Spawn of Satan, Get Thee Hence!

O-O-O-O-O-H, SPOOKY!

THIS FIRST HORROR FLICK of 2009 GLOMS TOGETHER ELEMENTS from ROSEMARY'S BABY, THE EXORCIST, THE OMEN and SEVERAL OTHER PREDECESSORS into a KIND of MONSTER MISH-MASH.

WRITTEN and DIRECTED by THE SCREENWRITER of JUMPER and ALL 3 BLADE MOVIES (WHO ALSO HAS STORY CREDITS on BATMAN BEGINS and DARK KNIGHT) THE UNBORN COULD EITHER SCARE the sh*t OUT of AUDIENCES....OR HAVE THEM sh*tTING THEMSELVES from LAUGHING SO HARD.

WE PLAN to (MAYBE) SEE IT WHEN IT COMES OUT on DVD (WHICH COULD BE BERRY SOON).

BELOW IS YOUR CHANCE to GIVE the DEVIL HIS DUE...

Yustman: "I'm not sure an ABBA sing-along is enough to terrify Satan..."

Oldman: "Maybe if we got Pierce Brosnan to join in??"

Don't be fooled, it's not a remake.

HeadRAZZberry, could you not be so anal with your thoughts?  There might be Razzie members under 18 on this forum. 

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: I never said it was a "remake" -- I blatantly implied that it was a rip-off of several previous horror films -- and gave multiple examples with IMDb links for each.

As for my being "anal" and possibly offending users under 18 -- I doubt "sh*tty" is a "dirty" enough word to actually offend anyone over 8 any more, let alone 18.

But "f**k" -- now that dirty word has power to offend at any age!

Rip-off indeed. The demonic baby thing has already been done time and time again. And seeing as how the poster for this movie features a girl's butt in tight underwear, we know who its target audience is.

And I think we here at the Razzie Forum already have a good idea who is under 18...

Another thing that's a laugh is the international poster (shown on the 2nd Worst of the Weak page now).

People won't look at the reflection in the mirror with the evil unborn child.  They will be staring at Yustman's fine a$$!  ...Wait a minute, are they using that gluteus maximus to lure viewers to see a movie that is crap in every other aspect?

Does a description that suggests the movie is hopeless sound funny to you?  I think it's more insulting than funny; and the reason I said something about people under 18 being on this forum is that he opened the discussion with a  joke and that's not exactly appropriate.

The RT critics are giving it a 13%, but the users are copping the negative reviews for sounding heinous and insulting (and also for not giving an inch).

Take a step back, and chill out. What does it matter if we make fun of a bad movie? Why does that make us "heartless"? You think this movie will be a masterpiece? If was going for that, the studio would release it on Halloween. A movie opening in Janurary is a tall-tell sign it is crap, because that's the only kind of movies released in Janurary. And if I recall correctly, you're voting member now, so technically, you are one of us "heartless" guys. Although you go against Uwe Boll and Seltzerberg, which is fine by me, they are not the end-all, be-all of bad filmmaking, this moive counts, too. If you can't take tongue firmly planted in the cheek jokes about bad movies, maybe you're visiting the wrong forum.

Man, I was gonna say the same thing! "The Uninvited" is being promoted as a horror movie, I think, but when I see the poster, all I can think about is an exchange of from Steve Carell and Seth Rogen in The 40-Year-Old Virgin:

Andy Stitzer: "Something's wrong with her panties..."
Cal: "Yeah, they're not in my mouth!"