Print Page | Close Window

WORST SUPPORTING ACTOR 2010 - POLL

Printed From: Official RAZZIE® Forum
Category: DISCUSSIONS & POLLS on 2010 RELEASES
Forum Name: POLL: POSSIBLE WORST SUPPORTING ACTORS for 2010
Forum Discription: Help Us Narrow a BERRY Over-Crowded Field...
URL: http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4690
Printed Date: November 23 2014 at 11:06pm


Topic: WORST SUPPORTING ACTOR 2010 - POLL
Posted By: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: WORST SUPPORTING ACTOR 2010 - POLL
Date Posted: December 05 2010 at 11:19am


ONE of OUR MOST OVER-CROWDED CATEGORIES EACH YEAR is WORST SUPPORTING ACTOR -- and for 2010, WE'VE GOT an EVEN MORE EXTENSIVE LIST of CHOICES THAN USUAL. 

HERE'S YOUR CHANCE to PUT YER 2 CENTS IN and HELP US NARROW a FAR-TOO-WIDE FIELD of POTENTIAL CONTENDERS. 

NOTE: WHEN THIS POLL WAS POSTED, http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1302067/ - (WHICH COULD ADD TWO or MORE NAMES to THIS LIST) HAD NOT YET BEEN SCREENED...  

HERE'S WISHING YOU the BERRY MERRIEST of TIMES WHILE VOTING! 

IMPORTANT NOTE: 

To clarify -- Forum polls are "just for fun," and have nothing to do with 

the actual/eventual results of this year's RAZZIE® Awards, 

which are determined by dues-paying Voting Members of the G.R.A.F. 

If you would like to become a Voting Member and receive 

both Nominating and Final Ballots for this year's RAZZIES®

here's the  http://razzies.com/join.asp -  to do so:  

http://razzies.com/join.asp - http://razzies.com/join.asp





-------------
Ye Olde Head RAZZberry



Replies:
Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: December 05 2010 at 12:13pm
This is quite easy, actually. George Lopez starred in 3 bombs in the former half of this year alone. Ken Jeong starred in two REALLY bad films this year. 

But can those three choices for Iron Man 2 and Date Night PLEASE be ruled out?  


-------------


Posted By: rburton
Date Posted: December 05 2010 at 8:01pm
 Dev Patel in The Last Airbender.  He is the worst slumdog in the world!


-------------
For Your Consideration

Dev Patel for WORST SUPPORTING ACTOR in The Last Fartbender


Posted By: oiram
Date Posted: December 06 2010 at 3:50am
I was going to give Dev a break and vote for Jackson instead, but since he's already leading the pack, I am forced to give Dev another vote.
 
EDIT: Are you also going to have us vote for Worst Supporting Actress soon?  

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Yes, between now and year's end ( http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic876_post6176.html#6176 - ) we'll be doing Weakly Polls on each of our main acting categories, with Worst Supporting Actress due to post next weak, followed by Worst Actor and Worst Actress polls...
 
EDIT EDIT: Why the heck isn't Dolph Lundgren up there? He's been dodging a Razzie nomination for too long!  




-------------
Elizabeth Hartman and Judith Barsi are more talented and beautiful than Scarlett Johansson and Chloe Grace Moretz. Fact.

Worst Supporting Actor: Brendan Fraser/Gimme Shelter and The Nut Job




Posted By: JoeBoyden
Date Posted: December 06 2010 at 7:35am
Great list HeadRAZZ! Most of the usual suspects seem to be there, though I'd have replaced Jay Baruchel and James Franco with Taylor Lautner (Twilight: Eclipse and Valentine's Day) and Will Arnett (When in Rome and Jonah Hex).
 
My pick for worst supporting actor is Our Family Wedding's Carlos Mencia.


Posted By: oiram
Date Posted: December 06 2010 at 10:22am
Cool.
Originally posted by oiram


RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Yes, between now and year's end ( http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic876_post6176.html#6176 - - - - when our Nominating Ballots go out ) we'll be doing Weakly Polls on each of our main acting categories, with Worst Supporting Actress due to post next weak, followed by Worst Actor and Worst Actress polls...  




