Is This the 13th Film in the Series??

Originally posted by Vits I still remember when Danielle Panabaker went to a mexican talk show to promote this movie.In every promo she and the hosts were screaming.It turns out during the interview she talked about the training to be a scream queen.

And clearly even her training wasn't enough to save the movie.

I saw it last night. It's your run fo the mill, paint by numbers horror movie. It adds nothing to a series that should have been abanded decades ago. Michael Bay's quest to rape the movie business continues.

I can't keep watchin'this,nor the NIGHTMARE IN ELM STREET and CHILD PLAY movies.Why?The villians always come back with no explanation,except they're inmortal or somethin'.I just feels endless.

I know you're not going to go this far, but I believe it was in the RAZZIES' best interests to nominate this for Worst Prequel, Sequel, Remake, or Ripoff.

Originally posted by dEd Grimley Isn't that original conversation from like a year ago?

Yeah, well over a year actually. It started all the way back with "Disaster Movie", in which MWG gave the movie his usual 6 or higher out of 10 review and called the movie "funny". Thus began 10 pages worth of debate that the movie sucked on every level and he didn't know what he was talking. But then "DM" managed to get away scott-free of any award "wins", so all the pages are useless now, just as bringing this thread back to life is pointless. But you know, MWG likes to point out how I'm always saying it's his taste in movies that we mock, not his IQ, so why is it he once again has to bring up his GPA? You wou'd if I posted something so many times, it would get through to him.

(Oh, and I believe GPA debate ended with us agreeing that yes, SOME schools do go as high as 5.0 or 6.0, but I was 3.6 out of 4.0 back in my high school days when 4.0 was the standard, not that this little factoid has anything to do with my taste in movies).

*Bringing discussion back to life*

Originally posted by Michaels I was about to say, those numbers did seem made up. I KNOW for a fact that a perfect SAT score is 1600, and seeing as how MWG said 1400 just goes to show he hasn't taken the test yet. And there's no way they would raise the score to 2100 without it making front page news across the country.

They added a new section to the SAT, the WRITING portion, which counts as another 800 so there is 2400 points total. In the writing, you deal with grammar and such along with writing an essay which is scored between 1 and 12, I think. You can look this up on Google. More info here: http://homeworktips.about.com/od/standardizedtests/a/writing .htm

But I can believe in a 5.0 GPA, but anything higher still sounds made up.

It's called a "weighted" GPA. It's out of 6 points. "Unweighted" GPA is out of 4.

But if he really thinks that makes him so much smater, just a little tidbit, I my GPA was 3.6 out of 4.0. And I have a feeling most people here had GPAs just as high if not higher, so I wouldn't be so quick to throw around words like "morons", "stupid", "idiots", etc.

I finally got my transcript which have both my weighted and unweighted GPA scores and my GPA out of 4 is a 3.7778.

It's just fate, I tells ya.

I think they use re-boot to sound more positive, actually. But the REAL official term should be "Razzie Nominee".