Official RAZZIE® Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > RAZZIE® Basics > Entire RAZZIE® History, Year-by-Year: 1980-2013
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: 2006 RAZZIE  Nominees
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

2006 RAZZIE Nominees

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
HeadRAZZBerry View Drop Down
Berry Important MODERATOR
Berry Important MODERATOR


Joined: April 23 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5087
Post Options Post Options   Quote HeadRAZZBerry Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: 2006 RAZZIE Nominees
    Posted: January 24 2007 at 6:27am

Nominees for The 27th Annual Golden Raspberry (RAZZIE®) Awards

WORST PICTURE

BASIC INSTINCT 2 (Sony/Columbia) a.k.a. BASICALLY, IT STINKS, TOO

BLOODRAYNE (Romar Entertainment)

             LADY IN THE WATER (Warner Bros.)

LITTLE MAN (Sony/Revolution)

THE WICKER MAN (Warner Bros.)

WORST ACTOR

Tim Allen / SANTA CLAUSE 3, THE SHAGGY DOG and ZOOM

Nicolas Cage $$ / THE WICKER MAN

Larry, the Cable Guy (Dan Whitney) / LARRY THE CABLE GUY: HEALTH INSPECTOR

Rob Schneider ## / THE BENCHWARMERS and LITTLE MAN

Marlon Wayans # & Shawn Wayans  # / LITTLE MAN 

WORST ACTRESS

Hilary Duff # & Haylie Duff / MATERIAL GIRLS 

Lindsay Lohan / JUST MY LUCK      

Kristanna Loken / BLOODRAYNE

Jessica Simpson # / EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH         

Sharon Stone ## / BASICALLY IT STINKS, TOO   

WORST SUPPORTING ACTRESS

Kate Bosworth / SUPERMAN RETURNS      

Kristin Chenoweth / DECK THE HALLS, PINK PANTHER and  RV 

Carmen Electra # / DATE MOVIE and  SCARY MOVIE 4        

Jenny McCarthy ## / JOHN TUCKER MUST DIE     

Michelle Rodriguez / BLOODRAYNE

WORST SUPPORTING ACTOR

Danny DeVito # / DECK THE HALLS             

Ben Kingsley $$ / BLOODRAYNE

M. Night Shyamalan $ / LADY IN THE WATER

Martin Short / SANTA CLAUSE 3

David Thewlis / BASICALLY, IT STINKS, TOO! and THE OMEN 

WORST SCREEN COUPLE

Tim Allen & Martin Short / SANTA CLAUSE 3

Nicolas Cage & His Bear Suit / THE WICKER MAN

Hilary & Haylie Duff / MATERIAL GIRLS

Sharon Stone’s Lop-Sided Breasts / BASICALLY, IT STINKS, TOO

Shawn Wayans & EITHER Kerry Washington OR Marlon Wayans / LITTLE MAN

WORST REMAKE or RIP-OFF 

LITTLE MAN (Rip-off of the 1954 Bugs Bunny cartoon “Baby Buggy Bunny”)

PINK PANTHER  (Sony/Columbia)         

POSEIDON (Warner Bros.)

THE SHAGGY DOG (Disney)

THE WICKER MAN                                                                                          

WORST PREQUEL or SEQUEL

BASICALLY, IT STINKS, TOO! 

BIG MOMMA’S HOUSE 2 (Fox)

GARFIELD 2: A TAIL of TWO KITTIES (Fox)

SANTA CLAUSE 3 (Disney)

TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE: THE BEGINNING (New Line)               

            

WORST DIRECTOR 

Uwe Boll  # / BLOODRAYNE

Michael Caton-Jones / BASICALLY, IT STINKS, TOO!  

Ron Howard $$ / THE DA VINCI CODE (Sony/Columbia)

M. Night Shyamalan $ / LADY IN THE WATER

Keenan Ivory Wayans # / LITTLE MAN

WORST SCREENPLAY

BASICALLY, IT STINKS, TOO Screenplay by Leora Barish & Henry Bean,

Based on Characters Created by Joe Ezsterhas## 

BLOODRAYNE Screenplay by Guinevere Turner, Based on the Video Game  

LADY IN THE WATER Original Screenplay by M. Night Shyamalan        

LITTLE MAN Written by Keenan Ivory Wayans, Marlon Wayans and Shawn Wayans

THE WICKER MAN Screenplay Adapted by Neil LaBute from a Screenplay by Anthony Schaffer

WORST EXCUSE for FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT (New Category!)

DECK THE HALLS (Fox)

GARFIELD: A TAIL OF 2 KITTIES

RV (Sony/Columbia)

SANTA CLAUSE 3: THE ESCAPE CLAUSE         

THE SHAGGY DOG 

NOMINATIONS PER PICTURE

BASICALLY, IT STINKS, TOO = 7  Nominations

             Worst Picture, Actress, Supporting Actor, Director, Sequel, Screenplay and Screen Couple

LITTLE MAN = 7  Nominations

             Worst Picture, Actor (2) Remake/Rip-Off, Director, Screenplay and Screen Couple

BLOODRAYNE = 6  Nominations

             Worst Picture, Actress, Supporting Actor, Supporting Actress, Director and Screenplay     

THE WICKER MAN = 5  Nominations

             Worst Picture, Actor, Screenplay, Remake and Screen Couple 

SANTA CLAUSE 3: THE ESCAPE CLAUSE = 5 Nominations

             Worst Excuse for Family Entertainment, Worst Actor, Supporting Actor, Sequel and Screen Couple

LADY IN THE WATER = 4  Nominations

             Worst Picture, Supporting Actor, Director and Screenplay 

DECK THE HALLS = 3 Nominations

             Worst Excuse for Family Entertainment, Supporting Actor and Supporting Actress

THE SHAGGY DOG = 3 Nominations

             Worst Excuse for Family Entertainment, Worst Remake and Worst Actor 

 

KEY TO SYMBOLS:

   # =  Previous RAZZIE Nominee

##  = Previous RAZZIE “Winner”

    $ = Previous Oscar Nominee

  $$ = Previous Oscar Winner 

© 2007, John Wilson and The Golden Raspberry Award Foundation

Ye Olde Head RAZZberry
Back to Top
Vits View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Chile
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6825
Post Options Post Options   Quote Vits Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 27 2010 at 3:36pm

THE HILLS HAVE EYES wasn't bad,but the directing was.It should've been up for "Worst Director".

You can follow me @Vits_Chile
Back to Top
TaRaN-RoD View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: November 20 2009
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 174
Post Options Post Options   Quote TaRaN-RoD Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 27 2010 at 4:48pm
Why don't you show the winners? I mean , I don't know how to say that little help here, there in the list but it's not clear who are the winners...
Back to Top
Vits View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Chile
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6825
Post Options Post Options   Quote Vits Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 27 2010 at 5:00pm
They separated the nominees and winners into 2 forums.
You can follow me @Vits_Chile
Back to Top
GTAHater767 View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: October 25 2009
Location: I shall not say
Online Status: Online
Posts: 1393
Post Options Post Options   Quote GTAHater767 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 27 2010 at 5:03pm

Why Superman Returns for that one nomination? Why not Eragon or Crossover?

Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 27 2010 at 5:44pm
Originally posted by GTAHater767

Why Superman Returns for that one nomination? Why not Eragon or Crossover?
Probably because more Razzie voters saw "Superman Returns". You have to remember that that's always a factor.
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
TaRaN-RoD View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: November 20 2009
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 174
Post Options Post Options   Quote TaRaN-RoD Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 27 2010 at 9:14pm
I agree that Eragon was a total piece of s***!
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 28 2010 at 11:28am
Originally posted by TaRaN-RoD

I agree that Eragon was a total piece of s***!
Not to mention the fact it copied and pasted plot points from "Star Wars" AND "Lord Of The Rings".
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2010 at 7:33pm
I just realized, MWG is always saying "oh, there was no twist in "Lady In The Water", none". But, once again, he is wrong, as usual. Granted, it wasn't a twist ENDING, but there was a twist. The twist being that everyone in the apartment complex (or hotel, whichever it was) had some role in the "fairy tale", but they all guessed wrong who was suppose to be what role ... which were then revealed later on and we were suppose to be all surprised who was the real role players were. Yeah, again, why people hate MNS and his overuse of twists.
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
Vits View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Chile
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6825
Post Options Post Options   Quote Vits Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 21 2010 at 12:51pm
No, Burn. People dislike his twist endings. It's not an obligation that horror movies must have twists at some point, but most of the good ones have at least one...  

You can follow me @Vits_Chile
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 21 2010 at 3:13pm
Originally posted by Vits

No, Burn. People dislike his twist endings. It's not an obligation that horror movies must have twists at some point, but most of the good ones have at least one...  
Well, sorry, Vits, but MNS dug his own grave. He made twists and twist endings his trademark and used them in every movie to the point people were only going to see what the new twist was going to be. And after a while, the twists just began to suck, and you could predict them from miles away. And then, he starting letting his ego get the better of him, and then he started making overall bad movies. It's like he set out to ruin his own career by making one mistake after another like Michael Cimino before him. It's a true example of a director allowing a little success to go straight to his head.
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
Vits View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Chile
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6825
Post Options Post Options   Quote Vits Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 21 2010 at 3:19pm
Wow!I know you usually repeat things like that,but that one seems to actually be copied and pasted word by word from another forum.How many times you have to bring up Michael Cimino?

Just like I said people dislike Shyamalan because of his twist endings,not the twists wee see throught the rest of the movies.
You can follow me @Vits_Chile
Back to Top
Vits View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Chile
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6825
Post Options Post Options   Quote Vits Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 02 2010 at 4:41pm
I don't think Tim Allen deserved the Worst Actor nomination. He was passable in LA SANTA CLAUSULA 3. And also in ZOOM Y LOS SUPERHEROES, although that one maybe deserved at least "Worst Director".
You can follow me @Vits_Chile
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 02 2010 at 6:39pm
Oh no, SANTA CLAUS 3 and ZOOM were both unwatchable. Tim Allen clearly just made them for the paychecks... 
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
Jennifar View Drop Down
Berry Important Member
Berry Important Member


Joined: November 01 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 62
Post Options Post Options   Quote Jennifar Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 23 2011 at 1:57am
There was a "twist ending." The twist being that everyone in the apartment complex had some role in the "fairy tale," but they all guessed wrong as to who was supposed to play what role ... which was then revealed later on, and we were supposed to be all surprised who the real role players were. Yet again, an example of why people hate Shyamalan and his overuse of twists.
Back to Top
Vits View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Chile
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6825
Post Options Post Options   Quote Vits Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 23 2011 at 6:51am
That didn't happen at the end.It didn't even happen after or during the climax.Therefor there's no twist ending.
You can follow me @Vits_Chile
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down