Print Page | Close Window

Year's Biggest B.O. Bust...and NOT in a Good Way!

Printed From: Official RAZZIE® Forum
Category: 31st Annual RAZZIE® Award Nominees & "WINNERS"
Forum Name: NUT-SMASHER 3-D
Forum Discription: Nominated for WORST EYE-GOUGING MIS-USE of 3-D
URL: http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4689
Printed Date: April 23 2014 at 1:26pm


Topic: Year's Biggest B.O. Bust...and NOT in a Good Way!
Posted By: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: Year's Biggest B.O. Bust...and NOT in a Good Way!
Date Posted: November 29 2010 at 2:00pm
IMAGINE YOU SPENT $90 MILLION on a MOVIE and SAW IT OPEN to  a MOUSE-LIKE http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=weekend&id=nutcracker3d.htm - http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=weekend&id=nutcracker3d.htm -  in the U.S. and CANADA... 

THAT'S WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED the MAKERS of WHAT MAY BE 2010's BIGGEST BOX OFFICE BOMB, a 3-D REMAKE of TCHAIKOWSKY's http://www.razzies.com/forum/ballbuster-in-3d_forum470.html - FEATURING NATHAN LANE, JOHN TURTURRO and LYRICS APPENDED to the COMPOSER's ORIGINAL CLASSICAL SCORE.  TO TOP OFF IT's ILL-FATED BOX OFFICE TAKE, the FILM ALSO SCORED the ELUSIVE  http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/nutcracker-the-untold-story/ -  -- and GOT a RESOUNDING "F" from a SUBSTANTIAL PORTION of the HANDFUL of PEOPLE WHO EVEN SAW IT... 

HERE'S YOUR CHANCE to LITERALLY "CRACK the NUTZ" of a MEGA-BUDGET B.O. BOMB... 

DON'T SAY WE NEVER GAVE YA NOTHIN' fer CHRISTMAS! 



EVEN THOUGH IT MAY LOOK LIKE THIS WAS WRITTEN 
by a MONKEY, a CLOWN and an 11-YEAR-OLD, BLAMING 
the 3 of US for NUTCRACKER 3-D IS BLATANTLY UNFAIR!!  




-------------
Ye Olde Head RAZZberry



Replies:
Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: November 29 2010 at 2:13pm
Considering its limited release, I can't decide whether to expect this to get a nomination. I wish it had more RAZZIE pedigree. Isn't that what a limited release movie needs to get nominated??  

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: As I see it, this is a possible contender for Worst Prequel, Remake, Rip-Off or Sequel and our proposed Worst Eye-Gouging Use of 3-D categories. As for any other nominations, I honestly don't think enough people will have seen it... 




-------------
My deadlines for Member-Started Forums, given 35% approval rating or less: Apl. 29; The Other Woman. May 6; Walk of Shame. May 20; Godzilla '014. May 27; Blended. Jne. 3; A Million Ways...


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: November 29 2010 at 2:26pm
The picture above is just ... wow. That's a deal-breaker right there!

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Razziedent Evil
Date Posted: November 29 2010 at 3:24pm
I cannot, just CANNOT stop laughing at the budget!!! LOLCryLOLCryLOL 90 million spent on this, just to get 0% on RottenTomatoes and $65,944 in its opening week at the Box Office???   

This may be the biggest flop EVER!


-------------


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: November 29 2010 at 7:09pm
Even "Cutthroat Island", which cost $100 million, made at least $1 million back!  

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: For the morbidly curious, here's a http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=cutthroatisland.htm - to see their take on the budget and gross for http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0112760/ - , which earned a http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0112760/awards - . The film cost just under $100 million, and actually earned back about $10 million...  




-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Berrynoia
Date Posted: November 29 2010 at 8:10pm
This film only appeared on 42 screens (now considering its high budget, that is quite a (de)feat alone).  It makes its candidacy harder to determine...but I wonder if the producers' goal was to get this in wide release...

I looked at the http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ud2t2k7dZqU - trailer , and a lot of it looked more like a futuristic war flick than something based on a ballet, with the rat men as the dictators being fought against.


-------------


Posted By: MiguelAntilsu
Date Posted: November 29 2010 at 8:17pm

I first saw the trailer for this movie at a screening for the movie 'MegaMind'.  There was nothing in it that reminded me of the ballet it's based on.  Based on what I saw, only the first act was being adapted into a family adventure film.  There was nothing about the Sugar-Plum Fairy or the Land of Sweets in it.  It IS a colossal failure considering that it was made on a budget of $90M and made <0.1% of it back in its first weekend.  It's not likely to make any more progress competing against the likes of Harry Potter 7, Tangled, and The Warrior's Way.



-------------


Posted By: Movie Man
Date Posted: November 29 2010 at 8:18pm
From Box Office Mojo's Arthouse report.

"While Break Ke Baad (Bollywood movie) fizzled, The Nutcracker in 3D was the weekend's major disappointment. Playing at 42 theaters, the reimagining of the classic ballet bombed in its debut, grossing $65,944 for the three-day weekend for a $87,539 five-day tally. Distributor Freestyle Releasing attributed the movie's dreary performance to its target audience (moms and their children) overwhelmingly choosing to see http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=rapunzel.htm - Tangled . Freestyle is looking to still expand the movie this upcoming weekend, though it won't be taking it nationwide as previously planned."

The only way Razzie-members might see and vote on this is if they download it.


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: November 29 2010 at 10:18pm
Only 42 theaters? Well, at least that doesn't break Uwe Boll's record of 4 theaters for "Postal"!


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Film Reel Redemption
Date Posted: November 29 2010 at 10:29pm
Judging by the picture, I could sum up this movie in a few words:

Welcome to Operation Mind-F*** (as someone once said)


-------------
You see in this filmmaking world there's two types of people my friend. Those with the knowledge of film and those who think they do but really don't.


Posted By: cvcjr13
Date Posted: November 30 2010 at 8:05am
Like I said elsewhere, they gutted The Nutcracker and put The Yellow Submarine in its place.
 
I mean, look at a plot comparison.
 
TN3D: The rat people raid the Prince's land and take over.
TYS: The Blue Meanies raid Pepperland and take over.
 
TN3D: The rat people turn the Prince into a Nutcracker and send him into exile into another world, which turns out to be our world.
TYS: Fred manages to escape into another world, which turns out to be our world.  (Slight difference there)
 
TN3D:  The Nutcracker tells the little girl she can save his world.  She goes along.
TYS: Fred tells the Beatles they could save Pepperland.  They go along.
 
TN3D:  The little girl somehow frees the prince's world from the Rat People and the Nutcracker turns into a prince again.
TYS:  The Beatles somehow free Pepperland from the Blue Meanies and free Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band.  (Again, a slight difference).
 
You can go on.  For example, instead of the Flying Glove from The Yellow Submarine, we have two rat people on jet packs in The Nutcracker 3D.
 
The biggest difference is that no Beatles songs were changed to accommodate The Yellow Submarine.  They added words to Tchaikovsky's Nutcracker for The Nutcracker 3D.
 


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: November 30 2010 at 12:49pm
Just 90 Million? No wonder the effects look a little lame!

I'm pretty sure CUTTHROAT ISLAND is the biggest flop ever. Literally.  




-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: oiram
Date Posted: November 30 2010 at 3:44pm
Does anyone know the name of the kid who played the nutcracker? I'm thinking about nominating him, as he was terrible!!!! Seriously, he'd make Macaulay Culkin look good as the Nutcracker. 



-------------
Elizabeth Hartman and Judith Barsi are more talented and beautiful than Scarlett Johansson and Chloe Grace Moretz. Fact.

Worst Supporting Actor: Brendan Fraser/Gimme Shelter and The Nut Job




Posted By: JoeBacon
Date Posted: November 30 2010 at 8:03pm
Wow, looks like it's playing at the Mann's Chinese. I'm tempted to go, but I'm still recovering from that Blue Light Special attack of Skyline...   

Burlesque did cheer me up a bit, though...  




-------------
2013's WORST PIC-After Earth ACTOR-Jaden Smith & Johnny Depp ACTRESS-Lindsay Lohan! SUP ACTRESS--Kim Kardashian! SUP ACTOR-Chris Brown DIRECTOR--Good "Night"! SCREAMPLAY--The Lone Ranger.


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 02 2010 at 10:32am
Not really. "Cutthroat Island" was also made for around $90 million, but at least made $1 million back in the US and $10 million worldwide. Now, if you mean by "Island" caused a studio to be shut down, then yes -- that would make it a bigger flop.  

Originally posted by Vits

I'm pretty sure CUTTHROAT ISLAND is the biggest flop ever. Literally.  


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: December 02 2010 at 1:48pm
It depends on what kind of flop. ZYZZYX ROAD is the movie that grossed the least money. CUTTHROAT ISLAND is the one that lost the most money... 


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 02 2010 at 2:37pm
I'm not sure about that: "Zyzzyx Road" (dumbest title ever, by the way) was made for $20 million and made only $30 back. Not $30 million, just $30. That's just pitiful, much like the movie's title.  

Originally posted by Vits

 It depends on what kind of flop. ZYZZYX ROAD is the movie that grossed the least money. CUTTHROAT ISLAND is the one that lost the most money... 


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Movie Man
Date Posted: December 02 2010 at 3:24pm
NUTCRACKER 3-D is increasing its number of theaters this week, and will go onto 115 screens, according to Box Office Mojo.  



-------------


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: December 03 2010 at 10:38am
I'm sure there are movies that grossed less than $30, but those must be from before B.O. MoJo had archives...

Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

I'm not sure about that: "Zyzzyx Road" (dumbest title ever, by the way) was made for $20 million and made only $30 back. Not $30 million, just $30. That's just pitiful, much like the movie's title.


Anyway,is there a movie that grossed less money? (Not counting the ones from the AfterDarkFest of course) 

Originally posted by Movie Man

NUTCRACKER 3-D is increasing its number of theaters this week, and will go onto 115 screens, according to Box Office Mojo.
 

But of course. Isn't there a rule: G and PG rated movies can be b.o. flops or critical failures, but not both??




-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 05 2010 at 8:28am
...Or because they never saw the light of day after being made. 

Originally posted by Vits

 
I'm sure there are movies that grossed less than $30,but those must be from before b.o. had archives.


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: December 05 2010 at 11:58am
You mean they weren't released? Then they weren't technically "flops." I think there's another name for that...  




-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: Grounder the Critic
Date Posted: December 06 2010 at 5:30am
Speaking of The Nutcracker in 3D, I found a parody video of Robert Zemeckis's NEW Nutcracker movie in 3D coming in 2012 by one of my favorite YouTube user, ForbiddenDouchebag.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=375CFIfUN30


-------------
Pictures move, do they?


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 08 2010 at 8:58am
What is this? Is "Nutcracker" becoming the new "Christmas Carol", the one holiday movie that has been remade to the point that it's a cliche? And what is with Zemeckis and his obsession with 3-D? Is he having some kind of secret contest with James Cameron?

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: December 08 2010 at 10:03am
Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

Is "Nutcracker" becoming the new "Christmas Carol", the one holiday movie that has been remade to the point that it's a cliche?
Not yet.It will be once Hollywood makes movies with an original premise but with the same story structure.
Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

And what is with Zemeckis and his obsession with 3-D? Is he having some kind of secret contest with James Cameron?
3D works better with sci-fi,Zemeckis and Cameron's specialties.


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 08 2010 at 9:45pm
Originally posted by Vits


(Nutcracker)Not yet.It will be once Hollywood makes movies with an original premise but with the same story structure.

This is true.

Originally posted by Vits

3D works better with sci-fi,Zemeckis and Cameron's specialties.

Yeah, but if you make use that same "specialty" one time too many, you risk becoming a one trick pony.


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: SchumacherH8ter
Date Posted: April 22 2011 at 12:05am
Oh my God, this was bad! There's a massive continuity error that I'm surprised no one's mentioned: there'a scene were the Rat King electrocutes a shark (Yes, there's a shark in it) and it's floating upside down. One scene later, the shark's rightside up. A thanks to Vheid, to sending me a link.

-------------
I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
https://twitter.com/Scott_DAgostino
Upcoming reviews: http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic7513.html


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: April 22 2011 at 12:33pm
Originally posted by SchumacherH8ter

Oh my God, this was bad! There's a massive continuity error that I'm surprised no one's mentioned: there'a scene were the Rat King electrocutes a shark (Yes, there's a shark in it) and it's floating upside down. One scene later, the shark's rightside up. A thanks to Vheid, to sending me a link.
Um, why is there a shark in The Nutcracker?

-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: SchumacherH8ter
Date Posted: April 22 2011 at 1:27pm
My guess is that the director had bad acid. That would explain the spontaneous combustion scene as well.

-------------
I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
https://twitter.com/Scott_DAgostino
Upcoming reviews: http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic7513.html


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: April 22 2011 at 2:01pm
Originally posted by SchumacherH8ter

My guess is that the director had bad acid. That would explain the spontaneous combustion scene as well.
Wait, there's spontaneous combustion in The NutCracker, too?!

-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: SchumacherH8ter
Date Posted: April 22 2011 at 2:48pm
I should have said that better. There's no actual scene where someone burst into flames, but, when the NutCracker turns from an actual nutcracker into a sh*tty CGI nutcracker, he destroys a pillow. When Frau asks about it, the little girl says that it spontaneosly combusted and she buys it. That scene was just one big WTF.

-------------
I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
https://twitter.com/Scott_DAgostino
Upcoming reviews: http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic7513.html


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: April 22 2011 at 3:22pm
This movie sounds like it would make Uwe Boll proud!

-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: Mayhem5185
Date Posted: April 23 2011 at 12:40pm
Originally posted by Michaels

Originally posted by SchumacherH8ter

Oh my God, this was bad! there'a scene were the Rat King electrocutes a shark (Yes, there's a shark in it) and it's floating upside down.
Um, why is there a shark in The Nutcracker?

Originally posted by Michaels

Originally posted by SchumacherH8ter

My guess is that the director had bad acid. That would explain the spontaneous combustion scene as well.
Wait, there's spontaneous combustion in The NutCracker, too?!


Is it bad that i have a morbid curiosity to see this now lol


-------------
I don't have pet peeves, I have major psychotic f**king hatreds! George Carlin


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: April 23 2011 at 1:10pm
Originally posted by Mayhem5185


Is it bad that i have a morbid curiosity to see this now lol
Maybe, because the more I hear about this movie, the more I want to avoid it at all costs.


-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: Mayhem5185
Date Posted: April 24 2011 at 3:17am
I said morbid curiosity lol, it sounds like one of those movies that's so bad, that it has to be seen to be believed, kind of like "house of the dead" and "Freddie got fingered"

-------------
I don't have pet peeves, I have major psychotic f**king hatreds! George Carlin


Posted By: Vheid
Date Posted: April 24 2011 at 3:27am
Mayhem, your not the only one with this morbid curiosity. To bad i can't watch the link that i send Schumacherh8ter myself (because i don't have divx on my computer)


Posted By: SchumacherH8ter
Date Posted: September 08 2011 at 3:13pm
Time to review the second worst 3D family film from last year!
 
The good:
 
?
 
The bad:
 
Nathan Lane: OK, who's the genius who cast Nathan Lane as Albert Einstein? Better yet, who thought that Einstein should be in this?
 
John Turtorro: He's just terrible in this. He plays the Rat King who looks like Andy Warhol. It's not his worst movie since there's no wrecking-ball testicles, but still!
 
Gielgud: He's that creepy monkey-man on the first page. He's annoying and when he's found beaten up, I hoped that it was his corpse. To my dismay, he lives on.
 
The ugly:
 
Andrey Konchalovskiy: This guy's the director. The directing is just crappy. The only movies of his that I've heard are this, Runaway Train and Tango & Cash. That last one features Stallone beating up Clint Howard with a slinky. As you can tell, it's a cinematic classic.
 
The special effects: This cost $90 million? Was all the money spent on John Turtorro's wig? This, almost, makes Skyline look like Transformers in this department.
 
Pedophilliac undertones: I'm convinced, the Rat King is a pedo! That line I said in the Furry Vengeance forum was only the tip of the iceberg! In another scene he offers the kids toys with me half-expecting to see a window-less van in the backround. He, also, hits on Mary shamelessly. Then again, everyone hits on her! Gielgud hits, Nutcracker hits on her, hell Frau Eva hits on her!
 
Well, that's one frankly disturbing movie! It does my heart good knowing that this tanked hard! Grade: F
 
Next-up: Scooby-Doo!


-------------
I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
https://twitter.com/Scott_DAgostino
Upcoming reviews: http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic7513.html


Posted By: SuperTeenTopia
Date Posted: September 08 2011 at 4:43pm
At last, one of your reviews ends with a much deserved F!

-------------
"People say 'It's all about the story’. When you're making tentpole films, bull$hit." -Andy Hendrickson (Disney Animation Studios' Chief Technical Officer)


Posted By: SchumacherH8ter
Date Posted: September 08 2011 at 4:49pm
Furry Vengeance had an F.

-------------
I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
https://twitter.com/Scott_DAgostino
Upcoming reviews: http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic7513.html


Posted By: SuperTeenTopia
Date Posted: September 08 2011 at 4:52pm
Originally posted by SchumacherH8ter

Furry Vengeance had an F.
Oops, my bad. Yes it does.

-------------
"People say 'It's all about the story’. When you're making tentpole films, bull$hit." -Andy Hendrickson (Disney Animation Studios' Chief Technical Officer)


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: September 08 2011 at 5:37pm
Originally posted by SchumacherH8ter

He, also, hits on Mary shamelessly. Then again, everyone hits on her! Gielgud hits, Nutcracker hits on her, hell Frau Eva hits on her!
Isn't she played by Elle Fanning?Figures.LOL


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: SuperTeenTopia
Date Posted: September 08 2011 at 6:03pm
Originally posted by Vits

Isn't she played by Elle Fanning?Figures.LOL
Now that her older sister, Dakota, is of age (as are most teenaged actresses this year), poor little Elle is the new jailbait of Hollywood!

-------------
"People say 'It's all about the story’. When you're making tentpole films, bull$hit." -Andy Hendrickson (Disney Animation Studios' Chief Technical Officer)


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: September 09 2011 at 7:23am
Let's not get carried away.Elle is pretty and all,but Dakota is something else.

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: SuperTeenTopia
Date Posted: September 09 2011 at 8:04am
Originally posted by Vits

Let's not get carried away.Elle is pretty and all,but Dakota is something else.
Well yes, Dakota has the acting chops of the family, but pedophiles couldn't care less either way! But I'm sure they are all too busy drooling over AnnaSophia Robb in "Soul Surfer" right now.

-------------
"People say 'It's all about the story’. When you're making tentpole films, bull$hit." -Andy Hendrickson (Disney Animation Studios' Chief Technical Officer)


Posted By: SchumacherH8ter
Date Posted: September 09 2011 at 1:05pm
Actually, I think that Elle is slowly surpasing Dakota. Sure, this may've sucked, but she has a lot of other good credits lately (Benjamin Button, Super 8) and Dakota's stuck in the Twatlight series.

-------------
I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
https://twitter.com/Scott_DAgostino
Upcoming reviews: http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic7513.html


Posted By: SuperTeenTopia
Date Posted: September 09 2011 at 5:03pm
Originally posted by SchumacherH8ter

Actually, I think that Elle is slowly surpasing Dakota. Sure, this may've sucked, but she has a lot of other good credits lately (Benjamin Button, Super 8) and Dakota's stuck in the Twatlight series.
True, very true. Not to mention that Hollywood is always looking for new, young talent, and now that Dakota is 18, she's considered over the hill. So now her much more illegal aged sister must take her spot as the go-to child actress!

-------------
"People say 'It's all about the story’. When you're making tentpole films, bull$hit." -Andy Hendrickson (Disney Animation Studios' Chief Technical Officer)


Posted By: SchumacherH8ter
Date Posted: September 09 2011 at 7:57pm
Actually, Dakota's still 17. And Dakota has had only ONE good movie in the past five years (Coraline) and that was animated, so she actually wasn't seen on-screen.

-------------
I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
https://twitter.com/Scott_DAgostino
Upcoming reviews: http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic7513.html


Posted By: SuperTeenTopia
Date Posted: September 09 2011 at 10:21pm
Originally posted by SchumacherH8ter

And Dakota has had only ONE good movie in the past five years (Coraline) and that was animated, so she actually wasn't seen on-screen.
Also very true. Little Elle is starting to outshine her with movie choices alone.

-------------
"People say 'It's all about the story’. When you're making tentpole films, bull$hit." -Andy Hendrickson (Disney Animation Studios' Chief Technical Officer)



Print Page | Close Window