Official RAZZIE® Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > General MOVIE & DVD Discussions > Talk Amongst Yourselves
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Who thinks Ridley Scott's Robin Hood needs a nom?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Who thinks Ridley Scott's Robin Hood needs a nom?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
oiram View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: June 28 2010
Location: America
Online Status: Online
Posts: 1198
Post Options Post Options   Quote oiram Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Who thinks Ridley Scott's Robin Hood needs a nom?
    Posted: August 11 2010 at 5:24am
I really disliked this moive, first Ridley Scott movie that has really let me down.
So boring (I mean Star Wars Prequel Trilogy Boring), some performances were not right, over the top, or bland (looking at you, Cate), the title was extremely misleading, the action scenes (matter of fact, alot of scenes) were shot very badly, and of course, the movie was unfaithful to the original story.


Elizabeth Hartman and Judith Barsi are much more talented and beautiful than Scarlett Johansson and Chloe Grace Moretz. Fact.


Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 11 2010 at 8:50am
If you want, you can pay a mere $35 to become a voting Razzie member (LINK) and vote for the movie as a write-in. But to the rest of us, there were movies FAR worse than Robin Hood that came out this year.
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
oiram View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: June 28 2010
Location: America
Online Status: Online
Posts: 1198
Post Options Post Options   Quote oiram Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 12 2010 at 4:23am
I'm quite aware that voting memberships are available online. I still think maybe Ridley Scott should be nominated for Worst Director, as he obviously can (and has!) done better.  

Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

If you want, you can pay a mere $35 to become a voting Razzie member (LINK) and vote for the movie as a write-in. But to the rest of us, there were movies FAR worse than Robin Hood that came out this year.


Elizabeth Hartman and Judith Barsi are much more talented and beautiful than Scarlett Johansson and Chloe Grace Moretz. Fact.


Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557
Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 12 2010 at 8:15pm
Yes, but as much as this movie might have been boring or a box office bomb, it is not nearly the level of bad directing on Scott's part for our consideration. It's not like he's M. Night Shamamladingdong and had no clue whatsoever about how to film an epic action movie. Frankly, I think it was a bad move on Scott's part by making a movie that was too identical to "Gladitor", not to mention that there has already been too many Robin Hood movies to begin with. The public just didn't want to pay $10 for something they could rent for half that price. In other words, this is just a hiccup for Scott, but nothing really worth our attention.  

Originally posted by oiram

I'm quite aware that voting memberships are available online. I still think maybe Ridley Scott should be nominated for Worst Director, as he obviously can (and has!) done better.
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down