Official RAZZIE® Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > 31st Annual RAZZIE® Award Nominees & "WINNERS" > LITTLE FOCKERS
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Reviews on LITTLE FOCKERS
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Reviews on LITTLE FOCKERS

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
HeadRAZZBerry View Drop Down
Berry Important MODERATOR
Berry Important MODERATOR


Joined: April 23 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4995
Post Options Post Options   Quote HeadRAZZBerry Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Reviews on LITTLE FOCKERS
    Posted: December 21 2010 at 10:04am
Whadda Cast!  And, as about 90% of reviewers are said...WHADDA WASTE! 

Here's an R.T. LINK, and a MetaCritic LINK to see if LITTLE FOCKERS can hold onto the title of Hollywood's Top Holiday Turkey of 2010...  


Ye Olde Head RAZZberry
Back to Top
Vits View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Chile
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6178
Post Options Post Options   Quote Vits Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 09 2011 at 6:01pm
R.T. gave this 9%:"As star-studded as it is heartbreakingly lazy,the film takes the top-grossing trilogy to embarrassing new lows".

Richard Roeper didn't gave this a grade,but his words are enough:"One of the worst threequels of all times.There aren't any laughs.The franchise ran out of steam halfway through.Who thought it was a good idea?".

Peter Travers gave this */****:"The second sequel to 2000's MEET THE PARENTS defines "uncalled for".It's upchuckingly unfunny".
You can follow me @Vits_Chile
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down