Official RAZZIE® Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > 31st Annual RAZZIE® Award Nominees & "WINNERS" > TWILIGHT SAGA: ECLIPSE
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: The Vampire Albino Clown vs The Shirtless Werewolf
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

The Vampire Albino Clown vs The Shirtless Werewolf

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 7>
Author
Message
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: The Vampire Albino Clown vs The Shirtless Werewolf
    Posted: June 27 2010 at 9:48pm
I agree with GTAHater, better these movies be forgotten all together than be given even more attention through Razzie "wins." And the movie is "Expendables," as in the goverment can afford them being killed in battle, not "Expandables", suggesting they grow in size at will ... although that would make for a far more entertaining movie -- which might explain why I keep spelling it that way! 
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
MiguelAntilsu View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: August 30 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1463
Post Options Post Options   Quote MiguelAntilsu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 28 2010 at 8:34am
You guys don't seem to get the picture, do you?  There is nothing worse than the Twilight Saga.  This detestable franchise killed American culture and must be punished for doing so.  Razzie Awards are the only punishment suitable enough for that crime.
Back to Top
Vits View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Chile
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4807
Post Options Post Options   Quote Vits Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 28 2010 at 9:29am
I just read that early reviews indicate that this one is the best of the saga so far.
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 28 2010 at 1:38pm
maybe, but that's like choosing which kidney you would rather be punched in.
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 28 2010 at 1:55pm
No, Miguel -- YOU don't get the big picture! No one here besides you is as obsessed about this series. To us, it's just a fingerprint on a window, a bleep on the radar, it's nothing worth our time. There are much bigger fish to fry. I'll go through the rundown one last time:  
 
"Twilight": Only been around 3 years. Bad movies, yes, but they will be forgotten by 2012 once all of them have been released. NO ONE will remember them a decade from now. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if people actually question why the series was so popular when they look back at it. This is just the flavor of the month, nothing else. It will get away nearly scott-free except maybe on worst acting award, if that. And personally, I think the ONLY reason why you care this much about it is because you're within the target age group that the movies are suppose to cater to. Most of the Razzie voters are in their 20s, 30s, and 40s, so we couldn't care less what's popular among teenagers.
 
"Vampires Suck": Seltzerberg returns! These guys make Michael Bay look like Steven Spielberg! They have no talent whatsoever, are lazy as can be, have had 4 bombs in a row, and yet they are still greenlit for whatever reason. Plus, they are overdue for somehow ducking the awards two years agao, when "Disaster Movie" should have had a clean sweep.
 
"Killers": Biggest rip-off of another movie all year. Kutcher and Heigl, Razzie favorites who have managed to get away clean thus far. RT rating in the single digits.
 
'Grown-Ups": Adam Sandler, another talentless hack, a man-child. How this man-child has been the success he has been is beyond me. 15 years, that's how long we've had to deal with his s***. I guess he speaks the mental midget in all of us. And then he brings his equally talentless butt buddies along for the ride, other guys whose careers should be dead and buried. Sandler is a favorite of the Razzies, and to further sweeten the deal, the movie's RT rating is in the single digits.
 
"Johan Hex": Might as well call it "Wild, Wild West 2". Ripped apart by critics, will never even break even at the rate it's going. Also stars Razzie favorite, Megan Fox.
 
"Expendables": One word, Stallone. He is the Razzie's Meryl Streep. Don't ask me why, but he is. Personally, I think there are actors much worse then him. He puts together a team of other Razzies favorites in what we be the must cut and dry action movie he can throw together. It's like waving a big, raw streak infront of a hungry lion. 
 
In other words, there's just stuff out there that's much worse than some flavor of the month teen fad who wins a bunch of pointless, useless public voting awards.
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
moviewizguy View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: January 23 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Post Options Post Options   Quote moviewizguy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 28 2010 at 2:18pm
Wow. 3 positive reviews on RT so far and 2 are from the top critics while the other is actually a credible critic! I know the trailer was fantastic and all but now I'm really excited.
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 28 2010 at 2:50pm
I think MWG just made Miguel's hate list.
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
Vits View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Chile
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4807
Post Options Post Options   Quote Vits Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 28 2010 at 4:17pm
Some "Seltzerberg" movies weren't bombs. Despite bad reviews, they did well at the box office.
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 28 2010 at 5:43pm
Only because they made $100 million, although their budgets were half that. However, their BO takes went lower and lower with each movie. Still, you can't tell me they have an ounce of talent between them, or that their movies are funny -- even by accident.  

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: I am unclear what Seltzerberg movie you are suggesting "made $100 million" -- Here's a B.O. MoJo LINK to a list of the all time top-grossing "Comedy/Spoof" movies, showing that DATE MOVIE was their most successful film, and it topped out at $48 million domestic...
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 28 2010 at 5:49pm
Actually, Miguel should be thanking MWG, because he just jinxed the movie for him -- Each and every time MWG points out how great the first reviews are for a movie, it then gets about a thousand negative reviews!
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
Mayhem5185 View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: October 10 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 259
Post Options Post Options   Quote Mayhem5185 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2010 at 12:03am
I don't know what's getting more tiresome, Miguel's constant whining about how Twilight ruins American culture, or Burn's counter-whining about Miguel's whining. It's like watching Hannity and Colmes, except instead of a neo-Nazi conservative bashing Droopy the Dog over the head, we get a habitual cynic bashing on a whiner who may (or may not) be insane.

Look, this is a site for discussing bad movies, and for all the crap we give Miguel, it should be brought up that New Moon got an abysmal 27% on RT, and was generally hated by almost anyone who wasn't a diehard fan or a tweener girl. (I was dragged on a date to see it, it really was bad). So there is some validity to his claims that this movie might be one of the worst of the year, (especially if you go by the time honored system that sequels tend to get even worse than the previous one, which so far has been the case). I personally don't think it will be a front runner, given the amount of sh*t we have on our plate so far (My moneys on Grown Ups), but it definitely does deserve our full consideration.

And on a slightly different note, Gee-Wiz and Vits, lets keep the posting of early reviews to a minimum. There's going to be well over a hundred reviewers (maybe 200) in the next couple of days for this film, so it really is pointless to be discussing whether or not a movie will be good from the first dozen or so. (GI Joe anyone?)


I don't have pet peeves, I have major psychotic f**king hatreds! George Carlin
Back to Top
-1 View Drop Down
Berry New Comer
Berry New Comer


Joined: June 29 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7
Post Options Post Options   Quote -1 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2010 at 5:58am
Another one?
One push is all you need.....
Back to Top
moviewizguy View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: January 23 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Post Options Post Options   Quote moviewizguy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2010 at 10:24am
I wouldn't call it thousands. It's almost on the same level as the first and far better than the second. 

Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

Actually, Miguel should be thanking MWG, because he just jinxed the movie for him -- Each and every time MWG points out how great the first reviews are for a movie, it then gets about a thousand negative reviews!
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2010 at 11:18am
I was including worldwide gross, too, since that seems to be the new standard that Hollywood likes to go by. 

Originally posted by HeadRAZZberry

 
RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: I am unclear what Seltzerberg movie you are suggesting "made $100 million" -- Here's a B.O. MoJo LINK to a list of the all time top-grossing "Comedy/Spoof" movies, showing that DATE MOVIE was their most successful film, and it topped out at $48 million domestic...
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2010 at 11:20am
Okay, HUNDREDS of negative reviews come rushing in after you point out the few good reviews that come out first. 

Originally posted by moviewizguy


I wouldn't call it thousands. It's almost on the same level as the first and far better than the second.
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2010 at 11:22am
Well, if you don't like my posts, you could simply not read them! 

But seriously, wasn't American culture already ruined by the time MTV came to be?  

Originally posted by Mayhem5185

I don't know what's getting more tiresome, Miguel's constant whining about how Twilight ruins American culture, or Burn's counter-whining about Miguel's whining. It's like watching Hannity and Colmes, except instead of a neo-Nazi conservative bashing Droopy the Dog over the head, we get a habitual cynic bashing on a whiner who may (or may not) be insane. 
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 7>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down