|
The BERRY WORST Movie of 2010 (Thru Aug. 31) |
Post Reply
|
Page 123 4> |
| Author | |
Vheid
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: December 10 2010 Location: Utrecht Online Status: Online Posts: 977 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: The BERRY WORST Movie of 2010 (Thru Aug. 31)Posted: January 10 2011 at 7:58am |
|
I am a voting member and have the nomination ballot right here in my hand. So i can say to you that it isn't on the shortlist for worst picture.
|
|
![]() |
|
Film Reel Redemption
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: August 19 2010 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 311 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 10 2011 at 7:54am |
|
The reason I mentioned 'Burlesque' Vhied was coz, according to some news sources, it's on the Razzie shortlist so in your case, it would be a horse so dark you wouldn't even know it was there.
|
|
|
You see in this filmmaking world there's two types of people my friend. Those with the knowledge of film and those who think they do but really don't.
|
|
![]() |
|
Vheid
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: December 10 2010 Location: Utrecht Online Status: Online Posts: 977 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 10 2011 at 5:53am |
|
Film Reel, didn't see Burlesque on the worst picture shortlist of my nomination ballot, so you can forget about that one.
|
|
![]() |
|
Film Reel Redemption
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: August 19 2010 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 311 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 09 2011 at 11:52pm |
|
If you ask my opinion, either 'The Last Fart-Bender' or 'Vampires Suck... BUT NOT AS MUCH AS THIS MOVIE!' have the Worst Picture trophy in the bag (unless there are dark horses, like 'Burlesque' and 'Eek-Lips', waiting in the wings to seize their chances).
|
|
|
You see in this filmmaking world there's two types of people my friend. Those with the knowledge of film and those who think they do but really don't.
|
|
![]() |
|
BurnHollywoodBurn
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 03 2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3557 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: November 18 2010 at 4:29pm |
|
|
|
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
|
|
![]() |
|
shaurya
Berry Good Friend
Joined: November 15 2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 23 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: November 18 2010 at 4:01am |
|
I ll consider the last airbender as well !
|
|
![]() |
|
bigbar4
Berry New Comer
Joined: November 04 2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 6 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: November 04 2010 at 6:44pm |
|
"Sex and the City, Too" really hits home in a lot of the essential emotional elements of filmmaking, but it goes about these desired effects in an entirely backwards fashion. This is a film that may quite easily have the audience laughing, crying, getting sick to their stomachs, vomiting, and even contemplating suicide. The emotional rollercoaster that is "Sex and the City, Too" achieves such successes by literally forcing viewers to sit through nearly two and a half hours of greedy, whiny, stubborn, ignorant, lazy, and UGLY middle aged women who are obsessed with dressing up like drag queens despite the fact that they are presented as females. Not only does this movie contain the same excruciatingly gluttonous (lack of a) plot as the series and the first movie, it is set in Dubai making it all the more "in your face". Featuring guest appearances from Miley Cyrus and Liza Manelli, "Sex and the City, Too" should easily "win" a few categories and hopefully it will be re-considered by certain people for "Worst Picture" before the spray painted gold is handed out.
|
|
![]() |
|
camillechen
Berry New Comer
Joined: July 22 2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: November 01 2010 at 7:46pm |
|
Sex and the City 2! |
|
![]() |
|
BurnHollywoodBurn
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 03 2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3557 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 14 2010 at 5:09pm |
|
It was mentioned that Dev Patel might have choosen to star in "Last Airbender" due to M. Night Shyamalan, who has been getting his work greenlit based on successes he had in the (distant) past. Considering you and MWG are so quick to defend him, it would appear that, like Shyalmalan's career, your love of his movies are best on his (distant) past successes. I know you didn't call him the next Spielberg, a magazine writer did ... and he couldn't have been any more wrong. RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Actually, Shyamalan wasn't just written about as "The Next Spielberg," he was featured on the cover of NEWSWEEK with that headline in the wake of his early successes SIXTH SENSE and SIGNS... |
|
|
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
|
|
![]() |
|
Vits
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 01 2010 Location: Chile Online Status: Offline Posts: 4800 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 14 2010 at 12:35pm |
|
Whatever it is I think of Shyamalan, I accept that others don't like him. I never said he was the next Spielberg. My point was that what you said earlier about MWG and me was obviously an insult, and I thought it came out of nowhere.
|
|
![]() |
|
BurnHollywoodBurn
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 03 2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3557 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 13 2010 at 7:04pm |
|
What? it's true! M. Night is living off his past success and you guys worship the ground he walks on like he's still a genius who pops out one Oscar-worthy blockbuster after another ... which he doesn't! He's not the next Spielberg, he's the new Mike Cimino.
|
|
|
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
|
|
![]() |
|
Vits
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 01 2010 Location: Chile Online Status: Offline Posts: 4800 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 13 2010 at 6:16pm |
|
Was that called for? I don't think so.
|
|
![]() |
|
BurnHollywoodBurn
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 03 2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3557 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 13 2010 at 3:40pm |
|
Better question, do moviewizguy and Vits understand that "for awhile now, Shyamalan has rested on his laurels"? My guess: no.
|
|
|
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
|
|
![]() |
|
cvcjr13
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: September 01 2006 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1161 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 13 2010 at 2:56am |
|
Once someone asked a long time ago if I would deny the mighty Zeus his aegis. That should be a catchphrase.
Perhaps Dev Patel held M. Night Shyamalan in high regard. That's not a stretch. Shyamalan went from Mahé, Puducherry, India all the way not only to become a top director in Hollywood, but also one who made one of the most highly regarded films of all time, The Sixth Sense. The question is, did Patel also know that, for awhile now, Shyamalan has rested on his laurels, or to be more accurate, used his past success to greenlight poorer and poorer scripts? If he didn't, or even if he did, it's understandable why he would collaborate with Shyamalan. And wasn't The Last Airbender a popular cartoon before it became a laughably bad movie? The great director from India coupled with a live action version of a popular cartoon series - it seems understandable why Patel would take the role.
But that doesn't detract from this being a bad next step in Patel's career, nor should it excuse a bad performance or a well-deserved Razzie nomination in the future. I'm just saying it's understandable.
Besides, Patel is London born and raised, his parents are Gujuratis from Kenya, and, if that's not removed far enough, the state of Gujurat is on the complete other side of India from Puducherry, complete with its own local language. If Patel felt great about Shyamalan, it would be like us cheering on the Olympians from our country. It's national pride, but we don't know them and they're probably not from our neighborhood.
And that doesn't excuse one from recognizing that Zeus' aegis is way too short.
|
|
![]() |
|
BurnHollywoodBurn
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 03 2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3557 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 12 2010 at 9:37pm |
|
I think Dev Patel is getting the most hate because of poor career choices. He goes from the Best Picture Oscar winner "Slumdog Millionaire" to this, the most critically panned movie of the year?!
|
|
|
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
|
|
![]() |
|
Vits
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 01 2010 Location: Chile Online Status: Offline Posts: 4800 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 10 2010 at 3:26pm |
|
I'm confused. All the true hate for AIRBENDER seems to go to Dev Patel. Most comments about Noah Ringer, Nicola Peltz and Jackson Rathbone are because critics hated the movie as a whole. But even if those 4 gave awful performances, they're not the only main actors, right? It wouldn't be fair to award the others if they don't deserve it.
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 123 4> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum |