Print Page | Close Window

DISCUSSION of 2005 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners"

Printed From: Official RAZZIE® Forum
Category: RAZZIE® Basics
Forum Name: Entire RAZZIE® History, Year-by-Year: 1980-2013
Forum Discription: Every Golden Raspberry Nominee & Every Winner...EVER!
URL: http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=668
Printed Date: September 01 2014 at 4:54pm


Topic: DISCUSSION of 2005 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners"
Posted By: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: DISCUSSION of 2005 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners"
Date Posted: March 06 2006 at 6:59am

TO READ the COMPLETE LIST of ALL NOMINEES and "WINNERS" for 2005's WORST ACHIEVEMENTS in FILM, http://www.razzies.com/forum/2005-razzie-nominees-and-winners_topic5536.html - TO OFFER YOUR FEEDBACK on OUR CHOICES, FEEL FREE to POST YER THOUGHTS BELOW...  





-------------
Ye Olde Head RAZZberry



Replies:
Posted By: viciouslove
Date Posted: June 27 2010 at 12:44pm
Again -- Tom Cruise for War of Worlds? I didn't care for the movie, but he was no way bad in it. 

These nominees are messed up! 


-------------


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: June 27 2010 at 2:30pm
Tom Cruise for War of Worlds had less to do with his performance in the movie, and more to do with his insane couch jumping on "Oprah." But he was not someone I would've nominated either.

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: June 27 2010 at 9:06pm
To be honest, I didn't think Revenge of the Sith, War of the Worlds [remake], or Kicking & Screaming were bad enough to be nominated as the worst 2005 had to offer. The nominations as a whole could've done better with a wider selection of films.

-------------
Possible Unofficial Forums, given <35% approval: Spt. 12: Dolphin Tale 2, Search Party. Spt. 19: The Maze Runner, Tusk.


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: June 27 2010 at 9:49pm
I think "Alone In The Dark" and/or "BloodRayne" came out this year -- One or both of those should have swept!  


RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: ALONE IN THE DARK was this same year, and if you'll check the nominations above, you'll see that it was a contender for Worst Director and Worst Actress. BTW: Have you ever seen DIRTY LOVE????

BLOODRAYNE was the following year, and was nominated for multiple RAZZIES®, including Worst Picture ( http://www.razzies.com/forum/2006-razzie-nominees_topic1642.html - )...


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: July 07 2010 at 1:32pm

If you had to nominate Will Ferrell, it should've been only for KICKING & SCREAMING. He was good in http://www.razzies.com/forum/bewitched_forum10.html - . In fact,that movie wasn't bad at all. Although Ferrell and Nicole Kidman didn't go very well together. 

Rob Shnaider and Hayden Christensen deserved it, though.


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: July 07 2010 at 2:09pm
Nah, no one here liked "Bewitched."  

Originally posted by Vits

If you had to nominate Will Ferrell it should've been only for KICKING & SCREAMING. He was good in  http://www.razzies.com/forum/bewitched_forum10.html - . In fact,that movie wasn't bad at all. Although Ferrell and Nicole Kidman didn't go very well together.
 


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: July 07 2010 at 4:19pm
What did other people like about Bewitched that the RAZZIES didn't? And why were Kicking & Screaming, War of the Worlds, and Revenge of the Sith nominated?

-------------
Possible Unofficial Forums, given <35% approval: Spt. 12: Dolphin Tale 2, Search Party. Spt. 19: The Maze Runner, Tusk.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: July 07 2010 at 4:56pm
Even though the STAR WARS prequels had good reviews they disappointed fans, so most of the Razzie voters must be fans?

-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: July 07 2010 at 6:19pm
Or, the Razzie voters were among the critics that hated it. Granted, critics didn't rip the prequels apart like they just did with "Last Fartbender" but by no means did they love it to death either.


-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: oiram
Date Posted: January 09 2011 at 5:20am
Carmen Electra was also in Cheaper by the Dozen 2. How did you miss that?

-------------
Elizabeth Hartman and Judith Barsi are more talented and beautiful than Scarlett Johansson and Chloe Grace Moretz. Fact.

Worst Supporting Actor: Brendan Fraser/Gimme Shelter and The Nut Job




Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: January 09 2011 at 10:36am
Why couldn't they have nominated Michael Bay's The Island, Elektra, A Sound of Thunder, and Aeon Flux instead of those three average-reviewed movies?

-------------
Possible Unofficial Forums, given <35% approval: Spt. 12: Dolphin Tale 2, Search Party. Spt. 19: The Maze Runner, Tusk.


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: January 09 2011 at 1:27pm
Originally posted by GTAHater767

Why couldn't they have nominated Michael Bay's The Island, Elektra, A Sound of Thunder, and Aeon Flux instead of those three average-reviewed movies?
Because as bad as those movies were, the ones that did get nods looked like they were made by glue sniffing chimps with cameras.

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: January 09 2011 at 3:12pm
Come on! Everybody knows Island, Elektra, Thunder, and Aeon were much worse than Sith, War, and Kicking!

-------------
Possible Unofficial Forums, given <35% approval: Spt. 12: Dolphin Tale 2, Search Party. Spt. 19: The Maze Runner, Tusk.


Posted By: BurnHollywoodBurn
Date Posted: January 09 2011 at 4:04pm
Originally posted by GTAHater767

Come on! Everybody knows Island, Elektra, Thunder, and Aeon were much worse than Sith, War, and Kicking!
Lost in translation again. Are you just talking about the Worst Picture category, or all categories in general?

-------------
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: January 09 2011 at 5:18pm
The 2005 RAZZIES in general, especially the ones where Sith, War, and Kicking got nominated.

-------------
Possible Unofficial Forums, given <35% approval: Spt. 12: Dolphin Tale 2, Search Party. Spt. 19: The Maze Runner, Tusk.


Posted By: oiram
Date Posted: April 24 2011 at 7:23am
Katie Holmes got a nom for Worst Supporting Actress for Batman Begins, despite that movie's acclaim?!?  

Originally posted by GTAHater767

You're suggesting all these well-received movies should've gotten RAZZIE nominations. Why can't you focus this more on panned movies instead?


-------------
Elizabeth Hartman and Judith Barsi are more talented and beautiful than Scarlett Johansson and Chloe Grace Moretz. Fact.

Worst Supporting Actor: Brendan Fraser/Gimme Shelter and The Nut Job




Posted By: Michaels
Date Posted: April 24 2011 at 4:19pm
That was probably a total "We hate every news article being about TomKat" nod.  

Originally posted by oiram

Katie Holmes got a nom for Worst Supporting Actress for Batman Begins, despite that movie's acclaim?!?


-------------
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)


Posted By: Vheid
Date Posted: April 24 2011 at 4:23pm
Batman Begins is kind of over-rated...  




-------------


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: June 16 2012 at 3:55pm
Originally posted by HeadRAZZBerry

WORST SUPPORTING ACTOR
Burt Reynolds / THE DUKES OF HAZZARD and THE LONGEST YARD

Skip to 04:47.
[TUBE]i2Xx6CyNbbY[/TUBE]
Thoughts?


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: August 19 2012 at 1:33pm
Originally posted by HeadRAZZBerry

WORST ACTOR
Tom Cruise / WAR of the WORLDS

I actually thought this version was better than the original. Skip to 06:14.
[TUBE]2BAdDdNEA3E[/TUBE]
Any thoughts?


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: GTAHater767
Date Posted: October 07 2012 at 1:52am
2005. Agent 005 had only appeared in the book Colonel Sun, which of course, is yet to be adapted into a film. He was a 00-Agent until he went legally blind and couldn't wield his guns. Here's my take on the Sun Colonel's Year.
 
Films that should've been RAZZed, but didn't: 3
Elektra
The Amityville Horror [remake]
Aeon Flux
 
Films that got RAZZed, but shouldn't have: 3
Kicking and Screaming
War of the Worlds [remake]
Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith
 
Films that were RAZZed to the wrong degree: 1
Alone in the Dark (Not RAZZed enough)
 
Worst Trends/Events of 2005:
V. "Stupid spoiled whore"'s Hollywood feature film debut (Had Paris Hilton actually starred in anything theatrical before House of Wax [remake]?)
IV. A narrow assortment of comedies, romances, and horrors (All 45-some-odd films that were at least considered for the RAZZIES in 2005 were strictly those 3 genres in their most vanilla sense. There wasn't one subtype of comedy, horror, or romance that stood out at all).
III. No-one went to the movies, and it's a complete mystery as to why! (For a year with more than 300 films released, revenues plunged in 2005. No-one can single out one or a few reasons for this dip.)
II.  The tabloids refuse to shut up about the lip synced concert and the videotaped C-Section (Ashlee [Undiscovered] and Federline)
I. Tom Cruise's horrible year; Katie Holmes, War of the Worlds, an anti-psychiatry crusade, and Episode 912 (Trapped in the Closet, the episode in which Tom Cruise locks himself in Stan Marsh's closet, was a banner episode in South Park's history, and of all the bad things to happen to Tom Cruise lately, they were all packed into 2005. No year before or after brought half as many ill-fortuned events upon him!)
 


-------------
Possible Unofficial Forums, given <35% approval: Spt. 12: Dolphin Tale 2, Search Party. Spt. 19: The Maze Runner, Tusk.


Posted By: Vits
Date Posted: March 02 2013 at 2:08pm
My review of the BATMAN franchise, which includes Worst Supp. Actress nominee BATMAN BEGINS (skip to 02:07):

[TUBE]ljFE6ermZr4[/TUBE]

Any thoughts?


-------------
You can follow me http://www.twitter.com/@Vits_Chile - @Vits_Chile


Posted By: moviecritic1994
Date Posted: May 15 2013 at 7:41am
I don't know if you all will want to strangle me or put me in a 12 step program, but I have to confess... I love Bewitched. I mean I'm not saying it's the greatest movie of all time but I did love it for hat it is. I do have my problems with it. Like even today, I don't know why Will Ferrell is even in this movie. He seemed to be out of his element in this film and I do agree with the Razzie win for Worst Screen Couple. Both him and Nicole Kidman had no real chemistry. Just like that spell she casted on him later in the film, the love wasn't real.

However, I loved Nicole in this role (her voice did get a little annoying though at times). But I am still glad she didn't get nominated for Worst Actress. In fact, this movie actually lead me to watch the original TV Show with Elizabeth Montgomery :)

-------------
If you care to find me, Look to the Western Sky :)



Print Page | Close Window