-------------
Elizabeth Hartman and Judith Barsi are more talented and beautiful than Scarlett Johansson and Chloe Grace Moretz. Fact.

Worst Supporting Actor: Brendan Fraser/Gimme Shelter and The Nut Job




Posted By: MiguelAntilsu
Date Posted: December 06 2010 at 6:28pm
I'm a little surprised Kevin James didn't make the list.  And would Taylor Lautner in Twilight: Eclipse be a lead role or a supporting role?  

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Since his role has expended from one film to the next, I would argue that Lautner should now be considered as a Worst Actor, rather than Supporting Actor contender for TWILIGHT: ECLIPSE. Regarding Kevin James, as mentioned in the first post for this poll, the field is clearly over-crowded as it is, and James seems less egregious in GROWN UPS than the two actors already listed from that film..




-------------


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 06 2010 at 7:59pm
Ah, poor Dev Patel, from lead actor in an Oscar winning Best Picture, to Razzie front-runner. Oh how the mighty have fallen!

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: cvcjr13
Date Posted: December 07 2010 at 7:58am
I'm disappointed David Zayas, who played the hotel manager-cum-survivalist in Skyline, isn't in the running for Worst Supporting Actor.  

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: I finally saw http://www.razzies.com/forum/skyline_forum468.html - were all RAZZIE® worthy, I am unsure if the film has been widely enough seen ( http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=skyline.htm - are announced on http://www.razzies.com/forum/sked-for-31st-razzies-83rd-oscars_topic876.html - ...




-------------


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: December 07 2010 at 10:55am
Wasn't Jay Baruchel the "lead" in both of those movies? And isn't he considered to be "good" in them and in HOW TO TRAIN YOUR DRAGON, too?


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: cvcjr13
Date Posted: December 07 2010 at 7:48pm
Yeah, there's the problem of how many members actually saw Skyline.  However, I sure hope enough of the membership saw that movie to give it what it deserves.  Sure, it's gonna get creamed going up against The Last Airbender and Vampires Suck, but we rarely have a movie that is bad in the way Skyline is bad.

Originally posted by cvcjr13

I'm disappointed David Zayas, who played the hotel manager-cum-survivalist in Skyline, isn't in the running for Worst Supporting Actor.  

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: I finally saw http://www.razzies.com/forum/skyline_forum468.html - were all RAZZIE® worthy, I am unsure if the film has been widely enough seen ( http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=skyline.htm - are announced on http://www.razzies.com/forum/sked-for-31st-razzies-83rd-oscars_topic876.html - ...


 



-------------


Posted By: shaurya
Date Posted: December 07 2010 at 11:38pm
Dev Patel, LAST AIRBENDER ... i m choosing him as he was the worst among all.




-------------


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: December 08 2010 at 8:15am
I have to say I'm very dissapointed with this list. Half the actors here were in bad movies, but the bad reviews didn't say they were bad. I think some listed here were even good




-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 08 2010 at 8:48am
Bad reviews are only part of the decision. The opinions of the voters are the other half...  




-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: December 08 2010 at 10:00am
What's more important: Awarding the worst performance or punishing actors for choosing to be in bad movies?  




-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: oiram
Date Posted: December 08 2010 at 12:18pm
I'll take a guess, and say I think it's both...  

Originally posted by Vits

What's more important: Awarding the worst performance or punishing actors for choosing to be in bad movies?


-------------
Elizabeth Hartman and Judith Barsi are more talented and beautiful than Scarlett Johansson and Chloe Grace Moretz. Fact.

Worst Supporting Actor: Brendan Fraser/Gimme Shelter and The Nut Job




Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 08 2010 at 9:39pm
I think the Razzies vote according to both factors. Actors with clout and great acting ability have the power to choose which projects to star in and (hopefully) give a great performances in. When such an actor or actress chooses to star in a bad movie, or gives a half-assed performance when they could have done better, they get Razzed (as was the case with Sandra Bullock in "All About Steve"). 

But, let's face it -- no one expects an Oscar worthy performance from Megan Fox!  


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: creamofthecrop
Date Posted: December 09 2010 at 7:38pm
Please people. SKYLINE has a worldwide gross of $47,000,000 - it's enough. MEMENTO had a worldwide gross of $39,000,000 and was nominated for an Academy Award for Best original screenplay and Best editing. Let Skyline be the underdog of the Razzies. It deserves it. 


Posted By: JoeBacon
Date Posted: December 09 2010 at 9:56pm
I'm still trying to recover from Skyline...


Posted By: Gregory
Date Posted: December 10 2010 at 8:48am
Me, too! I think David Zayas should have a shot in this category for Skyline and Expendables

But my vote goes to Razzie "winner" (and 'Worst Actor of the Decade' nominee) Rob Schneider for Grown Ups...  

Originally posted by JoeBacon

I'm still trying to recover from Skyline...
 

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Thanx for bringing Zayas to our attention -- With supporting roles in both http://www.razzies.com/forum/the-expendables_forum444.html - http://www.razzies.com/forum/skyline_forum468.html -


Posted By: aqua mailman
Date Posted: December 10 2010 at 3:43pm
I picked Ken Jeong. Besides being in my most hated 2010 film (Vampires Suck) as an added bonus, he was also in Furry Vengeance!  

-------------


Posted By: The Larch
Date Posted: December 10 2010 at 5:14pm
Aside from the obvious choices (Cyrus, Lopez, Mencia, The Last Airbender guys- though Aasif Mandvi needs to be included too-, Schneider, Spade), there's a bunch of omissions and choices who simply shouldn't be there, like Jay Baruchel (wasn't he a lead anyway??? Wacko), Ray Liotta (at least for Date Night), Mickey Rourke (he was BARELY in The Expendables, and Dolph Lundgren was worse anyway), and most inexcusably James Franco (WTF??? Censored); as for those left out, HOW do you not have Will Arnett, Chevy Chase (terrible as always in the otherwise mostly funny Hot Tub Time Machine), Mario Cantone (Sex and the City 2), Rob Corddry (see Chevy Chase, only grosser), and Guillermo Diaz (Cop Out, even worse than Tracy Morgan ) to name a few? Finally, Ken Jeong should also be cited for the criminally bad Furry Venegance... 


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 10 2010 at 8:31pm
I think, much like the Oscars, the Razzies like to pick on movies as a whole, rather than single out one or two performances in a movie that was otherwise not "Razzie worthy."  

Originally posted by The Larch

HOW do you not have Will Arnett, Chevy Chase (terrible as always in the otherwise mostly funny Hot Tub Time Machine), Mario Cantone (Sex and the City 2), Rob Corddry (see Chevy Chase, only grosser), and Guillermo Diaz (Cop Out, even worse than Tracy Morgan ) to name a few? Finally, Ken Jeong should also be cited for the criminally bad Furry Venegance... 


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vheid
Date Posted: December 11 2010 at 8:43am
How about John Turturro for The Nutcracker in 3D?  

He is a very good actor doing so many bad roles these days (both Transformers films for instance), I think we need to at least acknowledge him as a contender in the near future...  




-------------


Posted By: The Larch
Date Posted: December 11 2010 at 2:20pm
   So I like to think outside the ever-narrowing Razzies box from time to time Tongue; and with all due respect, When in Rome, Jonah Hex (that means you, Mr. One-Note Arnett Thumbs Down and certainly SATC2 are ALL more than Razzie-worthy anyhow! Pig


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 11 2010 at 4:42pm
Well, nominating ballots should be mailed out VERY soon, so in a few weeks, we'll know where all these possible choices stand on having a real chance of getting RAZZed!  




-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Film Reel Redemption
Date Posted: December 12 2010 at 1:16am
It appears either Patel or Rathbone is gonna need to clear his shelf to make way for that spray painted golden fruit (the Razzie Award) to remind him of how 2010 was a "berry" bad year. 

-------------
You see in this filmmaking world there's two types of people my friend. Those with the knowledge of film and those who think they do but really don't.


Posted By: Razziedent Evil
Date Posted: December 15 2010 at 8:36pm
Fully agree...  

Originally posted by Vits

 I have to say I'm very dissapointed with this list. Half the actors here were in bad movies, but the bad reviews didn't say they were bad. I think some listed here were evengood


-------------


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: December 16 2010 at 8:09am
I just don't like unfairness. For example, for months, all of you have stated Dev Patel gave the worst performance, but you're voting on Jackson Rathbone only because he was in two movies.



-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: oiram
Date Posted: December 16 2010 at 1:46pm
It's not just the fact that Rathbone was in two movies, it was that he also gave extremely poor performances in both of them!  




-------------
Elizabeth Hartman and Judith Barsi are more talented and beautiful than Scarlett Johansson and Chloe Grace Moretz. Fact.

Worst Supporting Actor: Brendan Fraser/Gimme Shelter and The Nut Job




Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 16 2010 at 2:47pm
Originally posted by Vits

I just don't like unfairness. For example, for months, all of you have stated Dev Patel gave the worst performance, but you're voting on Jackson Rathbone only because he was in two movies.
Yeah, it's because he was in TWO movies, but I think it should go to Dev because he should know better, coming off of an Oscar winning Best Picture.


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: rburton
Date Posted: December 16 2010 at 4:50pm
Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

Yeah, it's because he was in TWO movies, but I think it should go to Dev because he should know better, coming off of an Oscar winning Best Picture.


Before he was a slumdog, he was the worst thing on television's Skins.  Regardless of if he knew better, he should win the Razzie.


-------------
For Your Consideration

Dev Patel for WORST SUPPORTING ACTOR in The Last Fartbender


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: December 16 2010 at 4:54pm
Are you saying Patel's performance in SLUMDOG was Oscar worthy? 

Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

Yeah, it's because he was in TWO movies, but I think it should go to Dev because he should know better, coming off of an Oscar winning Best Picture.


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 16 2010 at 4:56pm
Never watched Skins. Not saying he should be spared, just saying he shouldn't have gone with this movie.  

Originally posted by rburton

Before he was a slumdog, he was the worst thing on television's Skins


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: AwesomelyBadCrap
Date Posted: December 19 2010 at 9:50am
I agree -- Can't say I care this way or that way about James Franco, but his consideration for Date Night is just downright silly. Where is Cam Gigandet for Burlesque? Phew did he stink. Or is he not considered because he isn't famous enough? Boooooo! 

:)  

Originally posted by Vits

 I have to say I'm very dissapointed with this list. Half the actors here were in bad movies, but the bad reviews didn't say they were bad. I think some listed here were evengood


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: December 19 2010 at 11:05am
Welcome, AwesomelyBadCrap

Unknown actors can be nominated. Last year that was the case with Jorma Taccone. The main proof is that in most sites that had the nominations list they had to write what character he played. And Gigandet has already been Razzie-looked for THE TWILIGHT SAGA.

I dare to say that, just like the Golden Globes, the Razzies are desperate for attention (specially since they'll be on TV). And what gave them so much advertising was when last year Sandra Bullock won an Oscar and a Razzie. Maybe they think they can do that with James Franco. Two problems: Colin Firth and Jesse Eisenberg have more chances,and,a lot of people say Franco was more of a best supporting actor in DATE NIGHT.


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: AwesomelyBadCrap
Date Posted: December 19 2010 at 12:20pm
Thanks, Vits1 Glad to be here. Smile Yup, totally agree with you on Franco. He was probably the best thing about Date Night!


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 19 2010 at 1:32pm
The problem with studios and award shows is that they always wait for the end of the year to release their Oscar baiters, so they are fresh in the voters' minds. The problems being: 

#1. Movie goers don't have time to see the movies, so the TV viewers have no idea what these movies are even about. 

#2. It's hard to tell who had the best performance or best picture of the year when all the buzz is in the very last weeks of the year.
 
The agenda of Hollywood is like this: Jan-April: Filler, usually the worst movies of the year. May-August: Blockbusters (or at least blockbuster hopefuls), some are good, many are not. Sept-Nov: More filler, slightly better movies than Jan-April, some Oscar baiters here and there. Dec: All Oscar bait, some last minute wannabe blockbusters. And this agenda has only gotten more transparent in the past decade.


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: AwesomelyBadCrap
Date Posted: December 19 2010 at 5:45pm
I know I'll be in the minority on this one, but I thought that Harrison Ford was absolutely horrible in Morning Glory. He has gone from low key performances to Al Pacino-mode with his completely hammy, over-the-top performances. In fact, I'd consider him a double nominee this year for Extraordinary Meausures where he was also horrible (but he may be considered lead for that one, though I'd consider it supporting....top billing or not)

Also Bradley Cooper in Case 39 would make my list for the bee scene alone! :-D


Posted By: cvcjr13
Date Posted: December 19 2010 at 5:56pm
What the hell are you talking about, Vits?  (see below)
 
"The Razzies are desperate for attention"?  Desperate?  We're mentioned worldwide, and the Foundation doesn't spend that much (if anything) on promotion.  
 
"And what gave them so much advertising. . .?"  I'm sorry, if you said "gave them a higher profile" I might let that one slide, but "advertising"?  If the awards show is on TV this year, there will be a sponsor,  but that's about the extent of any "advertising."  
 
Where do you get this nonsense?  The Razzies caught on by the news media and by word of mouth.  I mean, where were you when Halle Berry gave that wonderful acceptance speech for her Razzie for Catwoman?  Where were you when Bill Cosby accepted his Razzie for Leonard Part 6 in a separate presentation after he paid for the trophy to be specially made?  The Razzies have long since become part of the movie award seasons.  

For crying out loud, before the Writer's Guild settled, it looked like the Razzies would be the ONLY awards show to go on as planned back in 2008 without requiring a waiver.  Of course, that was because everyone was fairly sure Lindsay Lohan and Eddie Murphy were not going to show up. . . .
 
I can't speak for the Foundation, but from what I've seen the Razzies are not attention whores or moneygrubbers like you implied.  We seriously want to lampoon Hollywood for shilling out cinematic dreck and we want to have a lot of fun doing it.  That last, mischeivous part may have been a factor in voting for Sandra Bullock (although I assert again I felt she deserved it anyway).  That, and, the fact that we love films and we love the stars despite all appearances to the contrary.  But NOT because we were "desperate for attention".  

Originally posted by Vits

 Welcome, AwesomelyBadCrap

I dare to say that, just like the Golden Globes, the Razzies are desperate for attention (specially since they'll be on TV). And what gave them so much advertising was when last year Sandra Bullock won an Oscar and a Razzie. 
 
 


-------------


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 19 2010 at 9:53pm
I think Vits is just pissed by the idea that the Razzies MIGHT razz Franco just for a PR stunt so they get the same attention as they did with Sandra Bullock, because he believes Franco doesn't deserve it. According to the poll above, Franco is not the front-runner for a razzing, so Vits is jumping the gun with their theory.

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: December 20 2010 at 12:02pm
I don't know what "jumping the gun" means. I knew Franco wasn't going to be a front-runner, but I'm mad he's in the poll in the first place. 

I apologize for my wrong choice of words. By "advertising" I meant "profile". I also meant that it was going to look like a PR stunt. And I'm not saying that's a bad thing. That doesn't make them attention whores (your words). The Razzies are known, but not in the same way as other awards. And since it's going to be on TV it needs more word of mouth. There are a lot of ways of doing that, and awarding the wrong movies and people (like the Oscars have sometimes done and the Golden Globes will probably do this year) is one of them. 

When Cosby accepted his Razzies, I hadn't even been born yet. 

I don't see, what does that have to do what happened in '08 with the WGA Strike, or with this. 

Also, you said you can't speak for the Foundation, yet you refer to it as "we"?? 



-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 20 2010 at 12:18pm
"Jumping the gun" is a way of saying that you were jumping to conclusions without having any real reason to make that conclusion. In other words, just because Franco's name is on the poll list, you're jumping to conclusions that the Razzies want to razz him so they get the same attention that they did with Sandra Bullock winning an Oscar and Razzie on the same weekend.


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: cvcjr13
Date Posted: December 20 2010 at 7:49pm
I can't speak for the Foundation.  Really, only HeadRAZZ can speak for the Foundation.  However, I'm a Razzie member who is active on this website and have met a small number of the other members.  By "we", I mean the people I've met both here and in person.


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 20 2010 at 8:42pm
True, there are something like a total of 600+ voting members, and I only count maybe 30 regulars here at the forum. So the opinions of this forum are like 1/16th of the opinions that will decide who will win.  

Originally posted by cvcjr13

I can't speak for the Foundation.  Really, only HeadRAZZ can speak for the Foundation.  However, I'm a Razzie member who is active on this website and have met a small number of the other members.  By "we", I mean the people I've met both here and in person.


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Mayhem5185
Date Posted: December 21 2010 at 1:49am
Thats a good point, I don't have a right to speak for the razzies, in fact i don't think none of us can no matter how many posts we put on here, if anything i feel that the people here on the forum, like me, are more like the employee's at the record store in "High Fidelity" rather than an consensus on who's going to win the razzies.

The only thing i'll agree with vits is the fact that it's puzzling that James Franco is on the list at all, in the past he was a potential razzie target, but he has really turned his career around in a way that most razzie actors have not, his name being up there is a complete waste of space if nothing else, and for that matter so is Mickey Rourke... seriously wtf?!?!  




-------------
I don't have pet peeves, I have major psychotic f**king hatreds! George Carlin


Posted By: cvcjr13
Date Posted: December 21 2010 at 6:57am
Can you imagine what this place would be like if all 600 or so members were logged into this site?  I'm guessing two-thirds would lurk while the other third would post like crazy, but still, that would be 200 people posting around here at the same time.


Posted By: Vheid
Date Posted: December 21 2010 at 9:08am
Yet it still seems that 600+ people are voting on these polls that has to mean something (doesn't it?)

Originally posted by cvcjr13

Can you imagine what this place would be like if all 600 or so members were logged into this site?  I'm guessing two-thirds would lurk while the other third would post like crazy, but still, that would be 200 people posting around here at the same time.


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 21 2010 at 11:47am
But like Mayhem said, are those 600+ people all actual voting Razzie members, or are they just John Q. Public voicing their opinions? Back in 2008, Forum members mostly voted for Uwe Boll and Seltzerberg movies to "win," yet come the actual awards, "Love Guru" swept. Unlike the paint-by-numbers Oscars, who follow the trends of all the award shows before it, we won't know who will "win" what until the day of our award show.  

Originally posted by Vheid

Yet it still seems that 600+ people are voting on these polls that has to mean something (doesn't it?)


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vheid
Date Posted: December 21 2010 at 12:00pm
Right, but even if it is the general public voting on these polls it has to at least be some sort of indicator on what will be popular choices during razzie-time and what not. I mean every voter must have visited (and be aware) of this site at one point in ther life, how else did they know that you could become a voting member?

Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

But like Mayhem said, are those 600+ people really voting Razzie members, or are they just John Q. Public voicing their opinions? Back in 2008, forum members all voted for Uwe Boll and Seltzerberg movies to win, yet come the actual awards, "Love Guru" swept. Unlike the paint by number Oscars who follow the trends of all the award shows before it, we won't know who will win what until next the day of the award show.


Posted By: oiram
Date Posted: December 22 2010 at 4:57pm
Rathbone is so dead! 

-------------
Elizabeth Hartman and Judith Barsi are more talented and beautiful than Scarlett Johansson and Chloe Grace Moretz. Fact.

Worst Supporting Actor: Brendan Fraser/Gimme Shelter and The Nut Job




Posted By: cvcjr13
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 8:12am
I wouldn't rule out Dev Patel.  Remember, this poll is just online voters.
 
Originally posted by oiram

Rathbone is so dead.


Posted By: AwesomelyBadCrap
Date Posted: December 31 2010 at 5:41pm
Yes, got my ballot today and I am loving that Cam Gigandet made the new list of potential nominees! TongueThank you!!!!!! HugHugHug
Long live, Cam's Razzie chances!!!! Heart


-------------
In my spare time, I love to watch http://www.awesomelybadcrap.com - Awesomely Bad Crap


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: December 31 2010 at 7:41pm
That's odd. Cam Gigandet starred in 4 films this year, but the only one that caught the RAZZIES' attention was Burlesque, and many of us here hold that we have bigger fish to fry.  

Originally posted by AwesomelyBadCrap

Yes, got my ballot today and I am loving that Cam Gigandet made the new list of potential nominees! TongueThank you!!!!!! HugHugHug
Long live, Cam's Razzie chances!!!! Heart


-------------


Posted By: AwesomelyBadCrap
Date Posted: December 31 2010 at 9:58pm
Not sure what the 4th movie was, but I thought he was perfectly fine in the Twiight movie and Easy A. Burlesque, on the other hand, is a different story: IMO, he, not Christina A, gave the worst performance in the film, which speaks volumes about how awful I think he was. LOL 

He's got my vote.Thumbs Up


-------------
In my spare time, I love to watch http://www.awesomelybadcrap.com - Awesomely Bad Crap


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: January 01 2011 at 5:14pm
But Cam Gigandet wasn't in http://www.razzies.com/forum/twilight-saga-eclipse_forum445.html - .He was only in BURLESQUE and EASY A.Well,there were two other movies but they were straigth-to-DVD.

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: Anuss
Date Posted: January 01 2011 at 5:17pm
He wasn't that awfoul in Easy A.
In Burlesque he sucked so hard :P


Posted By: AwesomelyBadCrap
Date Posted: January 02 2011 at 5:10am
Originally posted by Anuss


In Burlesque he sucked so hard :P
Clap

-------------
In my spare time, I love to watch http://www.awesomelybadcrap.com - Awesomely Bad Crap


Posted By: baby_jane_2012
Date Posted: January 03 2011 at 5:52am
Pierce Brosnan for Worst Supporting Actor in Remember Me? Sorry, not buying it!!  



-------------


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: January 03 2011 at 6:10am
I guess his Razzie-winning performance in MAMMA MIA! is still in the voters's head.

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: Film Reel Redemption
Date Posted: January 03 2011 at 10:08am

I've got a question, do all users on the forum get a Razzie ballot or is it only those with an address or in the US get them?  


RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: To clarify -- Forum polls are "just for fun," and have nothing to do with the actual/eventual results of this year's RAZZIE® Awards, which are determined by dues-paying Voting Members of the G.R.A.F. 

If you would like to become a Voting Member and receive both Nominating and Final Ballots for this year's RAZZIES®, here's the http://razzies.com/join.asp - to do so:  

http://razzies.com/join.asp - http://razzies.com/join.asp







-------------
You see in this filmmaking world there's two types of people my friend. Those with the knowledge of film and those who think they do but really don't.


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: January 03 2011 at 2:38pm
Originally posted by Film Reel Redemption

I've got a question, do all users on the forum get a Razzie ballot or is it only those with an address or in the US get them? 
I got mine, and I was very happy to see that Worst Couple and Worst Ensemble were merged into one category. Thanks for doing the right thing.


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: JoJo
Date Posted: January 03 2011 at 5:23pm
Originally posted by Vits

I guess his Razzie-winning performance in MAMMA MIA! is still in the voters's head.

Me either!  I really think Remember Me was unfairly trashed.  It's a solid movie about repairing family relationships.  It's biggest problem was being marketed as some schmaltzy love story, when it was anything but...

The romance was very much secondary to the meat of the plot which was all about family - the romance thread tied the two together.  It stayed with me for days after I saw it - a mark of a good film IMO, not a bad one.


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: January 03 2011 at 7:31pm
Originally posted by Vits

I guess his Razzie-winning performance in MAMMA MIA! is still in the voters's head.
I believe it was his bad singing that earned him the "win".

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: AwesomelyBadCrap
Date Posted: January 05 2011 at 10:05pm
Oh I thought Remember Me was laughably bad. Big smile The sloooooooow pacing... The oh-so-original brooding lead character... De Ravin's choppy acting... the lame dialogue...that unintentionally hilarious fight scene between two main characters...and then there was the final 15 minutes. LOL I loved it! Thumbs UpI don't think Brosnan was that bad, though. Pattinson, on the other hand... Wacko He should win the Razzie for that boardroom scene alone. Clown

-------------
In my spare time, I love to watch http://www.awesomelybadcrap.com - Awesomely Bad Crap



Print Page | Close Window