Official RAZZIE® Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > 2005 Film Discussions > FANTASTIC FOUR (aka FAT/SPASTIC 4)
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: My Son Actually ENJOYED It!!
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

My Son Actually ENJOYED It!!
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
  Share Topic Share Topic  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557 		Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: My Son Actually ENJOYED It!!
    Posted: December 15 2010 at 7:39pm
Originally posted by thomsonmg2000

I remembered being underwhelmed by this film (I'm talking about Fantastic 4 btw, not The Shining). The final fight scene wasn't really fantastic. I'm surprised HeadRazz actually enjoyed it.

Also, I remembered rolling my eyes over the blatant scientific inaccuracies (I know I know it's a superhero film, but reversing your mutation and then mutating back into The Thing? Come on!). 
My points exactly, not to mention the second movie where the big world destorying villain was not even shown on screen and was easily defeated in two seconds, making not seem like any kind of real threat like they were making him out to be.
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
thomsonmg2000 View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: October 20 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 184 		Post Options Post Options   Quote thomsonmg2000 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 15 2010 at 7:14pm
I remembered being underwhelmed by this film (I'm talking about Fantastic 4 btw, not The Shining). The final fight scene wasn't really fantastic. I'm surprised HeadRazz actually enjoyed it.

Also, I remembered rolling my eyes over the blatant scientific inaccuracies (I know I know it's a superhero film, but reversing your mutation and then mutating back into The Thing? Come on!). 
Seltzerberg is back?

OH MY GOOOOOOOOOOD!!!!!!!

http://www.disastermovie.org
http://www.vampiressuck.org/
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557 		Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2010 at 5:54pm
Originally posted by Vits

1)It wasn't ripped.It was nominated for 2 Razzies.I didn't see it,but I think maybe it should've been nominated for "Screenplay" instead of "Director",seeing as it's considered a bad adaptation,but good movie in general.
No, after someone new comer here was complaining about why it happen, HeadRazz stated his reasons why, as did saturnwatcher. The movie wasn't as loyal as it could have been and Kubrick should have waited until film technology caught up with the movie so he could have done it properly. That's their words, not mine.
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
Vits View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Chile
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4800 		Post Options Post Options   Quote Vits Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2010 at 2:56pm
1)It wasn't ripped.It was nominated for 2 Razzies.I didn't see it,but I think maybe it should've been nominated for "Screenplay" instead of "Director",seeing as it's considered a bad adaptation,but good movie in general.
2)Most people disliked the movie when it was released.The same for PINOCCHIO.A while later,they became classics.
http://vits-ingthemovies.blogspot.com
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557 		Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2010 at 1:51pm
Originally posted by Vits

And THE SHINING.
Well, HeadRazz already ripped Kubrick's version apart for not being loyal to the book.
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
Vits View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Chile
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4800 		Post Options Post Options   Quote Vits Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2010 at 7:46am
And THE SHINING.
http://vits-ingthemovies.blogspot.com
Back to Top
Mayhem5185 View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: October 10 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 259 		Post Options Post Options   Quote Mayhem5185 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2010 at 1:57am
I don't know x-men and X2 stray pretty far from the source material but were really good movies, especially X2, i guess the key is to try and find a balance, and on that note, i didn't like this movie either
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557 		Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 12 2010 at 7:07pm
Originally posted by Vits

I don't think someone has solved the long-lasting debate of adaptations being good despite being different from the source...like SPIDER-MAN.
I have one word for you: "Catwoman".
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
Vits View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Chile
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4800 		Post Options Post Options   Quote Vits Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 12 2010 at 4:05pm
I don't think someone has solved the long-lasting debate of adaptations being good despite being different from the source...like SPIDER-MAN.
http://vits-ingthemovies.blogspot.com
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557 		Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 12 2010 at 2:56pm
Originally posted by Vits

I give this 9/10.It was a little predictable and there were cliches here and there.But overall is what I look for in superhero movies.
Again, if you were a comic book fan of the series, you would understand why everyone hated this movie.
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
Vits View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Chile
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4800 		Post Options Post Options   Quote Vits Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 12 2010 at 10:54am
I give this 9/10.It was a little predictable and there were cliches here and there.But overall is what I look for in superhero movies.
http://vits-ingthemovies.blogspot.com
Back to Top
Grounder the Critic View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: November 12 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 264 		Post Options Post Options   Quote Grounder the Critic Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 25 2010 at 5:32pm
Well, the first one was mediocre, but it was entertaining too. The sequel, just...no.
Pictures move, do they?
Back to Top
moviewizguy View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: January 23 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2136 		Post Options Post Options   Quote moviewizguy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 25 2010 at 5:27pm
I think the second is better. Unfortunately, there won't be a third. Instead, there will be a reboot.
Back to Top
Web Design Company View Drop Down
Berry New Comer
Berry New Comer


Joined: October 18 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2 		Post Options Post Options   Quote Web Design Company Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 25 2010 at 7:08am
Is there the 3rd as well?????
anyways, like any "saga", the first is always the best!
Back to Top
bruin_522 View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: January 30 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 360 		Post Options Post Options   Quote bruin_522 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 08 2007 at 3:21pm
I had fun with this first one as well, but not the second one at all.
Back to Top
SchumacherH8ter View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: September 06 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2011 		Post Options Post Options   Quote SchumacherH8ter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 06 2007 at 11:51am
Originally posted by HeadRAZZBerry

My 9-year-old son and I actually had fun at this one — Even if 75% of critics did not. Hey, it wuz only 'sposed to be Mindless Fun, and we'd argue it got BOTH the "Fun" and the "Mindless" parts down cold.

Whadda U Think?!?!?  

Fantastic Four Movie Stills

                                                                                               I agree!
Joel Schumacher is history's greatest monster!-Robot Chicken
https://twitter.com/SchumacherH8r
Next-up: The Oogieloves
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down