Print Page | Close Window

Reviews on DIANA

Printed From: Official RAZZIE® Forum
Category: DISCUSSIONS & INFO on 2013 RAZZIE® TITLES
Forum Name: DIANA
Forum Discription: A Depiction of a 20th Century Icon So Treashy That Brit Crix REQUESTED WePut into RAZZIE® Consideration!
URL: http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6347
Printed Date: July 22 2014 at 4:40am


Topic: Reviews on DIANA
Posted By: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: Reviews on DIANA
Date Posted: November 02 2013 at 9:19am
Crix on both sides of "the pond" seem to agree that this one's "A royal pain!" 

Here's an http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/diana_2013/ -



-------------
Ye Olde Head RAZZberry



Replies:
Posted By: HeadRAZZBerry
Date Posted: November 02 2013 at 12:55pm
JUST for FUN: Here's a http://ukcelebritynews.com/razzie-award-certainty-naomi-watts-princes-diana-biopic-panned-first-reviews/ - ® Front-Runner" for 2013... 




-------------
Ye Olde Head RAZZberry


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: November 02 2013 at 1:15pm
R.T. (5-10%): "Naomi Watts tries hard in the title role, but the film buries her efforts under a shoddy script and clumsy direction".

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: January 17 2014 at 10:19am
Ernesto Garratt (3/5): "This is a better performance than movie because Naomi Watts' work saves the imperfections caused by director Oliver Hirschbiegel [...] On the surface, the wrapping looks good, but the inside of this box isn't the gift one would expect from the great names involved in this biopic".

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile



Print Page | Close Window