Print Page | Close Window

WORST ACTRESS of 2010

Printed From: Official RAZZIE® Forum
Category: DISCUSSIONS & POLLS on 2010 RELEASES
Forum Name: POLL: POSSIBLE WORST ACTRESSES for 2010
Forum Discription: Which of These Lame-O Leading Ladies Should We Lay Into with a RAZZIE® Nomination??
URL: http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4729
Printed Date: August 20 2014 at 1:39pm


Topic: WORST ACTRESS of 2010
Posted By: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: WORST ACTRESS of 2010
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 9:04am



THOUGH IT HAS A MORE MANAGEABLE NUMBER of CONTENDERS,
WORST ACTRESS IS ANOTHER OVER-CROWDED CATEGORY for 2010. 

PLEASE PICK ONE CHOICE from AMONG the 14 LISTED ABOVE --
AND/OR LET US KNOW of ANYONE YOU THINK 
WE COULD'VE or SHOULD'VE INCLUDED and DID NOT...AS WELL AS (IF YOU INSIST!) ANYONE WE DID INCLUDE THAT YOU THINK WE SHOULDN'TA. 

IMPORTANT NOTE: 

To clarify -- Forum polls are "just for fun," and have nothing to do with 

the actual/eventual results of this year's RAZZIE® Awards, 

which are determined by dues-paying Voting Members of the G.R.A.F. 

If you would like to become a Voting Member and receive 

both Nominating and Final Ballots for this year's RAZZIES®

here's the  http://razzies.com/join.asp -  to do so:  

http://razzies.com/join.asp - http://razzies.com/join.asp





-------------
Ye Olde Head RAZZberry



Replies:
Posted By: MiguelAntilsu
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 9:54am
Just about everyone I thought was gonna be up for this is up here, so I don't have any to add.  I'm down to Fox, Heigl, and Stewart, and don't think I can narrow it down any further!  




-------------


Posted By: AwesomelyBadCrap
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 10:04am
I voted for Christina. I think a lot of people had such low expectations for her and the movie in the first place that her terrible performance isn't getting the attention it deserves. ErmmHeigl in Killers is my runner-up. I got the feeling she thought she was giving a great comedic performance in that film and she was just painfully unfunny. 

I hadn't realized that Gulliver's Travels had come out yet.  


-------------
In my spare time, I love to watch http://www.awesomelybadcrap.com - Awesomely Bad Crap


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 11:20am

W.T.F.,HeadRAZZ?! What's the point of "Worst Ensemble" if you put together the 4 actresses from "Sex and the City 2"?!  

Isn't Emily Blunt supporting in both movies?  
 
The Golden Globes always screw when nominating bad movies,but they always choose good performances, and bad movies can have good performances. So why is Angelina Jolie here?  
 
Why do you insist with Kristen Stewart? Even the 50% of critics who didn't like the movie said she acts well.
 
Renee Zellwegger? I thought limited releases can't be nominated.  

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Answering your inquiries point-by-point -- The four actresses listed together for SEX AND THE CITY #2 was to avoid them taking up more than one slot for Worst Actress when there are so many worthy choices this year...I have not yet seen GULLIVER'S but did see WOLFMAN on DVD, and Blunt's character (much like Megan Fox's in JONAH HEX) may not have been on screen in every scene, but was clearly the leading female character...If it were not for Fox's silly Southern drawl in JONAH, Jolie in THE TOURIST would get my vote for the Year's Worst Accent. Yes, Jolie was beautiful in the film (as were the Venice locations) but beautiful only buys you so much when you can't get past how phony her every line reading was...As for Kristen Stewart, I don 't know of anyone who found her pouty, breathless, ludicrously brooding performance in ECLIPSE appealing -- I think she got OK reviews for her other 2010 release(s) and so is listed solely for the TWILIGHT title...and Rene Zellwegger in CASE 39 was not a limited release here in the US -- According to B.O. MoJo, it played on more than 2,200 screens last October ( http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=case39.htm - http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic4037_post27858.html#27858 -



-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 11:41am

Did the critics really say Angelina Jolie acted better in The Tourist? Did they really say that about Kristin Stewart in The Twilight Saga: Eclipse?

Case 39 was a wide release.



-------------
Possible Unofficial Forums, given <35% approval: Ags. 27; The November Man.


Posted By: Vheid
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 11:49am
I fully agree with you, Vits

Originally posted by Vits

W.T.F.,HeadRAZZ?!What's the point of "Worst Ensemble" if you put together those 4 actresses?!


I went against everything I believe in (always vote for the worst performence) and voted for Angelina Jolie.

I really hope that she gets nominated, just to attack the credibility of the Golden Globes.



Posted By: MiguelAntilsu
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 12:06pm

Peter Travers attacked the credibility of the Golden Globes by listing 'The Tourist' at No. 1 on his Worst of 2010 list.



-------------


Posted By: Vheid
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 12:10pm
Miguel, do you have a link to Peter Travers worst list. I am interested now.


Posted By: JoeBoyden
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 12:28pm
Personally, I voted for what I think is the worst performance (Heigl). And even if the Globes had nominated Cyrus and Fox as Best Actress, I'd have still voted for Heigl.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 12:29pm
You guys are talking about http://razzies.com/forum/member-started-forum-the-tourist_topic4704.html - as a whole.We're talking about Jolie's performance.
Originally posted by GTAHater767

Did the critics really say Angelina Jolie acted better in The Tourist? Did they really say that about Kristin Stewart in The Twilight Saga: Eclipse?

Case 39 was a wide release.

1)More like Jolie is good and Stewart is O.K.,but considering the reception of that movie it's a compliment.
2)Sorry.I meant movies nobody saw.
Originally posted by JoeBoyden

And even if the Globes had nominated Cyrus and Fox as Best Actress, I'd have still voted for Heigl.
No.That would never happen.


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: MiguelAntilsu
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 12:53pm
http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/lists/10-worst-movies-of-2010-20101216 - Here  is a link to Peter Travers' Ten Worst List...

-------------


Posted By: Vheid
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 1:38pm
Thank you Miguel,

Hmmm...He seems to chose the more comercial titles (Knight & Day) over the smaller films (Vampires Suck & Skyline). How interesting.

Jonah Hex is my second most hated film this year and considering that A Serbian Film isn't released in the US this year I'll probably vote for it in the worst picture category (Hex that is).


Posted By: The Larch
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 2:08pm
Janet Jackson (For Colored Girls AND Why Did I Get Married Too?) should be on this ballot instead of Emily Blunt, who's a SUPPORTING ACTRESS in both of her movies anyway, unless you wanna tell me Ms. Jackson is a BETTER actress (or more to the point, not a WORSE one) than the more acclaimed Ms. Blunt...


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 4:04pm
Although it's debatable who's the lead in FOR COLORED GIRLS,it's been stablished she's supporting in the other one.

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 4:37pm
It's pretty much Katherine Heigl vs. Megan Fox, and as you can tell from my past posts, I'm voting for Heigl. As for "All 4 Gal Pals" from "Sex And The City 2", this is what Worst Ensemble Cast is for! Having four women up for one award as a group and the Worst Couple category are both outdated as can be. Worst Actress for that movie should be put squarely on Sarah Jessica Parker, the rest can be up for Worst Ensemble Cast.

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 4:41pm
Peter Travers didn't attack the credibilty of the Golden Globes; the Golden Globes tainted their credibity all on their own for nominating "The Tourist", one of the worst reviewed movies of the year, for THREE awards, including Best Comedy! It's as transparent as can be that they only did this to get Depp and Jolie on the show in hopes of a spike in the ratings.  

Originally posted by MiguelAntilsu

Peter Travers attacked the credibility of the Golden Globes by listing 'The Tourist' at No. 1 on his Worst of 2010 list.


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Anuss
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 6:11pm
Blunt is supporting and I thought she was ok. Worse than usual, but still... ok ;P

My vote is Miley Cyrus. She was so horrible, she needs win. My runner up are Katherine Heigl and Jennifer Aniston, they were horrible aswell.


Posted By: cvcjr13
Date Posted: December 24 2010 at 2:44am
Vits, I keep telling everybody limited releases are fair game, and have racked up awards in the past, even Worst Picture (Dirty Love, anybody?). 
 
If I have any gripes, it's because Helen Mirren isn't up there for Love Ranch. . . . Wink


-------------


Posted By: cvcjr13
Date Posted: December 24 2010 at 2:58am
I agree with the others.  Did Emily Blunt get enough screen time on The Wolfman to be placed on the actress list rather than the supporting actress list?  I actually couldn't say if she was on the screen more than 20 minutes, and it seemed she was onscreen much less, but now to think of it, I could be wrong.
 
Whatever the case, she deserves to be nominated.
 
However, it's Katherine Heigl, Megan Fox and Miley Cyrus competing for this category, and I'm throwing my vote to Megan Fox.  Heigl can act circles around Fox, although it seems Heigl couldn't pick a good movie script to save her career.  Throw Jennifer Anniston and Kristin Stewart in the lot, and I'll be happy.
 
 
 


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: December 24 2010 at 11:15am
Everytime I mention the subject, someone tells me those movies got "lucky" to win??  

Originally posted by cvcjr13

Vits, I keep telling everybody limited releases are fair game, and have racked up awards in the past, even Worst Picture (Dirty Love, anybody?).


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: oiram
Date Posted: December 24 2010 at 11:17am
You put Jolie on the list for Tourist and NOT Salt?  

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: While many of our Forum members didn't care for SALT, reviews on it were actually within "fresh" range on R.T. ( http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1213717-salt/ - ) while TOURIST was well within RAZZIE® range ( http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/tourist/ - ). Also, SALT's box office was nearly $120 million domestic ( http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=salt10.htm - ). Either of those factors alone would arguably "disqualify" SALT from being a strong contender. Together, they all but exempt SALT from inclusion among this year's likely RAZZIE® nominees... 




-------------
Elizabeth Hartman and Judith Barsi are more talented and beautiful than Scarlett Johansson and Chloe Grace Moretz. Fact.

Worst Supporting Actor: Brendan Fraser/Gimme Shelter and The Nut Job




Posted By: cvcjr13
Date Posted: December 24 2010 at 11:52am
I'd like to know who said that win was "lucky" (good choice of quotation marks), and then explain to me why that movie's "luck" is any different from any other worst movie's "luck".
 
Bottom line, we consider limited releases as well as wide releases.  When it comes to the Worst of the Weak, HeadRAZZ usually picks the wide release over the limited release mainly because he considers what the broadly located membership is able to view.  That doesn't preclude limited releases by any means.
 
Originally posted by Vits

Originally posted by cvcjr13

Vits, I keep telling everybody limited releases are fair game, and have racked up awards in the past, even Worst Picture (Dirty Love, anybody?).

Everytime I mention that subject,someone tells me those movies got "lucky" to win.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: December 24 2010 at 1:08pm
They were lucky because limited releases may be elegible but seem to be constantly overlooked...  



-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: JR1
Date Posted: December 24 2010 at 4:21pm
Not only did the Globes nominate The Tourist, but also Burlesque - but I suspect the HFPA wanted a true musical in that category, even if it wasn't very good. And when reviewing The Tourist, critics didn't exactly say Jolie gave a good performance, did they?




-------------


Posted By: Odyssey
Date Posted: December 24 2010 at 5:25pm
John, any chance to place Nicola Peltz as lead and Seychele Gabriel as supporting in the Nominating Ballot?


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 24 2010 at 10:34pm
Originally posted by JR1

Not only did the Globes nominate The Tourist, but also Burlesque - but I suspect the HFPA wanted a true musical in that category, even if it wasn't very good. And when reviewing The Tourist, critics didn't exactly say Jolie gave a good performance, did they?
Again, giving ANY nods to "Tourist" is just a stunt to get ratings with the help of Depp and Jolie. And "Red", what is that doing there? Wasn't that an action movie?


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 24 2010 at 10:38pm
Originally posted by Vits

Everytime I mention the subject, someone tells me those movies got "lucky" to win??  

Originally posted by cvcjr13

Vits, I keep telling everybody limited releases are fair game, and have racked up awards in the past, even Worst Picture (Dirty Love, anybody?).
In terms of "Dirty Love", "BloodRayne" should have won everything that year. Or was it "Alone In The Dark"? It was either Uwe Boll movie.

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: December 25 2010 at 12:22am

Dirty Love: Bottom 30 of 2005, #1. Alone in the Dark: Bottom 30 of 2005, #9. BloodRayne: Bottom 30 of 2006, #3.

It probably had to do with Jenny McCarthy. They didn't want a scatological star to make a movie. Especially after a series of events known as "The Leak", where several famous women wet themselves earlier in 2005.

-------------
Possible Unofficial Forums, given <35% approval: Ags. 27; The November Man.


Posted By: TheMovieSpoiler
Date Posted: December 25 2010 at 7:26am
Anyone who doesn't vote for Angelina in THE TOURIST obviously hasn't seen the movie.  She is amazingly bad and has to be the only reason why it was nominated in the comedy category in the Golden Globes.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: December 25 2010 at 10:47am
Come on.I know you're all desperate to award the movie in every possible category,but if Peltz is supporting,she's supporting.

Originally posted by Odyssey

John, any chance to place Nicola Peltz as lead and Seychele Gabriel as supporting in the Nominating Ballot?

RED was an action comedy. http://www.razzies.com/forum/member-started-forum-the-tourist_topic4704.html -  was an action "thriller."

Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

Again, giving ANY nods to "Tourist" is just a stunt to get ratings with the help of Depp and Jolie. And "Red", what is that doing there? Wasn't that an action movie?




-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: Longbourne
Date Posted: December 25 2010 at 11:34am

Somebody Get Angelina’s and Jennifer ‘s names on that ballot -- it would surely turn this year’s show into a media circus if they both were competing for Razzie "honors." Forcing  crazed Team Jen & Team Angie fans to vote in droves. 

And Megan fox deserves a break -- she wasn’t really leading in Jonah Hex.



-------------


Posted By: JR1
Date Posted: December 25 2010 at 11:55am
I too wondered about Red at first, but then read that it had comedic elements.

BTW- anyone know why "Musical' is lumped with "Comedy"? Lots of musical are more dramatic than comedic. Is it because musicals are "light" with the song-and-dance routines?

The Tourist nods, though, may be the funniest ever- and, yeah, since it stars two of the biggest box office stars in the world, the HFPA would want to give them incentive to attend.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: December 25 2010 at 1:13pm
Welcome,Longbourne

I haven't seen Jonah Hex, but I trust HeadRAZZ knows how to decide that. 

Originally posted by Longbourne

Megan fox deserves a break, she wasn’t really leading Jonah Hex.

I've always assumed that it's because each year not more than 5 musicals are made,and the number of good comedies is pretty low too. 

Originally posted by JR1

BTW- anyone know why "Musical' is lumped with "Comedy"? Lots of musical are more dramatic than comedic. Is it because musicals are "light" with the song-and-dance routines?



-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: Gregory
Date Posted: December 25 2010 at 3:02pm
Knight and Day and Eat Pray Love among the 10 Worst Films of the Year? The Tourist the Worst Film of the Year? Really?  
 
Did Travers even see Furry Vengeance? Skyline? The Spy Next Door? Vampires Suck???  

Originally posted by MiguelAntilsu

http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/lists/10-worst-movies-of-2010-20101216 - Here  is a link to Peter Travers' Ten Worst List... 


-------------


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 25 2010 at 11:05pm
I guess not even Travers is willing to torment himself like that, having to sit through the movies you listed. My guess: he expected Cruise, Diaz, Roberts, Depp, and Jolie to make better choices in their roles than what they did with those movies.

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: JR1
Date Posted: December 26 2010 at 6:18am
That could be a reason, Vits. And you know it must be a bad year for comedies when a title that's not intentionally funny (The Tourist) gets nominated in the category. Tongue Burlesque also may fit that bill, aside from fitting the "musical" requirement.


Posted By: blackswansucks
Date Posted: December 26 2010 at 2:28pm
Barbara Hershey must be added to this list.  I realize that she would be considered a "supporting actress" for her work in Black Swan, but acting this terrible deserves recognition.  Wow.  She is terrible!


Posted By: Vheid
Date Posted: December 26 2010 at 2:36pm
First off, this will never happen, You may disagree but Hershey has been named as a serious oscar-contendor and Black Swan is a critics favorite that will probably be nominated for a lot of oscars (and will maybe win some to). So it is miles away from the Razzies...

...and before I forget, Welcome Blackswansucks.

Originally posted by blackswansucks

Barbara Hershey must be added to this list.  I realize that she would be considered a "supporting actress" for her work in Black Swan, but acting this terrible deserves recognition.  Wow.  She is terrible!


-------------


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: December 26 2010 at 4:10pm
Yes, welcome Blackswansucks. Although, if the past has taught us anything, it is that you'll probably be the only one trying to convince people to vote for BLACK SWAN for "Worst Picture". I haven't seen it because it will not be released here until next year, but most people say it's good, so in case that's what you wanna do, I'll lave you time. As for Hershey,the only award she's been nominated for is the SAG for "Best Ensemble".

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 26 2010 at 5:16pm
I wish people would stick with the actresses listed in the poll. If they are listed here, that's a sure sign they are under serious consideration. If there's someone you think is being left out, that's what write-in votes are for. But please don't tell us to vote for someone who only you THINK is worthy when she's not even close to being as bad as the actresses listed here. I'm sure Hershey's acting isn't what it used to be, but it's gotta be down right Masterpiece Theater quality compared to Megan Fox!  

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: If you re-read my initial post setting up this poll, I did encourage people to make additional suggestions, even though 5 of the 14 actresses listed are likely to make up the list of final nominees. Also, I am fairly certain if Barbara Hershey in BLACK SWAN were to be considered, it would be in Worst Supporting Actress, as I believe trade ads for her performance for "All Those Other Awards" list her as a Supporting contender...  






-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Anuss
Date Posted: December 27 2010 at 6:01am
You gotta be kiddin'with Black Swan. I mean the movie was fantastic and acting was fabolous.


Posted By: Grounder the Critic
Date Posted: December 27 2010 at 6:40am
And was scary too. I mean, I like scary stuff, and Black Swan is NO exception. I love Black Swan.

-------------
Pictures move, do they?


Posted By: AwesomelyBadCrap
Date Posted: December 27 2010 at 10:27am
Not sure anyone should expect Diaz to make better choices. LOL I think her "performance" in Knight and Day should be considered, btw, and the movie should win in a newly added category - lamest movie title. 

 
Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

I guess not even Travers is willing to torment himself like that, having to sit through the movies you listed. My guess: he expected Cruise, Diaz, Roberts, Depp, and Jolie to make better choices in their roles than what they did with those movies.


-------------
In my spare time, I love to watch http://www.awesomelybadcrap.com - Awesomely Bad Crap


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 27 2010 at 1:26pm
Fine, "Knight And Day" was underwhelming so, that I can understand. But "Black Swan"? I understand HeadRazz asked for write-ins, but ones made as "Oscar bait" that were actually pretty good aren't going to get very far with Razzie voters.  



-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: December 27 2010 at 2:03pm
Actually, I think (could be wrong)that "Oscar baiter" means a movie that tried but don't succeed in getting Oscar attention, while BLACK SWAN probably is going to be nominated for the "Best Picture" Oscar.  

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 27 2010 at 2:27pm
"Oscar baiters" are movies that were made to get Oscars. Some do get nominated (like "Black Swan" likely will) but others fail horribly at their goal (like "For Black Girls" likely will). 




-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Mayhem5185
Date Posted: December 27 2010 at 2:40pm
Yeah  i thought Peter Travers' list was incredibly weak, which is a shame considering i like him. i can understand him maybe not wanting to take the easy way out, but at the same time, he left off some of the "worst of the worst" and put a few on there that were really only mediocre...  



-------------
I don't have pet peeves, I have major psychotic f**king hatreds! George Carlin


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 27 2010 at 8:53pm
Originally posted by Mayhem5185

Yeah  i thought Peter Travers' list was incredibly weak, which is a shame considering i like him. i can understand him maybe not wanting to take the easy way out, but at the same time, he left off some of the "worst of the worst" and put a few on there that were really only mediocre... 
Alot of those movies belong on that list, but come on! "The Tourist" is #1, while "Fart Bender" is #8 or 9?! Again, I think he was just in the mood to bash big-named, former Oscar calibur talent for making bad choices.


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: December 28 2010 at 10:57am
I know that the fact those movies got under 10% in R.T. and Metacritic means most people disliked them, but it doesn't mean everyone does. Peter Travers may be a famous critic, but even he has his own taste. 

Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

"Oscar baiters" are movies that were made to get Oscars. Some do get nominated (like "Black Swan" likely will) but others fail horribly at their goal (like "For Black Girls" likely will).
 

Good to know. Thanks!  



-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: AwesomelyBadCrap
Date Posted: December 28 2010 at 11:02am
Agreed, Sir. Agreed (see below).  

Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

Fine, "Knight And Day" was underwhelming so, that I can understand. But "Black Swan"?   



-------------
In my spare time, I love to watch http://www.awesomelybadcrap.com - Awesomely Bad Crap


Posted By: film buff
Date Posted: December 29 2010 at 5:09pm
HALLE BERRY, WORST ACTRESS!!!!!


Posted By: Anuss
Date Posted: December 29 2010 at 6:33pm
Halle Berry? For what?


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: December 30 2010 at 12:20am
I'm guessing on genernal principal??  

Originally posted by Anuss

Halle Berry? For what?


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: December 30 2010 at 6:47am
Welcome, Film Buff. The only movie Halle was in this year is FRANKIE & ALICE, for which she's up for a Golden Globe... 

Originally posted by film buff

HALLE BERRY, WORST ACTRESS!!!!!


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: vampirediaries
Date Posted: January 02 2011 at 9:43am
Miley or Megan should win.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: January 02 2011 at 10:45am
Welcome Vampirediaries.It appears the prize will be between those 2.

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: JR1
Date Posted: January 02 2011 at 10:46am
So, will Christina Aguilera snag a nomination? Some reviewers said she was better than you'd expect...but other reviewers said otherwise. 



-------------


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: January 02 2011 at 11:34am
I doubt she is bad enough, especially this year.


-------------
Possible Unofficial Forums, given <35% approval: Ags. 27; The November Man.


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: January 02 2011 at 11:58am
"Will Christina Aguilera snag a nomination?"  

In a year with Sarah Jessica Parker, Jennifer Aniston, Milla Jovoich, Megan Fox, and Miley Cyrus? I don't think so!  


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: January 02 2011 at 1:26pm
I'm sure there's a number (maybe small) of bad reviews against her that were largely because they didn't like the whole movie. 

Originally posted by JR1

So, will Christina Aguilera snag a nomination? Some reviewers said she was better than you'd expect, but some reviewers said otherwise.


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: January 02 2011 at 3:20pm
Not to mention Burlesque also features Cher, a former Oscar winner who should be able to give on a good performance...but didn't!  




-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Anuss
Date Posted: January 02 2011 at 8:17pm
The thing is that Christina Aguilera was actually kinda good in Burlesque. So I hope she won't get a Razzie nomination.

-------------


Posted By: JR1
Date Posted: January 03 2011 at 8:05am
Good in terms of the musical numbers, or do you actually mean in the acting department?

Possibly she may be nominated, but I doubt she'd win (same for the movie).

I think that because the movie had so much promotion, release in 3,000+ theaters and didn't end up a hit, that could work in its "favor" for nominations. I didn't see it, but apparently it wasn't as bad as some thought it would be. Its Rotten Tomatoes score is 37%- not good by any means, but far from being one of the worst of the year.


Posted By: j0rxxxdan
Date Posted: January 03 2011 at 8:47am
I seriously went out of my way to make an account for this disgusting website just because I feel the need to let every one know that websites like this make the human race INCREDIBLY more negative than it needs to be.  

WHY would you need to vote for "worst actress"? ... I don't particularly care for these actresses, but there is no reason other people need the opportunity to vote for who is "worst."  What if there was a poll in your area for worst neighbor? Or worst person in general???  How would you feel if you won that?  Probably not great -- so why put down other people, even if you do dislike them?  If you cannot keep your dislike for a certain person or their acting skills to yourself, you probably hate YOURSELF. 

These awards are simply proof that humans have too much time, jealousy, and negative energy on their hands!  


-------------
Jordan


Posted By: j0rxxxdan
Date Posted: January 03 2011 at 8:50am
However, there is one actress on here I need to defend: Kristen Stewart is a phenomenal actress.  You cannot base your opinion of her acting skills only upon the Twilight Saga (which, while not terrible, is definitely over-rated by its obnoxious little fans). Watch Welcome to the Rileys, or The Runaways to see her real talent, because it definitely exists. Basically, anyone who votes for her as "Worst Actress" is just "type casting," or voting based on their hatred for Twilight Saga in general.  

-------------
Jordan


Posted By: scarymary
Date Posted: January 03 2011 at 10:23am
If Aniston doesn't win this after all the sh*t she's crapped out (sometimes multiple horrible movies in one year), then I suggest "the FIX is in." 

I'm sure her power PR flack Stephen Huvane is orchestrating something behind the scenes with the Razzies to insure she doesn't get the glory. That's the only reason I can think of why she hasn't won this "honor" yet.  
 
Cyrus wasn't nearly as bad as Aniston, and Stewart shouldn't even be included after the performances she's given this year (The Runaways, and Welcome to the Rileys).
 
Are people confusing the material an actress has to work with, with bad performances? Not even Meryl Streep could improve that Stephenie Meyer pablum that Stewart has to work with. Give the kid a break.
 
Aguilera won't win, even though she should - because this seems to be a popularity contest, the woman with the most haters wins these stupid polls. Except remember, you aren't voting for them because they're with the hot guys that you'd sell your mother for, we're voting for them for their uninspired performances.
 
I'm convinced Jolie is only included because Aniston is there, The Tourist didn't rock the box office, and many critics gave it 2 stars - but I have yet to read where Jolie was the problem. Most of them praised her. Being angry at the Globes for liking the pic and including it in the comedy category, shouldn't mean she gets kicked in the head for no reason.


-------------


Posted By: scarymary
Date Posted: January 03 2011 at 10:25am
Exactly! Pattinson fans may be voting for Stewart because she's got Rob Pattinson -- LOL! 

Never underestimate delusional jealous b*tches with no lives!  

Originally posted by j0rxxxdan

However, there is one actress on here I need to defend: Kristen Stewart is a phenomenal actress.  You cannot base your opinion of her acting skills only upon the Twilight Saga (which, while not terrible, is definitely over-rated by its obnoxious little fans). Watch Welcome to the Rileys, or The Runaways to see her real talent, because it definitely exists. Basically, anyone who votes for her as "Worst Actress" is just "type casting," or voting based on their hatred for Twilight Saga in general.  


-------------


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: January 03 2011 at 10:45am
I normally welcome new members, but I'll make an exception for you 2. Clearly, you are trolls. Just so we're clear, this is just a Forum poll -- It won't have anything to do with the actual awards' results... 

Originally posted by j0rxxxdan

I seriously went out of my way to make an account for this disgusting website just because I feel the need to let every one know that websites like this make the human race INCREDIBLY more negative than it needs to be.  

WHY would you need to vote for "worst actress"? ... I don't particularly care for these actresses, but there is no reason other people need the opportunity to vote for who is "worst."  What if there was a poll in your area for worst neighbor? Or worst person in general???  How would you feel if you won that?  Probably not great -- so why put down other people, even if you do dislike them?  If you cannot keep your dislike for a certain person or their acting skills to yourself, you probably hate YOURSELF. 

These awards are simply proof that humans have too much time, jealousy, and negative energy on their hands!

It's Yin-Yang. There are awards for the best in movies, so there should also be awards for the worst. 
 
If I feel my neighbor deserved to be called "the worst," I would do so. I'm not sure how someone could be "the worst person in general."  

Originally posted by j0rxxxdan

However, there is one actress on here I need to defend: Kristen Stewart is a phenomenal actress.  You cannot base your opinion of her acting skills only upon the Twilight Saga (which, while not terrible, is definitely over-rated by its obnoxious little fans). Watch Welcome to the Rileys, or The Runaways to see her real talent, because it definitely exists. Basically, anyone who votes for her as "Worst Actress" is just "type casting," or voting based on their hatred for Twilight Saga in general.

Couldn't agree more.

Originally posted by scarymary

If Aniston doesn't win this after all the sh*t she's crapped out (sometimes multiple horrible movies in one year), then I suggest "the FIX is in." 

I'm sure her power PR flack Stephen Huvane is orchestrating something behind the scenes with the Razzies to insure she doesn't get the glory. That's the only reason I can think of why she hasn't won this "honor" yet.  
 
Cyrus wasn't nearly as bad as Aniston, and Stewart shouldn't even be included after the performances she's given this year (The Runaways, and Welcome to the Rileys).
 
Aguilera won't win, even though she should - because this seems to be a popularity contest, the woman with the most haters wins these stupid polls. Except remember, you aren't voting for them because they're with the hot guys that you'd sell your mother for, we're voting for them for their uninspired performances.
 
I'm convinced Jolie is only included because Aniston is there, The Tourist didn't rock the box office, and many critics gave it 2 stars - but I have yet to read where Jolie was the problem. Most of them praised her. Being angry at the Globes for liking the pic and including it in the comedy category, shouldn't mean she gets kicked in the head for no reason.

1)So many people keep saying the same,but Aniston hasn't made that many bad movies.

2)If Stewart does get nominated it won't be for THE RUNAWAYS,WELCOME TO "THE RILEYS" nor YELLOW HANDKERCHIEF.

3)Most reviews say Aguilera's acting was alright.

4)If that was the case, Depp would also be in our polls. It seems the Golden Globes are the only ones praising her performance.  



-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: RoxiRoller
Date Posted: January 03 2011 at 1:08pm
ABSOLUTELY! In The Runaways, Kristen Stewart literally was Joan Jett; every aspect of her was channeled through Stewart and in Welcome to the Rileys, she was absolutely as wild and out of control as her character. 

I predict, after the Twilight films are over, her gaining much more credit with her other films (she filmed Jack Kerouac's 'On the Road' in the fall, that is sure to be a great film) and I have no doubt that she'll be either on the Oscar podium or at least nominated. Stewart is an absolutely wonderful actress, one of the best in the biz in my personal opinion. and people will eventually (hopefully -- one by one?) come to see that.  

Originally posted by j0rxxxdan

However, there is one actress on here I need to defend: Kristen Stewart is a phenomenal actress.  You cannot base your opinion of her acting skills only upon the Twilight Saga (which, while not terrible, is definitely over-rated by its obnoxious little fans). Watch Welcome to the Rileys, or The Runaways to see her real talent, because it definitely exists. Basically, anyone who votes for her as "Worst Actress" is just "type casting," or voting based on their hatred for Twilight Saga in general.  


-------------


Posted By: JoJo
Date Posted: January 03 2011 at 1:51pm
Angelina for the "win"!  The last time I heard a British accent that bad was Keanu Reeves and his sporadic attempts in Bram Stoker's Dracula!  



-------------


Posted By: Anuss
Date Posted: January 03 2011 at 2:56pm
I read some reviews from RT, and many of them were saying that Jolie was OK in Tourist. Johnny Depp got much more negative reviews...  



-------------


Posted By: scarymary
Date Posted: January 03 2011 at 5:33pm
Everyone knows that due to certain representation, PR agents/agencies you're beholden to, you will never give the nod to some.
 
Jolie, is like shooting fish in a barrel for a lot of media wh*ring entities (blogs, d-list celebs, tabloids, and outfits like this one) that are pwned by PR agencies and power agents (see Huvane Inc), as she is agentless. 
 
 You can get in plenty of smacks to the face, and no one is gonna threaten you - and as a main added bonus, you get lots of press on her back.
 
That means the same pay for play schemes, bribes, threats that usually go along w/ nominating and awarding someone this 'honor,' don't happen with her.
 
She's a safe one to beat up on, as she's never ever had a PR goon. Unlike Huvane's Aniston.
 
You proved my point and demonstrated your own ownage, by saying the following: "Aniston doesn't make that many bad movies." LMAO. In one year, we had The Bounty Hunter, The Switch and Love Happens and yes, she was the worst thing in all of them per the critics. So stop peeing on my leg please.
 
As for Depp, people have been kissing the Oscarless Johnny's faux-eccentric ass for YEARS, the fact remains, take him out of his kooky costumes and put him in a drama and he's snore city. Again, representation is why he's nowhere on your forum list. That and the fact you find beating up females more fun.
 
I read reviews, and I repeat - critics had problems with The Tourist as a film, but no one blamed Jolie. Get off the pipe with that lie.
 
I'm no Jolie superfan, but I did see The Tourist and enjoyed it, and know she was one of the best things about it. Ditto, the Twilight films and Stewart, who's playing moody teen angst - or did you miss the part where she got the script about an angsty teen girl from a broken home who falls in love w/ a boy who wants to kill her. Cyrus wasn't reamed in the reviews either.
 
The only person consistently reamed every time out of the box practically, is the one you won't have the balls to sock it to.


Posted By: scarymary
Date Posted: January 03 2011 at 5:44pm
It's odd that you say that, since no one's really lambasted her accent in The Tourist. Probably because if they said she did a great job playing 'British,' in both Tomb Raider movies and also said she nailed the French/English accent in A Mighty Heart (Marianne Pearl) to critical acclaim - it would be some kind of bullsh*t fakery w/ severe ulterior motives to revise history and say she can't do pretty much the same accent now. 
 
Dumb Americans calling tech on 'accents,' is always hilarious. Like they know what the sh*t is supposed to sound like anyway.   LOL  
 
Not to mention the fact, didn't she live in the UK, and have a British husband?  
 
Retroactively out of the blue trying to say her accent is off now, is kind of stupid.  

Originally posted by JoJo

Angelina for the "win"!  The last time I heard a British accent that bad was Keanu Reeves and his sporadic attempts in Bram Stoker's Dracula!  

 
 


-------------


Posted By: scarymary
Date Posted: January 03 2011 at 5:44pm
Thank you!  

Originally posted by Anuss

I read some reviews from RT, and many of them were saying that Jolie was OK in Tourist. Johnny Depp got much more negative reviews...
 



-------------


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: January 03 2011 at 7:27pm
Maybe "Dumb Americans" watch too much of the BBC/America channel?


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Mandy75
Date Posted: January 04 2011 at 4:11am
Totally agree with j0rxxxdan about Stewart. I don't think it's even fair for her to be included on this list. IMO she was the only good thing in Eclipse. The Runaways still one of my favorites movies of the year, and Welcome to the Rileys I didn't watch yet lol. But reviews say she's great there too.  Anyways, it's clear enough that Pattinson's fans are the ones voting against her, because she got to f**k him every night. Whatever.

I voted for Miley for obvious reasons. Bad acting and bad movie IMO. Jennifer Aniston wasn't good either.  

Originally posted by j0rxxxdan

However, there is one actress on here I need to defend: Kristen Stewart is a phenomenal actress.  You cannot base your opinion of her acting skills only upon the Twilight Saga (which, while not terrible, is definitely over-rated by its obnoxious little fans). Watch Welcome to the Rileys, or The Runaways to see her real talent, because it definitely exists. Basically, anyone who votes for her as "Worst Actress" is just "type casting," or voting based on their hatred for Twilight Saga in general.  


-------------


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: January 04 2011 at 6:46am
Piece of advice for scarymary: Don't insult others when they haven't insulted you -- Specially if you're new here.

Obviously this wasn't Aniston's year,but most users say she's long overdue.I'm asking why they say that. And I'm not even going to ask what "Peeing on my leg" means.

I didn't see  http://www.razzies.com/forum/member-started-forum-the-tourist_topic4704.html - THE TOURIST . I'm just saying what I've read, so don't call me a liar.

Originally posted by scarymary

You proved my point and demonstrated your own ownage, by saying the following: "Aniston doesn't make that many bad movies." LMAO. In one year, we had The Bounty Hunter, The Switch and Love Happens and yes, she was the worst thing in all of them per the critics. So stop peeing on my leg please.

I read reviews, and I repeat - critics had problems with The Tourist as a film, but no one blamed Jolie. Get off the pipe with that lie.
 

Hmmm...I see you're from New York??   

Originally posted by scarymary

Dumb Americans calling tech on 'accents,' is always hilarious. Like they know what the sh*t is supposed to sound like anyway.   LOL




-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: JR1
Date Posted: January 04 2011 at 8:11am
There's an article on the L.A. Times' website that discusses some of the "shortlist" Razzie  contenders: 

http://entertainment.latimes.com/awards/

Christina Aguilera is mentioned, and Emily Blunt is mentioned for Supporting Actress.


-------------


Posted By: Mandy75
Date Posted: January 04 2011 at 9:41am
Kristen Stewart got more than 4.000 votes in less than 3 hours. I thought there was something wrong, then I looked on Twitter and, yes, those are Rob`s fans voting against her. But I think they are cheating cos there`s no way 4.000 votes came in in less than 3 hours!    

-------------


Posted By: JoJo
Date Posted: January 04 2011 at 9:47am
Good lord - WTF is wrong with you people?  Seriously?  Is this kind of crap really going on?  If so - you'd think Pattinson's fans would understand he might be a bit upset if his girlfriend was given a Razzie award.  Guess these aren't real fans, but stalkers, perhaps?  The mentally unhinged?  
 
Stewart is NOT good in Twilight, but she is a good actress.  Loved her in Into the Wild and The Runaways.  I didn't realize such teenage bullsh*t happened on this site...


-------------


Posted By: Mandy75
Date Posted: January 04 2011 at 10:06am
I know, it`s really sad. Here are some comments from Rob`s fans at his E-online board:  

@112 Tue, Jan 4, 2011, 9:59 AM 

Yes, we are cheating ahahahahah and guess what, until the end of the day she will be winning by many votes I promise you  


Nonsten Tue, Jan 4, 2011, 10:03 AM  

Yes, we will cheat, I wanna see her winning this one lmaooooo she better be away from Rob. See what only 5/6 nonstens can do, she had 1600 votes 2 hours ago and now she has 6000 and counting WE HAVE THE POWER!!!


Cheating Tue, Jan 4, 2011, 10:05 AM  

Nonstens know how to cheat! Suck on that, losers!



It`s really sad, if you aske me. 


-------------


Posted By: Anuss
Date Posted: January 04 2011 at 10:32am
You do understand that even if Stewart "wins" here, that doesn't mean she'll actually get the Worst Actress Razzie??  

-------------


Posted By: Mandy75
Date Posted: January 04 2011 at 10:41am
I know -- I just think it's sad to see all this hating over a 20-year-old kid just because she`s dating some guy. They (Rob `s fans) also are doing a campaign, sending emails to FOX asking them to keep her away from the Water for Elephants premiere. 
People with no life at all!!    


-------------


Posted By: Susan25
Date Posted: January 04 2011 at 11:01am
Robert Pattinson officially has worse fans than Justin Bieber!  


-------------


Posted By: Kate.T
Date Posted: January 04 2011 at 11:10am
Pattinson fans are raging a war against Kristen (and Lautner now, b/c Your god can not win a Razzie, your god is the best actor in the world by "Rob fans"). Example: The Rafas awards -- they went to Angelina's board and told Angelina fans to go vote, because KS was winning in the polls. There is only one winner (it was in the fine print on the voting site). And these  Rob fans, who are hiding behind their, "I don't care, Rob still won" are to blame for this. Kristen actually was second behind Angelina in votes. Interesting how the best laid plans, don't work the way you would think.  Pattinson fans are evil!  
 
I've always said that Rob's fans will be the downfall of his career, and little game playing, mean-spirited fatties WILL end his career. His fanbase is horrid, and all the gossip sites, magazines, critics are aware of it!  


-------------


Posted By: Kate.T
Date Posted: January 04 2011 at 11:34am
Rob fans try to hurt Kristen, but succeed in hurting Rob. ROB FANS ARE DELUSIONAL.

Another campaign against Kristen:  

  I'm all for starting a major letter/email writing campaign to FOX to keep the WFE everything Stew free....This is Rob's moment to shine and separate himself from Twilight for his career! Let him have it FFS

 LOL..I'll be more than happy to hold her down. Too violent.I don't give a *****

 I'll hold her, you smack the **** out of her lol...


"i wish the leech was dead."

Letter writing campaign starts here to FOX studios...Let them know you want WFE Stew free...and one more...a general phone number to FOX...it's all on the web Let's keep WFE Stew free ** End quote * Can you people get any crazier? Let's hope WFE brings mega bucks at the BO, so Fox Studios will have a good reason to sign Rob for more proyects after having to deal with you. Said it once and will keep on saying it: you and your "brilliant" plans will be the end of his career.

..Letter writing campaign starts here to FOX studios 10201 Pico Boulevard, Century City, CA. 90064 Let them know you want WFE Stew free...and one more...a general phone number to FOX...310.369.1000....it's all on the web Let's keep WFE Stew free
 


-------------


Posted By: JR
Date Posted: January 04 2011 at 12:08pm
Rob's fans hacked this poll. Kristen got more than 5000 votes in 3 hours


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: January 04 2011 at 12:55pm
Aside from the big change in votes, we also get new users by the hour! Probably they join because they know our nominations will be announced soon?  

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: January 04 2011 at 2:14pm
Yeah, get ready for our Forum to be spammed and flamed to death over who got nods and who didn't. YIKES!  

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Anuss
Date Posted: January 04 2011 at 3:10pm
The truth is that Anglina wasn't bad in Salt, nor in The Tourist. She was pretty good. If she's gets nominated, it won't be fair. 

-------------


Posted By: JoJo
Date Posted: January 04 2011 at 3:42pm
I think it should be noted that not all of Rob's fans are lunatics.  It sucks that due to some psycho fringe element his entire fanbase is getting a bad name.  There are plenty of SANE Rob fans, that actually love Kristen as well.  Whatever.  Let them believe they somehow have created some sort of victory for themselves - as if it means Kristen Stewart's career will go in the sh*tter or Rob will stop loving her - freaks...  This is the element of fandom I will never understand.  And I will say I have seen this in the reverse as well - fans of Kristen's that hate on Rob.  It's beyond pathetic.
 
Anyway - I still hold that Angelina for the Tourist is the worst of this lot.  I get very aggrevated when I know she can do so much better.  I still hope for another Girl Interrupted....


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: January 04 2011 at 4:13pm
JoJo, I added a forum for The Tourist. If you have anything else to say about that movie, you should take it there. By the way, from the bits and pieces of the movie that I saw, I didn't like Angelina's performance all that much, but I usually pay more attention to the film overall than the individual performance.

-------------
Possible Unofficial Forums, given <35% approval: Ags. 27; The November Man.


Posted By: kitkat8562
Date Posted: January 04 2011 at 8:55pm
JoJo, I agree not all of Robs fans are crazy.  Its only a few who give the rest a bad name.  Most fans of Robs are also fans of Kristen.  You will aways have some who will come to these boards just to stir things up on both sides of the fandom.
 
 


Posted By: morgengrauen
Date Posted: January 05 2011 at 4:57am

The nominates are totally unfair



Posted By: Mandy75
Date Posted: January 05 2011 at 6:28am
Pattinson's fans got what they wanted... Kristen is winning. I just don't think it's fair because they were cheating, but whatever...


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: January 05 2011 at 8:54am
I don't think you newcomers get it.Nobody cares in what team you are,or if you are jealous of Kristen or not.There's already a big lack of integrity in the Razzies for you to come and vote for the wrong reasons.I'm guessing for your comments and your spelling you're teens who got bored of tweeting for a while so you come here.That's good,because there are less chances you'll buy a membership.
Originally posted by Anuss

The truth is that Anglina wasn't bad in Salt, nor in The Tourist. She was pretty good. If she's gets nominated, it won't be fair.
If she does get nominated it will be for the latter,not the former.


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: kitkat8562
Date Posted: January 05 2011 at 10:14am
Mandy and Kate, take your war somewhere else.  No one cares.  Votes here mean nothing.
 
If my vote did count I would vote for Heigl


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: January 05 2011 at 10:17am
Then buy a membership.

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: January 05 2011 at 10:52am
Those memberships are a paltry 25 Daura. I'd buy one myself, but I can't get permission from my family.

-------------
Possible Unofficial Forums, given <35% approval: Ags. 27; The November Man.


Posted By: claudiia828
Date Posted: January 05 2011 at 1:21pm
1. Is "Kristen" not "Kristin"
2.
I'm sick of only criticism for the Twilight saga ... She acts since age 9, and made many more movies such as "Welcome to the Rileys" and other,  is pre-nominated for the Academy Awards of 2011. I could go on ...
3. When you look at all her films, you can criticize
4. And yes, Angelina Jolie is also a good actress
For me this is stupid,  everyone is doing well.
Thanks



Print Page | Close Window