|
YOUR Favorite BAD Movie -- And WHY??? |
Post Reply
|
Page <1 5678> |
| Author | |
GTAHater767
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: October 25 2009 Location: I shall not say Online Status: Offline Posts: 1127 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: YOUR Favorite BAD Movie -- And WHY???Posted: January 18 2010 at 6:45pm |
|
For me, three movies come to mind immediately. One is a RAZZIE classic. They are The Man With the Golden Gun (late 1974), Moonraker (1979), and A View to a Kill (1985). While most people would think those are my least favorite James Bond films, they'd be wrong. I actually liked these three movies. The series, I believe, really fudged up with The World is Not Enough. They weren't the best, but I liked a lot of the lines in them.
|
|
|
RAZZIE Dirty Dozen: Battlefield Earth, F G Fingered, Pluto Nash, A Sound of Thunder, Alone in the Dark, Dirty Love, Rise Silver Srfr, Daddy Day Camp, IKWKM, The Love Guru, All About Steve, Airbender
|
|
![]() |
|
Razzilla
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: September 18 2005 Location: Lost Wages NV Online Status: Offline Posts: 862 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 26 2010 at 8:57pm |
|
The William Bendix overuse of movie cliches classic "The Babe Ruth Story" was one of those that I regretted watching the second time through...even though that first time was almost 15 years ago...and even then I thought it had enough ham and cheese in it to open a chain of delicatessens...
RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Bendix as "The Babe" was one of my least enjoyable movie-watching experiences, too. In almost everything he did, Bendix pushed the limits of bathos and embarrassed himself. Slightly better, but still not berry good, was the 1992 John Goodman version of this same material (IMDb LINK)... |
|
|
Comparing Uwe Boll's movies to a sack of horse manure will only get you sued by every fertilizer company in existence...
|
|
![]() |
|
Vits
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 01 2010 Location: Chile Online Status: Offline Posts: 4800 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 27 2010 at 6:56am |
|
I'm confused about the question here. Do you want me to tell you about a bad movie I dislike the least and can tolerate, or a bad movie I consider good?
RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: Others have responded both ways, but it's kinda implied in the question that "favorite" means something you at least have some fun watching... |
|
![]() |
|
Vits
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 01 2010 Location: Chile Online Status: Offline Posts: 4800 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 27 2010 at 1:09pm |
|
The only bad movies I consider among the best ever made are:
1) 50 FIRST DATES:Usually Sandler movies don't balance comedy and drama well, but this time it does. We have one of his typical silly comedies and a touching love story. 2) DUDE,WHERE'S MY CAR?: It was stupid...but it was stupid on purpose! Besides, it's fun trying to discover the mystery. 3) KUNG POW!:ENTER THE FIST: Also stupid on purpose. The perfect example of how a dumb parody should be made: Steve Oedekerk is so creative, and his voices are so multi-layered. Needless to say I gave them all 10/10. |
|
![]() |
|
BurnHollywoodBurn
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 03 2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3557 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 27 2010 at 3:38pm |
|
Responding to Vits' list of best bad movies: 1). Actually, Sandler's best take on both comedy and drama was "The Wedding Singer." 2). This movie is only "good" if you're drunk or high, because then you'll laugh at anything. 3). See #2.
|
|
|
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
|
|
![]() |
|
BurnHollywoodBurn
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 03 2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3557 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 28 2010 at 8:23am |
|
I really hope those 10s are strictly for the "so bad, it's good" factor.
|
|
|
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
|
|
![]() |
|
Vits
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 01 2010 Location: Chile Online Status: Offline Posts: 4800 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 28 2010 at 11:42am |
|
Not totally. If I consider a movie is "so bad it's good," then I usually give it no more than 4/10. But I consider these three to be excellent movies...even if it's just for what genre they are.
|
|
![]() |
|
BurnHollywoodBurn
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 03 2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3557 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 28 2010 at 1:00pm |
|
"Excellent movies"?? Yeah, excellent at being really, really, REALLY bad and stupid.
|
|
|
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
|
|
![]() |
|
Vits
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 01 2010 Location: Chile Online Status: Offline Posts: 4800 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 28 2010 at 3:05pm |
|
No. Excellent at being really, really, really funny...and stupid.
|
|
![]() |
|
BurnHollywoodBurn
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 03 2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3557 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 28 2010 at 7:40pm |
|
I guess if you find stupid jokes that are only slightly more sophisticated than those of a 5-year-old-child, that were probably written at 2 in the morning, then yes...those are movies you'd enjoy.
|
|
|
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
|
|
![]() |
|
GTAHater767
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: October 25 2009 Location: I shall not say Online Status: Offline Posts: 1127 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 28 2010 at 10:15pm |
|
Did I, by any chance, mention that my favorite bad movie of last decade (the Decade of the 00-Agents) is ironically Die Another Day? While the CGI may not have been high-quality and the characters shallow than most Bond films, in most ways it was far better than many other movies from 2002, some of which even avoided RAZZIE nominations (particularly Ecks vs Sever). I only listed it as the 15th worst film of that year because of the marketing campaign and a little bit of the CGI.
|
|
|
RAZZIE Dirty Dozen: Battlefield Earth, F G Fingered, Pluto Nash, A Sound of Thunder, Alone in the Dark, Dirty Love, Rise Silver Srfr, Daddy Day Camp, IKWKM, The Love Guru, All About Steve, Airbender
|
|
![]() |
|
Vits
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 01 2010 Location: Chile Online Status: Offline Posts: 4800 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 29 2010 at 8:15am |
|
Bad movie? It's considered the 2nd best Pierce Brosnan "007" movie. Actually,I consider none of the Bond movies with him as being bad.
|
|
![]() |
|
BurnHollywoodBurn
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 03 2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3557 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 29 2010 at 7:47pm |
|
Actually, "Die Another Day" was why they rebooted the series, because the Bond formula was so dated and tongue in cheek at that point that something had to be done to revive it.
|
|
|
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
|
|
![]() |
|
Vits
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 01 2010 Location: Chile Online Status: Offline Posts: 4800 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 31 2010 at 11:32am |
|
Oh, yeah, fans may have disliked it. But critics didn't.
|
|
![]() |
|
BurnHollywoodBurn
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: February 03 2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3557 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 31 2010 at 12:57pm |
|
Yeah -- in Hollywood terms: REBOOT TIME!
|
|
|
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
|
|
![]() |
|
Mayhem5185
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
Joined: October 10 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 259 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: October 31 2010 at 2:58pm |
|
Except on that rare occasion, the reboot actually worked both critically and financially, not to mention it was pretty good, who would've thought?
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <1 5678> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |