Official RAZZIE® Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > DISCUSSIONS & POLLS on 2010 RELEASES > LETTERS TO JULIET
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Reviews on LETTERS TO JULIET
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Reviews on LETTERS TO JULIET

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
HeadRAZZBerry View Drop Down
Berry Important MODERATOR
Berry Important MODERATOR


Joined: April 23 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5088
Post Options Post Options   Quote HeadRAZZBerry Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Reviews on LETTERS TO JULIET
    Posted: May 10 2010 at 10:00am
Many a critic would rather emulate Romeo -- and take poison -- than sit through something like this again! 

Here's an R.T. LINK and a MetaCritic LINK to read reviews on yet another unsatisfying 2010 Rom/Com, LETTERS TO JULIET...  
Ye Olde Head RAZZberry
Back to Top
Vits View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Chile
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6841
Post Options Post Options   Quote Vits Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 12 2011 at 12:41pm
R.T. gave it 40%:"It has a refreshingly earnest romantic charm,but it suffers from limp dialogue and an utter lack of surprises".
 
Roger Ebert gave it ***/****:"I know the ending is preordained from the setup.I know the characters are broad and comforting stereotypes.In this case,I simply don't care.Sometimes we have personal reasons for responding to a film".
 
Peter Travers gave it **/****:"Redgrave is incandescent, and casting Franco Nero as LORENZO was inspired".
You can follow me @Vits_Chile
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down