Two Minutes from Now, You’ll FORGET This!

I don't know, after reading more of your post, you seem to really like movies that are gimmicked up, with plot twists and "irony" and no closure. For most critics and audiences, we like this thing called "story structure". You know, beginning, middle, and end? Yeah, this movie didn't have that last part, no matter how much you try to defend it, it just didn't. I like movies with structure, not gimmicks.

They had every right to be mad, the whole movie was one big c***tease. I don't know why anyone would want to defend a movie with the biggest metor creater sized plot hole in the history of filmmaking ... until "Transformers 2" came along, that was an entire metor shower.

Originally posted by moviewizguy Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn No, that's still a gapping plot hole since they didn't explain why Jessica Biel's future is an exception to the rule. In the end, he didn't save anything, because the entire movie you just watched didn't happen, which is just a big b**** slap in the face of the audience. Dude, it was a chillfhanger, there was no closure. For all we know, he will fail to stop the bomb no matter what. Uh-huh. You say he wouldn't stop the bomb. Why not? He can go back where he started everytime he fails. how could he not find a way to stop the bomb? The audience is left to assume that he'll eventually find a way to stop the bomb. He may need to take 100 more turns to finally get it right or maybe even one more time, but that doesn't change the fact that he will eventually find a way to defeat the baddies and save the day.

Originally posted by Vits But it's not 100% sure that he'll stop it,and that's the point.

I find it highly unlikely for a person to not succeed in something if he has unlimited ways to change the way he tries achieve it. It's like a test with multiple choice. You don't know a question so you guess out of 4 choices. You find out you circled in the wrong answer. You go back in time and change it. If it's wrong again, you go back and change it. Eventually, you'll get the right answer and that's what the ending of this film was trying to portray.

Originally posted by moviewizguy Originally posted by Vits But it's not 100% sure that he'll stop it,and that's the point. I find it highly unlikely for a person to not succeed in something if he has unlimited ways to change the way he tries achieve it. It's like a test with multiple choice. You don't know a question so you guess out of 4 choices. You find out you circled in the wrong answer. You go back in time and change it. If it's wrong again, you go back and change it. Eventually, you'll get the right answer and that's what the ending of this film was trying to portray.

Well,I don't think it's 50-50.Remember that he can see ev'ry possible outcome,and there's an infinite number of those.I really think it's closer to 99%.

Not really.Remember that when he's around LIZ,he can see more than 2 minutes into the future.From that moment when he wakes up with her,which is when the last scene begins,he can see ev'rythin',and time won't go by.

Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn Yeah, but then he left Liz. Now it's the return of the plot hole, how long can he see into the future now, why was the rule changed when around Liz? I'm sure you liked the movie and considered it something different, but it's flawed no matter what way you spin it.

It's like saying why does a dead princess come back to life when her true love kisses her. You just go along with it.