Official RAZZIE® Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > RAZZIE® Events, Announcements & Activities > ALL THE LATEST on ALL THE LAMEST!
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: STAR DREK #357...The Knock-Offs Begin
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

STAR DREK #357...The Knock-Offs Begin

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
HeadRAZZBerry View Drop Down
Berry Important MODERATOR
Berry Important MODERATOR


Joined: April 23 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4486
Post Options Post Options   Quote HeadRAZZBerry Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: STAR DREK #357...The Knock-Offs Begin
    Posted: April 21 2006 at 3:32am

BOLDLY GOING WHERE WE'VE ALL BEEN BEFORE: PARAMOUNT DECIDES to RESURRECT 'STAR TREK' MOVIE FRANCHISE, WITH 'LOST' CREATOR (and M-I-3 DIRECTOR) at HELM...

Trekkies have a new leader:
'Star' treatment for J.J. Abrams

By Dave McNary / DAILY VARIETY

J.J. Abrams is becoming the next Gene Roddenberry.

Paramount is breathing life into its "Star Trek" franchise by setting "Mission: Impossible III" helmer J.J. Abrams to produce and direct the 11th "Trek" feature, aiming for a 2008 release.

Damon Lindelof and Bryan Burk, Abrams' producing team from "Lost," also will produce the yet-to-be-titled feature.

Project, to be penned by Abrams and "MI3" scribes Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci, will center on the early days of seminal "Trek" characters James T. Kirk and Mr. Spock, including their first meeting at Starfleet Academy and first outer space mission.

Deal reflects Paramount's bullishness on "MI3," which launches worldwide next weekend, and underlines the goal of Paramount chief Brad Grey and prexy Gail Berman to re-energize the pipeline via high-profile tentpoles while revitalizing the Par brand with top-tier talent such as Abrams.

"MI3" is the first pic to be released that's been greenlit by Grey.

"Star Trek" has been Hollywood's most durable performer other than James Bond, spawning 10 features that have grossed more than $1 billion and 726 TV episodes from six series.

Decision to relaunch "Star Trek" comes less than a year after UPN pulled the plug on their series "Star Trek: Enterprise"amid dismal ratings following a four-season run and four years after "Star Trek: Nemesis" turned in the worst performance of the 10 films with a mere $43 million domestic.

Original series, created by Roddenberry, launched in 1966 on NBC and ended in 1969.

During the following decade, the original 78 episodes of "Trek" became staples in syndication and helped mobilize the fan base along with conventions, books and merchandise. Paramount released "Star Trek: The Motion Picture" in 1979 and saw domestic grosses hit $82 million. The next three films grossed a combined $263 million domestically, so Paramount started the second TV series, "The Next Generation," in 1987, with Rick Berman and Roddenberry co-exec producing.

Under Sherry Lansing's tenure, Rick Berman had been teamed several years ago with Jordan Kerner and Kerry McCluggage to develop an 11th feature set in the early days of Starfleet Academy.

No word yet on who will play such iconic roles as Kirk, Mister Spock, "Bones" McCoy or Sulu...

(c) 2006 / VARIETY

Ye Olde Head RAZZberry
Back to Top
Movie Man View Drop Down
Berry Special GUESTS
Berry Special GUESTS
Post Options Post Options   Quote Movie Man Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 21 2006 at 8:40am
A new "Star Trek" film is fine by me (since I'm a big Trekkie), but who wants to recast the old series with new faces. How about a sequel, not a prequel.
Back to Top
JoeBacon View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: July 15 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 492
Post Options Post Options   Quote JoeBacon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 21 2006 at 3:55pm
Just the thought of Tom Cruise as Captain Kirk and Tom Hanks as Spock

Back to Top
Michaels View Drop Down
Berry Special GUESTS
Berry Special GUESTS
Post Options Post Options   Quote Michaels Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2006 at 1:36am
As far as I'm concerned, the "Star Trek" franchise is dead. Just let it die already. If you want to bring it back to life, do what Lucas did and wait 18 years to build it up so people will actually care.
Back to Top
JoeBacon View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: July 15 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 492
Post Options Post Options   Quote JoeBacon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2006 at 2:14pm
Yes, Lucas waited 18 years, but the end product was extremely
disappointing!

I'm sure glad he has called it quits, originally he was going to make 3 sets
of trilogies. If this is any indicator, episodes 7 8 and 9 would have been
even worse that 1, 2 & 3!
Back to Top
adam View Drop Down
Berry Special GUESTS
Berry Special GUESTS
Post Options Post Options   Quote adam Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2006 at 5:56pm

Just the thought of Tom Cruise as Captain Kirk and Tom Hanks as Spock

Wait a second! William Shatner can't find work! Maybe the old Kirk can do this movie too!

Or how about Another few   

Back to Top
moorlock2003 View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: July 15 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 101
Post Options Post Options   Quote moorlock2003 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 23 2006 at 6:58pm

Bet they'll get really cheesy with this thing and put Shatner and Nimoy in cameo roles...I wouldn't be surprised.

Fred Cooper
Back to Top
Brierfox View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: March 05 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 117
Post Options Post Options   Quote Brierfox Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 03 2006 at 2:24pm

I know!  Wait, it's coming clearer. yes!

William Shatner, playing a Federation Lawyer,  goes to bat for his old shipmate Spock.  Spock, it seems has made crude and insulting remarks regarding Sulu's sexuality.  Shatner's defense rests on the fact that Spock has no feelings and uses only logic, so Spock couldn't have meant anything criminal.  

What do you think?   It updates the old StarTrek format a bit, makes it a little edgy, and will be sure to bring in the gay sympathy vote at Oscar time.  

"We aren't in Kansas anymore Toto... Toto??"
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down