|
STAR DREK #357...The Knock-Offs Begin |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
HeadRAZZBerry
Berry Important MODERATOR
Joined: April 23 2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 4486 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: STAR DREK #357...The Knock-Offs BeginPosted: April 21 2006 at 3:32am |
|
BOLDLY GOING WHERE WE'VE ALL BEEN BEFORE: PARAMOUNT DECIDES to RESURRECT 'STAR TREK' MOVIE FRANCHISE, WITH 'LOST' CREATOR (and M-I-3 DIRECTOR) at HELM... Trekkies have a new leader: By Dave McNary / DAILY VARIETY J.J. Abrams is becoming the next Gene Roddenberry. Paramount is breathing life into its "Star Trek" franchise by setting "Mission: Impossible III" helmer J.J. Abrams to produce and direct the 11th "Trek" feature, aiming for a 2008 release. Damon Lindelof and Bryan Burk, Abrams' producing team from "Lost," also will produce the yet-to-be-titled feature. Project, to be penned by Abrams and "MI3" scribes Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci, will center on the early days of seminal "Trek" characters James T. Kirk and Mr. Spock, including their first meeting at Starfleet Academy and first outer space mission. Deal reflects Paramount's bullishness on "MI3," which launches worldwide next weekend, and underlines the goal of Paramount chief Brad Grey and prexy Gail Berman to re-energize the pipeline via high-profile tentpoles while revitalizing the Par brand with top-tier talent such as Abrams. "MI3" is the first pic to be released that's been greenlit by Grey. "Star Trek" has been Hollywood's most durable performer other than James Bond, spawning 10 features that have grossed more than $1 billion and 726 TV episodes from six series. Decision to relaunch "Star Trek" comes less than a year after UPN pulled the plug on their series "Star Trek: Enterprise"amid dismal ratings following a four-season run and four years after "Star Trek: Nemesis" turned in the worst performance of the 10 films with a mere $43 million domestic. Original series, created by Roddenberry, launched in 1966 on NBC and ended in 1969. During the following decade, the original 78 episodes of "Trek" became staples in syndication and helped mobilize the fan base along with conventions, books and merchandise. Paramount released "Star Trek: The Motion Picture" in 1979 and saw domestic grosses hit $82 million. The next three films grossed a combined $263 million domestically, so Paramount started the second TV series, "The Next Generation," in 1987, with Rick Berman and Roddenberry co-exec producing. Under Sherry Lansing's tenure, Rick Berman had been teamed several years ago with Jordan Kerner and Kerry McCluggage to develop an 11th feature set in the early days of Starfleet Academy. No word yet on who will play such iconic roles as Kirk, Mister Spock, "Bones" McCoy or Sulu... (c) 2006 / VARIETY |
|
|
Ye Olde Head RAZZberry
|
|
![]() |
|
Movie Man
Berry Special GUESTS
|
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: April 21 2006 at 8:40am |
|
A new "Star Trek" film is fine by me (since I'm a big Trekkie), but who wants to recast the old series with new faces. How about a sequel, not a prequel.
|
|
![]() |
|
JoeBacon
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: July 15 2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 492 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: April 21 2006 at 3:55pm |
|
Just the thought of Tom Cruise as Captain Kirk and Tom Hanks as Spock
|
|
![]() |
|
Michaels
Berry Special GUESTS
|
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: April 22 2006 at 1:36am |
|
As far as I'm concerned, the "Star Trek" franchise is dead. Just let it die already. If you want to bring it back to life, do what Lucas did and wait 18 years to build it up so people will actually care.
|
|
![]() |
|
JoeBacon
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: July 15 2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 492 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: April 22 2006 at 2:14pm |
|
Yes, Lucas waited 18 years, but the end product was extremely
disappointing! I'm sure glad he has called it quits, originally he was going to make 3 sets of trilogies. If this is any indicator, episodes 7 8 and 9 would have been even worse that 1, 2 & 3! |
|
![]() |
|
adam
Berry Special GUESTS
|
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: April 22 2006 at 5:56pm |
|
Or how about Another few |
|
![]() |
|
moorlock2003
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: July 15 2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 101 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: April 23 2006 at 6:58pm |
|
Bet they'll get really cheesy with this thing and put Shatner and Nimoy in cameo roles...I wouldn't be surprised. |
|
|
Fred Cooper
|
|
![]() |
|
Brierfox
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: March 05 2006 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 117 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 03 2006 at 2:24pm |
|
I know! Wait, it's coming clearer. yes! William Shatner, playing a Federation Lawyer, goes to bat for his old shipmate Spock. Spock, it seems has made crude and insulting remarks regarding Sulu's sexuality. Shatner's defense rests on the fact that Spock has no feelings and uses only logic, so Spock couldn't have meant anything criminal. What do you think? It updates the old StarTrek format a bit, makes it a little edgy, and will be sure to bring in the gay sympathy vote at Oscar time. |
|
|
"We aren't in Kansas anymore Toto... Toto??"
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |