|
Will Smith’s First Failed Oscar® Baiter?? |
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Author | |
Vits
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 01 2010 Location: Chile Online Status: Online Posts: 4824 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Will Smith’s First Failed Oscar® Baiter??Posted: November 03 2010 at 2:45pm |
|
I gave this 7/10.
|
|
![]() |
|
BurnHollywoodBurn
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 03 2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3557 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: April 02 2010 at 6:24pm |
|
|
|
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
|
|
![]() |
|
saturnwatcher
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: July 14 2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2577 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: April 02 2010 at 3:27pm |
|
|
|
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken
|
|
![]() |
|
BurnHollywoodBurn
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 03 2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3557 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: April 01 2010 at 7:47pm |
|
Well, he dies via jellyfish. That's kinda original, I guess.
|
|
|
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
|
|
![]() |
|
Vits
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 01 2010 Location: Chile Online Status: Online Posts: 4824 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: April 01 2010 at 11:54am |
|
Spoiler alert!
The problem with this movie was that they didn't realize that just because BEN is the lead character,doesn't mean we shouldn't care about the others.
Did BEN cared'bout what EMILY would feel if he dies?We didn't see how any of the characters felt'bout his mission.It all made BEN look selfish.We also didn't see if BEN got the redemption he wanted,or even if he deserved it in the 1st. place. Nevertheless,this is still the most underrated movie of 2008. I usually don't like slow movies.Specially if the climax they add up to isn't that shockin'.This is the exception. |
|
![]() |
|
GTAHater767
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: October 25 2009 Location: I shall not say Online Status: Online Posts: 1128 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 28 2010 at 4:11pm |
|
7#'s does NOT meet up to Will Smith's best standards. Hopefully it'll be a while before we can count his failures on two hands. First Wild Wild West, then Hancock, then this. While many people defend this movie (I don't get why), others suggest this as worse than The Spirit!
SAN JUU ROKU
|
|
|
RAZZIE Dirty Dozen: Battlefield Earth, F G Fingered, Pluto Nash, A Sound of Thunder, Alone in the Dark, Dirty Love, Rise Silver Srfr, Daddy Day Camp, IKWKM, The Love Guru, All About Steve, Airbender
|
|
![]() |
|
moorlock2003
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: July 15 2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 101 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: April 05 2009 at 2:41pm |
|
|
|
Fred Cooper
|
|
![]() |
|
cvcjr13
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: September 01 2006 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1161 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 08 2009 at 2:01pm |
|
Will Smith's worst movies are better than many actor's best movies. Well, except for Wild, Wild West. Wild, Wild West was terrible.
|
|
![]() |
|
Michaels
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: May 12 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2848 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 08 2009 at 12:42am |
|
Whether you hate his movies are not, Will Smith is loved by most movie-goers. So long as he doesn't use his money on hookers and drugs, I don't have any problem with it. |
|
|
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)
|
|
![]() |
|
ravishingshloka
Berry New Comer
Joined: January 07 2009 Online Status: Offline Posts: 10 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 07 2009 at 6:25pm |
|
A recent survey of theatre owners voted "7 Pounds and "Hancock" star Will Smith as the top most money making movie star.
What are your views on this??? |
|
![]() |
|
saturnwatcher
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: July 14 2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2577 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: December 31 2008 at 2:09am |
That may be the single most relevant point. People are being lured into this movie on false pretenses and then being subjected to some really gut-wrenching subject matter. Admittedly it would be difficult to market this movie without giving away some signficant plot points, but a more intellectually honest approach probably could have been offered. |
|
|
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken
|
|
![]() |
|
cvcjr13
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: September 01 2006 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1161 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: December 30 2008 at 6:04pm |
|
Good points, saturnwatcher. Seventh, not only does the movie not deal with how an audience would feel about suicide, not only does the movie not deal with how an audience would feel about "the method of his atonement", but also the movie does not deal with him being a stalker. He was violating people's privacy to the extreme. People have very negative emotions about these things, and just throwing them up there with the barest acknowledgement about these strong emotions begs for a very strong backlash. About the stalker issue, I'm reminded of the one scene in Brian Singer's Superman Returns where Superman becomes Super Stalker. Even those of us who enjoyed the movie (and, as the Razzies revealed, this movie polarized the audience) cringed as our hero used his x-ray vision to spy on Lois Lane and her family. If Superman isn't cut any slack for being a stalker, why did Will Smith think he could be a stalker and little more needs to be said about it? Eighth, the commercials for Seven Pounds are appalling. The perfect gift for the holidays? I can do without those type of gifts (and I'm still trying not to reveal too much). A love story? Well, there is a love story within the movie, but that's not what audiences are going to take away from this -- not by a longshot. Soon to come, Seven Pounds 2 (Fourteen Pounds? Forty-nine Pounds?), where a not-so-ethical bioethicist clones Ben Thomas several times so he can open his own business providing products people desperately want (I'm still trying not to reveal too much), justifying the whole thing because Thomas suffers from recurring nightmares, there's a demand that needs to be met and he has plenty of jellyfish, too. . . .
|
|
![]() |
|
saturnwatcher
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: July 14 2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2577 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: December 30 2008 at 3:35am |
|
I didn't like Seven Pounds at all, but I don't think it is a major omission Given the competition this year, I really doubt that it would have broken through to the final ballot in any category. As to the problems presented by sending out Razzie ballots, I think it should be noted that very few truly Razzable movies are ever released in the final two weeks of the year. We may miss one or two now and then, but I don't really think it is a problem that screams for any sort of reordering of the schedule that has been in place for several years. |
|
|
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken
|
|
![]() |
|
HeadRAZZBerry
Berry Important MODERATOR
Joined: April 23 2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 4490 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: December 29 2008 at 2:00am |
|
RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Proximity to the Little Gold Naked Man Awards® is now part-and-parcel of the RAZZIES®, doing it right before their ceremony being a major part of our joke. But it has become a decidedly mixed blessing ever since Oscar® moved his ceremony to Sunday from Monday about a decade ago, then jumped it forward into February from March/April. Maybe the answer to this particular dilemma would be to convince studios to pre-screen their RAZZIE® Contenders for our members like they pre-screen their Oscar® and Globe® contenders for the other gize... YEAH, RIGHT -- LIKE THAT'S EVER GONNA HAPPEN!
|
|
|
Ye Olde Head RAZZberry
|
|
![]() |
|
Michaels
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: May 12 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2848 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: December 29 2008 at 1:23am |
|
This might not be any of my business, but perhaps the Razzies need to make their own time instead of working around the Oscars, that way, deserving Christmas-released released movies will be able to get razzed. Like, instead of announcing the nods and having the award show the day before the Oscars annouce their nods and have their award show, what about announcing the nods and having the award show the WEEK AFTER the Oscars have their nod announcement and award show?
|
|
|
"Just once I want my life to be like an 80's movie ... but, no, no. John Hughes did not direct my life." ("Easy A", 2010)
|
|
![]() |
|
Mrs. Magnatech
Berry Important Member
Joined: December 09 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 71 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: December 28 2008 at 9:33am |
|
This deserved to be on the ballot in the "Worst Screenplay" category... RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: This is another example of why I hate the Oscars moving from March to February -- To have our Nominating Ballots ready to go out by Christmas, we had to take them to the printers' nearly a week ahead of time. So the list of potential contenders in each category couldn't include anything released after about Dec. 18. Along with SEVEN POUNDS, in compiling the Nominating Ballot, we also had to determine the eligibility of BEDTIME STORIES, YES MAN, VALKYRIE and THE SPIRIT without the chance to have actually seen any of them. Of course, our Voting Members alwaze have the right to write-in anything they think deserving that they feel we overlooked...
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |