Print Page | Close Window

Member Discussion: THE UNDEFEATED...

Printed From: Official RAZZIE® Forum
Category: INFO on POSSIBLE 2011 RAZZIE® CONTENDERS
Forum Name: Member Discussion & Add'l INFO on THE UNDEFEATED
Forum Discription: Here's Where to Express Yer Thoughts & Find Out Credits, B.O. Numbers, Reviews, ETC.
URL: http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5199
Printed Date: April 24 2014 at 12:15pm


Topic: Member Discussion: THE UNDEFEATED...
Posted By: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: Member Discussion: THE UNDEFEATED...
Date Posted: July 08 2011 at 5:04pm
HERE's WHERE to EXPRESS YER THOUGHTS: SHOULD WE JOIN in the BIMBO-BASHING and NOMINATE SRAH PALIN as WORST ACTRESS...or LIMIT the COMPETITION to THOSE WHO ADMIT THEY'RE ACTING??  

NOTETHE L.A. TIMES' GOSSIP BLOG "GOLD DERBY" HAS RUN an ITEM on the POTENTIAL of OUR NOMINATING SARAH PALIN as WORST ACTRESS -- HERE's  http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/awards/2011/07/razzie-award-chief-sarah-palin-might-win-for-the-undefeated.html -  to READ the ARTICLE.  

AND, for YOUR SARAH-FICATION, HERE's the http://www.razzies.com/forum/official-razzie-take-on-the-undefeated_topic5200.html - to READ the OFFICIAL RAZZIE® TAKE on http://www.razzies.com/forum/member-discussion-addl-info-on-the-undefeated_forum544.html - ...


-------------
Ye Olde Head RAZZberry



Replies:
Posted By: Vheid
Date Posted: July 08 2011 at 5:34pm
If she is on the nomination ballot, I'll probably vote for her...

-------------


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: July 08 2011 at 5:44pm
I like how she said, "My phone's going ringy" in episode 1212, About Last Night aka Obama's Eleven. Part of me says giving Condoleezza Rice, George "Dubya" Bush's secretary of state, one of the four Acting RAZZIES, along with Dubya and his Pet Goat the 2004 Worst Screen Couple award, is a big part of what cost the RAZZIES heavily in the worst of 2004 RAZZIES. So, in order to spare us any criticism for nominating any more politicians for the RAZZIES, I vote NO on this proposition.

-------------
My deadlines for Member-Started Forums, given 35% approval rating or less: Apl. 29; The Other Woman. May 6; Walk of Shame. May 20; Godzilla '014. May 27; Blended. Jne. 3; A Million Ways...


Posted By: Vheid
Date Posted: July 08 2011 at 6:43pm
Do the Razzies really care about being criticised?


-------------


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: July 08 2011 at 7:47pm
As much as I would like for Rosie The Sex Robot from "Trannies 3" to win Worst Actress ... hell yeah I would vote for Sarah Palin in a heartbeat ... for a Razzie that is!

-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: SchumacherH8ter
Date Posted: July 08 2011 at 8:21pm
I think that documentaries and concert films should be exempt from acting Razzies. It's unfair to actors who gave REAL bad perfromances. Also, I REALLY don't want to watch this and if it's on the ballot, then I have to watch it.

-------------
I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
https://twitter.com/Scott_DAgostino
Upcoming reviews: http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic7513.html


Posted By: Film Reel Redemption
Date Posted: July 08 2011 at 10:59pm
Well, come Razzie voting time, if Miss 'Trigger-Happy, Global-Warming-Denying' Palin ends up on our nominating ballot, she could go from The Undefeated to The Defeated...

-------------
You see in this filmmaking world there's two types of people my friend. Those with the knowledge of film and those who think they do but really don't.


Posted By: whatsthepoint
Date Posted: July 09 2011 at 6:25am
Wait -- I thought this was the title of a John Wayne film? Big smile  


RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Indeed it is. When I searched Google Images for the poster of the Sarah Palin doc, the one-sheet for the John Wayne version kept coming up. Made in 1969, it co-starred Rock Hudson(!), had a post-Civil War setting, and was considered a minor box office success. Here's an http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0065150/ -



-------------


Posted By: SchumacherH8ter
Date Posted: July 09 2011 at 9:00am
If Sarah Palin wanted to name her movie after a John Wayne movie, she should have named it The Conqueror.  


RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Or if, like her fellow Tea Party twit and doppelganger  http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_tdQibIWZXrg/Sp22l0nShPI/AAAAAAAAA08/T5HjrbqLL8U/s320/political-pictures-michele-bachmann-crazy.jpg -



-------------
I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
https://twitter.com/Scott_DAgostino
Upcoming reviews: http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic7513.html


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: July 09 2011 at 11:52am
Considering that Palin was on the ticket that LOST by triple digits in 2008 the Presidential Election, then quit her position in Alaska, then quit the "bus tour" she was doing, "The Undefeated" is the most inaccurate title for a movie about her! A proper title would be "The Quitter" or maybe "Media Whore." 

Originally posted by Head RAZZberry

 
RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Or if, like her fellow Tea Party twit and doppelganger  http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_tdQibIWZXrg/Sp22l0nShPI/AAAAAAAAA08/T5HjrbqLL8U/s320/political-pictures-michele-bachmann-crazy.jpg - Where do the Republicans find these morons?! And are American voters really stupid enough to vote for them because they compare themselves to John Wayne?!



-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: July 09 2011 at 3:08pm
Let me start by stating I don't care about politics. Not that I don't care for politics, though I know that's usually an excuse for ignorance,but that's how I feel.  

It's true: Bush did "win" a Worst Actor award. But that was 7 years ago and today there are more Razzie voters, and I'd guess at least half are against awarding documentaries.  

I think you guys are contradicting yourselves. You want an excuse to bash the politicians you hate, right? Then why the acting awards when Worst Picture is a much more important category, and it doesn't have to have just fiction movies?Think about it. All I'm asking is, if this turn out to be bad, put it in the nominating ballot in any category except the acting ones or Worst Screenplay. If Worst Couple continues to exist, that's fine. If this turn out to be good, it can still be in the same categories, except Worst Picture.  


RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Statistically, the actual number of current RAZZIE® Voting Members is not substantially higher than it was when Bush was awarded Worst Actor for FAHRENHEIT 911 (we had about 650 then, and we have about 700 now -- a difference of less than 10%) so that particular argument is not really a valid one. As for determining the "wishes" of our Voting Members, I'm all for listing something on the Nominating Ballot and letting it be rejected by our Members, rather than leaving it off because I (or someone else) presumes its being listed would meet with disapproval... 




-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: Vheid
Date Posted: July 10 2011 at 2:44pm
The movie needs just one more bad review to get a 0%-rating on RT. http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/771245638/ - link


-------------


Posted By: SchumacherH8ter
Date Posted: July 11 2011 at 9:53am
Did anyone else notice that RT has this listed as a "Science Fiction & Fantasy" film?LOL

-------------
I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
https://twitter.com/Scott_DAgostino
Upcoming reviews: http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic7513.html


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: July 11 2011 at 11:59am
I've been a member or R.T. about as long as I've been a member here.So I went through the merge with Flixter.Ever since then,that site has had a billion problems.One of them is having some movies in the wrong genre.

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: Vheid
Date Posted: July 11 2011 at 1:48pm
Can someone please explain to me why RT has the score as N/A, eventhough the movie currently has 5 reviews?

I think a genre like FANTASY is perfectly suitable for a propoganda-piece like this.


-------------


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: July 11 2011 at 3:23pm
5 reviews don't really mean anything as a whole.

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: whatsthepoint
Date Posted: July 11 2011 at 4:39pm
Well it's at 0 now!


Posted By: HeadRAZZBerry
Date Posted: July 12 2011 at 9:58am
NOTETHE L.A. TIMES' GOSSIP BLOG "GOLD DERBY" HAS RUN an ITEM on the POTENTIAL of OUR NOMINATING SARAH PALIN as WORST ACTRESS -- HERE's  http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/awards/2011/07/razzie-award-chief-sarah-palin-might-win-for-the-undefeated.html -  to READ the ARTICLE. 


-------------
Ye Olde Head RAZZberry


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: July 12 2011 at 12:15pm
If critics (and forum members) are saying this might as well be sci-fi fantasy movie, then by all means, Sarah Palin should be prime target for Worst Actress (too bad for "Rosie The Sex Robot").

-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: whatsthepoint
Date Posted: July 12 2011 at 2:27pm
LOL


Posted By: Vheid
Date Posted: July 12 2011 at 2:43pm
So... does the fact that the mainstream media is reporting it, mean that she's the frontrunner?

Oh and the comments in that article are really meanspirited (towards "liberals"). As a European who never met a Palin-supporter in real-life, I have to ask, Are they really THAT petty? Could this also mean that IF she gets nominated, we'll have to prepare ourselves for a sh*tstorm of complaints?

Originally posted by HeadRAZZBerry

NOTETHE L.A. TIMES' GOSSIP BLOG "GOLD DERBY" HAS RUN an ITEM on the POTENTIAL of OUR NOMINATING SARAH PALIN as WORST ACTRESS -- HERE's  http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/awards/2011/07/razzie-award-chief-sarah-palin-might-win-for-the-undefeated.html -  to READ the ARTICLE. 


To be fair, Michaels, Considering that they're already busy planning Transformers 4, Rosie will probably get another shot at the prize...


-------------


Posted By: whatsthepoint
Date Posted: July 12 2011 at 3:59pm
I think a more realistic title for this movie would be "The Defeated"!

-------------


Posted By: JoeBacon
Date Posted: July 15 2011 at 8:16pm
C'mon, Head Razz, let's nominate Sarah Palin and Her Ego for WORST SCREEN COUPLE! Wink  

And Andrew Breitbart for WORST SUPPORTING ACTOR...

Just think of all the press the Razzies will get if he tries to crash the ceremony with James O'Keefe in tow!

LOL


-------------
2013's WORST PIC-After Earth ACTOR-Jaden Smith & Johnny Depp ACTRESS-Lindsay Lohan! SUP ACTRESS--Kim Kardashian! SUP ACTOR-Chris Brown DIRECTOR--Good "Night"! SCREAMPLAY--The Lone Ranger.


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: July 15 2011 at 9:15pm
Agreed! Or Worst Ensemble for everyone and anyone who had a hand in the making of this flick!  

Originally posted by JoeBacon

C'mon, Head Razz, let's nominate Sarah Palin and Her Ego for WORST SCREEN COUPLE! Wink


-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: July 15 2011 at 10:24pm
You know what ... the hell with "Trannies 3"! I declare this movie as the frontrunner for Worst Picture!
 
http://www.movieline.com/2011/07/empty-theaters-0-positive-reviews-greet-sarah-palin-documentary.php - http://www.movieline.com/2011/07/empty-theaters-0-positive-reviews-greet-sarah-palin-documentary.php
 
One of the most fun reads ever!


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: saturnwatcher
Date Posted: July 16 2011 at 4:34am
I'm all for nominating Palin. I've always figured that the reason her bus tour got cut short was because it should have been a "short bus" tour. ;)

-------------
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken


Posted By: saturnwatcher
Date Posted: July 16 2011 at 4:37am
Yes!  
 
But just to elaborate a bit, keep in mind that Palin is the darling of an American political movement that named itself after an act of terrorism.  As Americans we celebrate it because it was a catalyst towards the American Revolution, but it was still an act of terrorism. It has been noted that tea parties are for little girls with imaginary friends. But these people go around dressing up like the founding fathers and spend most of their time bitching about taxes, which pay for a lot of things that are critical in their lives...not to mention paying off the massive debts for George Bush's wars of adventurism. The incredible part of it is that the founding fathers would have absolutely loathed everything they stand for: Bible thumping, anti-intellectualism and devotion to illiteracy.  

Originally posted by Vheid

Oh and the comments in that article are really meanspirited (towards "liberals"). As a European who never met a Palin-supporter in real-life, I have to ask, Are they really THAT petty? 


-------------
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken


Posted By: pamcwill
Date Posted: July 18 2011 at 7:28am
I haven't seen the movie yet, but if it's as bad as the poster, it should definitely get a Razzie. 


Posted By: Berrynoia
Date Posted: July 18 2011 at 12:58pm
After the 2004 Razzies and the political award "winners," I have to question if this film makes Palin a "legitimate" candidate for our awards.  Now, if she did her own acting for this film, I could see her as a likelier nominee.  However, she did not have any role in this film's production.  

Harass Sarah is a nice PALINdrome, but should we be the ones Razzing her?  The director seems more logical to be considered for a nomination.  




-------------


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: July 19 2011 at 4:05pm
Fun fact: Fox "News" claims that this movie was a success, with sold out crowds in every theater! In reality, it made only $65,000. Man, I can't wait for News Corp to be shut down because of this phone hacking scandal!

-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: jesse685
Date Posted: July 19 2011 at 5:37pm
I agree, let's put this up for Worst Picture, unless something worse gets released.

-------------
"If you can't make it good, make it 3D!" Peter Travers, Rolling Stone
F**k Yeah/WTF Were They Thinking Awards Results Live-Tweet @jesse685


Posted By: saturnwatcher
Date Posted: July 19 2011 at 9:42pm
Unfortunately Fox won't get shut down, and Rupert Murdoch won't even get a hand slap. The people that watch Fox Noise will keep watching it, and probably won't even give the matter sufficent attention to ask what all the fuss is about.
 
Incidentally, the box-office performance for this movie is interesting because it is generating numbers almost identical to Ass-hole Chugged in terms of per screen average, although it opened in considerably fewer theaters. The guess here is that it is exactly the same audience.  


Originally posted by Michaels

Fun fact: Fox "News" claims that this movie was a success, with sold out crowds in every theater! In reality, it made only $65,000. Man, I can't wait for News Corp to be shut down because of this phone hacking scandal!


-------------
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: July 21 2011 at 5:56pm
Yeah, I was hoping for a scenario more along the lines of Murdoch going to prison, News Corp being disbanded, and all the companies being bought by people who won't fill the media outlets with propaganda that suits their personal agendas. 

But yeah, Murdock is so damn rich, he'll get away scott-free and this will all be just a bad memory for him.  

Originally posted by saturnwatcher

Unfortunately Fox won't get shut down, and Rupert Murdock won't even get a hand slap. The people that watch Fox Noise will keep watching it, and probably won't even give the matter sufficent attention to ask what all the fuss is about.


-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: jesse685
Date Posted: July 21 2011 at 6:54pm
Let's just hope Murdoch goes bankrupt and gets sentenced to jail for however long it takes. Plus, this is a RAZZIE forum, not a Rupert Murdoch discussion.

-------------
"If you can't make it good, make it 3D!" Peter Travers, Rolling Stone
F**k Yeah/WTF Were They Thinking Awards Results Live-Tweet @jesse685


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: July 21 2011 at 8:26pm
Yeah, but it fits, considering the subject matter of this sub-forum.  

Originally posted by jesse685

Plus, this is a RAZZIE forum, not a Rupert Murdoch discussion.


-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: Vheid
Date Posted: July 26 2011 at 5:49am
Box Office Mojo is setting the record straight... Attendence was far less than the media claims it to be...  


RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Just saw this article myself -- Here's the http://www.boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=3215&p=.htm -

P.S. Once they saw the second week implosion of box office numbers, the makers of DEFEATED...er UNDEAFEATED, quickly announced the film's pay-per-view and DVD debut dates. Here's a http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/palin-undefeated-tanks-heads-pay-per-view-193115807.html -



-------------


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: July 26 2011 at 11:22am
Ha! And the media likes to make the Tea Party seem like some "unstoppable force" that has numbers in the millions. In truth, they are just a few hundred thousands ... and their combined IQ is in the low double digits -- if that.  



-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: July 26 2011 at 12:20pm
I consider the "low double digits" to specifically be 10-39. "Mid double digits" is 40-69, and "upper double digits" is 70-99. Taking my dad's word for it, my IQ is between 140 and 160. I value it, but even I'd be surprised to be admitted into MENSA.
 
Meanwhile, in another area of politics, the 2012 Presidential Elections, the American public is fed-the-(censored)-up with both Democrats and Republicans! If the approval rating for Obama and all possible Republican candidates hits 0% (any day now, if you ask me), the public at large will vote for a 3rd party candidate. Unfortunately, there is no 3rd party candidate in particular, but the most likely prospect so far is Ron Paul. If the public's vote for anyone other than the 2 major parties gets drowned out, it'll probably be thanks to corporations, lobbyists, and buyouts. In that case, the American government will get SO much worse that the best we could hope for would be a second American Civil War.  


RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: So cynical! Actually, my suspicion is that Michele Bachmann could do well in many of the early GOP primaries (Iowa and South Carolina in particular) but not well enough in the long run to be the nominee. Having tasted popular support (and being spoken to directly by God) she will then declare herself as the "official" Tea Party candidate, thus throwing the election to Obama (who could then win a second term with about 45-48% of the popular vote). Lest we forget, Bill Clinton was elected twice without winning a majority either time...  
 
RESPONSE to Head RAZZberry's addendum: Then I suppose America is headed down into a Civil War II, Revolutionary War II, etc. within the half decade... 


 


-------------
My deadlines for Member-Started Forums, given 35% approval rating or less: Apl. 29; The Other Woman. May 6; Walk of Shame. May 20; Godzilla '014. May 27; Blended. Jne. 3; A Million Ways...


Posted By: saturnwatcher
Date Posted: July 26 2011 at 7:00pm
...and while we are at it, Mensa will generally take anyone with a certified I.Q. of 140 or above. I know quite a few people who are quite proud of their membership, but it signifies only that someone once scored well on a standardized test. In his book, The Mismeasure of Man, the late  extraordinary evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould openly asked how many people have been held back or discouraged from pursuing their true capabilities in life as the result of one bad score on a culturally biased test. He also very aptly noted, "I am somehow less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein's brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops."

-------------
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: July 27 2011 at 7:07am
Actually, I would prefer that the Democrats challenge Obama in the primaries. Granted, he is a better choice than any of the Republicans who want the position of President in 2012, but there's probably better Democrats for the role as well.  


RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Political tradition proscribes anyone from the same party challenging an incumbent President (the only recent exception being when LBJ faced anti-war Sen. Eugene McCarthy in the 1968 New Hampshire primary. McCarthy got 40% of the vote versus LBJ's 60%, but the results were embarrassing enough to LBJ that, as a result, he dropped out of the 1968 presidential race). And I hardly think, even though he's not a wildly popular President just now, that Obama's poll numbers suggest any Democrat challenging him in 2012 would serve as anything more than a symbolic gesture.  

I should maybe add that, while I personally am somewhat disappointed at what Obama has been able to achieve, I still find him vastly preferable to either his predecessor (whom I consider the WORST President of my lifetime, if not of ALL time) or any of the current GOP wanna-bes (who, to me, deserve the sobriquet Snow White and the Seven Dorks...Plus One).  




-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: saturnwatcher
Date Posted: July 27 2011 at 1:38pm
Considering the terrible mess Obama had to try and dig us out of, I don't think he has done a particularly bad job. It is also worthy of note that not only did Bush II get elected with less than 50%, he even got fewer popular votes than Al Gore. The election was awarded to him by a majority of Supreme Court justices (mostly appointed by preceeding Republican Presidents) who upheld a laundry list of fraudulent election activities in Florida that would have embarrased a banana republic. If something similar had happened somewhere in Central America, we would have sent in Jimmy Carter and a whole team of observers, and forced them to hold new elections.

-------------
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: July 27 2011 at 3:16pm
I agree that Obama is not doing the best job that he could (he does have the Republicans blocking him at every turn), but yes, he is a million times better than Bush Jr. (who got us into all this debt in the first place), and a thousand times better than any of the Republican dummies running for 2012. Could the Democrats have someone better on hand? Maybe, but I doubt any of them will challenge Obama ... unless his approval ratings drop into the 30% range. Because, after all, this is America, and we are most concerned about our jobs and our money more than anything else.

-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: SchumacherH8ter
Date Posted: August 04 2011 at 9:02am
Apparently, there's another Sarah Palin documentary coming out this year. It's called Sarah Palin-You Betcha and it's less flattering than this one. Maybe she could be nominated for both?  

-------------
I'm the Goddamn Batman.-All-Star Batman And Robin #2
https://twitter.com/Scott_DAgostino
Upcoming reviews: http://www.razzies.com/forum/topic7513.html


Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: August 04 2011 at 4:06pm
At least that other Palin movie will be based on reality (I hope). But hey, if it can double her choices of getting Razzed!

-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: Lord Naseby
Date Posted: October 04 2011 at 3:54pm
Oh yeah, Flixter has effectively killed the community section of the RT site. Maybe we need to give Flixter some negative award. Something like: Website most like a parasite.  

Originally posted by Vits

I've been a member or R.T. about as long as I've been a member here.So I went through the merge with Flixter.Ever since then,that site has had a billion problems.One of them is having some movies in the wrong genre.
 




-------------
Lord Naseby read my reviews!

http://lordnasebyblog.blogspot.com/


Posted By: Lord Naseby
Date Posted: October 04 2011 at 3:58pm
My vote is no on this being on the ballot. Palin is made fun of way too much as it is and to do this would be just a re-hashing of giving Bush the Razzie a while ago. I think there are worse films out there that deserve to be put into consideration particularly sine this is a documentary. 

Now, does Palin belong in politics? No I don't think so. Not as much as she is. Putting Palin on the ballot would just be ridiculous. There are far more worthy nominees for the award. 

Don't vote Palin in 2012!


-------------
Lord Naseby read my reviews!

http://lordnasebyblog.blogspot.com/


Posted By: saturnwatcher
Date Posted: October 05 2011 at 7:26am
Palin is made fun of way too much? Nobody dragged her into the spotlight and no one has forced her to remain in it. She is the poster child for the Peter Principle: A human being who has risen way above her level of incompetence. Further, this documentary didn't get made or released without her full cooperation. 

I say "Razz away!"  


-------------
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken


Posted By: Lord Naseby
Date Posted: October 05 2011 at 10:29am
I still think nominating Palin would be more of a political statement and, since it is a documentary, it isn't technically "acting." 

Plus, there are just worse movies out there. 


-------------
Lord Naseby read my reviews!

http://lordnasebyblog.blogspot.com/


Posted By: SuperTeenTopia
Date Posted: October 05 2011 at 11:19am
Did you hear Palin's  latest rant? Apparently, she will not being running for President in 2012, because the role of President so just so far below her. Yes, because you can make so much more money doing reality shows and public speeches. That, and in the event she did run and lose, she'd finally disappear from the spotlight.

-------------
"People say 'It's all about the story’. When you're making tentpole films, bull$hit." -Andy Hendrickson (Disney Animation Studios' Chief Technical Officer)


Posted By: robhexer
Date Posted: October 08 2011 at 11:12am
They should list the movie under comedy. Seems the GOP keeps providing the laughs by promoting these clowns like Palin and Bachmann. LOL


Posted By: saturnwatcher
Date Posted: October 09 2011 at 4:45pm
Actually, I think her vanity has caused her to convince herself that the field will end up deadlocked, and she will be drafted at the convention. She is just crazy enough to talk herself into something like that. Oh? Am I libeling you Ms. Palin? mailto:saturnwatcher@yahoo.com - saturnwatcher@yahoo.com I will provide you with all the information you need to contact me. Let's rock!  

Originally posted by SuperTeenTopia

Did you hear Palin's  latest rant? Apparently, she will not being running for President in 2012, because the role of President so just so far below her. Yes, because you can make so much more money doing reality shows and public speeches. That, and in the event she did run and lose, she'd finally disappear from the spotlight. 


-------------
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: June 16 2012 at 6:43pm
I just saw GAME CHANGE, an HBO TV Movie about the 2008 elections, and gave it a 6/10.  

SARAH PALIN was called "the best actress in politics" a couple of times. She had to memorize speeches to say them in front of cameras, even when she didn't mean any of what she was saying. She also supposedly had "acting coaches" in the form of political advisors and history teachers (I don't know if that was true). Assuming she did the same in this Documentary... then I'm not completely against her Razzie nomination as Worst Actress.


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile



Print Page | Close Window