|
Rants, Raves & Reviews for M-I-III |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
HeadRAZZBerry
Berry Important MODERATOR
Joined: April 23 2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 4487 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Rants, Raves & Reviews for M-I-IIIPosted: May 06 2006 at 1:36pm |
|
HERE's YOUR CHANCE to EXPRESS YOUR VIEWS on THE MOVIE, MR. CRUISE, ETC...
|
|
|
Ye Olde Head RAZZberry
|
|
![]() |
|
Queen_of_Toad
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: January 30 2006 Location: Germany Online Status: Offline Posts: 314 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 18 2006 at 6:12pm |
|
Is this thread still active? Because I love ranting against Crui$emeister, more than I love ranting against Gayden Chrystalmeth! |
|
|
Please, forgive my poor English. It's not my native language.
|
|
![]() |
|
Ed Wood
Berry New Comer
Joined: September 08 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 4 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 18 2006 at 6:15pm |
|
It is for me.Any time you want to bash Tom it is fine with me.
|
|
![]() |
|
jb razz
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: November 25 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 156 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: December 26 2006 at 2:24am |
|
Since this has been a slow topic I will give my opinion: I don't like Tom Cruise as a person, but he is not the celebrity I hate most. I can't stand a group of women I call "the sluts" which includes Paris Hilton, Britney Spears, Jessica Simpson, etc. Unlike other people I am able to separate him as a person and as an actor and watch his movies (if they are good). I haven't seen M:I:2 but M:I:3 is much better than the original. The original wasn't Razzie worthy, but its plot was way to convoluted. M:I:3 had a plot that worked, some eye-popping location, and better action sequences. It had a likable supporting cast and they didn't let Tom Cruise hog all of the screen time. Philip Hoffman was very good as the villain (no sign of the Oscar curse yet). The only problem was Tom Cruise showing off by doing two larger than life stunts that reminded me of his real life self. Response from Head RAZZberry: I recently rented M-I-3 from Netflix, and while I didn't find Tom Cruise's performance Oscar or RAZZIE-worthy, I certainly found the screenplay -- which was hard to follow, full of Buick-sized plot-holes and regularly featured technology (like the latex-rubber-mask-making machine) that was outright laughable -- deserving of possible RAZZIE attention...
|
|
![]() |
|
moviewizguy
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: January 23 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2136 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 24 2007 at 10:44am |
|
I'm going to PRAISE this film. I also haven't seen M:I:II and seen the original is this film is like 10 time better than the original! I LOVED this film soooooooo much! It's one of the best films of the year! And it has good reviews so it's not anywhere close to getting a Razzie nomintation.
|
|
![]() |
|
Vits
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 01 2010 Location: Chile Online Status: Offline Posts: 4818 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March 22 2010 at 2:14pm |
|
How'eird!This movie had better reviews than "M.I. 2",and that one had better than "M.I. 1".It's supossed to be the other way around.
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |