirls" would have been much, much, MUCH awful if it didn't have the gratuitous nudity ... and that too-funny-for-words "seizure" sex in the pool scene!  

Originally posted by rburton

Not that there’s all that much difference. “Burlesque” is like “Showgirls” without the redemptively gratuitous sex and nudity.



-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: November 24 2010 at 7:46am
I meant that if a movie has 40-49% in R.T. and/or Metacritic is average to bad,but if it has 0-10% it's awful.I'm sure BURLESQUE will be bad,but we need to wait to the last second to see how bad it is...specially to see if it's a Razzie contender.Although even if it has good reviews it can still be nominated in acting categories.  

Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

And 45% is still very Razzie worthy. Remember, RT rating is only ONE of many factors in choosing contenders.


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: November 24 2010 at 1:07pm
There are other factors, like being a box office bomb. Add that to sub-par reviews and we may have a contender! We'll know soon enough.

Originally posted by Vits

I meant that if a movie has 40-49% in R.T. and/or Metacritic is average to bad,but if it has 0-10% it's awful.I'm sure BURLESQUE will be bad,but we need to wait to the last second to see how bad it is...specially to see if it's a Razzie contender.Although even if it has good reviews it can still be nominated in acting categories.
 



-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: November 24 2010 at 1:19pm
The concensus is in. The movie isn't among the 10-15 worst reviewed of the year. Critics say the musical numbers and the cast are fine, including Aguilera, but the script is awful.

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: November 24 2010 at 2:22pm
If they should lead in what information we use, then if the reviews get worse, we can give it just one suggestion on the nominations ballot for Worst Screenplay.

-------------


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: November 24 2010 at 4:31pm
Oh my lord, you must see this video! I swear, it's not parody, it really must be how Nic Cage chooses the movies he stars in.

http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1942044

Enjoy!


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 2:25pm
I'm pretty sure that this has more chance of being up for "Remake Or Rip-off" for being considered a rip-off of CHICAGO and SHOWGIRLS.

Originally posted by GTAHater767

If they should lead in what information we use, then if the reviews get worse, we can give it just one suggestion on the nominations ballot for Worst Screenplay.

I don't see what it has to do with this movie,but it was hilarious!

Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

Oh my lord, you must see this video! I swear, it's not parody, it really must be how Nic Cage chooses the movies he stars in.

http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1942044



-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 6:31pm
Yeah, I lost track of which thread I put it in, but I'm glad you liked it!


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Jennifar
Date Posted: November 26 2010 at 10:20am
You've probably heard early reviews praising Aguilera's performance. She could be good, but this is a musical, so it could be one of those "easy performances," like Beyonce's Golden Globe-nominated performance in DREAMGIRLS.  

You should probably drop this from the ballot, if only because there are many, much worse movies to tackle for 2010.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: November 26 2010 at 12:01pm
Thank you.I'm always honored when someone quotes me.  

Originally posted by Jennifar

You've probably heard early reviews praising Aguilera's performance. She could be good, but this is a musical, so it could be one of those "easy performances," like Beyonce's Golden Globe-nominated performance in DREAMGIRLS.


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: lguim
Date Posted: November 26 2010 at 1:18pm
Burlesque is AMAZING!


Posted By: Razziedent Evil
Date Posted: November 26 2010 at 3:07pm
LOL why do you want this movie to be nominated no matter what? The reviews are already in, it has 51/100 on MetaCritic and it also seems to be doing very well at the box office (at least judging from Wednesday-Thursday numbers) so I realy don't see this being a Razzie contender. Unless people are just mad they were wrong painting this as the next Showgirls trainwreck so they want it nominated to avoid admitting their mistake.  

Originally posted by Vits

Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

And 45% is still very Razzie worthy. Remember, RT rating is only ONE of many factors in choosing contenders.

I meant that if a movie has 40-49% in R.T. and/or Metacritic is average to bad,but if it has 0-10% it's awful.I'm sure BURLESQUE will be bad,but we need to wait to the last second to see how bad it is...specially to see if it's a Razzie contender.Although even if it has good reviews it can still be nominated in acting categories.


Originally posted by Vits

Originally posted by GTAHater767

If they should lead in what information we use, then if the reviews get worse, we can give it just one suggestion on the nominations ballot for Worst Screenplay.
I'm possitive that this has more chances of being up for "Remake Or Rip-off" for being considered a rip-off of CHICAGO and SHOWGIRLS.





-------------


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: November 26 2010 at 4:26pm
I don't want it to get nominated because I haven't seen it.I'm just repeating what others have said.

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: November 26 2010 at 5:38pm

Repeating what? That it reminds us of Chicago, Showgirls, and Glitter? I hope you don't want it to get nominated, because this movie is merely below average and doesn't deserve much of our attention at all.



-------------


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: November 27 2010 at 9:43am
That's right.

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: rburton
Date Posted: November 27 2010 at 2:50pm
I take back everything I ever said about Burlesque.  It was delightful, campy, and the most fun I've had at the movies in ages.  Even Aguilera is acceptable in it.  I'm refocusing my all my energy on The Last Airbender and Alice and Wonderland.


-------------
For Your Consideration

Dev Patel for WORST SUPPORTING ACTOR in The Last Fartbender


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: November 27 2010 at 5:29pm
Yeah, if I were you, I would limit that focusing to "Last Airbender" only, because getting voters to vote for "Alice" is going to be a really hard sell considering the other contenders to choose from!  

Originally posted by rburton

I take back everything I ever said about Burlesque.  It was delightful, campy, and the most fun I've had at the movies in ages.  Even Aguilera is acceptable in it.  I'm refocusing my all my energy on The Last Airbender and Alice and Wonderland.


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: robmosva
Date Posted: November 28 2010 at 1:02pm
I have to say that maybe you should watch the film first before you can slam it... I heard the reviews are mixed not like the ones of Showgirls, or even last year's Nine!!!  
 
Well i only hope to see worthy bad performances nominated for the RAZZIE, not the mixed perfomances played by more KNOWN artists. Please guys, you should give the RAZZIE to horrible performances like Beyonce''s OBSESSED or SJParker's Did u Hear.. instead of Sandra's All about STEVE which u probably didn't see, as well WILL FERRELL for LAND OF LOST (another horrible perf.) instead of Jo Bros Concert Movie or SHARON STONE in Catwoman (which i truly hated) instead of Britney Spears interview. 

Really guys give the razzie to the bad perfomances that deserves it!  
 


-------------
Let's do it!!!


Posted By: cvcjr13
Date Posted: November 28 2010 at 1:55pm
Actually, I DID see Sandra Bullock's performance in All About Steve, and it was a horrible character in a horrible movie that should not have been made.  Just because she portrayed the character right doesn't mean that she SHOULD have.  Some characters, or more to the point, some movies need to be sent back to screenwriters for one hell of a re-write.  One of the things that counts towards a "worst" nom is clout; does this person have the clout to get this movie changed into something at least halfway decent if not good?  It was Bullock's production. 
 
As bad as Obsessed was, Beyoncé was not the worst thing about it.  It was her co-star, Ali Larter, who was HORRIBLE.  No, in this year's Worst Actress category, the real horse race was between Megan Fox, who looks great in photos but should not be allowed to move or say lines, and Sandra Bullock.  I can't speak for the other members, but I was already leaning towards Sandra (because she KNOWS better) when she made that announcement.  After that, I said why think about it any further.
 
No, as much as I would enjoy Sandra Bullock buying me and all the other Razzie members a drink, no, she deserved the award.  Again, she KNOWS better than to make a movie that bad.
 
Originally posted by robmosva

I have to say that maybe you should watch the film first so you can slam it... if heard the reviews are mixed not like the ones of Showgirls o even last year Nine!!!
 
Well i only hope to see worth-bad performances nominated for the RAZZIE not the mixed perfomances played by more KNOW artist. Please guys you should give the RAZZIE to horrible performances like Beyonce''s OBSESSED or SJParker's Did u Heard.. instead of Sandra's All about STEVE which u probably didn't see, as well WILL FERRELL for LAND OF LOST (another horrible perf.) instead of Jo Bros Concert Movie or SHARON STONE in Catwoman (which i truly hated) instead of Britney Spears interview.
Really guys give the razzie to the bad perfomances that deserves it.!
 


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: December 14 2010 at 8:48am
This has been nominated for 2 Golden Globes.I'll discuss it http://www.razzies.com/forum/schedule-for-31st-razzies-83rd-oscars-in-2011_forum189.html - here .

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 14 2010 at 11:51am
Originally posted by Vits

This has been nominated for 2 Golden Globes.I'll discuss it http://www.razzies.com/forum/schedule-for-31st-razzies-83rd-oscars-in-2011_forum189.html - here .
Well, they needed SOMETHING to feel the Best Comedy/Musical Film and Best Score/Song spots, so of course they would go with a musical.

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Anuss
Date Posted: December 14 2010 at 2:30pm
So they could have pick Country Strong, Easy A, MorningGlory instead of Burlesque ;) But they picked Burlesque... Get over with it.


Posted By: Razziedent Evil
Date Posted: December 14 2010 at 4:11pm
Originally posted by Vits

This has been nominated for 2 Golden Globes.I'll discuss it http://www.razzies.com/forum/schedule-for-31st-razzies-83rd-oscars-in-2011_forum189.html - here .

It was nominated for 3 Golden Globes, Best Comedy/Musical and two Best Song nods.


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 14 2010 at 4:18pm
Originally posted by Anuss

So they could have pick Country Strong, Easy A, MorningGlory instead of Burlesque ;) But they picked Burlesque... Get over with it.
True, they could have gone with "Easy A", considering Emma Stone is up for Best Comedy Actress. Oh well, their fault for making that mistake.

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: December 14 2010 at 4:50pm
Originally posted by Razziedent Evil

Originally posted by Vits

This has been nominated for 2 Golden Globes.I'll discuss it schedule-for-31st-razzies-83rd-oscars-in-2011_forum189.html - here .

It was nominated for 3 Golden Globes, Best Comedy/Musical and two Best Song nods.

My bad.Thank you.
Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

[QUOTE=Anuss]True, they could have gone with "Easy A", considering Emma Stone is up for Best Comedy Actress. Oh well, their fault for making that mistake.

I always disliked when one performance somehow makes a movie excellent.This time they finally did the right thing,but I prefer it over the other ones.Ironic.


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 14 2010 at 5:07pm
Originally posted by Vits

I always disliked when one performance somehow makes a movie excellent.This time they finally did the right thing,but I prefer it over the other ones.Ironic.
The Best Comedy/Musical category is just a custerf***. Why are half these movies even there? Yeah, there's one musical, so that kinda pardons that movie, but "The Tourist"? It was ripped apart by critics. I guess there's going to be a Johnny Depp love-fest this year.

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: JR1
Date Posted: December 14 2010 at 5:35pm
Yes, to nominate The Tourist, one of the most critically reviled movies of the year? Well, that speaks loudly enough. The HFPA probably wants the star power of Depp and Jolie to attend- after all, they're two of the biggest movie stars in the world.

From what I understand, Burlesque isn't THAT bad, at least compared to something like Showgirls- which was so-awful-it's-good. Wonder if that will "hurt" its chances to get Razzie nods.

That's a question- have any Golden Globe nominated movies gone on to score Razzie nominations?


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 14 2010 at 8:44pm
Originally posted by JR1


That's a question- have any Golden Globe nominated movies gone on to score Razzie nominations?
Pia Zadora not only won a Golden Globe for "Butterfly", she went on to WIN TWO Razzies for that same role!

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: February 22 2011 at 1:12pm
Last night in E! NEWS Guliana Rancic said this movie made SHOWGIRLS look like CITIZEN "KANE"!LOL

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: August 02 2011 at 10:11am
I just saw it.So what is the problem with this movie?

While SHOWGIRLS is worse,it did something better than this movie*.Both used the very rehashed premise of the small town girl who goes to the big city to make it,but SHOWGIRLS showed it in a more realistic way with a lot of conflicts.This one uses it in the cheesiest way leading up to...you guessed it...a happy ending.And it does rip-off CHICAGO.I haven't seen it,but I still know how the girls looked.Also,there's a scene where a girl is singing,and then the lead imagines herself singing that same song on stage.They replay it shot by shot.

Christina Aguilera clearly had trouble during the scenes where she required to show real emotions,but overall she wasn't bad.I know it's wrong to judge a performance based only on facial expressions,but I have to do that with Cher.While she did alright in other aspects(voice,gestures,etc),everytime she talked(or sang)it felt as she just came out of the plastic surgery clinic,so I guess it was alright she got nominated.I remember Cam Gigandet being in consideration.Well,his performance isn't bad but it's as bland as his character.And Stanley Tucci was just recycling what he did in THE DEVIL WEARS PRADA.

Once again about Christina...I honestly think she has one of the best voices in music history,but she still doesn't realize screaming isn't singing.Now,imagine 2 hours of that.All the musical numbers are stylish but very repetitive,and the songs are nothing out of this world.

Plot holes:
-Is bad enough that BOUND TO YOU is a rip-off of her old song BEAUTIFUL.But in the number,the way she's dressed...it makes no sense to the other numbers and therefor the plot.
-At the beginning TESS sings on stage.She never does that again(except in a sound checking scene).
-Are we supposed to root for ALI to get with JACK,after he breaks up with his fiance over the phone?

I give this 3/10.

*Did I just said something positive about SHOWGIRLS?!


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile



Print Page | Close Window