|
It’s a Silly Ritual, If You AXE Me!! |
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Author | |
GTAHater767
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: October 25 2009 Location: I shall not say Online Status: Offline Posts: 1135 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: It’s a Silly Ritual, If You AXE Me!!Posted: January 28 2010 at 4:25pm |
|
This movie is best described as "stupid". Most people who like horror movies don't even like this one. There was the old Prom Night quadrilogy from the 1980's, then they let it go dormant for almost two decades, before trying to remake the first one in hopes no-one would notice. It's all too common!
NI JUU ROKU
|
|
|
RAZZIE Dirty Dozen: Battlefield Earth, F G Fingered, Pluto Nash, A Sound of Thunder, Alone in the Dark, Dirty Love, Rise Silver Srfr, Daddy Day Camp, IKWKM, The Love Guru, All About Steve, Airbender
|
|
![]() |
|
moviewizguy
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: January 23 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2136 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 05 2009 at 12:29pm |
From your other reports on what was on there or not, I really don't care anymore. It's not really impressing me. |
|
![]() |
|
Michaels
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: May 12 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2848 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 05 2009 at 2:31am |
|
Well, moviewizguy would be happy to know this movie was only listed as Worst Remake on our first voting ballot, but managed to get away without anything else...
|
|
|
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)
|
|
![]() |
|
movieman
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: May 23 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 220 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 04 2009 at 2:06pm |
|
By the way, moviewizguy, this is off-topic, but you used "whom" incorrectly. It should be "who", as far as I know. "whom" goes is used along the same usage with "him", "her", and "them". The word, "who" would be used in in the same parts of sentences as "he", "she", and "they". You wouldn't say, "them weren't likely the target", you would say, "they weren't likely the target", so the correct way to say it would be, "who weren't likely the target".
|
|
![]() |
|
Michaels
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: May 12 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2848 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 04 2009 at 1:49pm |
|
Again with the usual 6/10 rating. So with the exception of three or four movies listed in this forum, all of them are about "average" in your view. |
|
![]() |
|
wolfee37
Berry Important Member
Joined: January 03 2009 Location: Canada Online Status: Offline Posts: 60 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 04 2009 at 12:20pm |
Totally agree with you in everything you said. Took the words out of my mouth. There is a quote floating on this board somewhere (I think its on The Women board) that remake should be left for flawed films, which I completely agree with. The original was complete sh*t. Which is why I was fine with this film, unlike some other unesscesary remakes (cough*Angel Heart*cough).... |
|
![]() |
|
movieman
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: May 23 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 220 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: November 28 2008 at 7:36am |
|
I can see some of what you are saying, some of the the sound and ominous techniques might work if they were given some better direction and if the teens in peril were not complete idiots who have apparently never watched a horror movie before. And as you said, the movie is saturated in cliches and formula(you know that old cliche where the damsel in distress jumps from something she thought was the killer and it ends up being something completely harmless? That happens to Donna about 10 times).
And another thing, why would they show us the everything the killer does, there's never a moment of shock or surprise. You even see the killer check in to the hotel while another one of the teens get keys for the room. DON'T SHOW US THAT! Let us find out later and let us connect the dots you draw out. Another thing, why are you showing us a killer for so often and not tell us his motives? My best guess is that its for sexual desires, so he slaughters her family to get to her or some kind of crap like that. Which brings me to another point, I find it hard to believe that Donna would be able to heal so quickly after her teacher/killer slaughtered her brother and dad and she watched him kill her mom while she hid under the bed. From the other psychological movies and Dr. Phil I've watched, my best guess would be she ends up dropping out of school and become a drug addict that works out on sixth street. But hey, I haven't had anyone kill my family, maybe I could move on and live my life like nothing happened too. This movie might have been scary if you were to erase all the horror movies that have come in the past 30 years starting with the original Halloween, but after seeing as many horrors as I have, this is as the consensus says, "a dim and predictable remake of an already dull slasher flick". |
|
![]() |
|
moviewizguy
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: January 23 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2136 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: November 28 2008 at 7:02am |
|
Really? When I saw that, I thought it was one of the better actual scares in the movie. I didn't expect that at all because rarely any horror movie does it so I was surprised but I guess it's different from other people. |
|
![]() |
|
moviewizguy
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: January 23 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2136 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: November 28 2008 at 7:01am |
|
Donnas senior prom is supposed to be the best night of her life, one of Forget about what you've heard about this movie. Forget about the Now here comes the catcher: This movie relies more on suspense, a If you don't like the sound of that, well, skip this movie. It isn't Apart from those flaws, the film stands up pretty well. I appreciate I also liked the fact the filmmakers decided to show the killer's face Overall, the way this film was shot, the use of sound, and some other |
|
![]() |
|
movieman
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: May 23 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 220 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: November 21 2008 at 9:06am |
|
It's been said that they should only redo the movies they got wrong the first time, because it's inevitable that the remakes of good ones can't equal their predecessors. Unfortunately for this one, it was even worse than
|
|
![]() |
|
MiguelAntilsu
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: August 30 2008 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1467 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: November 21 2008 at 3:05am |
|
What was the point in creating this film? The original was terrible enough and this only makes it worse.
|
|
![]() |
|
movieman
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: May 23 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 220 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: August 20 2008 at 1:40pm |
|
I know what you mean! As soon as she hid in the closet at the climax, me
and my friend predicted that the shadow she saw would be the black detective and that the killer would pop up in the closet with her. And that's exactly what happened! |
|
![]() |
|
SchumacherH8ter
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: September 06 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2065 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: August 19 2008 at 1:15pm |
|
I HATED this movie. Me and my parents were able to predict every death before they even happened! The only reason it's not the worst movie of the year is because of "In The Name Of The King". Worst Picture, Director, Actress, Supporting Actor (for Jonathan Scheach as the deranged teacher), Worst Screenplay, Worst Screen Couple (Snow and Scheach), and Worst Remake and Rip-Off. This is way worse than "Deal".
|
|
|
Joel Schumacher is history's greatest monster!-Robot Chicken
https://twitter.com/SchumacherH8r Next-up: The Adventures Of Ford Fairlane |
|
![]() |
|
movieman
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: May 23 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 220 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 31 2008 at 1:18pm |
|
I saw this with a friend, and there were only three other people in the
theater, and the movie was fricking hilarious! seriously, if the girl victims are dumb enough to be making decisions as dumb as running down the stairs with your high heels on, then you deserve to die! if this so-called horror movie doesn't have you bursting into a round of laughter once, I'll be amazed! |
|
![]() |
|
tomsmobr
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: March 18 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 255 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: April 05 2008 at 5:03am |
|
The three SEQUELS #1 Film Freak was referring to are: Prom Night II: Hello Mary Lou: Prom Night II (1987)
|
|
![]() |
|
moviewizguy
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: January 23 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2136 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: April 04 2008 at 7:36am |
|
I'm VERY looking forward to this. One of those horror movies that looks really good. I know, it's not going to be a masterpiece. Cliched-filled or not, I will certainly enjoy this (or hope to)! I mean, look at the TV spots -- They look like they put some razzle dazzle into this picture! I don't know, but that's just me...
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |