Official RAZZIE® Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > RAZZIE® Basics > Entire RAZZIE® History, Year-by-Year: 1980-2013
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: 2006 RAZZIE  Nominees
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

2006 RAZZIE Nominees

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
GTAHater767 View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: October 25 2009
Location: I shall not say
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1302
Post Options Post Options   Quote GTAHater767 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: 2006 RAZZIE Nominees
    Posted: October 07 2012 at 2:05am
2006. Perhaps Agent 006 was the second most famous of the 00-Agents behind James Bond (007). Alec Trevelyan had been on the side of MI6 until a mission to a Chemical Warfare Facility in the ByeLoMorYe Dam. Arkady Ouromov had seemingly executed him before the bombs attached to the chemical bottles could detonate in 3 minutes (Bond promised Trevelyan 6 minutes). He resurfaced in a junkyard and unmasked himself as Janus. I won't tell the rest. Here's my take on the Year of the Golden-Eyed Traitor:
 
Films that should've been RAZZed, but didn't: 7
The Lake House
Crossover
Eragon
Ultraviolet
Black Christmas [remake]
The Covenant
See No Evil
 
Films that got RAZZed, but shouldn't have: 1
Superman Returns
 
Films that got RAZZed to the wrong degree: 0
 
Worst Trends/Events of 2006:
V. EXTREMELY bad horror and fantasy films that luckily no-one saw (The Grudge 2, See No Evil, Stay Alive, Silent Hill, When a Stranger Calls [remake], Eragon.)
IV. Prequels, sequels, remakes, rip-offs, and other secondary installments hit a record high (Secondary installments in quantites like never before. We finally had to split 'em into 2 categories, but many of us wish it was that way to stay.)
III. Nicolas Cage's personal debt crisis begins in a bear costume (The Wicker Man [remake] is the first stand-out bad film starring Nic Cage since Gone in 60 Seconds [remake] in 2000, but this time it didn't slow down afterward.)
II. Between The Da Vinci Code, Shyamalan's savior role, and The Omen of 6-06-006, Jesus Christ and cinema didn't mix.
I. All the lousy family films, a dearth in quality G and PG rated entertainment (RV, The Shaggy Dog [remake], ZOOM, Garfield: A Tail of Two Kitties, The Pink Panther, The Benchwarmers)
Possible Unofficial Forums, given <35% approval: Ags 8; TMNT '014. Ags 13; Let's Be Cops. Ags 15; The Giver, The Expendables 3. Ags 29; Jessabelle
Back to Top
mrbhavya View Drop Down
Berry New Comer
Berry New Comer


Joined: May 16 2011
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1
Post Options Post Options   Quote mrbhavya Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 16 2011 at 10:32pm
If anyone knows the nominies for 2006, please post that info. I am making a database of it... 

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: They're right here, fella. And, since we already have a complete "database" of our history (as do both NetFlix and The IMDb - LINK) I am curious as to why you think another "database" is even necessary? Is your post Berry Cleverly Disguised SPAM...or do you not speak English well enough to know you are wasting your time replicating something which already exists on multiple sites??
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 23 2011 at 12:18pm
Okay, fine -- he "overuses twist endings and twists in general, when they are not needed." 

Happy now?  


The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
Vits View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Chile
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6608
Post Options Post Options   Quote Vits Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 23 2011 at 12:03pm
Then stop saying "twist ending"! You wanna hate him? Fine! But at least do it for the right reasons!
You can follow me @Vits_Chile
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 23 2011 at 9:02am
Sorry, Vits, but Jennifar is right. Although the twist didn't happen at the end, it's still a twist none the less. Same goes with "The Happening". Yes, the trees thing is not revealed at the end, but still, WHAT A TWIST. This is why people are sick of M. Night. Just make a straight forward movie for once.
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
Vits View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Chile
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6608
Post Options Post Options   Quote Vits Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 23 2011 at 6:51am
That didn't happen at the end.It didn't even happen after or during the climax.Therefor there's no twist ending.
You can follow me @Vits_Chile
Back to Top
Jennifar View Drop Down
Berry Important Member
Berry Important Member


Joined: November 01 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 62
Post Options Post Options   Quote Jennifar Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 23 2011 at 1:57am
There was a "twist ending." The twist being that everyone in the apartment complex had some role in the "fairy tale," but they all guessed wrong as to who was supposed to play what role ... which was then revealed later on, and we were supposed to be all surprised who the real role players were. Yet again, an example of why people hate Shyamalan and his overuse of twists.
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 02 2010 at 6:39pm
Oh no, SANTA CLAUS 3 and ZOOM were both unwatchable. Tim Allen clearly just made them for the paychecks... 
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
Vits View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Chile
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6608
Post Options Post Options   Quote Vits Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 02 2010 at 4:41pm
I don't think Tim Allen deserved the Worst Actor nomination. He was passable in LA SANTA CLAUSULA 3. And also in ZOOM Y LOS SUPERHEROES, although that one maybe deserved at least "Worst Director".
You can follow me @Vits_Chile
Back to Top
Vits View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Chile
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6608
Post Options Post Options   Quote Vits Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 21 2010 at 3:19pm
Wow!I know you usually repeat things like that,but that one seems to actually be copied and pasted word by word from another forum.How many times you have to bring up Michael Cimino?

Just like I said people dislike Shyamalan because of his twist endings,not the twists wee see throught the rest of the movies.
You can follow me @Vits_Chile
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 21 2010 at 3:13pm
Originally posted by Vits

No, Burn. People dislike his twist endings. It's not an obligation that horror movies must have twists at some point, but most of the good ones have at least one...  
Well, sorry, Vits, but MNS dug his own grave. He made twists and twist endings his trademark and used them in every movie to the point people were only going to see what the new twist was going to be. And after a while, the twists just began to suck, and you could predict them from miles away. And then, he starting letting his ego get the better of him, and then he started making overall bad movies. It's like he set out to ruin his own career by making one mistake after another like Michael Cimino before him. It's a true example of a director allowing a little success to go straight to his head.
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
Vits View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Chile
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6608
Post Options Post Options   Quote Vits Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 21 2010 at 12:51pm
No, Burn. People dislike his twist endings. It's not an obligation that horror movies must have twists at some point, but most of the good ones have at least one...  

You can follow me @Vits_Chile
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2010 at 7:33pm
I just realized, MWG is always saying "oh, there was no twist in "Lady In The Water", none". But, once again, he is wrong, as usual. Granted, it wasn't a twist ENDING, but there was a twist. The twist being that everyone in the apartment complex (or hotel, whichever it was) had some role in the "fairy tale", but they all guessed wrong who was suppose to be what role ... which were then revealed later on and we were suppose to be all surprised who was the real role players were. Yeah, again, why people hate MNS and his overuse of twists.
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 28 2010 at 11:28am
Originally posted by TaRaN-RoD

I agree that Eragon was a total piece of s***!
Not to mention the fact it copied and pasted plot points from "Star Wars" AND "Lord Of The Rings".
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
TaRaN-RoD View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: November 20 2009
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 174
Post Options Post Options   Quote TaRaN-RoD Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 27 2010 at 9:14pm
I agree that Eragon was a total piece of s***!
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 27 2010 at 5:44pm
Originally posted by GTAHater767

Why Superman Returns for that one nomination? Why not Eragon or Crossover?
Probably because more Razzie voters saw "Superman Returns". You have to remember that that's always a factor.
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down