|
YAY! (And Also YUCK!) UWE’s BACK!! |
Post Reply
|
Page <1234> |
| Author | ||
SchumacherH8ter
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: September 06 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2015 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: YAY! (And Also YUCK!) UWE’s BACK!!Posted: January 21 2008 at 12:28am |
|
|
||
|
Joel Schumacher is history's greatest monster!-Robot Chicken
https://twitter.com/SchumacherH8r Next-up: The Oogieloves |
||
![]() |
||
Bonogamy
Berry New Comer
Joined: January 21 2008 Location: Canada Online Status: Offline Posts: 4 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 21 2008 at 2:25pm |
|
|
I've heard that this Toilet Boll dump cost anywhere from 60-70 million dollars. I'm actually tempted to see it: In the Name of the King OPENED at my local second run movie house and it would only cost three bucks to go for a matinee on my day off. If that's not a telling sign of how far Boll has dropped (albeit it's not a long drop), I don't know what is.
I have a question for fans of Dungeon Siege: I've never played the game, but in your opinion could the game have been made into a better movie? I'm a big supporter of GTA: Vice City and GTA: San Andreas, and I'm of the opinion that neither game could be made into a good movie since it would essentially be a knock off of movies and TV shows that portray the essence of the games more accurately and authentically (Scarface, Miami Vice, New Jack City and Boys in the Hood, for example, mostly because the games were inspired by them.) I'm assuming Warcraft will be made into a movie (if it's already not in production,) but I have no idea how the game will translate into a quality movie without seeming like a deliberate rip-off of Jackson's LotR. For most fans of Warcraft, the movie will always pale in comparison to the game, and I'm wondering why there isn't more of a gamer backlash to Hollywood's money-grubbing cynicism that gamers will empty their wallets at anything with their games' name on it. Hopefully, In the Name of the King is the beginning of that backlash. |
||
|
Dreams for Stallone sequels:
Hawk: Over the Top Part II Marion Cobretti: Cobra Part II Joe Bomowski: Stop! Or My Mom Will Shoot Part II Nick Martinelli Rides Again: Rhinestone Part II |
||
![]() |
||
Sanndman228715
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: July 31 2005 Online Status: Offline Posts: 524 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 24 2008 at 8:40am |
|
|
I disagree with with the opinion that Liotta's best work since Goodfellas was Grand Theft Auto Vice City. I thought he was great in Narc, and good in Cop Land, and The Rat Pack. Anyway I saw Dungeon Siege yesterday. I am amazed at the incompetance of the film. ( Ninjas in that time period, in that part of the world?!) This film had so many unintentional laughs I lost count. Almost everyone in the cast either looked uninterested in the film, or angry to be in it ( Or both, like Burt Reynolds) But the acting "Dis-honors" goes to Matthiew Lillard, who has to be seen to believed. Let's just say that Jim Carrey's Ace Ventura would tell him to "Tone it down, a little bit", and thank God the film wasn't in 3-D or half of the audience would have came in raincoats in preparation for everytime Lillard opened his mouth. I'm a fan of Ray Liotta, but the man seriously needs to get a new agent. However, I'm happy to say that "The Uwe Boll Actor curse" has finally been broken. There was a performance in it that I and the guy sitting in front of me dared call, in 100% sincerity "Pretty good". John Rhys Davis did a good job as the good wizard. So remember kids, if you have a horrible script that is going to be made into a film, get a Shakespearian actor to play at least one part, it will come in handy ( For referance see McDiarmid, Ian in Star Wars Episode 3). Still, one decent performance is one more than in all of Uwe's other American films combined. (Well, I think, I never saw BloodRayne) |
||
![]() |
||
cvcjr13
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: September 01 2006 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1161 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 24 2008 at 2:50pm |
|
|
John Rhys-Davies gave a good performance in the awful Chupacabra Terror, too. He seems to be one of the most dependable actors out there, even when he's a tall man pretending to be four feet tall! |
||
![]() |
||
cvcjr13
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: September 01 2006 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1161 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 24 2008 at 5:10pm |
|
|
The bad news: The good news: I'm sad about this in a way. ITNOTK's failure means that Postal may never be released in theatres in Los Angeles or New York. |
||
![]() |
||
Sanndman228715
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: July 31 2005 Online Status: Offline Posts: 524 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: January 25 2008 at 12:36pm |
|
|
Rhys-Davies is like Brian Cox, Brenden Gleeson, and Timothy Spall, in that they're usually good, no matter how bad the film they're in is. Like Cvcjr said, they're all good, dependable character actors.
|
||
![]() |
||
bts228
Berry New Comer
Joined: February 13 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: February 13 2008 at 11:48am |
|
|
Didn't Leelee Sobieski used to be one of the most talented "up-and-coming"
actors? What the hell happened? |
||
![]() |
||
SchumacherH8ter
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: September 06 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2015 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: February 14 2008 at 9:22am |
|
|
Sobieski was, also, in "The Liquor Man".
|
||
|
Joel Schumacher is history's greatest monster!-Robot Chicken
https://twitter.com/SchumacherH8r Next-up: The Oogieloves |
||
![]() |
||
SchumacherH8ter
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: September 06 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2015 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: February 18 2008 at 4:54am |
|
|
||
|
Joel Schumacher is history's greatest monster!-Robot Chicken
https://twitter.com/SchumacherH8r Next-up: The Oogieloves |
||
![]() |
||
Mayhem5185
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: October 10 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 259 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: February 19 2008 at 5:28pm |
|
|
John Rhys-Davies is a movie whore plain and simple, however no matter how bad the movie is, he will still gives it his all (One only has too look at his appearance in the VG Dune 2000 and Wing Commander) Ron Perlman is kinda the same way too, although I haven't heard anything about his performance in this movie yet.
|
||
![]() |
||
Sanndman228715
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: July 31 2005 Online Status: Offline Posts: 524 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March 04 2008 at 8:40am |
|
|
I like Ron Perlman, I thought he made the perfect Hellboy, but even he looked kind of uninterested during the film, as did everyone else who wasn't either A.) Overacting or B.) John Rhys-Davies.
|
||
![]() |
||
SchumacherH8ter
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: September 06 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2015 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: March 04 2008 at 10:57am |
|
|
I like Ron Perlman and he was perfect as Hellboy.
|
||
|
Joel Schumacher is history's greatest monster!-Robot Chicken
https://twitter.com/SchumacherH8r Next-up: The Oogieloves |
||
![]() |
||
SchumacherH8ter
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: September 06 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2015 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: April 17 2008 at 2:36am |
|
|
Uwe Boll may be the worst thing to happen to video games since Shaq Fu!
|
||
|
Joel Schumacher is history's greatest monster!-Robot Chicken
https://twitter.com/SchumacherH8r Next-up: The Oogieloves |
||
![]() |
||
HeadRAZZBerry
Berry Important MODERATOR
Joined: April 23 2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 4490 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: April 17 2008 at 1:32pm |
|
|
I finally saw this on DVD*... All I can say is: WOW! If this isn't the most incoherent movie ever made, it's certainly in the top ten. Uwe Boll doesn't know how to establish time, place or character, each of which is essential to understanding what's going on in a movie. His complete incompetence at establishing any of them makes this one of Boll's worst efforts (and given his track record, that's saying a lot!). Perhaps because they all know that appearing in something directed by Boll is The Kiss of Death Career-Wise, almost every actor in KING gives either a lethargic or ludicrously over-the-top performance. All five slots in our Worst Supporting Actor category could be filled by this one film alone! Among the likely RAZZIE® contenders here are our 1993 Worst Actor "winner" Burt Reynolds as a tired old king, John-Rhys-Davies as an emaciated wizard, Ron Perlman as a piss-and-vinegar peasant, Matthew Lillard as a spoiled royal nephew given to hissy fits, Leelee Sobieski as a princess encrusted in 17th-century Maybelline, Claire Forlani as the main character's main squeeze, and Kristanna Loken (a Worst Actress nominee for BLOODRAYNE) as a forest sprite who seems to have escaped from Cirq d' So Lame. But Ray Liotta, as the self-described "King of the Krug," is the most memorably awful, giving a performance even less subtle than his rape-of-Pia-Zadora-by-garden-hose cameo in LONELY LADY. The Netflix sleeve in which the DVD arrived said it ran 2-and-a-half hours, and I spent most of the film watching the time display on my DVD player crawl by, constantly thinking "Oh, my God -- It's got another HOUR to go!" Turns out it actually runs only 2 hours and SEVEN minutes...but it's so hard to follow and pointless that it seems more like 3-and-a-half hours! If there's any justice, this one will have multiple RAZZIE nominations (including Worst Picture, Worst Screenplay and, of course, Worst Director) come next January... *It was released theatrically when I was too bizzy putting The 28th Annual RAZZIES® together to bother seeing it... |
||
|
Ye Olde Head RAZZberry
|
||
![]() |
||
SchumacherH8ter
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: September 06 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2015 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: April 17 2008 at 4:00pm |
|
|
HeadRAZZBerry's review makes Uwe look like the worst thing to happen to video games since Atari refused to credit their developers. This angered the developers, so they started their own companies, causing many other people who had no idea how to make a videogame (like Quaker Oats) to get into the videogame business. They created a bunch of crappy videogames that were quickly returned. However, they weren't fast enough to return it to the factories before the company folded and dropped off the face of the earth. This left stores with a bunch of crappy games. So, they put them into bargain bins. Many gamers saw the cheap prices and bought them. They were disgusted by the udder crappyness of the games and many stopped gaming all together. Meanwhile, Atari was interested in releasing an American version of a Japanese game about a monkey named "Donkey" throwing barrels, by a little company called Nintendo. They were going to release it on the Atari 2600, when Coleco showed a demo of Donkey Kong on their (ill-fated) ADAM computer system. This made Atari executive Ray Kassar think that Nintendo was selling information to Coleco and cut themselves off from them. At the same time, Atari had released a bunch of outright bombs like E.T." and their bastardization of "Pac-Men". This caused the destruction of the Atari 2600. They could have rebounded with "Donkey Kong", but they severed ties with Nintendo. With a, formerly, respectable video game company in ruins, a bunch of crappy games at a cheaper price, and a lack of interest from the public the video game industry crashed. It was later recovered, with help from Nintendo. Uwe's gonna have to make 20 video game-based movies to measure up to that!
|
||
|
Joel Schumacher is history's greatest monster!-Robot Chicken
https://twitter.com/SchumacherH8r Next-up: The Oogieloves |
||
![]() |
||
JoeBacon
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: July 15 2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 492 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: May 04 2008 at 3:54pm |
|
|
Holy crap! I see that the iTunes Movie Store is charging $14.99 to buy In the
Shame O The King! You cannot rent it. Most other movies go for a mere $9.99. How does The Toilet Bowl get to charge 50% more than everyone else?????? |
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page <1234> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |