|
FORUM FEEDBACK on 2011 RELEASES LIST |
Post Reply
|
Page 123 178> |
| Author | |
SuperTeenTopia
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: August 18 2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 304 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: FORUM FEEDBACK on 2011 RELEASES LISTPosted: February 26 2012 at 12:43pm |
|
I have just gotten word of this year's nods, and I figured I'd return to comment on it. Adam Sandler. That name makes me shudder in disgust. Along with Michael Bay, Sandler is the leader of what I like to call “Nimrod Nation Movies”. These two cater to the lowest common dominator of film goers who wouldn’t know what a good movie was if one bit them on the face (like a certain other person we all know). If you have seen one movie from either man, you have seen them all. Bay does nothing but uncalled for slow motion, car chases (usually with Hummers), models and other good looking women who lack in acting ability and are used for nothing but sexist reasons, racist undertones, piss poor writing, and LOTS of explosions. Sandler uses the humor of a 12 year, always casting himself as a “lovable” moron who is anything but, and always gets what he wants in the end out of dumb luck and doesn’t learn anything from the whole experience; lather, rinse, and repeat since 1995. That being said, I am more than glad to see both of these worthless sacks of flesh (I mean that strictly from a film historian/critic POV) have more than plenty of chances of taking home two fists full of spray painted gold! For the longest time, it seemed that “The Sly Guy” and Madonna were the Razzies’ personal punching bag (at least at the actual awards, the forum is a whole other story), with Sly’s record 10 wins and Madonna’s runner-up 9 wins. But in one night, Sandler might tie or break either one of those records! I can’t think of a better person to get such an “honor”! AND, “Jack & Jill” is also likely to break the win record of “I Know Who Killed Me”, so this will be a history making Razzies indeed. That being said, I am looking VERY (or BERRY) forward to this year’s April Fools’ Day (something I usually never say). Here’s my rundown of each category and my opinion of it. WORST PICTURE In my opinion, it’s a two picture race between “Jack & Jill” and “Trannies 3”. I highly doubt “Bucky Larson”, as bad as it is, was seen by enough voters to win. That and considering how low profile the movie was, it wouldn’t be a “big” enough win. “New Year’s Eve” was just made for the sole reason of getting Worst Ensemble. Even though it wasted all 20 of its celebrity stars, as a movie, it wasn’t the worst the year had to offer. I know there’s a certain member on the forum who would love nothing more for “Twilight Part 4 of 5” to get the win, but it’s not going to, simply because there’s still the grand finale of the series to go, so it’s not like we’re losing anything by it not winning this year. That leaves “J&J” and “T3”. “J&J” is the bigger target. Sandler being so in love with himself, he just HAD to cast himself in both lead roles. Throw in Mrs. Couch Jumper (aka Katie Holmes) and Mr. “I Have No Self-Respect Left, I’ll Take Any Role Offered to Me and Either Sleepwalk or Scene Chew My Way through It” (aka Al Pacino), and you have the ultimate Razzie pandering movie! “T3”, on the other hand, is just more of the same from the series, and if it doesn’t win, hey, there’s always “Trannies 4”! Who Will/Should Win: “Jack & Jill” WORST ACTOR Nic Cage is an even bigger whore than Al Pacino, but when you are up to your eyeballs in debt from buying houses, comic books, castles, a car once owned by the Prince of Persia, a dinosaur skull, islands (yes, the man bought ISLANDS!), you’d probably have to accept every project put in front of you, too! The shirtless guy from “Twilight” (that’s what this poor kid will forever be remembered for, so why bother knowing his actual name!?) is a non-factor in my opinion, and he’ll probably get another nod next year for “Twilight 5 of 5” anyway. The guy from “Bucky Larson” is also a non-factor, again because of how low profile the movie was. And as much as everyone hated the “”Arthur” remake, Russell Brand is not that big of a target either. That leaves us with Sandler, for not one, but two movies (as if one movie of his per year wasn’t enough!). That being said, Sandler is the shoe-in, as he was just begging the Razzies for attention this year! Who Will/Should Win: Adam Sandler WORST ACTRESS Two of which are not even women! Everyone hates Sarah Jessica Parker, and I don’t blame, seeing as how the media praises her like she is God’s gift to women’s entertainment, even though the woman has the face of a horse and subpar acting ability. Kirsten Stewart is pretty much a robot, but she will have yet another choice at this award next year. When it comes down to who will actually win, it’s either Sarah Palin or Adam Sandler. If Palin wins, it’s just a big middle finger to her, but do we really want to give this woman an excuse to lengthen her 15 minutes of fame, especially when HBO is already doing a TV movie about her? So, I’m hoping for Sandler getting what’s coming to him, and hoping that he’ll finally realize that speaking in a high pitched voice doesn’t mean you automatically sound like a woman! Who Will/Should Win: Either Adam Sandler or Sarah Palin (Hopefully Sandler) WORST SUPPORTING ACTOR I consider Dempsey and Franco as non-factors; they are just here to fill a spot. This race is between Al Pacino, Ken Jeong and Nick Swanson. As I said, Panico is just drifting his way through the twilight of his career. Jeong’s agent seemed to be hell-bent on having his client in every bad movie of last year, kind of like a reverse Jessica Chastain, who was in just about every good movie from last year. And Swanson is just one of Sandler’s buddies, which means Sandler puts him in all of his movies, regardless of his buddies have any talent to speak of! In the end, this is just who will be guiltier by association, in which case, I give it to Jeong, since he can’t hide behind Sandler as an excuse to why he was in all of the worst movies last year. Who Will/Should Win: Ken Jeong WORST SUPPORTING ACTRESS Again, two of these women aren’t even women! Nicole Kidman is just filling a spot; she’s only here because she should know better than appearing in an Adam Sandler movie. I’m guessing her mortgage was due or Sandler had blackmail photos of her. This leaves us with another guilty by association result: Katie Holmes (for being ½ of TomKat), David Spade (for being among Sandler’s friends), or that Victoria’s Secret model (do talentless models turn actresses Cindy Crawford and Estella Warren ring any bells?). In the end, I think this win belongs to the VS model, whom was casted for the sole reason of Michael Bay exploiting her body! Who Will/Should Win: The Victoria’s Secret Model WORST ENSEMBLE Once again, “Bucky Larson” is too small, “Twilight” will have yet another chance next year. That leaves “Trannies 3”, “New Year’s Eve”, and “Jack & Jill”. “NYE” was made just for this category, but “J&J” loaded itself with Razzie favorites. “T3” is just guilty by association. In the end, this will just add to the win tally for “J&J”, because it’s just so gosh darn tempting. Who Will/Should Win: Either New Year’s Eve or Jack & Jill (Probably the latter) WORST SCREEN COUPLE I’m not sure why this category exists. I was under the impression Worst Ensemble was created as a replacement for many reasons, namely because movies nowadays are crammed with “name” celebrities in just about every role, no matter how small said role maybe, so “couples” are no longer a trend. That and Ensemble also mocks the SAG Awards (or “Saggies”), while Screen Couple is nod to the MTV Movie Awards, and why would you want to associate yourself with that fecal matter of a program (or overall network)!? That being said, this will just add to Sandler’s tally. Who Will/Should Win: Either one of Sandler’s nods (Probably the one for “Jack & Jill”) WORST REMAKE, PREQUEL, SEQUEL, REBOOT, RIP-OFF (or as I call them, the only movies Hollywood makes these days!) Again, this will just add to the win tally for “Jack & Jill”. However, I would personally like to see it go to “Hangover 2”, for being the laziest excuse for a movie possible, just a cutting and pasting from the first movie! Who Will/Should Win: Either “Jack & Jill” or “Hangover 2” (I would prefer the latter) WORST SCREENPLAY Oh wow, this is the hardest to call. All of these screenplays are from the bottom of the barrel! Part of me would really, really, really like to see it go to “Trannies 3”, but I know it will most likely go to the win tally for “Jack & Jill”, again because it’s the juicier target. Who Will/Should Win: Either “Trannies 3” or “Jack & Jill” (Probably the latter) WORST DIRECTOR Call me bias if you will (which I sure is what will happen), but I’m giving this one to Michael Bay. This man is a talentless hack, but Hollywood is still going to give this man work, so long as dumb people who enjoy looking at pretty explosions and shiny CGI keep paying to see his trash! Who Will/Should Win: Michael “Attention Span of 4 Seconds” Bay So, there you go; my two cents. You asked for it, and now you have it. Enjoy Oscar night, flaws and all! |
|
|
"People say 'It's all about the story’. When you're making tentpole films, bull$hit." -Andy Hendrickson (Disney Animation Studios' Chief Technical Officer)
|
|
![]() |
|
mbh
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: April 24 2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 356 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: February 25 2012 at 10:57pm |
|
I personally would have put Smurfs instead of Breaking Dawn as well. Like BurnHollywoodBurn already said last year, I'm worried as well about the reputation of the Razzies if there is too much focus on certain franchises.
