|
This One Looks Seriously SCROOGED... |
Post Reply
|
Page <12345 9> |
| Author | |||
CriticalFrank
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 24 2009 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1314 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: This One Looks Seriously SCROOGED...Posted: May 02 2009 at 1:34am |
||
Safer then a priest... Heck, I'd probably trust my kid with a mass-murderer, or Michael Bay before I trusted my kid anywhere near a priest...Not that I actually have a kid or anything... |
|||
|
Life's short and hard, like a body-building elf - Bloodhound Gang
|
|||
![]() |
|||
dEd Grimley
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: July 31 2008 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2024 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 02 2009 at 1:38am |
||
|
I'm pretty sure Michael Bay is a reassigned priest. From the church of Satan, perhaps. He's certainly made some sort of deal with the devil.
|
|||
|
-Iron helps us play-
|
|||
![]() |
|||
moviewizguy
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: January 23 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2136 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 02 2009 at 3:45am |
||
|
Don't you find it funny that this film was like 9% on RT the first day and Wolverine was 100% on the first day. Now the former has a 32% and the latter has a 36%.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
dEd Grimley
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: July 31 2008 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2024 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 02 2009 at 5:09am |
||
|
These things have a way of balancing themselves out, but I still would like to point out that the positives for GoGFP read something like this:
* As a romcom, it's average, but as a Matthew McConaughey romcom, it's above average. If you're a low-expectations moviegoer, this one might surprise you. * In a movie as spiritless and stupid as this, you can't help but look for clues you've hit bottom. * Ghosts of Girlfriends Past doesn't do Dickens any favors, but in a year that brought us Bride Wars, it'll do. * Ghosts of Girlfriends Past might be one of the most unoriginal films ever made, but it works anyway. * Comfort zones don’t come much plusher than the one habitually occupied by Matthew McConaughey, who must read the words “arrogant, torso-flaunting alpha male” in script synopses and think: “That’ll do.” There are a few nicer ones, but ultimately you'll pick up a lot of backhanded compliments. |
|||
|
-Iron helps us play-
|
|||
![]() |
|||
saturnwatcher
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: July 14 2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2577 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 02 2009 at 6:35am |
||
|
No, because you are making the same mistake I called you on before: You are drawing assumptions based upon data sets that are too small to draw valid conclusions. You can't really spot legitimate trends until at least 30 or so reviews are posted. Ten or 12 just isn't a large enough data set. |
|||
|
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken
|
|||
![]() |
|||
moviewizguy
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: January 23 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2136 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 02 2009 at 7:38am |
||
You take things too seriously now. I'm not saying that because I'm assuming. I'm saying that because I find it funny because two seemingly polar-reacted films would end up in almost the same rating. I thought that was apparant. And what are you saying? Both of the films have more than 30 reviews... |
|||
![]() |
|||
saturnwatcher
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: July 14 2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2577 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 02 2009 at 7:47am |
||
|
They do now. At the point where there was a significant discrepancy in their numbers, there were comparatively few reviews for either. Admittedly I don't have the first clue as to what "polar-reacted" means, but based upon early buzz, I don't find it surprising that these two films are garnering similar critical reaction, in effect, both are generating mostly negative responses. However you may wish to spin it, there simply is no conclusion to be drawn from the fact that in the early going with very few reviews posted, there was a wide difference between their R.T. scores, or that their respective scored ended up similar; unless you wish us to come to the astonishing conclusion that a large percentage of professional film critics are just as apt to dislike a bad action film as they are to dislike a bad chick flick.
|
|||
|
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken
|
|||
![]() |
|||
CriticalFrank
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 24 2009 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1314 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 02 2009 at 9:43am |
||
I'm still looking for the review that says "Well, at least I survived through the film... I think that's a plus" or perhaps "I didn't want to drive railroad spikes through both my eyes afterward, just the left eye would do." Or how about "The opening credits looked decent, but my wife started to choke before the movie really got started, so I had to leave." |
|||
|
Life's short and hard, like a body-building elf - Bloodhound Gang
|
|||
![]() |
|||
dEd Grimley
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: July 31 2008 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2024 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 03 2009 at 1:43am |
||
|
I think MWG was just pointing out that because the earliest reviews of Wolverine were so favorable, it's funny that it's now ranked at the about the same level as what's undoubtedly one of the stupidest looking movies in all of history. (Actual scores be damned... This move looks like it deserves single digits.) And to be honest, I kind of agree. It is funny that Wolverine has fallen over 60% since the beginning... That the earliest reviews were ALL positive, and now that's nearly completely inverted.
But I also entirely agree with you in that you can't definitively judge something without having a thorough and comprehensive data set to work with... Whether it be RT reviews, or how well a US president is actually doing based on his first three months in office (*Ahem to both parties*). |
|||
|
-Iron helps us play-
|
|||
![]() |
|||
moviewizguy
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: January 23 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2136 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 03 2009 at 10:13am |
||
|
Why? Could you tell me this? Of all people, I'm the one that doesn't judge movies by their trailers (well, sometimes, I do, but you get my point). And it's funny that you say that, since there's one particular user here who does judge movies because of low ratings on RT. |
|||
![]() |
|||
dEd Grimley
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: July 31 2008 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2024 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 03 2009 at 11:45am |
||
And once again, the Point just SAUNTERS right past him... What an egotistical jerk that Point is... The point was that if one person tells you a movie was good, that doesn't mean it's good. If 10 people do, who have at least slightly different tastes or backgrounds, then you might actually be on to something. |
|||
|
-Iron helps us play-
|
|||
![]() |
|||
CriticalFrank
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 24 2009 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1314 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 03 2009 at 12:49pm |
||
|
[QUOTE=dEd Grimley]
One of these days someone will teach The Point some damned manners, and possibly surgically remove the stick from his ass. Until that day comes, I shall shun The Point like there is no tomorrow! Shun....Shun....SHUUUUUUUUUUN!! |
|||
|
Life's short and hard, like a body-building elf - Bloodhound Gang
|
|||
![]() |
|||
dEd Grimley
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: July 31 2008 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2024 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 03 2009 at 10:58pm |
||
|
I heard he was engaged to that Seńora Obvious, but somehow I feel like he'd be settling.
|
|||
|
-Iron helps us play-
|
|||
![]() |
|||
moviewizguy
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: January 23 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2136 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 03 2009 at 11:37pm |
||
I think we're talking about two different things. |
|||
![]() |
|||
CriticalFrank
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 24 2009 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1314 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 04 2009 at 3:27am |
||
|
Seńora Obvious is a nice girl. Sometimes the things she says seem a little pointless, but she means well. I don't think he'd be settling at all.
|
|||
|
Life's short and hard, like a body-building elf - Bloodhound Gang
|
|||
![]() |
|||
dEd Grimley
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: July 31 2008 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2024 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 04 2009 at 3:47am |
||
Clearly. |
|||
|
-Iron helps us play-
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Post Reply
|
Page <12345 9> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |