Print Page | Close Window

MEMBER DISCUSSION of HANGOVER PART II

Printed From: Official RAZZIE® Forum
Category: INFO on POSSIBLE 2011 RAZZIE® CONTENDERS
Forum Name: Forum Discussion & Add'l Info on HANGOVER PART II
Forum Discription: Here's Where 2 Find Forum Members' Feedback PLUS Reviews, Promos, Grosses and Credits on This Film
URL: http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5083
Printed Date: October 25 2014 at 3:18pm


Topic: MEMBER DISCUSSION of HANGOVER PART II
Posted By: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: MEMBER DISCUSSION of HANGOVER PART II
Date Posted: May 23 2011 at 9:42am
HERE's WHERE to HAVE AT IT -- SEE IF YOUR COMMENTS HERE CAN GIVE the MAKERS of http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum-discussion-addl-info-on-hangover-part-ii_forum525.html -  a HANGOVER of THEIR OWN!  

AND HERE's the http://www.razzies.com/forum/official-razzie-take-on-hangover-part-ii_forum524.html - to READ "THE OFFICIAL RAZZIE® TAKE" on THIS FILM... 

HERE's the http://www.razzies.com/forum/cast-credits-for-hangover-part-ii_topic5080.html - to SEE CAST & CREDITS for the FILM...  

HERE's the http://www.razzies.com/forum/official-site-for-hangover-part-ii_topic5081.html - for the FILM's OFFICIAL SITE...

HERE's the http://www.razzies.com/forum/reviews-on-hangover-part-ii_topic5082.html -  to READ REVIEWS at R.T. and MetaCRITIC...

AND, FINALLY, HERE's the http://www.razzies.com/forum/bo-mojo-s-for-hangover-2_topic5096.html - for B.O. INFO on HANGOVER PART II... 
 



-------------
Ye Olde Head RAZZberry



Replies:
Posted By: Movie Man
Date Posted: May 23 2011 at 10:00am
Finally! A "Hangover" movie is on here -- you should've had a Forum for part one as well!  




-------------


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: May 23 2011 at 12:17pm
The concept is wrong for so many reasons. Like we all know this movie will likely repeat the same jokes as the first. Also it's unbelievable that these guys didn't learn that lesson. 

Originally posted by Movie Man

Finally! A "Hangover" movie is on here -- you should've had one for part one as well!
 

I'll pretend I didn't read that.


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: May 23 2011 at 12:48pm
I don't know if this deserves a forum yet. It's the sequel to one of 2009's most popular movies, with the same cast and crew. I'd be worried if there was a different cast and crew. I'll wait for reviews before I pass any judgment. And at Metacritic, there are 2 reviews, one positive, one average. In fact, the only 2 wide release sequels that didn't get forums here this year were Rodrick Rules and Fast Five.

-------------


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: May 23 2011 at 2:01pm
And this people, is why comedies, more so than any other genre, should NOT have sequels. Because all they are going to do is tell or do the exact same jokes and sight gags all over again. The trailer alone was nothing but references to the original movie. Living in it's shadow much? But no, this turd will make millions, and they'll make a third movie for some reasons. Gee, you would think that after waking up with no memories of what you did the night before and losing someone TWICE, this characters would get a f***ing clue and stop drinking!

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: May 23 2011 at 2:19pm
Like I've said, the first "Hangover" was nothing more than a more realistic version of "Dude, Where's My Car?" I had my laughs during the movie, but by no means should it be the highest grossing rated-R comedy of all time, and it shouldn't have sequels either. Like Burn said, how many times can these characters get so drunk that they can't remember what they did last night and lose a member of their group before they realize...they really shouldn't drink anymore?  

Originally posted by Movie Man

Finally! A "Hangover" movie is on here -- you should've had a forum for part one as well!


-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: May 23 2011 at 5:06pm
Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

And this people, is why comedies, more so than any other genre, should NOT have sequels. Because all they are going to do is tell or do the exact same jokes and sight gags all over again. The trailer alone was nothing but references to the original movie. Living in it's shadow much? But no, this turd will make millions, and they'll make a third movie for some reasons. Gee, you would think that after waking up with no memories of what you did the night before and losing someone TWICE, this characters would get a f***ing clue and stop drinking!
Every time you post a response, I imagine a really angry person venting his thoughts out. Can you please calm down?

As for the film, I agree, it doesn't look great. It's basically a remake of the first film.


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: May 23 2011 at 5:21pm
Originally posted by moviewizguy

 
Every time you post a response, I imagine a really angry person venting his thoughts out. Can you please calm down?
Thank you, Captain Obvious. Yes, I do come here to vent, and it's pretty damn fun to do, too.  


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: May 23 2011 at 5:23pm
Michaels,are you sure it was more realistic?Yeah,DUDE... had aliens,but in it's own mythology it was well-written.THE HANGOVER had one plot hole...but it was a big one.
Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

Thank you, Captain Obvious.
That's from DUDE...!


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: May 23 2011 at 5:36pm
Originally posted by Vits

Michaels,are you sure it was more realistic?Yeah,DUDE... had aliens,but in it's own mythology it was well-written.THE HANGOVER had one plot hole...but it was a big one.
I'll rephrase, "Hangover" was slightly more realistic than "Dude...". I think the chances of four guys accidently drinking roofies and not remembering what happened the night before and maybe even losing one of their group members happening are much larger than say aliens coming down to Earth, stealing a pair of slackers' car to use it in their grand plans for the planet, and then erasing the slackers' memories. Just saying. As for the plot hole, yeah, why did they have to go to the hospital anyway?

-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: May 23 2011 at 5:43pm
Actually,I meant the answer of the mystery at the end(spoilers obviously):
Justin Bartha spent a day an a half on the rooftop without food,water or a proper bathroom,and all he got was a sunburn?

To be fair,there are other plot holes,but not major:How did the gang took the tiger without it attacking them...specially after Bradley Cooper "f*cks" him?


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: May 23 2011 at 5:55pm
Originally posted by Vits

Justin Bartha spent a day an a half on the rooftop without food,water or a proper bathroom,and all he got was a sunburn?
Oh right, I was wondering about that, too. And under that Vegas sun, he probably would be dead. 


-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: Vheid
Date Posted: May 23 2011 at 8:05pm

Movie Man, Eventhough i disliked the first one (and would've loved it if it had a forum). You have to acknowledge that it was very popular with critics...

Vits and Michaels, The main problem I had with the first movie is that I simply disliked the characters depicted on screen. I just couldn't sympathize with people THAT obnoxious...

That and it just wasn't my kind of humor...

About the rooftop: Why did he threw the mattress away again.... Couldn't he have used it to block the sun... I mean he was aware that he was on a hotel-roof in the middle of the desert, wasn't he?





-------------


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: May 23 2011 at 9:09pm
Originally posted by Vheid

Vits and Michaels, The main problem I had with the first movie is that I simply disliked the characters depicted on screen. I just couldn't sympathize with people THAT obnoxious...

About the rooftop: Why did he threw the mattress away again.... Couldn't he have used it to block the sun... I mean he was aware that he was on a hotel-roof in the middle of the desert, wasn't he?

Yeah, the characters were hard to care for, you were almost glad they were getting beaten up. You have the p***ywhipped nerd, the smartass prettyboy, and the socially awkward mental miget. It's like the Three Stooges made worse! As for the rooftop, yeah, talk about your Grand Canyon sized plot holes, right up there with most M. Nut movies! The dude should have just tried to climb down the building or pretended like he was going to jump so that a crowd would gather and the fire department would reach him. But if they did that, it wouldn't make for a funny comedy of errors now would it? I'm almost curious to see what the plot hole will be for the sequel and why they can't find the missing kid brother. And I do mean ALMOST.

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vheid
Date Posted: May 23 2011 at 9:36pm
Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

Originally posted by Vheid

Vits and Michaels, The main problem I had with the first movie is that I simply disliked the characters depicted on screen. I just couldn't sympathize with people THAT obnoxious...
 

Yeah, the characters were hard to care for, you were almost glad they were getting beaten up. You have the p***ywhipped nerd, the smartass prettyboy, and the socially awkward mental miget. It's like the Three Stooges made worse!

Don't they just feel like unrealistic caricatures when you list them like that..



-------------


Posted By: Film Reel Redemption
Date Posted: May 24 2011 at 8:10am

I see some of you are thinking along the same lines as me. I mean this sequal is just repeating the same plot as the first one only a different setting, I mean what else is there to add?



-------------
You see in this filmmaking world there's two types of people my friend. Those with the knowledge of film and those who think they do but really don't.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: May 24 2011 at 12:13pm

I don't think you're meant to "sympathize" with the characters in the first Hangover. If you sympathize with them, you'd feel bad instead of laughing.  

It's OK. It is hard to ask someone to laugh at a baby masturbating. 


Originally posted by Vheid

The main problem I had with the first movie is that I simply disliked the characters depicted on screen. I just couldn't sympathize with people THAT obnoxious...

That and it just wasn't my kind of humor...



-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: Vheid
Date Posted: May 24 2011 at 12:23pm

In the first film, I didn't care if they found Doug or not... Lots of comedies work while having likable main characters... I mean, to me these characters were just obnoxious douchebags, which made it hard for me to finish watching this movie... 

These are the kind of people I try to avoid in real life, so why would I want to spend time watching them on screen, I ask you?  

Originally posted by Vits

Originally posted by Vheid

The main problem I had with the first movie is that I simply disliked the characters depicted on screen. I just couldn't sympathize with people THAT obnoxious...

That and it just wasn't my kind of humor...

I don't think you're meant to.If you sympathize with them you'd feel bad instead of laugh.

It's OK.It's hard to ask someone to laugh at a baby masturbating.




-------------


Posted By: MiguelAntilsu
Date Posted: May 24 2011 at 7:14pm

Based on what I've seen and heard, this is kinda like the song, 'One Night in Bangkok', only they don't remember anything.  Other than that, it basically looks like the same movie all over again.



-------------


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: May 24 2011 at 7:51pm
If they're in Bangkok, maybe they will run into Nicolas Cage playing a hit-man?!?  

Originally posted by MiguelAntilsu

Based on what I've seen and heard, this is kinda like the song, 'One Night in Bangkok', only they don't remember anything.


-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: Vheid
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 4:59am

Most of the reviews seem to really point out the overacting of both Zach Galifianakis and Ken Jeong in this movie...

Could Jeong make a comeback on the ballot with this movie, Big Momma 3, Transformer 3 and Zookeeper?



-------------


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 7:52am
To quote Roger Ebert(**/****): "The MPAA's elaboration of the film's R rating says the movie has "pervasive language, strong sexual content including graphic nudity, drug use and brief violent images.Also other stuff. Maybe their space was limited?"

Do you think this will be http://blog.moviefone.com/2011/05/24/five-redundant-sequels-the-hangover-part-2 -

Originally posted by Vheid

Could Jeong make a comeback on the ballot with this movie, Big Momma 3Transformer 3 and Zookeeper?
 

I'll pretend I didn't read that.


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: Vheid
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 8:16am
Why would you "pretend"?

Originally posted by Vits

Originally posted by Vheid

Could Jeong make a comeback on the ballot with this movie, Big Momma 3Transformer 3 and Zookeeper?
I'll pretend I didn't read that.




-------------


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 8:34am
'Cuz it's Ken Jeong,dog! He's the shizzle! The R-dizzle! He's a crazy mother[falsetto voice]f*ck*r!

He's so good he even makes me talk like that...and I don't even know what I just wrote! LOL 




-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: May 25 2011 at 2:45pm
All signs point to" "YES!"  

Originally posted by Vheid

Could Jeong make a comeback on the ballot with this movie, Big Momma 3,Transformer 3 and Zookeeper?


-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: oiram
Date Posted: May 26 2011 at 5:23am
Oh yeah, he can, especially since I believe that Big Mommas, Transformers, and Zookeeper are very strong contenders for Worst Picture. However, I would nt be surpised if the Worst Supporting Actor award ends up going to Stallone............. again *sigh*
 
I think Mike Tyson shoiuld also be up there on Worst Supporting Actor. What he did in the movie is pretty close to what HeadRazz thought of Liza in Sex and the City 2.  

Originally posted by Vheid

Could Jeong make a comeback on the ballot with this movie, Big Momma 3Transformer 3 andZookeeper?

 


-------------
Elizabeth Hartman and Judith Barsi are more talented and beautiful than Scarlett Johansson and Chloe Grace Moretz. Fact.

Worst Supporting Actor: Brendan Fraser/Gimme Shelter and The Nut Job




Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: May 26 2011 at 3:20pm
Rotten Tomatoes(30%): "A crueler, darker, raunchier carbon copy of the first installment, it lacks the element of surprise(and most of the joy) that helped make the original a hit."  

Richard Roeper(C-): "Hugely disappointing sequel with no fresh ideas. One of the most uninspired and unoriginal sequels you'll ever see. Or not see, if you're lucky!"  


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: jkovats
Date Posted: May 27 2011 at 8:49am
Some movies just were not meant for a sequel.


Posted By: SchumacherH8ter
Date Posted: May 27 2011 at 5:15pm
This was "OK". There were funny parts, but I'd wait for video. I was surprised that Ken and Zach were bad. Ken was just re-hashing his character and Zach was way too unlikable. The thing that made him great in the first film was how innocent and "nice" he was. Here, he's unpleasent.

-------------
I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
https://twitter.com/Scott_DAgostino
Upcoming reviews: http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic7513.html


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: May 27 2011 at 6:49pm
Wow, 32% for "Pirates 4" and 34% for "Hangover 2" (it surely is one of ours!). Further proof, sequels suck unless fully thought out and done well.

-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: May 29 2011 at 1:08pm
I just saw this and gave it 6/10.Review coming soon.

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: May 29 2011 at 8:38pm
Wow, this movie should have just been called "Hangover 1.5"! It's almost the exact same movie as the first one! It's like the screenwriters took the script from the first movie, changed a few details around and called it a day's work. I'm calling it ... Laziest. Sequel. EVER!

-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: moviewizguy
Date Posted: May 29 2011 at 10:30pm
Other than the fact that Scream 4 and Fast Five both got favorable reviews, both of which you bashed to death. 

Originally posted by Michaels

Wow, 32% for "Pirates 4" and 34% for "Hangover 2" (it surely is one of ours!). Further proof, sequels suck unless fully thought out and done well.



-------------


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: May 30 2011 at 7:55pm
Coming the same guy who praises every movie critics hate and/or is posted here. Yeah, I can use the "reverse opinon of critics" card, too. Burn was onto something, you clearly weren't captain of the debate team. I stand behind my remarks, uncalled for and lazy sequels always suck.  

Originally posted by moviewizguy

Other than the fact that Scream 4 and Fast Five both got favorable reviews, both of which you bashed to death.
 



-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: May 31 2011 at 4:36pm
WHY NOT JUST "THE HANGOVER 2"?IS IT THAT MUCH OF A COPY?(***/*****):


Starring:Bradley Cooper,Ed Helms and Zach Galifianakis as the guys who suffer from a HANGOVER...again.


No spoilers here.


So what is the problem with this movie?It's pointless that to give Ken Jeong a bigger role if he's going to be underused.And Helms's "girly screaming" routine gets annoying after a while.

We need to get things straight.Yes,the now called "Wolfpack" goes through the same problems yet again and it feels like they must be idiots for not learning their lesson,right?Wrong.First of all,what happens to them is an accident.And anyway,it's not like we're supposed to sympathize with them.We root for them because we want them to find they're friends.

Also,yes,the movie repeats the formula from the first one,but it doesn't repeat the jokes.Although,at some points that would've been the safer choice,because some of the jokes are crueler.I don't blame Todd Phillips,who this time wrote a lot more.I blame his co-writers Craig Mazin and Scot Armstrong,who,based on their resumes,bring the wrong type of humour.Mazin's cruel jokes work for spoofs because they're…well,spoofs.And Armstrong's humour is as lame as always.

Repeating the formula is lazy,specially during the last 1/3 where it's more obvious.The final moments are basically word by word the same.But this doesn't take 100% the element of surprise.You still don't know how things will turn out.You'll know STU will solve the mystery,but you won't know the answer.And…drum roll…it's funny!Not as funny as the first one,but who expected it to be?The cast remain it's chemistry and comedic timing.

This does ruin the first one.Not in the sense that you can't enjoy it next time you watch it,but…well,the first one,along movies like WEDDING CRASHERS and THE 40 YEAR OLD VIRGIN were a step up for raunchy comedies,showing that that they can be well made.But this movie is a step down.Not because it's not a technical wonder(those other movies aren't either),but because everything good in this movie probably comes from simple good luck.And after the mystery is revealed,you'll feel empty and can't wait until the movie is over.


Grades:C in the U.S. and 5,0 in Chile.


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: May 31 2011 at 8:23pm
3 stars is a little generous. 1 or 2 stars is more like it, my opinion.

-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: June 01 2011 at 8:22am
Guys...a 3rd installment is already "in the works." Dead  




-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: June 01 2011 at 1:45pm
Yeah, seriously, how many times can the same three guys accidently take roofies, forget everything from the night before, lose a member of their party ... AND keep it funny?!  




-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: Grounder the Critic
Date Posted: June 02 2011 at 5:45am
I bet in the third movie, they will be in Paris getting drunk. I know it may not be funny, but my idea is better than this second Hangover movie, which I'm not gonna see!   




-------------
Pictures move, do they?


Posted By: Vheid
Date Posted: June 02 2011 at 7:44am
I fear that Hangover III will be set in Amsterdam... Not the REAL Amsterdam, but a Hookers and Drugs-filled Fairy Tale-Land named Amsterdam, like the one depicted in Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo.  


-------------


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: June 02 2011 at 2:16pm
And I have a sinking feeling that you may be completely right!


-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: jesse685
Date Posted: June 23 2011 at 1:50am
Oh f**k, now Hollywood's probably gonna make a s***ty Three Stooges remake (or rip-off) after reading this, and it'll sweep up lots of Razzies!    

Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

You have the p***ywhipped nerd, the smartass prettyboy, and the socially awkward mental miget. It's like the Three Stooges made worse!


-------------
"If you can't make it good, make it 3D!" Peter Travers, Rolling Stone
F**k Yeah/WTF Were They Thinking Awards Results Live-Tweet @jesse685


Posted By: jesse685
Date Posted: June 23 2011 at 1:55am
Nic Cage playing a hitman! Comedy gold, my friend! Cage-sploitation at its best!  

Originally posted by Michaels

If they're in Bangkok, maybe they will run into Nicolas Cage playing a hit-man?!? 


-------------
"If you can't make it good, make it 3D!" Peter Travers, Rolling Stone
F**k Yeah/WTF Were They Thinking Awards Results Live-Tweet @jesse685


Posted By: whatsthepoint
Date Posted: June 24 2011 at 12:54pm
I knew this would get bad reviews the minute I saw Todd Phillips name on the script. Plus it's basically a remake of the first one only in a different location, how wrong can you go with that? 


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: June 24 2011 at 8:15pm
Originally posted by whatsthepoint

I knew this would get bad reviews the minute I saw Todd Phillips name on the script. Plus it's basically a remake of the first one only in a different location, how wrong can you go with that? 
Um, because why pay to see a beat for beat remake when you can just as easily watch the original movie again?

-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: whatsthepoint
Date Posted: June 25 2011 at 7:47am
Just for the record this has become the highest grossing R rated comedy of all time.


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: June 25 2011 at 10:40am
Originally posted by jesse685

Nic Cage playing a hitman! Comedy gold, my friend! Cage-sploitation at its best!  
Yeah, it was called "Bangkok Dangerous", which was infamous for making only $7 million on its opening weekend!
 
As for "Hangover 2" being the highest grossing R rated movie, just because something is successful, that doesn't mean it's a good product. saturnwatcher once pointed out, even pet rocks sold well back in the day, that doesn't make them a great product. And I for one, think this movie should go under Worst Remake/Rip-Off for being almost the exact same movie as the first.


-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: SchumacherH8ter
Date Posted: August 10 2011 at 5:24pm
Well, time to review this one.
 
The good:
 
Ed Helms' song, "Alantown: It's one of the higlights of the movie.
 
The monkey: She was awesome.
 
The "little kid" scene: For those that ahevn't seen it, there's a scene where Alan has a flashback where he and the rest of the wolfpack (and Mr. Chow) are children. To me, this is best part of the movie.
 
The bad:
 
Jamie Chung's acting: Sure, she's hot, but a Real World reject an actress does not make.
 
The gross nudity: The first one had some gross-ness, but it doesn't compare to this. Mr. Chow's button-shaped ding-dong and the trannie strippers were the low-lights.
 
The ugly:
 
Zach and Ken's disapointing performances: They were the best parts of the first one, yet they're two of the worst parts. If they weren't two of the best parts of the first one, they'd be in the bad alongside Jamie.
 
The general rehashy-ness of the movie: I called Pirates Of The Caribbean: On Stranger Tides a half-ass cash-in, but it's got nothing on this in terms of half-assed cash-ins. There's at least one aspect that isn't a retread. That is...
 
The pointlessness: I don't mean pointless in terms of its existance, I mean in terms of story. See, if they found Doug at the beginning of the first one, they'd still be in trouble. By not finding him first, they were able to resolve all their problems first. With this, however, if they found Teddy first, then all the broblems would be solved.
 
Typing that all out changed my views of the movie. At first, I thought it was like On Stranger Tides: a half-assed cash-in that was entertaining. But, me writing all my gripes made me realize how not-good the movie is. Grade C+.
 
Next up: The Rite!


-------------
I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
https://twitter.com/Scott_DAgostino
Upcoming reviews: http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic7513.html


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: August 10 2011 at 5:49pm
A few weeks ago,I saw INSIDE THE ACTORS STUDIO with guest Bradley Cooper(this originally aired before this movie was released).At the end,he was asked "What can you tell us about THE HANGOVER PART II?",he replied "So far,I love it".I know he has to say that to promote the movie,but he was being interviewed by his acting teachers!And I think they knew the truth.
Originally posted by SchumacherH8ter

Jamie Chung's acting: Sure, she's hot, but a Real World reject an actress does not make.
Have to disgree here.Not that I think she's a good actress,but her role in this movie was so small I couldn't judge her at all.Although she might get nominated since this isn't the only contender she's in.
Originally posted by SchumacherH8ter

See, if they found Doug at the beginning of the first one, they'd still be in trouble. By not finding him first, they were able to resolve all their problems first. With this, however, if they found Teddy first, then all the broblems would be solved.
Hey...you're right.How did I miss that?


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile



Print Page | Close Window