But Sandler's nominations are getting positive responses. |
|
![]() |
|
GTAHater767
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: October 25 2009 Location: I shall not say Online Status: Offline Posts: 1127 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: February 25 2012 at 6:44pm |
|
2011 had MUCH better choices for RAZZIE finalists than 2010, with only 3 mild to moderate complaints: 1) Too few films swept the nominations, with 17 titles nominated (18 if you count The Son of No One, for Katie Holmes for Worst Actress). Luckily, the only film that got nominations it didn't deserve was Drive Angry 3D, which had a merely below average 45% approval rating.2) The following seven films were not high enough on the RAZZIE radar:
The Smurfs 3D (moreso than any other film that dodged nominations!) The Roommate
Red Riding Hood Atlas Shrugged Part IAlvin & the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked
The Human Centipede II: Full Sequence (to a lesser extent. It should've gotten 1 nomination for Tom 6)
3) Transformers: Dark of the Moon and The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part I were both a little too high on the radar. At least Breaking Dawn Part I got bad reviews as opposed to the average reviews for Twilight Eclipse, but still!: How did these two both beat The Smurfs 3D for a Worst Picture nomination?
To HeadRAZZ: If you're reading this, then quote/copy this post, add it to your forum for the 2011 RAZZIE finalists and winners feedback discussion, and add your response in that topic instead.
|
|
|
RAZZIE Dirty Dozen: Battlefield Earth, F G Fingered, Pluto Nash, A Sound of Thunder, Alone in the Dark, Dirty Love, Rise Silver Srfr, Daddy Day Camp, IKWKM, The Love Guru, All About Steve, Airbender
|
|
![]() |
|
moviewizguy
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: January 23 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2136 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 29 2012 at 12:39pm |
|
It's been known for awhile that Drive wouldn't get nominated for Best Picture, because it's not much of what the Academy likes.
|
|
![]() |
|
saturnwatcher
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: July 14 2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2577 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 24 2012 at 6:36pm |
|
Extremely Loud and War Horse were decidedly surprise picks -- the smart money seemed to be on Bridesmaids to get nominated as well. I've already noted this on another thread, but snubbing Project Nim in the Best Feature Documentary category is one of AMPAS's greatest injustices in years.
|
|
|
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken
|
|
![]() |
|
jesse685
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: May 12 2011 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 420 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 24 2012 at 3:07pm |
|
I am very unhappy with some of the Oscar nominations. Extremely Loud & Incredibly Trite (Peter Travers called it that) over Drive for Best Picture. WTF? |
|
|
"If you can't make it good, make it 3D!" Peter Travers, Rolling Stone
F**k Yeah/WTF Were They Thinking Awards Results Live-Tweet @jesse685 |
|
![]() |
|
Vits
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 01 2010 Location: Chile Online Status: Offline Posts: 4821 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 24 2012 at 9:59am |
|
Also, I forgot that there were no nominations for 50/50, MELANCHOLIA, WIN WIN, TAKE SHELTER, WE NEED TO TALKA ABOUT KEVIN nor SHAME.
|
|
![]() |
|
Vits
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 01 2010 Location: Chile Online Status: Offline Posts: 4821 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 24 2012 at 6:25am |
|
The Oscar nominations have been announced (I saw them live because here it was 10:30 AM):
-Best Picture nominess ended up being 9, with EXTREMELY LOUD & INCREDIBLY CLOSE getting a nomination over BRIDESMAIDS! And DRIVE, which only got one nomination for Best Sound Editing?! -Woody Allen for Best Director over Nicolas Winding Refn?! -Yesterday I read that GoldDerby predicted Demián Bichir from A BETTER LIFE sneaking into Best Actor, and he did. But Leonardo DiCaprio was snubbed. I saw J. EDGAR a few days ago, and he deserved the nomination. -Max Von Sydow also sneaked in, snubbing Albert Brooks. -As I said a few days ago, I didn't mind who won Best Animated Film between TINTIN, KUNG FU PANDA 2 and RANGO, because I thought they were equally good. But TINTIN was left out, and instead they put that awful PUSS IN BOOTS, and 2 foreign movies sneaked in. TINTIN did get a nomination for Best Score, and I thought that was it's weakest part. It was too similar to John Williams' previous works, specially CATCH ME IF YOU CAN. -TRANNIES 3 is up for 3 including Best Visual Effects. It's against REAL STEEL, which I thought had awful effects. They could've chosen SUPER 8, THOR, GHOST PROTOCOL, and even FINAL DESTINATION 5 and SUCKER PUNCH! -Most people wanted HARRY POTTER to be up for Best Picture, and it deserved it since it was among the best reviewed movies of the year. It's only up for the techincal categories (some said Alan Rickman was a safe bet).The same for THE MUPPETS, which is only up for Best Song. -Some here thought Madonna's W.E. and Roland Emmerich's ANONYMOUS could be nominated for the Razzies. The former still has possibilities. Meanwhile, both movies are up for Best Costume Design. -UNDEFEATED is up for Best Documentary. But wait! It's not the one with Sarah Palin.
|
|
![]() |
|
saturnwatcher
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: July 14 2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2577 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 23 2012 at 8:07am |
|
I know we don't spend a lot of time speaking of the year's best movies, but I wanted to chime in quickly on the Oscar race. Goldderby.com is spotting The Artist as the odds on favorite to take home Best Picture. I saw it over the weekend and I would definitely agree that it is a unique and very entertaining movie. It could only be pulled off once and they did a great job. But out of the three apparent frontrunners, I would still place The Help on top for story, social relevance and quality of acting with The Artist second and The Descendents a rather distant 3rd.
|
|
|
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken
|
|
![]() |
|
GTAHater767
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: October 25 2009 Location: I shall not say Online Status: Offline Posts: 1127 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 22 2012 at 9:16am |
|
This is posted here because the Schedule topic is locked... YOU DELAYED THEM?! But you didn't wait until April Fool's Day 2007 to hold the Worst of 2006 RAZZIES, so will you please revert the schedule? If not, I hope you're satisfied, HeadRAZZ, because this announcement ruined my weekend! I had my whole weekend planned around the nominations, and you just ripped them away, and I can't ignore such a thing. Plus you need to redeem yourself after the NUMEROUS mistakes that were made with the Worst of 2010 RAZZIES! |
|
|
RAZZIE Dirty Dozen: Battlefield Earth, F G Fingered, Pluto Nash, A Sound of Thunder, Alone in the Dark, Dirty Love, Rise Silver Srfr, Daddy Day Camp, IKWKM, The Love Guru, All About Steve, Airbender
|
|
![]() |
|
Vits
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 01 2010 Location: Chile Online Status: Offline Posts: 4821 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 19 2012 at 6:53am |
![]() |
|
saturnwatcher
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: July 14 2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2577 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 18 2012 at 7:28pm |
|
|
|
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken
|
|
![]() |
|
Vits
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 01 2010 Location: Chile Online Status: Offline Posts: 4821 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 18 2012 at 2:26pm |
|
But wasn't your show's slogan "The Razzie version of the Golden Globes"? Anyway, can we participate?
|
|
![]() |
|
MiguelAntilsu
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: August 30 2008 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1463 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 18 2012 at 1:55pm |
|
I am doing the Methane Movie Awards this year, Vits. I'm just scheduling them closer to the Oscars and the Razzies because A. Those two shows are more relevant than the Golden Globes and B. I don't want to associate my awards with the Golden Globes.
Saturnwatcher, I don't think you saw the part where I bemoaned the Producers Guild of America's choices for Best Picture. I was going to create an award show in response to their choices because only five of them were in my Top 10. The HFPA and the Golden Globes have nothing to do with it.
|
|
![]() |
|
Vits
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 01 2010 Location: Chile Online Status: Offline Posts: 4821 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 18 2012 at 10:56am |
|
I just saw THE ADVENTURES OF TINTIN... in 3D! If you haven't seen it, the 3D is alright but not necessary. As for the Oscars, the movie is as good as RANGO and KUNG FU PANDA 2.
Sorry to put this so late, but here are the worst movies of the year according to R.T.
|
|
![]() |
|
saturnwatcher
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: July 14 2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2577 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 16 2012 at 8:24am |
|
|
|
Nine times out of ten, in art as in life, there is no truth to be discovered, only an error to be exposed.--H.L. Menken
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 123 178> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum |