DISASTER Indeed!!

Like dEd, I was hoping that we here at the Razzies would be the final nail in the coffin for Seltzerberg's career, but their own lack of talent beat us to it, or so it seems for now.

I don't wan'na watch,but I have to.It's the only Seltz-berg movie I haven't seen,I need to so I can officially call them the worst filmmakers.Even if I like the movie,it would be their only good movie,so I wouldn't be wrong.

Originally posted by Vits Be honest:Is this better or worse than the others?

To be completely honest....I liked it. *hides in a cave covered by a huge boulder*

Originally posted by moviewizguy Originally posted by Vits Be honest:Is this better or worse than the others? To be completely honest....I liked it. *hides in a cave covered by a huge boulder*

I know it's not impossible,but they can't all be equally bad,right?

I read just one part,'cuz I don't wan'na know ev'rythin'that happens.

Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn If you read a lot of his posts, he has called people "morons" and "idiots" for not agreeing with his opinion, which is sad.

Hypocrite.

To me, at least, he seems to view movies with a child-like, uncritical eye, in which all movies start at 10 and are good until they are proven to suck, and that is why he ends up giving them ratings of nothing below 6 and up. That's not how movies work and it's not how life works. Everything starts with a clean slate, in other words, movies start at 0 and they have to be proven good in order to reach that 6 or higher, and that is where MWG is flawed.

You're wrong with that interpretation but it's a nice theory. I'll explain my secret once and for all: When I go in seeing a bad movie (in other words, a movie with generally negative reviews/word of mouth), I set my expectations so low it would reach Hell (eh, I don't know a better metaphor). This is why when I watch these films, it ends up surpassing my super low expectations. The same goes for good films. If films are hailed as masterpieces, I set my expectations just like that: As a masterpiece. You know 2001: A Space Odyssey? I freaking hated that film. I hated, hated, hated the movie so much because it's ridiculous to see people praising a film with images that are shown with classical music in the background.

But most of the times, I usually end up liking good films, although I don't consider them masterpieces. However, it's bad for your health to be so negative all of the time. It's proven if you're happy, it's good for your body so me liking 96% of every film I watch isn't such a bad thing. I'd hate to be the person who criticize every movie they see.

Originally posted by Vits Moviewizguy,the thing is of course there's nothing wrong if you like "bad" movies and viceversa,but you can't consider yourself an expert and you can't review movies.You defend a lot of "bad" movies,but not by sayin'"I like it,but that's my opinion".You say things like "It's good".

No, I don't. When any person say their opinion, it's IMPLIED that it's their opinion. I say it if I have to but I don't say it all of the time because I do get tired saying, "in my opinion" when it's already implied.

Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn But yet, you'll defend all of them regardless of how good or bad it was. To you, they are all good and any one who says otherwise is either wrong in their opinion, or didn't get the message of the movie. Or it could be Mister M. Night needs to stop writing.

I can understand why people didn't like The Happening and won't attack them for their opinion. I never attack people because of their opinions.